Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1396234 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#971179 Aug 27, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>So it is going to be another fiasco like Bosnia? where Clinton killed the wrong side and ended up aiding and abetting Muslim terrorists. Sounds plausible.
Right whiners think all Muslims are terrorists. Did you cheer when those Muslim Terrorist babies were gassed to death?
TheIndependentMa jority

Brodhead, KY

#971180 Aug 27, 2013
sino89 wrote:
I agree, Obama shouldn't start something in Syria even if the NRA or other lobbies or UK put pressure on him. Nothing's proved so far.
And we should't have ever stpped a foot in LIBYA either.

Idiots.

Biggest MESS of Foreign Policy FAILURE ever.
NJ raider 1

Newark, NJ

#971181 Aug 27, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text> there was no doubt Saddam had possessed and used chemical weapons (a fact to which the victims of Iraqi chemical attacks in both Kurdistan and Iran would doubtless testify were they not dead from chemical-weapons exposure), they had vanished from Iraq.
Wrong again! Saddam did have chemical weapons. The person he got them from is your idol, Ronald Reagan! America saw no problem with it back when he was our go to guy of the region. Only after Saddam bitched Bush41 did America have a problem with the factual evidence that, Saddam was using chemical weapons on his own people! The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That's the republican way &, history proves it. Same circumstances, same result for Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden. Reagan have Saddam his wmds during the Iraq-Iran war. Why do you think Saddam had influence over Iran? Iran knew they had to deal with aid from the US if tensions got too high. Why do you think Iran is now our primary threat? Because the asshole Bush took away the lion tamer! America wasn't even worried about Iran before Bush's mistake that still haunts America till this day. History 101! Not your story!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#971183 Aug 27, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you the same idiot that said "Sweden is doing just fine" when they were having their 5th day of rioting?
Yeah sure, you have tons of credibility.
You're an idiot!
Aren't you that foreigner who laughs at the US Constitution?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#971184 Aug 27, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>No war, if anything a few missile strikes to take out some WMD's, which is what Bush should have done in Iraq, oh wait there were no WMD's in Iraq. My 401K is fine after Bush almost zeroed it out.
...and what happens if Syria retaliates in self-defense, or if Russia comes to the aid of their ally?

How about going to Congress for a declaration of war before starting the war?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#971185 Aug 27, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The other option is Al Qaeda.
Are you people complete idiots?
What you are proposing is helping Al Qaeda take over a country, you morons.
Have you given any thought as to what Al Qaeda will do with the chemical weapons when they take possession of them?
If Assad sinks an American aircraft carrier with the Russian anti-ship missiles, the Arab world cheers. We already know the Arab world cheered on 9/11(2001).
It's a now-win situation for the US.
How about we let Europe take the lead on this. Europe helps whomever they desire, and we stand behind Europe. The Europeans are probably helping the secular rebels, whereas Obama is arming the Al Qaeda terrorist insurgents.
If Europe takes the lead, there is a chance a secular government will be installed, like in Libya. If Obama takes the lead, Al Qaeda will take control of Syria.
Now, who here is in favor of putting chemical weapons in the hands of Al Qaeda?
Still, it isn't certain Assad used chemical weapons. It could very well be the so-called "rebels" (who are actually Al Qaeda insurgents - Syria is being invaded) used them to assist the US involvement.
It's a trap. An idiot can see it. Obama is Putin's bitch. And Putin will spank Obama's sycophant ass once more.
If it's a trap, then you idiots would be cheering Obama.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#971186 Aug 27, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you're in favor of giving that chemical weapons facility and munitions to Al Qaeda, right?
By the way, I thought Saddam Hussien didn't have any chemical weapons. What changed your mind on that?
What changed YOUR mind son?
No Surprize

Saint Petersburg, FL

#971188 Aug 27, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Right wing bullsht liar__who the fk do you think your kidding?
Syria had far superior weapons facilities and capabilities than Iraq did, they didn't need Iraq's leftover poorly stored junk.
You're become a huge waste of time.
Your double-minded approach seems to help keep you irresponsible and unaccountable stupid and drunk on your own ignorance realtime, forever enslaved to idiot... you once again proven wrong and brought up to snuff by Carol and got your diaper changed...

It's the culture...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#971189 Aug 27, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> You can smell a smoker a mile away.
The insurance company is never within a mile of the smoker.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#971190 Aug 27, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, how about starting by arresting the people carrying stolen guns on the streets?
Got a problem with that?
The solution is simple. Enforce exsiting laws. Nobody believes Democrats will enforce any new law in their districts when they don't even enforce existing laws.
This gun control initiative is intended only to disarm what the Democrats see as "white America".
Then why are you people making up things about being disarmed if you already KNOW any such law won't be enforced?!?!?!?!?!

You people are such illogical, circular idiots!

But it's fun to watch!
TSM

El Paso, TX

#971191 Aug 27, 2013
Obama's Red Line didn’t work; Putin/China thumbed their noses at him how about a Beer Summon with Assad? LOVE NOT WAR
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#971192 Aug 27, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> They are a member of NATO and by treaty must help.
NATO is a defense pact, not an open license to support each other in a needless war.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#971193 Aug 27, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Mainstream media won't ask, "Where did Syria get WMDs".
Anyone know where Syria got WMDs?
lol! Why don't you just make it up as usual?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#971194 Aug 27, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text> I was under the impression that the election of Obama in 2008 permanently ended war, oppression and religious intolerance. I mean, they gave the guy the Nobel Peace Prize without a shred of collateral, maybe just because he looked like a black guy.
O'bama’s idea of hopey, changey, peace and improving America’s standing in the eyes of the world is laughable.
lol! If you really thought that, then why didn't you vote for him son?!?!?!?!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#971195 Aug 27, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Evidently Galt likes the idea that is Congressmen worry more about being on the good side of Limbaugh, Beck & Norquist, rather than on the side of our country.
Galt's Congressman, Darrell Issa, is a force of his own.

However, Galt appreciates all Congressmen who stand with the American people in resisting the tyrant Obama.

Every day is a day closer to freedom, except for the Syrian people soon to be murdered by Obama.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#971196 Aug 27, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Right whiners think all Muslims are terrorists. Did you cheer when those Muslim Terrorist babies were gassed to death?
Did you cheer when Obobblehead's drones killed 78 children?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#971197 Aug 27, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you can't recognize the difference between Bush's unilateral invasion and military action as part of a coalition of nations, there is no hope for you as you are the one who is truly brain dead.
However, we have certainly used our Security Council vito power to stop actions against Israel. There is o reason we should not show Russia the same courtesy. Moscow is right, we shouldn't act before evidence is in hand. I hope Obama doesn't listen to the war mongers.
Bush had the support of Congress as well as international support.

Obama will not go to Congress because he knows that he could not win a vote to attack Syria.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#971199 Aug 27, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Galt & an Al Qaeda terrorist just happened to be standing on the same street when a fire broke out in the elementary school across the street.
The Al Qaeda terrorist started running to help save kids.
Galt said "F*ck those kids . I ain't helping no terrorist"
.
A Moslem terrorist, who is a friend of O'bama, would not be running to save kids--he would however be holding them up as a human shield to keep Galt from saving them or the school. Sorta like what O'bama is doing in Syria now. Saving the terrorists and killing the civilians. But as liberals always say...it's for chillllllllldreeeeeeen.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#971200 Aug 27, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Galt & an Al Qaeda terrorist just happened to be standing on the same street when a fire broke out in the elementary school across the street.
The Al Qaeda terrorist started running to help save kids.
Galt said "F*ck those kids . I ain't helping no terrorist"
.
Galt would kill the terrorist and let the fire department handle the fire.

Dumbass Dave has the same retarded thinking as Obama, that it's OK to help your enemy in what you perceive to be a good cause.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#971201 Aug 27, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Right whiners think all Muslims are terrorists. Did you cheer when those Muslim Terrorist babies were gassed to death?
Well, they sure as hell won't fly an airplane into an American skyscraper 20 years from now.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 min Patriot AKA Bozo 60,156
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 27 min OH SNAP 102,550
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 53 min Mad Hatter 217,001
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr Pennie Lane 8,919
News Chicago Police Stage "Intervention" In Violence... 2 hr bozo 1
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 2 hr GEORGIA 1,689
Who's this Fauxcahontas? 2 hr FREE Prize with Jack 29

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages