Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#975524 Sep 3, 2013
Grampy wrote:
<quoted text>The evil warmonger Gaddafi was planning world conquest with his advanced military armaments! Thank Allah that Bozo Hussein Obama used the No-Fly Zone to shoot down and destroy Gaddafi's flying tanks, flying howitzers, flying APCs and flying navy boats.
Since when Liberals are pro-war?

>> Since Bush left office!

See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#975525 Sep 3, 2013
Adam 36 wrote:
<quoted text>Actually that is incorrect. The Tea Party was effectively sidelined in 2012 by a scandal that leads right up to the White House. The Tea party victories in 2010 so frightened Obumbler and his Chicago Mafia that he had his IRS thugs try to thwart the movement.

It appears all Tea Party's have no only survived but have received increased donations thanks to the IRS and Obumbler. 2014 will be just like 2010 with Dumbocrats running for the hills on the coattails of a failed Presidency.
Liberals hate historical facts!

They all pretend 2010 did not happened!!

No single Liberal I know had ever explain what happened in 2010, because they believe that not taking about it means it did not happened!!!

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#975526 Sep 3, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Many Liberal Media are in favor of the looming strike in Syria, in an attempt to counter the fact that the country is overwhelmingly against military action.
What do you suggest then ? Drop a few napalm bombs on Assad's lot as pay back for chem weapons then drop a few conventional bombs on the rebels just so he can say we are not taking sides ? Would that satisfy the Tea Baggers , who switch from one position to the next daily depending of course on what they hear on Fox who have expert on hand to back any position.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#975527 Sep 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>Congress has the sole power to declare war, but not the power to dictate the limits of the military action.
Did you said that about Bush?

See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#975528 Sep 3, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Tuesday, September 03, 2013

Bombshell: Syria's 'chemical weapons' turn out to be sodium fluoride used in the U.S. water supply and sold at Wal-Mart

The Syria chemical weapons narrative being pushed by the White House is an outlandish hoax.

http://www.naturalnews.com/041883_Syria_chemi...

Perhaps better ventilation when you play with your meth lab 'Queen of Everything' would have helped you recognize your plantation inbred stupidity and your sold out Hope and Change ignorance lily.

AND... Obama wants to start World War III. What a dumbass!

The War Mongering Sickness and Poison of Unconscious Liberalism

It's the culture..
Since when Liberals live war?

>> Since Bush left office.

See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#975529 Sep 3, 2013
Homer wrote:
The rightwing dummies appear to be out in force this morning. Hello everyone.
Liberals now OWN IT!!!

They beat black seller for Obamacare.

Liberals voted themselves the death of the unions as we know it!!!

I Love when Liberals destroy themselves!!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975530 Sep 4, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress will approve it.
Obama will get his strike.
Republicans can't complain too much without blaming their own party.
And what do we do if the Assad government falls and Al Qaeda gets chemical weapons? Do you clowns even consider that certain eventuality? Or, are you working for Al Qaeda?

Besides, we've been blaming RINOs for a while now. Looks like the RINOs will have to cut a deal with the Democrats to program the voting machines to steal votes to stay in Washington... which is probably part of the deal cut between them. You know, another conspiracy.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975531 Sep 4, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Wahabbists are just members of a sect of Islam and not a terrorist group as you claim.
Perhaps you should quit calling ll Muslims terrorists.
Because one is Muslim, is married to a Muslim, friends with a Muslim, or spoke to a Muslim in the past 10 years does not make them a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.
This anti - Islam stance you right whiners take is jus bigotry, and we know you people are rally good at being bigots.
You really need to work on your reading and comprehension of the written English language.
All Suni terrorists are Wahhabist. Al Qaeda is Wahhabist. The Muslim Brotherhood is Wahhabist. Name any muslim terrorist group not promoting Sharia Law.

It seems the muslims in Egypt disagree with you. It seems UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon disagrees with you. It appears the muslims opposing Wahhabism have gotten some traction, as evidenced by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon saying this issue should be decided by the permenant members of the Security Council. That means the anti-Muslim Brotherhood and anti-Al Qaeda muslims have some support in the UN.
The only elements that support Obama are Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. No other country in the world supports Obama.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975532 Sep 4, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Al Queda is running Libya, Egypt, and other countries.
Let me explain this to you:
The Muslim brotherhood is the POLITICAL face/arm of radical Islam.
Al Queda is the MILITARY face/arm.
CAIR is the political correctness face. Used to subjugate you as.shole.
MSA-Muslim Student Association is the RECRUITING arm/face.
ACLU is the suing legal face/arm.
And Obama is their puppet!
Obama owes them a few things, so he is expected to assist them, over Congress head.
Exactly right.
Obama is a stooge for the Muslim Brotherhood. They are desperate to take over a country after they got tossed out in Egypt. Syria is in play. There is no civil war in Syria. Syria has been invaded by Al Qaeda.
Since Obama took office, Al Qaeda went from hiding in caves to being able to invade Syria and fight a full scale war with the Syrian army.
That cannot be a coincidence.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975533 Sep 4, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Liberals now OWN IT!!!
They beat black seller for Obamacare.
Liberals voted themselves the death of the unions as we know it!!!
I Love when Liberals destroy themselves!!!
So, why do you think Americans should be killed so Obama can help Al Qaeda get chemical weapons and the Muslim Brotherhood can take over a government?

And, who is saying Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack? Got a reputable source for that accusation?

What if this is another "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" hoax? You do know it was a Democrat president that pulled off that big lie, right?
To me, nothing has been made clear. Nothing has been proved. Yet, pathological liars are accusing Assad. It could just as likely be Al Qaeda that did this to get the ole Gulf of Tonkin excuse to drag the United States into that war and help Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood take over a country.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975534 Sep 4, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Liberals now OWN IT!!!
They beat black seller for Obamacare.
Liberals voted themselves the death of the unions as we know it!!!
I Love when Liberals destroy themselves!!!
Actually, that last post was pointed at Homeo. I clicked too fast.
Sorry about that.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975535 Sep 4, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you suggest then ? Drop a few napalm bombs on Assad's lot as pay back for chem weapons then drop a few conventional bombs on the rebels just so he can say we are not taking sides ? Would that satisfy the Tea Baggers , who switch from one position to the next daily depending of course on what they hear on Fox who have expert on hand to back any position.
What will satisfy TEA is, if we are going to bomb anyone in Syria, we should be bombing Al Qaeda, not helping them acquire chemical weapons.

So, tell us why Americans should be killed so Obama can help Al Qaeda acquire chemical weapons and the Muslim Brotherhood can take control of a country after they were tossed out on their Wahhabist asses in Egypt?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975536 Sep 4, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Since when Liberals live war?
>> Since Bush left office.
See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites.
An observation I had 40 years ago was, the only authority the hippies didn't like was the authority they didn't have. Any authority they get, they abuse.
Like now, so-called "anti-war" frauds are clammoring for the US to join some Suni-Shi'ite bullshit war so Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood can replace an Iranian puppet.

If we kill anyone in Syria, we should kill Al Qaeda. We definitely shouldn't help them acquire chemical weapons, which is a certainty if Assad falls.
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#975537 Sep 4, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Where"d the money come from? Oh, wait...the treasury, right?
Wrong dumbass! People buy health insurance from their own funds just like they buy their car insurance.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#975538 Sep 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Burger King will always need stumblebums like Ghost/Yeah to empty the trash bins and clean the toilets.
We have a company here called Rally's. Drive-thru and walk up outside only. Although they do have a couple of tables with umbrellas. No public restrooms.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#975539 Sep 4, 2013
Lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
No bags at Costco
Yes I'm quite aware. Nor at Sam's or BJ's.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#975540 Sep 4, 2013
Who here not on food stamps noticed the cost of buying groceries has almost doubled since Obama took office?
It costs us over 400 dollars a month for two people to eat almost every night at home, and two meals a day on weekends.
Shopping mostly at Randall's, some at HEB, and infrequently at Kroger.
The cost of food seems to increase proportionately with the cost of gas.
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#975541 Sep 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
...the free market, where everything is available for a price
Maybe in your twisted, amoral, sociopathic universe but not in any country that realizes that it's strength derives from the well being of its citizens and not in the bottom lines of a few individuals seeking to profit from the miseries of others.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#975542 Sep 4, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for your input on why Obama is NOT concerned with a Syrian regime change though.
Why does he not like Israel?
Just for the record, "boots on the ground" refers to "ground troops p]who are on active service in a military operation." Special forces deployed covertly do not qualify.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#975543 Sep 4, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Who here not on food stamps noticed the cost of buying groceries has almost doubled since Obama took office?
It costs us over 400 dollars a month for two people to eat almost every night at home, and two meals a day on weekends.
Shopping mostly at Randall's, some at HEB, and infrequently at Kroger.
The cost of food seems to increase proportionately with the cost of gas.
Yeah, you notice the dollar menu is almost gone. A Whopper is $4. Took oldest daughter to Sonic after band practice yesterday and a foot long chili/cheese dog, large fries, and large coke was almost $9. But there is no inflation, NAW!!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chicago police stop black motorists more, ACLU ... 28 min reality is a crutch 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 37 min RACE 98,878
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 49 min IBdaMann 49,319
Is Vanessa Hudgens A PORN-STAR ?? (Oct '07) 1 hr moe 189
amy 12-25 1 hr RACE 2
Dear Abby 12-25 1 hr RACE 2
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Jacques Ottawa 182,087
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:06 am PST

Bleacher Report12:06AM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Tennessee Titans: Complete Week 17 Preview for Tennessee
NBC Sports 3:43 AM
Jay Cutler on Bears: "Everyone could get axed"
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Colts' Complete Week 17 Preview vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center