Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1457547 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#973201 Aug 30, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
No one is denying anything. Collateral damage is a condition of WAR.
The use of chemical weapons against innocent civilians is an entirely different situation.
As long as we are involved in this ridiculous war orchestrated by George W. Bush, I'm for anything that keeps our soldiers safe...that should be our number one priority and drones serve that purpose.
I suggest you watch this 2009 video about Bush's war:
http://rethinkafghanistan.com/cc.php
seems not a single person knows the O'bama doctrine-not even O'bama.... er ah well um I I I see well er um children sheez mmm well er ah red something something something line children. I am O'bam er well um duh great!

Since: Nov 11

United States

#973202 Aug 30, 2013
Liberals love to sexualize and degrade women in their unabated war on women!

Miley Cyrus any one?

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#973203 Aug 30, 2013
This has probably been mentioned here but DAMN this thread is long!

Why am I considered racist if I do not agree with the Obama Regime policies?

I would feel the same way if he was white. Oh wait, he is half white.

(more coffee please)
No Surprize

Saint Petersburg, FL

#973204 Aug 30, 2013
World Opinion Turns Against Obama's Plan to Attack Syria

Obama Ready to Go It Alone on Syria

Congress Challenges Obama's Authority to Attack Syria
Polls Show US Strongly Opposes Syrian Attack
Blakeman: British Smackdown Is Example of Obama' Leading From Behind' on Syria
Former Navy Commander: US Shouldn't Strike Syria
Rep. Rogers on Syria: US Will 'Pay a Price for Generations'

Obama alone with RealDumDave are gonna start World War III. What a dumbass!

The War Mongering Sickness and Poison of Unconscious Liberalism..

It's the culture...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#973205 Aug 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Liar.
Those who buy insurance as individuals or get insurance thru companies with 9or fewer employees (half of all small businesses) will have access to less costly insurance policies through the exchanges..
How will the cost through the exchanges be controlled to ensure they are "less costly"? Wouldn't this require government control? Government control is government. Ultimately, for what you say to be true, the government has to provide the insurance.
Isn't this the agenda anyway?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#973206 Aug 30, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
No one is denying anything. Collateral damage is a condition of WAR.
The use of chemical weapons against innocent civilians is an entirely different situation.
As long as we are involved in this ridiculous war orchestrated by George W. Bush, I'm for anything that keeps our soldiers safe...that should be our number one priority and drones serve that purpose.
I suggest you watch this 2009 video about Bush's war:
http://rethinkafghanistan.com/cc.php
"rethinking Afghanistan"...
When Bush left office, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were holed up in caves in the tribal regions. Since Obama took office, Al Qaeda and the Taliban are running around the entire country blowing up villages everywhere.
When Bush left office, Al Qaeda was holed up in caves. Since Obama took office, Al Qaeda has established jihad training facilities in multiple countries, and has rebuilt sufficiently to take over countries.

Do you support Obama's intent to get Americans killed helping Al Qaeda acquire the chemical weapons in Syria?
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#973207 Aug 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Repetition is necessary for those with thick skulls.
The majority of Americans did not want Obamacare from the beginning and still don't.
Democrats who wrote the darn thing are backtracking.
And there's bee yet another delay because they don't even know how to get the darn thing off the ground.
But you go ahead and wave your little sign.
That you of all people would call anyone else thick headed is hilarious Carol. Only a true bone head would keep trotting out the same crap. Let's look at some numbers developed by a poll done by the Kaiser Health Foundation. The raw numbers show a 43% unfavorable rating as opposed to 35% favorability. However 8% of those indicating an unfavorable opinion did so because they didn't think the ACA went far enough. They don't want it repealed, they want it to include more like a public option. Taking those folks out of the equation leaves those that thinks it goes too far at 35%, hardly a majority and exactly the same as those who approve of the law. That leaves 23% who either don't know enough about the law or refused to answer. As more people start realizing the benefits from the ACA like guaranteed enrolment , no lifetime caps on payments for medical procedures and extended family coverage for families with young adults in college or just starting out, the larger the favorability rating will be.
I'm going to repeat something for the thick skulled like you Carol, the Republicans aren't fighting to repeal the ACA because it's going to fail. If it did then they'd have political capital up the Wazoo. They're petrified that it's going to work and show them up for the liars they are.
You just keep waving your sign Carol. It says "I'm a sociopath!" "I don't care if cancer patients get their treatment s cut off!" "I don't care if childhood cancer survivors can't get insurance as adult!"
"I'm all for big insurance padding their bottom line on other peoples misfortune!"
You're beneath contempt Carol.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#973208 Aug 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
They had plenty of solutions that were both cost free and practical but none of them gave Obama his big government with more control over us and didn't give the Democrats their strictly partisan vote to pave the way for a single-payer system.
They still have the same solutions. The Democrats didn't want any part of them then and don't want to hear them now.
Unfortunately for them, they own Obamacare now.
Really Carol? Just what were those solutions? You're lying again. The Republicans didn't come up with anything.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#973209 Aug 30, 2013
when all else fails attack Assad's wife...that ought to help the idiot O'bama.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#973210 Aug 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
When we were attacked on 9-11, both Republicans & Democrats stood with the President.
When we were hit with a financial crisis, what the f*ck did the Republicans do? Certainly they did not stand with their President, George Bush. Nope, it was election year & they opted to play politics instead of help us prevent a financial meltdown.
So really Flacktard, you keep supporting & defending Republicans & blaming Obama who took office after all the economic disaster hit.
Who destroyed this country?
How about the Republicans under Bush who took us from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years, a housing collapse, a near financial meltdown, two quagmire wars & doubling the debt.
Who is helping us recover. Certainly NOT Republicans & lying weasels like you & your ilk.
Some American you are, allow your country to suffer instead of help because it might make a Democrat President look good and that will help Democrats in the next election.
You people are beyond pathetic.
Here is a link to a detailed description of how the government is funded:

http://constitutionus.com/

Here is a link to government spending:

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/

Why do you continue to post obvious lies? Posting those obvious lies over and over again won't make them true... in any world where truth is truth, and not merely what most people have been programmed to repeat, that is.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#973211 Aug 30, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously you never read the reports following his procedure.
"Former president George W. Bush successfully underwent a heart procedure in Dallas on Tuesday after doctors discovered a blockage in an artery during his physical, a Bush spokesman said.
“The procedure was performed successfully this morning, without complication, at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital,’’ said Freddy Ford.
Bush, 67, was expected to be discharged Wednesday and RESUME HIS NORMAL SCHEDULE THE FOLLOWING DAY."
For the record, I'm not a big supporter of Michael (Martin Luther)King. I acknowledge that it is well documented that he was a plagiarizer as well as a philanderer. I never supported a holiday named in his honor and will be interested to read his FBI file when it is released to the public in 14 years.
Thank you, for the opinion on King. That file should be very interesting.
As far as resuming a full schedule, they might tell you it's possible, but, it isn't very probable.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#973212 Aug 30, 2013
The bottom line is, if Assad falls Al Qaeda will control Syria and acquire the chemical weapons there.

Who here supports Obama's plan to get Americans killed so Al Qaeda can acquire chemical weapons?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#973213 Aug 30, 2013
Hey mental midget wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey motormouth, here's one of your compassionate crony's now, practicing that tolerance and christian-like exemplary behavior you're so proud of!! I hope you're "concerned"!!!
Conservative Candidate Posts ‘Shoot The N****r’ Photo Of President Obama On Facebook (IMAGE & VIDEO)In a post which has since been taken down, a Republican candidate for selectman in the town of Sabbatus, Maine posted a picture of President Obama that said “Shoot the n****r,” the Bangor Daily News reports.
https://bangordailynews.com/2013/08/28/news/l...
Do everyone a favor lardass, next time you post one of your lies, put a "BULLSHYT" warning label on it first. Better yet, keep your piehole shut unless you have something useful to say, liar.
What's the lie of today gonna be, shyt sack?
It wasn't a "conservative candidate". It was an old man in Maine who was "pissed off at the system" and doesn't believe Obama is who he says he is.

He's one person who doesn't represent anyone, and what he said was wrong.

Liberals, on the other hand, are like a herd of buffalo who think and act exactly the same. A herd of blind loyalists is much more concerning than one disgruntled old man.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#973214 Aug 30, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Really Carol? Just what were those solutions? You're lying again. The Republicans didn't come up with anything.
They've been outlined and summarized numerous times.

It's outlined extensively here.

"House GOP Solutions Group Outlines Health Care Plan
to Increase Affordability, Accessibility, Availability

Commonsense Health Care Reform to Lower Costs and Increase
Access and Quality at a Price Our Country Can Afford
Republicans"

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/GOPHealthPl...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#973215 Aug 30, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
That you of all people would call anyone else thick headed is hilarious Carol. Only a true bone head would keep trotting out the same crap. Let's look at some numbers developed by a poll done by the Kaiser Health Foundation. The raw numbers show a 43% unfavorable rating as opposed to 35% favorability. However 8% of those indicating an unfavorable opinion did so because they didn't think the ACA went far enough. They don't want it repealed, they want it to include more like a public option. Taking those folks out of the equation leaves those that thinks it goes too far at 35%, hardly a majority and exactly the same as those who approve of the law. That leaves 23% who either don't know enough about the law or refused to answer. As more people start realizing the benefits from the ACA like guaranteed enrolment , no lifetime caps on payments for medical procedures and extended family coverage for families with young adults in college or just starting out, the larger the favorability rating will be.
I'm going to repeat something for the thick skulled like you Carol, the Republicans aren't fighting to repeal the ACA because it's going to fail. If it did then they'd have political capital up the Wazoo. They're petrified that it's going to work and show them up for the liars they are.
You just keep waving your sign Carol. It says "I'm a sociopath!" "I don't care if cancer patients get their treatment s cut off!" "I don't care if childhood cancer survivors can't get insurance as adult!"
"I'm all for big insurance padding their bottom line on other peoples misfortune!"
You're beneath contempt Carol.
Gallup
August 30, 2013

52% of Americans disapprove of the Affordable Care Act, up slightly from 45% in November 2012.

http://www.gallup.com/video/163328/americans-...

Gallup
November 2009

49% disapproved, 44% approved.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/Americans-L...

Since: Jul 08

We will not go gentle

#973216 Aug 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't a "conservative candidate". It was an old man in Maine who was "pissed off at the system" and doesn't believe Obama is who he says he is.
He's one person who doesn't represent anyone, and what he said was wrong.
Liberals, on the other hand, are like a herd of buffalo who think and act exactly the same. A herd of blind loyalists is much more concerning than one disgruntled old man.
You're a bigger liar than Orally, and NEVER even apologize for being wrong. Just answer this: did or did not the CANDIDATE post the picture of Obama with the caption, "Shoot the n---" on facebook? You claim to know all about blacks, liberals, herds, etc., do you ever contemplate the phrase, "Know thyself," vile, hateful, lying beast?
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#973217 Aug 30, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
"rethinking Afghanistan"...
When Bush left office, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were holed up in caves in the tribal regions. Since Obama took office, Al Qaeda and the Taliban are running around the entire country blowing up villages everywhere.
When Bush left office, Al Qaeda was holed up in caves. Since Obama took office, Al Qaeda has established jihad training facilities in multiple countries, and has rebuilt sufficiently to take over countries.
Do you support Obama's intent to get Americans killed helping Al Qaeda acquire the chemical weapons in Syria?
When Bush left office, Osama Bin Laden was living safely in a large walled villa near Pakistan's equivalent of West Point. Al Qaeda had already spilled out of Afghanistan into Pakistan, North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and of course Iraq.

Speaking of Iraq__Al Qaeda has taken credit for the recent attacks against the Shiite population.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#973218 Aug 30, 2013
Still can't get an answer to this question:

Who here supports Obama's plan to get Americans killed so Al Qaeda can acquire chemical weapons?

This will be the certain result if Obama orders the US to start a war with Syria and it causes the Assad government to fall. Al Qaeda will acquire the chemical weapons stores and facilities we know to exist in Syria.

Who here supports Obama's plan to get Americans killed so Al Qaeda can acquire chemical weapons?

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#973219 Aug 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
When we were attacked on 9-11, both Republicans & Democrats stood with the President.
When we were hit with a financial crisis, what the f*ck did the Republicans do? Certainly they did not stand with their President, George Bush. Nope, it was election year & they opted to play politics instead of help us prevent a financial meltdown.
So really Flacktard, you keep supporting & defending Republicans & blaming Obama who took office after all the economic disaster hit.
Who destroyed this country?
How about the Republicans under Bush who took us from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years, a housing collapse, a near financial meltdown, two quagmire wars & doubling the debt.
Who is helping us recover. Certainly NOT Republicans & lying weasels like you & your ilk.
Some American you are, allow your country to suffer instead of help because it might make a Democrat President look good and that will help Democrats in the next election.
You people are beyond pathetic.
I don't give a damn about some stupid election! I don't give a damn whether it's a republican or democrat president! I am neither!!!! What I do give a damn about is the greatest country ever conceived by man being destroyed by a bunch of progressive traitors!!!! What I give a damn about is the willful destruction of the idea of self reliance by the American people!!!! What I give a damn about is the growing mentality that because you exist you have the right to what other people worked hard for!!!!! I resent the fact that you progressives think you can just march into America and decide what we can eat, drink, drive, where we can smoke or not, and any other progressive idea that takes away the freedoms of the American people!!!!
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#973220 Aug 30, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
That you of all people would call anyone else thick headed is hilarious Carol. Only a true bone head would keep trotting out the same crap. Let's look at some numbers developed by a poll done by the Kaiser Health Foundation. The raw numbers show a 43% unfavorable rating as opposed to 35% favorability. However 8% of those indicating an unfavorable opinion did so because they didn't think the ACA went far enough. They don't want it repealed, they want it to include more like a public option. Taking those folks out of the equation leaves those that thinks it goes too far at 35%, hardly a majority and exactly the same as those who approve of the law. That leaves 23% who either don't know enough about the law or refused to answer. As more people start realizing the benefits from the ACA like guaranteed enrolment , no lifetime caps on payments for medical procedures and extended family coverage for families with young adults in college or just starting out, the larger the favorability rating will be.
I'm going to repeat something for the thick skulled like you Carol, the Republicans aren't fighting to repeal the ACA because it's going to fail. If it did then they'd have political capital up the Wazoo. They're petrified that it's going to work and show them up for the liars they are.
You just keep waving your sign Carol. It says "I'm a sociopath!" "I don't care if cancer patients get their treatment s cut off!" "I don't care if childhood cancer survivors can't get insurance as adult!"
"I'm all for big insurance padding their bottom line on other peoples misfortune!"
You're beneath contempt Carol.
Interesting-helpful-agree.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr Dr Guru 230,912
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr Basil Fomeen 62,297
last post wins! (Dec '10) 6 hr honeymylove 2,740
Johnny Murray a/k/a Johnny's Marine 6 hr Elder James Johnson 34
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 hr John Schanahan 104,488
last post wins! (Apr '13) 7 hr They cannot kill ... 1,953
Why does Chicago want to harbor illegal criminals 8 hr YIM 9

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages