Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1279009 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#978926 Sep 9, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>I am denying that it was Assad. Now there have been attacks by O'bama's rebels since January-O'bama is on the side of the terrorists as per usual.
Here is what you obviously believe.

Assad saw the results of a chemical weapon that killed over a thousand of innocent civilians. His people.

Why didn't he call in the UN right away & give them access to the site? Certainly proof that the rebels were using chemical weapons would diminish their support from outside countries & bring the wrath of the UN down on his enemies. You would think he would have invited UN, American & Russians to the site to clear himself & catch the rebels.

The analysis to prove the Sarin gas must take place right away or the most telling signatures dissipate. The longer the delay, the less evidence to find.

You also believe that Assad was so concerned about these people that he continued to shell that site for days.

Assad said he was not responsible, not that he attack did not come from his government.

Assad clearly delayed allowing UN inspectors & tried to destroy evidence through shelling the site.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#978927 Sep 9, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Self centered nature of your posts is evident.
Real soldiers died for jerks like you.
Who elected this ass clown obama??

The Poison of Unconscious Liberalism

It's the culture...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#978928 Sep 9, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservatives anti President Obama seem pro Syria and root for evil to hit America.
Conservatives are opposed to use of their tax dollars to support Al Qaeda, in Syria and elsewhere.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#978929 Sep 9, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Filled with hatred for President Obama she does no see.
Obama is gonna start World War III. What a dumbass! Who elected this ass clown??

The War Mongering Sickness and Poison of Unconscious Plantation Liberalism.

It's the culture...
WOW

Bronx, NY

#978930 Sep 9, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservatives anti President Obama seem pro Syria and root for evil to hit America.
If Bush had Racism as his support he would be as great in your mind as Obama is to you because they have done the SAME things in their PRESIDENCY but Bigots and Racists are on OBAMAS side bush didnt have that kind of Support Wjite Folks had no Qualms about calling Bush Evil now Hollywood is scared to be Anti-War of fear of being Called Racists COWARDS is What they are and the NAZI POWERBROKERS OF HOLLYWOOD HAVE WARNED THEM MORGAN FREEMAN GOT OFF WITH ONLY A MILLION DOLLAR FINE REMEMBER

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#978931 Sep 9, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush played Congress for fools. Telling them he would seek U.N. approval if they would approve a military action, then going it alone. All you have to do is research the outrage and revulsion that followed his decision which was expressed by members of Congress to see that they felt betrayed.
Bush lied, soldiers died.
The outrage by certain Democrats who knew exactly what everyone else knew at the time they supported military force in Iraq was only for political and personal gain when it was to their advantage to let Bush hang in the wind.

Your weasels lied to you. No one else. Not Bush...not the UN...not the Intel everyone was privy to - including the weasels.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#978932 Sep 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Anti-ship weaponry has advanced a long way in the past 40 years, dufus. Just how dumb are you?
"... safer."
You seem to be admitting that sailors won't be safe when Obama uses them to help Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood take over Syria. All it takes is just one of the anti-ship missiles launched to hit just one ship, and Obama has a planeload of corpses he can do a photo op with when he pretends to be sad about Americans getting killed. Just how dumb are you?
The term safer is comparative, dipstick.

In Vietnam, were troops safer on the ships than the troops on the ground.

Yet another question you are running from because you are afraid to answer it.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#978933 Sep 9, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, sheep dip.
You said l Qaeda was behind the chemical weapon attack.
You avoided ( as usual) the question: If Al Qaeda has chemical weapons, why haven't they used them on their attacks the past few years?
It a simple GD question, why are you afraid of answering it?.
... idiots.

Putis said Al Qaeda was behind the chemical weapons attack.
Obama said Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack.

Which of the above two people habitually lie to you?
Why would you expect Obama to not be lying now?

That may have been all the chemical weapons smuggled to them.
However, after Obama starts a war with Syria, Al Qaeda will be able to get the entire stockpile of chemical weapons there.... which brings us back to the question you've been running away from since Obama threatened to start a war:

Do you support the Obama plan to get Americans killed starting a war with Syria so Al Qaeda can acquire the chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria?

If Obama has always habitually lied to you, why on Earth would you think he's not lying now?

Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Only an idiot would expect him to obey Congress, and not obey the Muslim Brotherhood.
Obama thinks he can start a war and nothing will happen to him.
What do you think? Do you think Obama can start a war and get away with it?
WOW

Bronx, NY

#978934 Sep 9, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservatives are opposed to use of their tax dollars to support Al Qaeda, in Syria and elsewhere.
Thats what they want a debate on Lib/ Con lets all be Decent Citizens of the world who speaks out against WRONG no matter what PARTY, RACE, RELIGION,NATIONALITY

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#978935 Sep 9, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Because Al Qaeda just received the chemical weapons from their people in Libya.
Libya had no sarin stockpiles.

Next you will claim Sadam moved his WMDs to Libya?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#978936 Sep 9, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Assad knows he would lose a war with Israel (again).
So, why are Obama and his Muslim Brotherhood masters too stupid to figure that out?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#978937 Sep 9, 2013
RAFAH, Gaza Strip — The ­Egyptian military has launched what appears to be a campaign to shut down, once and for all, the illegal but long-permitted tunnels that provide a vital economic lifeline to the Gaza Strip and supply tax revenue to the Islamist movement Hamas.

The operation seems to be part of an effort to cripple Hamas, which rules the coastal enclave bordered by Egypt and Israel. The group is an offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, whose ­standard-bearer held that country’s presidency before being ousted from power this summer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_ea...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#978938 Sep 9, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Filled with hatred for President Obama she does no see.
Good point.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#978939 Sep 9, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
The term safer is comparative, dipstick.
In Vietnam, were troops safer on the ships than the troops on the ground.
Yet another question you are running from because you are afraid to answer it.
Your ability to read and understand the English language has improved somewhat. You actually realized "safer" as comparative. But, you're still too ignorant to know the difference between "safer" and "safe".
Here's why:
Anti-ship weaponry has advanced a long way in the past 40 years, dufus. Just how dumb are you?
You seem to be admitting that sailors won't be safe when Obama uses them to start a war with Syria and help Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood take over there. All it takes is just one of the anti-ship missiles launched to hit just one ship, and Obama has a planeload of corpses he can do a photo op with when he pretends to be sad about Americans getting killed. Just how dumb are you?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#978940 Sep 9, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Libya had no sarin stockpiles.
Next you will claim Sadam moved his WMDs to Libya?
Do you support the Obama plan to get Americans killed starting a war with Syria so Al Qaeda can acquire the chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#978941 Sep 9, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh brother, take another hit jefro
I mean you can believe this or not. Not sure what to think myself.

And, yes, this is an Al Jazeera blog site, but maybe you should just take a peek at it considering the Director of Research at the Brookings Doha Center, Shadi Hamid, tweeted out about the Egyptian media depicting Obama as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

http://blogs.aljazeera.com/topic/egypt/egypti...

Here's the tweet that Hamid sent out and responses in Arabic.

https://twitter.com/mlnahas/status/3733822654...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#978942 Sep 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
U.S. DOCUMENTS SHOW EMBRACE OF SADDAM HUSSEIN IN EARLY 1980s
DESPITE CHEMICAL WEAPONS, EXTERNAL AGGRESSION, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
Fear of Iraq Collapse in Iran-Iraq War Motivated Reagan Administration Support;
U.S. Goals Were Access to Oil, Projection of Power, and Protection of Allies;
Rumsfeld Failed to Raise Chemical Weapons Issue in Personal Meeting with Saddam
National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 114 of November 26, 1983, "U.S. Policy toward the Iran-Iraq War," delineating U.S. priorities: the ability to project military force in the Persian Gulf and to protect oil supplies, without reference to chemical weapons or human rights concerns.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82...
oil. just like Bush.
US Protected Iraq at UN from Iranian Charges of Chemical Weapons Use

Posted on 08/28/2013 by Juan Cole

http://www.juancole.com/2013/08/protected-cha...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#978943 Sep 9, 2013
MOSCOW — In a surprise move, Russia promised Monday to push its ally Syria to place its chemical weapons under international control and then dismantle them quickly to avert U.S. strikes.

The announcement by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov came a few hours after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that Syrian President Bashar Assad could resolve the crisis surrounding the alleged use of chemical weapons by his forces by surrendering control of “every single bit” of his arsenal to the international community by the end of the week.

If the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in that country would allow avoiding strikes, we will immediately start working with Damascus,” Lavrov said.

Al-Moallem said his government was ready to host the U.N. team, and insisted that Syria is ready to use all channels to convince the Americans that it wasn’t behind the attack.

He added that Syria was ready for “full cooperation with Russia to remove any pretext for aggression.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_ea...
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#978944 Sep 9, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh brother; fetch almight, whatever, dbwrider, no surprise, etc. all of them.
If there are that many, then you should easily be able to easily provide a link as an example of one of them rooting for Russia.

Otherwise, you are just doing the typical disingenuous, lying Obama voting liberal routine.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#978945 Sep 9, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Libya had no sarin stockpiles.
Next you will claim Sadam moved his WMDs to Libya?
You speak as a KNOW IT ALL YOU ARE not how do you know for sure who had what and who did what it almost as if you would like us to believe you have more information or access than anyone else you have ONE POINT OF VIEW thats It Protect the GLOBAL AGENDA

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 13 min Joe Balls 197,216
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 27 min Red_Forman 6,450
News Should prostitution be less illegal-or more? 5 hr El Diablo 13
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 6 hr Into The Night 54,626
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 11 hr David Morrison 100,682
abby 9-4-15 12 hr mrs gladys kravitz 6
Word (Dec '08) 13 hr Red_Forman 5,431
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages