Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1432842 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976704 Sep 5, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
What we have today is the President of Russia calling the Secretary of State of the United States a liar, using that specific word, in front of the whole world.
Do you think he is doing the same thing Obama and Kerry are doing, justifying a future action?
You're an idiot if you don't realize that.
The only question is, what future action is Putin justyfying? Do you think he plans to join the battle when Obama starts a war with Syria?
... that's a yes or no question.
Nice of you to cheer your Russian com-rats on son!

All of you belong together!

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#976705 Sep 5, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
"WASHINGTON — Russia has sent advanced antiship cruise missiles to Syria, a move that illustrates the depth of its support for the Syrian government led by President Bashar al-Assad, American officials said Thursday. "
You forgot to answer. who is more at risk? I never said no risk.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976706 Sep 5, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Who told you there is missile tracking showing the launch locations?
Who told you there is intercepted communications?
Have these people lied to you recently?
You must be part of israeli 'intelligence' son!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#976707 Sep 5, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> I never said Iran had a problem with it dumbass.
Why would Sadam send weapons to Iran's closet ally.
Hey DumbDave box of rocks. Now your are pretty brazen posting as Waxywaxturd.

Please don't leave this thread. We enjoy you making a fool out of yourself.

Baawaaahhh!!!!!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976708 Sep 5, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry DumbDave you paranoid dumbfk, DBWriter is not Waxman.
lol! But we know you're a foreigner!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#976710 Sep 5, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Don't worry son. You never saw proof with Obama's BC either.
But then, you're not intelligent enough to make that determination either!
What was for dinner Grey Ghost? Dong?

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#976711 Sep 5, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> I never said Iran had a problem with it dumbass.
Why would Sadam send weapons to Iran's closet ally.
Cause the big boy was about to come to town, dumbass. look at the map, stupid. What would have been his choices?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976712 Sep 5, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
Where were they at the beginning of World War I? It seems they weren't even significant enough to be noticed.
I don't recall a single significant event in history that involved Austria-Hungary. Please tell us the history of Austria-Hungary's involvement in the world affairs.
lol! Wasn't Hitler Austrian son?

What you DO recall would fit in a vacuum!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976713 Sep 5, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times do I have to say it....."I am not in favor of any military action that is not sanctioned by the United Nations or, at the very least, performed as part of a coalition of nations." IMO, we should never follow in the footsteps of George W. Bush.
lol! You have to understand, they can't attack you if they can't pigeon hole you!

Because it simply defeats their premise if you're allowed to think on of your own free will!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#976714 Sep 5, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! But we know you're a foreigner!
Sorry E-1/Ghost. Wrong as usual. Go fetch me a beer now. Fetch!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976715 Sep 5, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody cares what you think, Waxywaxturd.
... or a foreigner like you son!

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#976716 Sep 5, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> I never said Iran had a problem with it dumbass.
Why would Sadam send weapons to Iran's closet ally.
Funny how you ran away from the "sworn enemy" stance you were carrying.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#976717 Sep 5, 2013
Where is Wilhem from Germany, libtard Ghost? Guess that didn't work out too well for you - eh moron?
MOM

Waterbury, CT

#976718 Sep 5, 2013
US and International law authorizes use of lethal force against US, UN and NATO leaders.The Nuremberg trial established that the most effective course of action to end any war of aggression or prevent aggressive war is to use lethal force against the person or persons who gave the order to plan for, prepare for and wage war against any sovereign state. No person, not even the US president, the Canadian Prime Minister, the UK Prime Minister, the French president, the UN Secretary General or NATO’s Secretary General, has the authority to wage war against another state. If a leader of one country decides to go to war with another country that leader is committing crimes that include; war of aggression, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, mass murder, torture and other deplorable war crimes and criminal offenses.
Statute was established when the US government and the United Nations made war illegal and those who planned for, prepared for and waged war were henceforth declared criminals when the US presided over the International Military Tribunal (IMT) held at Nuremberg, Germany post WWII. The UN Charter was drafted directly from the judicial rulings of that Nuremberg Tribunal. The criminal charges of; crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, war of aggression and war crimes were all made into law as a direct result of the Nuremberg trial. The purpose of making these laws was to outlaw war and all its atrocities. To never again go to war and to severely punish all those who plan for, prepare for, initiate and engage in war.
In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle VI, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
The chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:
To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.
The Nuremberg tribunals were the first international courts established to try crimes against international law, and they firmly established the responsibility of individuals, at whatever level they participate in atrocities, as well as denying immunity to political leaders. Article 7 of the Charter ( http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#a... ) expressly rejected sovereign immunity for military and political leaders:“The official position of defendants, whether as heads of state or responsible officials in government departments, shall not be considered as freeing them from responsibility or mitigating punishment.”
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#976719 Sep 5, 2013
While President Obama was in St. Petersburg, Russia, on Thursday, trying to sway skittish allies to back a military strike on Syria, thousands of miles away in St. Petersburg, Fla., residents were leaving little doubt that Obama has a lot of work to do if he's to gain their support for military action.

Lawmakers in and around the coastal city say their constituents are almost uniformly opposed, or at least cautious, on a strike. Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla., who represents the city, wrote to Obama saying her neighbors are "extremely wary of military action."

Republican Rep. Rich Nugent, who represents a nearby district, told FoxNews.com his office has gotten 1,800 calls and emails opposing action in Syria, and only 17 in favor.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/05/ta...

Baawwaaahhh!!!!

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#976720 Sep 5, 2013
MOM wrote:
<quoted text>So I guess you are a stupid ass also information is for stupid people smart people listen to only their thoughts you big dummy
You spelled mom backwards.
No Surprize

Saint Petersburg, FL

#976721 Sep 5, 2013
Bush did not lie about anything... When Clinton Lied.. America Died!!! Osama Bin Laden was made in the USA...(by Bill Clinton)

Bill Clinton killed a half million Muslim children in Iraq you fool... "We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States (Bill Clinton) has more Muslim blood on his hands than Al Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims," said Imam Fiesal Abdul Rauf.

Raud added that having homes and lives destroyed does not justify "bombing innocent Iraqi civilians" or "actions of terrorism by Bill Clinton"

President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 and every single democrat voted and said Saddam was an imminent threat and Saddam had to be removed three years prior to 9/11...

John Kerry: I voted for the wain Iraq before I was against it...

Myths, lies and complete stupidity.. that's Gilligan...

If only President Clinton hadn't signed the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 and every single democrat said Saddam was an imminent threat and had to be removed...

The War Mongering Sickness and Poison of Unconscious Liberalism

It's the culture..
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976722 Sep 5, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Hiler was a democrat.. All NAZI's hate jews...
It's the culture...
Could be.

But he was supported by conservatives....

... and the Church.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#976723 Sep 5, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
I never, ever posted as Ferris Dumb Dave.
Stop being a cry baby Dumb Dave. You are a paranoid sicko.
This is your life?
Baawwaaahhhh!!!!
And you're STILL a foreigner son!

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#976724 Sep 5, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> You forgot to answer. who is more at risk? I never said no risk.
I didn't forget sht. I showed you the means by which Syria could kill soldiers on a ship. What would they have to lose?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min Leeward Outlier 225,381
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 2 hr PEllen 2,072
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr PEllen 6,753
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 2 hr PEllen 3,193
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr PEllen 9,542
News 15-year-old Chicago boya s burned body found in... 2 hr Well Well 4
News Murderous Chicago 4 hr wow 7
last post wins! (Apr '13) 4 hr Retired SOF 1,706

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages