Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1234296 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

WOW

Bronx, NY

#979186 Sep 9, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Was her name Micheal? Was her joint twice the size of yours?
Did she use the term "tooken" in ordinary conversation???
No her name was beyonce hahahahlololololoand your bigotted homophobic comment goes against your Homosexual president the word burns and he needs facey time with the homosexual contigent too bad BLACKS dont get that kind of profile from obama lololololhahahaha stay back if you black says obama aaaawwwwwwyou gotta pass the brown paperbag test to get in the whitehouse lololololhahahahahaha

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#979187 Sep 9, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
We are calling on the Syrian leadership to not only agree on placing chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also on its subsequent destruction and fully joining the treaty on prohibition of chemical weapons,” he said.
Lavrov said that he has already handed over the proposal to al-Moallem and expects a “quick, and, hopefully, positive answer.”
His statement followed media reports alleging that Russian President Vladimir Putin, who discussed Syria with President Barack Obama during the group of 20 summit in St. Petersburg last week, sought to negotiate a deal that would have Assad hand over control of chemical weapons
The Russian move comes as Obama, who has blamed Assad for killing hundreds of his own people in a chemical attack last month, is pressing for a limited strike against the Syrian government. It has denied launching the attack, insisting along with its ally Russia that the attack was launched by the rebels to drag the U.S. into war.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_ea...
"placing chemical weapons storage sites under international control"

What sites?
Under who's control? The UN? Do you remember how the UN sat and watched the villages get massacred when they were supposed to be protecting them in Yugoslavia?
If you propose an answer, you should first check to make sure it fits in the real world, and not some halucination from some idealistic dream you Democrats are notorious for pretending is reality.

Will the chemical weapon stockpiles for Hezballah be included?

Do you really believe "international control" will be effective? Who will manage that control? The UN? Don't you remember how the UN managed the oil-for-food scam that was used to rebuild Saddam Hussien's infrastructure for war?... to cite just one case.

Because Obama is part of the Muslim Brotherhood and working with Al Qaeda, I don't want him anywhere near anyone who has anything to do with the chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria. Because the UN has a horrendous record, I don't want them anywhere near those chemical weapons stockpiles. You might as well just tell Al Qaeda to line their trucks up at the gate and get ready to load them.

There is no one with any credibility in this administration. Obama is a pathological liar and stooge for the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda. Kerry is a pathological liar and an enemy of the United States. I don't want either one of them anywhere near those chemical weapons.

I'd go along with the chemical weapons stockpiles being transferred to Russia. Putin isn't working with Al Qaeda. Putting a pathological lying fraud like Obama anywhere near them will be just handing them over to Al Qaeda.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979188 Sep 9, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Supported President Bush and the troops in the war.
You on the other hand
seem to hate America and have joy in every problem faced
in the last four years.
That is so pathetic.

You can support the US without supporting all the policies of Obama.

The world is all black and white.

I don't support this war as it is misguided.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#979189 Sep 9, 2013
Annie wrote:
<quoted text>We had a chance to elect a decent, patriotic, successful businessman who actually laid out a coherent foreign policy (Um, because he actually knew a little something about the world outside of Chitcago), saw Russia as the international threat they just yet may prove to be, and told us exactly what his 5-point plan was to get our economy out of the Obama-sewer it is in!
But no, you guys just couldn't hold your nose for someone imperfect enough to make some compromises to get some work done throughout his career.
Well, it's been a while since I said so but THANKS A TON FOR GETTING MR. SLOGAN REELECTED!!
Hope and Change (meaningless) Hope and Change!!
You guys really a AHOLE out the BOX FU
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#979190 Sep 9, 2013
Baruck's overall approval rating dropped over two points through yesterday. It will be interesting to see how low it will go if he bombs Syria after congress turns him down. I'm thinking 10-20% at that point (impeachment level ratings)... :-)
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979191 Sep 9, 2013
Annie wrote:
President Obama cancelled a fundraising trip to California next week because of the Syrian situation.
See that's when you know this is serious, when President Obama cancels a fundraiser. Oh, my God, we're in Code Red!
Jay Leno
The anti-war Left while claiming they don't want to come vocally against the war because Obama is black are still not willing to have pics taken with him at this time.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979192 Sep 9, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
.......and already released.
He IS a major retard for allowing himself to be duped into a confrontation w the ex-wife. It sounds like there WAS a gun in the home, but it belong to the father-in-law.
He SERIOUSLY needs to wisen up, split with his whale ex-wife, and move on........
If he did punch the father-in-law it will be an insult.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#979193 Sep 9, 2013
RFK jr. call Sharpton Creepy wow now that was a description that fits as far as the cuomo statement the father took money for low income housing and built prisons upstate new york the apple doesnt fall far from the tree

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#979194 Sep 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Good. Because NDEs can no more be denied by scientists who have studied people who've experienced them for decades than astronauts, scientists, experienced airline pilots and retired top military who are lobbying to have a Congressional hearing to expose the reality of UFOs.
In order to scientifically prove that the undiscovered country exists, one must go there and return with a flower, photo or inhabitant. Memories of observations don't count, unfortunately.

When Houdini returns, we can all breath a sigh of relief:)
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979195 Sep 9, 2013
Police: George Zimmerman hasn't been arrested; officers at house trying to determine what happened.

Now back to things important to the US like the messy war drums.
TSM

El Paso, TX

#979196 Sep 9, 2013
Putin might be the Man to save Obama from Himself…Ironic!!
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979197 Sep 9, 2013
If he did punch the father-in-law it may be insult -not illegal-but also an assault charge is probable.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#979198 Sep 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Republican hypocrisy on Syria is just amazing. Imagine that Mitt Romney were president. Romney took a far more hawkish line than Barack Obama did on Syria during the campaign. He wanted to arm the rebels, supported in-country cover ops, and so on. So if Bashar al-Assad had used chemical weapons during President Romney’s tenure, there’s every reason to think he’d be pushing for action too. And what, in that case, would Republicans now temporizing or opposing Obama be doing in that case? They’d be breathing fire, of course. There’s a lot of chest thumping talk right now about how a failed vote will destroy Obama’s credibility. I guess that may be to some. But to anyone paying attention, the credibility of these Republicans is what will suffer, and the vote may well come back to haunt some of them in 2016.
Some Republicans are, to their credit, taking the position consistent with their records. John McCain stood up to those people who looked like they were about two feet away from his face at that town hall meeting last week. Lindsey Graham deserves more credit, since he’s facing reelection and is being called “a community organizer for the Muslim Brotherhood.” On the other side, Rand Paul and the neo-isolationists

blah... blah... blah...
.
....What a bunch of relentless hypocrites they are, making a decision as weighty as this purely on the basis of their hatred of Obama.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09...
... idiot dupes.
Who told you Assad used chemical weapons?
Has that person lied to you recently?
It's beginning to appear that the chemical weapon attack was actually Al Qaeda, and Obama is supposed to start a war with Syria over it and help Al Qaeda get those chemical weapons.
It's appearing that Obama is involved in a conspiracy to launch a chemical weapon attack, blame it on Assad, and bring the United States into the war where Al Qaeda invaded Syria and is trying to take over the country.
If the United States and Russia destroy themselves, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood rid themselves of their two most significant enemies.
Do you want to get US servicemen killed so Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood can take over Syria and get the chemical weapons stockpiles there?
Do you want the US and Russia to go to war so the most significant enemies of Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood will eliminate themselves?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#979199 Sep 9, 2013
Whatever wrote:
If Israel's elected leaders are saying "We have no dog in that fight" and AIPAC is lobbying for war because it supports Israel.
One of the two messages is wrong
AIPAC does not serve the interest of Israel. They serve the liberal Jews in America. I don't support AIPAC because I don't support liberalism. AIPAC supports the liberal agenda in America-they are the ones who pushed for the state of Israel to give up land to the Palestinians as in GAZA-the only people it helped was the terrorist Palestinians--they were able to bomb more Israeli cities and at a closer range to boot. But AIPAC thought that would bring peace with the muzzies. Liberalism.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#979200 Sep 9, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
That is so pathetic.
You can support the US without supporting all the policies of Obama.
The world is all black and white.
I don't support this war as it is misguided.
Thank You I can work with your statement that is MORAL, HONEST,also YOUR RIGHT as an AMERICAN thank you
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979201 Sep 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Hillary - of all people - is now making the case that Russia's offer to intervene and dump the chemical weapons is the solution.
After WH officials including a 90-minute speech by Susan Rice insisted emphatically that all other avenues and options had been exhausted.
Now they want Russia to save the day.
Of course. Why shouldn't we trust Russia?
You haven't read any of my posts or you would have KNOWN that Kerry's gaffe was pounced on by the UK, UN, and Russia.

I won't try to bring you up to speed here.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#979202 Sep 9, 2013
Hillary they putting you in place to replace the FRAUD OBAMA they knew they had a shelf life with him he better go away quietly because he knows what they know about him so obama will always be a good BOY a little unruley but a good boy who knows his place he is six degrees of separation will smith never heard Denzil Washington say much about Obama I know Jamie Foxx hey girl but not denzel mmmm mmmmmm mmmmmmm
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979203 Sep 9, 2013
forks_make_us_fat wrote:
No red lines from the Peace loving war, starting Liberals...
"John Kerry gives Syria week to hand over chemical weapons or face attack"
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/09/...
Yes, the gaffe was pounced on by Russia, the UN and UK as a good idea.

SoS originally tried to walk it back. Then sent Hilary out to say this idea was indeed Kerry's and worthy of being looked at.

I have Time Line of unfolding events that have posted through out the morning if interested.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#979204 Sep 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words, a strike might successfully impede Assad's military objectives, be an abject failure, or start WWIII.
That pretty much covers all bases. Liberals much prefer vague generalities. Just like stonewalling and covering up incompetency and abuses of power.
A Liberal, standing at the altar, will never say "I do" unless their lawyer is standing there with them holding a list of exceptions, clarified definitions, attached conditions and contingency plans in tow.

Even then, they can always claim insanity at a later date.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#979205 Sep 9, 2013
TSM wrote:
Putin might be the Man to save Obama from Himself…Ironic!!
LOL,yes indeed.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Former U.S. House Speaker Hastert indicted on f... 1 hr Over and Out 5
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Earthling-1 53,502
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr red and right 190,216
help troll them pls 4 hr lukeintothelight 1
amy 5-28 6 hr Julie 13
Dirty Marge 6 hr That girl 1
Abby 5-28 7 hr Julie 17
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]