Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1458548 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#971806 Aug 28, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
sorry, not playing your game today. the uber-troll thing is wearing thin.
That is usually interpreted as "Not paying attention to facts today. You're using too much common sense."

Back to the issue and current events....
The war in Syria is between the pro-Iranian Assad government (Shi'ite) and an invading Al Qaeda jihad (Suni).
The winner of that war will have chemical weapons facilities and stores.
Who here wants Al Qaeda to have chemical weapons to use in their terrorist attacks here?
Russia will give Assad the most modern anti-ship missile systems they have. These systems are just as good as ours. It is a certainty US ships will be hit by these missiles. It is a certainty US sailors will be killed. It is likely US ships will be sunk. It is certain the aircraft carrier will be the most significant target, and these missiles are capable of sinking it.
Who here wants perhaps thousands of US sailors killed just so Obama can help Al Qaeda acquire chemical weapons?
If we have to become involved, we should kill the existing enemy of the United States. We should help Assad kill the invading Al Qaeda Suni jihad army.
Otherwise, there should be no US involvement.
WOW

New York, NY

#971807 Aug 28, 2013
I love the Hypocritical racism and bigotry from the obama supporters after 8 years they will only have a Photo signed with autopen ans copied hahahahahahahahlolololo gay is the new Black hahahahlololololthe obama supporter have embraced bigotry to cover obmas failed presidency

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#971808 Aug 28, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
For the very ignorant students in the class:
The value of health care coverage provided by your employer is now reported in Box 12 with Code DD to identify the amount. The amount reported in the box should include both the portion paid by your employer and any amount paid in by you.
Prior to ObamaKare, this wasn't on the W-2.
So why is this information showing up on your form W-2 now? Under ObamaKare, most employers must now report the cost of your health care plan. A few small businesses have received an exemption from reporting under the transitional relief subjectively offered by IRS.
If it's on the W-2, it's already taxable, dumbass. The only thing that's required is the order given to the IRS to apply a tax. I'm thinking that will happen in 2017. It doesn't really matter who wins, as far as this goes. The government has been driven so far into debt, it will have to use any excuse it has to get revenue. With the economic "recovery" putting 5 people into poverty and being supported by the government for every tax payer it generates, the IRS will be given the order to count the health care benefit as taxable income.
Do you ever know anything about what comes out of your mouth?
I knew you were a f*cking idiot but really, you can't possible be this GD dumb.

You just admitted healthcare benefits are not taxable.

You just admitted there are no plans to make it taxaible.

My God what a fool you are.

I

Since: Aug 13

Harrodsburg, KY

#971809 Aug 28, 2013
good. I am SURE you didn't hear the whole conversation. Please don't go there. Also ther are some blacks who didn't vote because they didnt like either men, there are some blacks who voted for McCain.
TheIndependentMa jority

Brodhead, KY

#971810 Aug 28, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Wow, Methmouth, just when I thought you couldn't possible get any more ignorant, "there you go again." Ships on the GROUNDS of...why don't ya' go elect Turtle McConnell again or run Rand for POTUS? Got teeth?
Too bad for you old hag huh-UNlike your rabid, no doubt pre-manufactured fangs--My teeth are REAL.

Do you do yer fat arse doggy yap tricks with them in, or just when out?
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#971812 Aug 28, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>And one of you violent, racist, ignorant rednecks with three names shot him for it...
Oh, "hi" stankagash. Did you hug your little pickaninny today? Better watch to make sure he doesnt pick the crack out of your pocket, those skills start young in that group....
TheIndependentMa jority

Brodhead, KY

#971813 Aug 28, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>And one of you violent, racist, ignorant rednecks with three names shot him for it...
Kinda like-
Lump and labelduhm, ignorant endentured, bigot say what?

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#971814 Aug 28, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you would like to respond to the content of the post. Here it is again for your convenient reference. Please identify any statement that isn't accurate:
Just one example:
Before President Barack Obama departed for Israel earlier this year, he took time to consult with Mohamed Magid.
White House officials have praised Magid's organization, ISNA, as a pillar of the American-Muslim community.
We know from the Muslim Brotherhood's own documents that ISNA is a Muslim Brotherhood front -- they say that explicitly in one of their 1991 secret memos. Internal Muslim Brotherhood documents, captured by the FBI, name ISNA as one of 29 American-Muslim organizations with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
They said their work in America is “a kind of grand jihad, in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within.”
Obama is a key player in this “grand jihad”.
ISNA began in 1982 in Plainfield, Ind. A founding member, Sami al Arian, was convicted in a U.S. federal court of conspiring to support the terror group, Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Adurahman Alamoudi also worked closely with ISNA for years. He's currently serving a federal prison sentence for funding al Qaeda.
ISNA's founders were even given a tour of the White House in March 2013.
In short, Obama is part of the jihad, and is working toward the destruction of the evil United States.
Perhaps that explains why Iraq devolved into chaos and the Taliban are once again a threat in Afghanistan, and Al Qaeda went from hiding in caves to taking over countries since Obama was made president.
Your content is crap. There are no facts relating to your claim that Obama backs the Muslim Brotherhood.

You & Glenn Beck, two turds in the same toilet bowl.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#971815 Aug 28, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
So, why are they trying to exempt themselves from ObamaKare?
What Congressman went to Congress without existing health insurance?
Why does every Democrat in Congress hate ObamaKare?
The Commonwealth Fund last week released an interesting study (PDF) of young people and Obamacare. It found that between 2011 and 2013, the number of people aged 19 to 25 who had been on a parent’s health insurance plan in the previous year rose from 13.7 million to 15 million.“Of the 15 million young adults on a parent’s plan, an estimated 7.8 million likely would not have been eligible to enroll in that plan prior to the Affordable Care Act,” the Commonwealth Fund reported. The report also found that Republicans were more into this provision of the ACA than Democrats. In March 2013, 73 percent of young Republicans surveyed had heard of the provision, compared with 63 percent of Democratic youths. Maybe it’s because they were more likely to be benefitting from the expansion.“In March 2013, 63 percent of Republican young adults had enrolled in a parents’ policy, compared with 45 percent of Democrats,” the report said.

Rebates are a second, apparently non-objectionable component of Obamacare that has already kicked in. The ACA set standards for the insurance industry, stipulating that firms must spend a certain amount (80 percent) of the premiums they collect on patient care. Under Obamacare, insurers that choose to spend more money on administration, or marketing, or salaries, or dividends have to send rebates to customers. This summer, the first rebates were sent out, some $500 million to 8 million Americans. Now, these rebates are likely to have been shipped disproportionately to Republican households—those with high-end, employee-subsidized coverage. But I haven’t been able to turn up any examples of people refusing thechecks, or sending them back, or burning them—an act FreedomWorks is suggesting people do to their fictional “Obamacare cards.”(If you did burn your Obamacare rebate check, please tweet at me:@grossdm I’d love to speak with you.) Republicans, like Democrats, enjoy receiving checks in the mail.

Then there’s the case of pre-existing conditions—another aspect of Obamacare that is popular among some Republicans. In the old days, they used to say that a conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. When it comes to health insurance, it seems a liberal is a conservative who has been mugged by an illness. After having a devastating stroke in 2012, Sen. Mark Kirk had an epiphany about the inadequacy of rehabilitation services for poor people.“My concern is what happens if you have a stroke and you’re not in the U.S. Senate, and you have no insurance and no income,” he told National Journal.“That’s the question I have been asking, and the reality is that if you’re on Illinois Medicaid and are a stroke survivor, you will get just five visits to the rehab specialist.”

....even as they cavil about ripping up Obamacare, and hence the ban on pre-existing conditions, it is common to hear some Republicans speak kindly of the ban.

This is a dynamic we’ve seen over and over again in the past 80 years. Republicans shriek, cry socialism, and offer full resistance to any effort to expand social insurance. Then, after a certain amount of time passes and social insurance measures become popular and effective, they stand foursquare behind them and demand they be protected. Every single stinking component of FDR’s New Deal was a disaster, but don’t you dare touch Social Security! Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society program was a debacle, but keep the government out of Medicare!

