Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1232304 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

WOW

Bronx, NY

#978897 Sep 9, 2013
Now almost everyone is saying no to War with Syria the man of Peace the President Obama is doing everything in his power to go to War a war no one wants but Big OIL and Military Industrial Complex now who does Obama work for not the People what More do you need to see Self Serving Liberals who are Bigots Proven refuse to speak out Because they Fear being called Racists now THATS RACISTS Bigots not doing the RIGHT thing Because of wanting to Maintain a PHONY IMAGE while INNOCENT SYRIAN CHILDREN WOMEN and men will be killed even more by OBAMA not BUSH OBAMA how many INNOCENT syrian people have been killed since OBAMA started his MURDER spree HOW MANY INNOCENT LIBYANS and many more under OBAMAS MURDER DRONES now he is OUT IN THE OPEN
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#978898 Sep 9, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
If the wealthy white kids have to go into war; there may not be any more wars.... just a thought.
Israel has mandatory military service for men and women.
You mean like Bill Clinton, Joe Biden & Dick Cheney?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#978899 Sep 9, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
SonicIdiot posted a link from "rawstory" which is a joke. If you opened the link, dolt, the first sentence says:
"Lawmakers and law enforcement officials in Iowa ---> "are debating" <-- the merits of issuing blind citizens permits to acquire and carry concealed firearms"
Quite a contradiction from the headline SonicIDIOT posted.
A leftrard like you lily, is susceptible to propaganda from a fellow loon like SonicIDIOT.
NOT the first time.(%% os sonimorons post are bogus... sonic moron would steal from his kids and lie to his alcoholic mother...

It's the culture....

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#978900 Sep 9, 2013
Lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Read your fellow teabaggers comments
I went back and read 6 hours of posts and couldn't find one where a conservative was rooting for Russia.

Did I not go back far enough? Or did you just perhaps read into some of them what you wanted to read?
WOW

Bronx, NY

#978901 Sep 9, 2013
OBAMA came from a Bloodline that has nothing to do with African Americans they are hoping to USE him to get in the Circle he was already being used by POWERS FAR GREATER THAN THEM OR OBAMA HIMSELF ego keeps them thinking otherwise When we look around, it may seem like man is basically evil, but that is not true. There is good and evil within us all; it needs to be there for our basic survival, and they are subjective terms in the sense that we can define good and evil in whatever way we want. What's good for one person, may be considered evil by another and vice versa. However, the society will eventually reflect the minds of their leaders, and if the leaders are implementing what the majority perceives as evil, the society will be evil as well, and people affected by a malevolent government will start acting like them. However, WE are the ones who appoint and accept our leaders, so ultimately the responsibility is yours and mine.

All this chaos, genocide, ethnic cleansing and the overall disasters have a genuine purpose. It is all very carefully planned by a few people, mostly men, behind the scenes, high up in the society, above any power structure that the ordinary citizen is aware of. It is a modern extension of an old theme to "take over the world". To those people, power, control and wealth is their true religion and they use any means they can to maintain their power and control, including murder and genocide.

These people on top, who basically are of Royal Bloodlines, is currently working on reducing the world population in order to easier maintain their control, and ultimately the strive towards a centralization of power, which will include the whole world.

This is a very old plan; something the same bloodlines have been working towards for millennia. However, now is the time when they have the means to accomplish their goal and fulfill the "Work of the Ages". They see us citizens as inferior and are dehumanizing us in their own minds to the extent that they don't care if we live or if we die. In a future Global Society, if they manage to accomplish this to its full extent, you and I will be no more than slaves, whom they can kill and treat as they want anytime they want.

Is this what is happening or not lie to yourselves if you want your reward will still be as a commoner
Whatever

Gering, NE

#978902 Sep 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
U.S. DOCUMENTS SHOW EMBRACE OF SADDAM HUSSEIN IN EARLY 1980s
DESPITE CHEMICAL WEAPONS, EXTERNAL AGGRESSION, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
Fear of Iraq Collapse in Iran-Iraq War Motivated Reagan Administration Support;
U.S. Goals Were Access to Oil, Projection of Power, and Protection of Allies;
Rumsfeld Failed to Raise Chemical Weapons Issue in Personal Meeting with Saddam
National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 114 of November 26, 1983, "U.S. Policy toward the Iran-Iraq War," delineating U.S. priorities: the ability to project military force in the Persian Gulf and to protect oil supplies, without reference to chemical weapons or human rights concerns.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82...
oil. just like Bush.
No Blood for O
WOW

Bronx, NY

#978903 Sep 9, 2013
Many people call this the New World Order, but it is really an Old World Order which is now about to be fully accomplished, unless we do something about it.we are already mind controlled, deceived and slaves to these super-rich families, most of us without even noticing it, but the future they have at hands for us will be much worse... Are you voting for the Democrats or the Republicans? Does it really matter which? Is the difference that big?
the outcome, no matter whom you vote for, is already thoroughly outlined and predicted; not by the politicians themselves, but by the real powers, the "Shadow Government", invisible to the general public. The political decisions they make are not in our best interest, but in theirs only. The tax money you are paying to your government so they can work on accomplishing our common goals actually go towards accomplishing their goals, which are very different from ours. This Power Elite is deeply into the occult and black magic, which I also will show on this website. The rituals are practiced within secret societies

THEY CONSPIRE HOWEVER YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE THEORIES
Whatever

Gering, NE

#978904 Sep 9, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
Propaganda from the mindless Sonicflutter Post #10!
ROTFLAMO!!!!
<quoted text>
His and lily's favorite real news source is "Raw Story"
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#978905 Sep 9, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
Propaganda from the mindless Sonicflutter Post #10!
ROTFLAMO!!!!
<quoted text>
95% of soncmorons post are bogus and fraud... Literally someone elses work he continually steals and plagiarizes...

In the age of information and Google...Age 58 sonicmorons ignorance and him continually running on empty is still a racist and a morons best choice.

The Unconscious Poison of Liberalism

It's the culture...-

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#978906 Sep 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
So? Obama is Al Qaeda's buddy.
Al Qaeda won't have the stockpiles of chemical weapons in Syria until after Obama starts a war with Syria and the existing government falls.
Now, let's go over this again.
Putin says Al Qaeda did it.
Obama says Assad did it.
Which of the two above have a history of lying to you?
Why do you think Obama isn't lying to you again?
For some reason, Obama just can't produce the evidence he says he has. That's kind of like not producing the birth certificate, then when he does produce it, it's obviously fraudulent.
Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. He will do what the Muslim Brotherhood commands him to do. He even tells you that's what he will do in his goddam book, you moron.
Look, sheep dip.

You said l Qaeda was behind the chemical weapon attack.

You avoided ( as usual) the question: If Al Qaeda has chemical weapons, why haven't they used them on their attacks the past few years?

It a simple GD question, why are you afraid of answering it?.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#978907 Sep 9, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
If the wealthy white kids have to go into war; there may not be any more wars.... just a thought.
Israel has mandatory military service for men and women.
A professional army is far superior to unwilling draftees.

Besides, the US could not afford to draft more than a small percentage of the men and women of draft age, resulting in inherent unfairness.

And what would the military do with the 50% women?

By the way, white deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan are significantly in excess of their percentage in the population and black deaths are significantly lower.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#978908 Sep 9, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Who called the cops?
Not sure, but the situation turned lethal when the cops called in SWAT, the execution squad, the bloodthirsty killers.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#978909 Sep 9, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>A push of the button. Laughing in your face. Syria and Assad have been Israel's neighbor for a long time. Israel has attacked Syria several times-did Assad ever retaliate? NO-and the border was kept secure by Assad up until O'bama's terrorist rebels have taken it over.
Assad knows he would lose a war with Israel (again).
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#978910 Sep 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
An interesting take by David Frum, a contributing editor at Newsweek and CNN contributor.
"Nobody remembers now, but after Mubarak's fall there was much debate whether the Muslim Brotherhood should be allowed to participate in Egypt's new political system. West Germany banned neo-Nazi parties after 1945; the post-1989 Czech Republic forbade former communist officials to hold government jobs - and both democracies are stronger for it. In the end, the Muslim Brotherhood escaped the ban by promising not to run a candidate for president, a promise it promptly broke.
"Through it all, the Obama administration pressed for engagement, inclusion and acceptance, provided only that the Muslim Brotherhood complied with the rules of the political system. It did - and here we are.
"That's the argument to have."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09...
Obama has always waffled over certain radical Islamists. He always seemed to think he could influence a certain segment and they wouldn't disappoint him.
That's just naivety on his part.
We are supporting the democratic aspirations of all people," Rice said. "As President Bush said in his second inaugural address:'America will not impose our style of government on the unwilling. Our goal instead is to help others find their own voice, to attain their own freedom, make their own way.' "

"The people of Egypt should be at the forefront of this great journey, just as you have led this region through the great journeys of the past," she said.

Egyptian voters last month, in a nationwide referendum, approved a constitutional amendment to allow in September -- for the first time -- multiple candidates in a presidential election.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/06/20/mid...

And, don't forget Hamas being elected in 2006; this was a Bush doctrine, spreading democracy and free elections in the Middle East. Was he being na´ve?
WOW

Bronx, NY

#978911 Sep 9, 2013
The Liberals now use Bush and Reagan to Justify their Criminal Bloodlust so the Lives of Innocent Syrians Come second to Americans Ego and Feelings and thats what was done to AMERICA when the Towers were attacked they killed innocent Families for their own reasons the people in the towers had nothing to do with their issues but they didnt care I put myself in the shoes of an ordinary working syrian before they found the largest OIL DEPOSITS in the world in syrian terretory going to work paying my mortage all of a sudden CRIMINAL gangs are killing people in the name of freedom ok we might want change but not criminal change for a oil pipeline or to control a seaport for oil to Iran India and China so America wants to Kill our people with Al quida is that what happened with the Towers seems like the M.O if this is the case the American Economy should be the Best and their should not be one American with out a good job Period if Wars are being conducted in our NAMES AS AMERICAN I WANT MY FAIR SHARE OF BLOOD MONEY BECAUSE I HAVE NO CHOICE my vote doesnt count after tjhe elections MONEY FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GAS $1.30 a gallon standard in AMERICA

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#978912 Sep 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
U.S. DOCUMENTS SHOW EMBRACE OF SADDAM HUSSEIN IN EARLY 1980s
DESPITE CHEMICAL WEAPONS, EXTERNAL AGGRESSION, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
Fear of Iraq Collapse in Iran-Iraq War Motivated Reagan Administration Support;
U.S. Goals Were Access to Oil, Projection of Power, and Protection of Allies;
Rumsfeld Failed to Raise Chemical Weapons Issue in Personal Meeting with Saddam
National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 114 of November 26, 1983, "U.S. Policy toward the Iran-Iraq War," delineating U.S. priorities: the ability to project military force in the Persian Gulf and to protect oil supplies, without reference to chemical weapons or human rights concerns.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82...
oil. just like Bush.
In the 1980s, the Islamic revolution in Iran changed the entire strategic landscape in that region. America's ally in the Persian Gulf, the Shah, was swept aside overnight, and no one else was on the horizon to replace him as the guarantor of U.S. interests in the region.

With the Shah ousted, Saddam Hussein had ambitions to position himself as the new strong man of the Middle East.

He condemned the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and signed an alliance with Saudi Arabia to block the Soviet-backed attempt to take over North Yemen. In 1979, he also allowed the CIA which he had once so virulently attacked to open an office in Baghdad.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Carter began to look more favorably toward Saddam Hussein as a potential counterweight to the Ayatollah Khomeini and as a force to contain Soviet expansionism in the region.

That's where it all started.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#978913 Sep 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
I went back and read 6 hours of posts and couldn't find one where a conservative was rooting for Russia.
Did I not go back far enough? Or did you just perhaps read into some of them what you wanted to read?
Oh brother; fetch almight, whatever, dbwrider, no surprise, etc. all of them.
LCNLin

United States

#978914 Sep 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
I went back and read 6 hours of posts and couldn't find one where a conservative was rooting for Russia.
Did I not go back far enough? Or did you just perhaps read into some of them what you wanted to read?
Conservatives anti President Obama seem pro Syria and root for evil to hit America.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#978915 Sep 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
An interesting take by David Frum, a contributing editor at Newsweek and CNN contributor.
"Nobody remembers now, but after Mubarak's fall there was much debate whether the Muslim Brotherhood should be allowed to participate in Egypt's new political system. West Germany banned neo-Nazi parties after 1945; the post-1989 Czech Republic forbade former communist officials to hold government jobs - and both democracies are stronger for it. In the end, the Muslim Brotherhood escaped the ban by promising not to run a candidate for president, a promise it promptly broke.
"Through it all, the Obama administration pressed for engagement, inclusion and acceptance, provided only that the Muslim Brotherhood complied with the rules of the political system. It did - and here we are.
"That's the argument to have."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09...
Obama has always waffled over certain radical Islamists. He always seemed to think he could influence a certain segment and they wouldn't disappoint him.
That's just naivety on his part.
Obama, believing the charismatic myth others draped him in, truly believes his words will slow the rise of oceans and calm the blood thirst of Jihadist.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#978916 Sep 9, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, sheep dip.
You said l Qaeda was behind the chemical weapon attack.
You avoided ( as usual) the question: If Al Qaeda has chemical weapons, why haven't they used them on their attacks the past few years?
It a simple GD question, why are you afraid of answering it?.
Because Saddam hadn't sent his WMDs to Syria yet.

Easy question.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min Coffee Party 189,753
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 12 min Patriot AKA Bozo 53,482
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 9 hr Net Workit 5,994
Amy 5-23 17 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
Abby 5-23 18 hr mrs gladys kravitz 2
News AP Exclusive: Union members appointed after $10... (Mar '08) 18 hr RICO 7,567
Word (Dec '08) 20 hr Dream Crystal 5,239
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]