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08...
WOW

New York, NY

#971816 Aug 28, 2013
Simmons did a lot to promote the word N***er thanks rus Lee Daniels and Russell Simmons are also in high places. They get the deals to create images of black life because they can be replied upon to do the right thing by white people. Russell Simmons is a bottom feeder who didn’t even know how to be smooth with his slander. Lee Daniels is made of sterner stuff and knows what black people want to see. We want to see black people on screen who do great things even if it is just getting a raise for the domestic help or sneering at the struggles of young people when they try to change the system.

After being properly scolded for the sex tape horror, Simmons removed the sex tape from his site and now says he has plans to produce biographies of Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglass. He probably has no real interest in doing this but for the sake of argument he must be treated as if he does. He can’t be trusted with our image ever again and must never be allowed to live down this shameful episode.

Daniels will probably get more movie deals and more opportunities to create outwardly uplifting fare that is in reality anything but. He is equally untrustworthy but more dangerous. He is after all the man who gave us Precious.

Black celebrities cannot be given a pass to treat us any way they want but the yearning for black success is still quite strong. As with politicians and other misleaders, they get consideration where none is deserved. Hopefully there will be no more black historical figures in sex tapes or white people being given phony and undue credit, at least not for a while. Two such episodes in one week is simply too much.
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#971817 Aug 28, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If you don't want me to talk about race, quit posting racial slurs. It is that simple.
How can I be a race baiter when I respond to posts with racal slurs.
Even a dumbass racist f*ck like you should be able to figure that out.
"Waaaaaaaaaahhhhh"!! !!!!

Do you think you'll 2742ever outgrow the diaper stage, crybaby chimp?
TSB

El Paso, TX

#971818 Aug 28, 2013
Kerry/Hagel must be furious at the Mess Clinton/Panetta left them!! The scary part is we replace Incompetence with Incompetence!!
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#971819 Aug 28, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Wow, Methmouth, just when I thought you couldn't possible get any more ignorant, "there you go again." Ships on the GROUNDS of...why don't ya' go elect Turtle McConnell again or run Rand for POTUS? Got teeth?
Here cnt, I found the pic you should steal for your avatar......

http://www.thedistractionnetwork.com/images/U...

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#971820 Aug 28, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
They Were John Birchers Then, They are John Birchers Now: The Tea Party GOP Would Have Hated Dr. King and The Great March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom
http://www.chaunceydevega.com/2013/08/they-we...
Many expert blacks say Jesse Jackson Sr, was involved with killing MLK, it seems plausible.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#971821 Aug 28, 2013
RNC Chairman: What Race Problem?

While reflecting on the March on Washington's legacy, the GOP leader makes a miscalculation.

I asked Priebus whether in light of the many racially inflammatory comments made by Republican leaders recently (which you can read here, here and here) and the many more made by Republican leaders as a whole since President Obama took office (which you can read here), he as party leader would consider apologizing on behalf of the party for such rhetoric and setting a zero-tolerance policy so that such rhetoric stops being commonplace. The chairman replied that he has criticized specific Republicans for specific instances of offensive language, most notably when he pressed for the resignation of an Illinois Republican Party leader who made racist and sexist comments about multiracial Republican congressional candidate Erika Harold. But in a baffling turn, Priebus then seemed to insinuate that the GOP doesn't have any more of a racist rhetoric problem than the Democrats do.

"Look, I don't think either party has a monopoly on stupid comments," he told The Root. "I think both parties have said plenty of stupid things, and when people in our party say them, I'm pretty bold in coming out and talking about them, whether it be the issue in Illinois [involving Erika Harold] or Todd Akin or a variety of issues."

When reminded by The Root that there is precedence for such a unilateral apology -- former RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman apologized before the NAACP for the racist tactics employed by the party at the height of the so-called "Southern Strategy" of the 1960s -- Priebus gave a curious reply: "I don't know what the back story is. You're giving me facts and back-channel information I'm not aware of. I know his [Mehlman's] speech was before the NAACP. I thought he did a great job. He was a good chairman." But the significance of Mehlman's speech is not some sort of obscure secret. It netted extensive coverage in mainstream outlets like the Washington Post, USA Today and many others. Mehlman's apology was a public acknowledgement that there was a systemic problem that at one time plagued the party he was tasked with leading.

For Priebus to be unaware of the significance of such a historic moment of outreach to minority voters in the party's recent history is worrisome. But for Priebus to refuse to acknowledge that the party is plagued with an equally troubling systemic race problem today is, at its best, a case of extreme denial and, at its worst, intentionally misleading. Before President Obama's election, I don't recall Republican congressmen being taken to task for referring to African-American elected officials as "boy," which is how Rep. Geoff Davis referred to the president after he took office. The fact that the number of racially inflammatory slights originating from Republican leaders the first year the president took office was enough to fill an entire slideshow speaks volumes about the depth of the party's problem. Yet, based on Priebus' logic, the racism is not a party-specific issue but a person-specific issue. Except all of these specific people seem to have the same political party in common.

http://www.theroot.com/blogs/blogging-beltway...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#971822 Aug 28, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Like most working Americans, they already have coverage through their employer.
We are their employer. We are Congress' and every government employees' employer. We pay their salaries and benefits.

We pay for their Cadillac coverage.

We get the lemon and eat the crumbs left over from the cake.

Our employers have to deal with the consequences of more regulations and higher costs.

At least it works for the Obamas and the elite.
carol

Florence, OR

#971823 Aug 28, 2013
Sometimes a girl just needs to be herself, and not Superman's girlfriend, or somebody else (as much fun as that can be for a housebound oldwhore like me.

Anyways, after I fled my enemies last night, I looked through the family album that I keep handy on the coffee table for trips down Memory Lane. Boy, was I thinner 30 years ago! LOL. Probably by at least 20 pounds. In those days, the clam would lube up just THINKING of getting filled up with a new life. And let me tell you (in spite of what you might have wrongly guessed), I wasn't any too particular about the ethnic background of the "contributor" to my little project. I always felt great when gravid, btw, and only scraped them out when the prospective daddy/meal ticket "blew town," so to speak, when I started to "show."

I mean, what was I supposed to do, slave away in walmart or a rug factory while that parade of losers skipped off on their merry way? Yes, life IS precious, but I wasn't going to give life to perhaps a prospective future country music singer or scientific genius without the resources at my disposal to guide his/her little mind! So, prudently, I waited for just the right man -- a combination of tired resignation and a willingness to stand by me as we watched our little future princess grow, and grow and GROW ... Well, as I might have mentioned, she's now Assistant Manager at a Save-A-Lot in Atlanta. I'm so proud! I even have a photo from that wonderful day when she got promoted.

But back to me and my clam problems. Yes, it's now dry as stall shavings and hardly remembers when it would drip like honey on a hot Georgia afternoon (instead of from the fridge). I swear, it would slide down these California Redwood legs so fast that if you walked up behind me, you'd slide down on the lino.

Well, later folks. I like to slither in after my topix tormenters are off doing other things. I seem to have some kind of radar for that. I'll just close by saying I'm worried, so you should be too. And if not, why not?
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#971824 Aug 28, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
sorry, not playing your game today. the uber-troll thing is wearing thin.
Reading that trolls posts make my eyes bleed.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#971825 Aug 28, 2013
WOW wrote:
<quoted text>On you lololhahahaha
who's in the White House?

must have been those long lines at the polls in vote suppressing Florida. some of those black folks standing there waiting to vote for 8 hours. wonder why?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#971826 Aug 28, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
80 Republicans in the House already committed to shutting down Government if ACA funding is included.
12 in the Senate have signed a similar pledge.
Yep, Republicans are digging their own grave. Now to avoid a shutdown, the House will need Democrat votes which will mean the bill will need to be more to the liking of Democrats.
Smooth move Republicans.
the government shuts down every Friday night until Monday morning--aren't you outraged?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 11 min honeymylove 2,280
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 21 min Extasy5256 231,043
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 22 min Legal Analysis 104,521
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr PEllen 9,852
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr PEllen 3,449
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Ize Found 71,234
Why does Chicago want to harbor illegal criminals 3 hr YIM 20

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages