Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more
LCNlin

United States

#968582 Aug 22, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
You must give them a little sympathy. They were not raised to think for themselves. Parroting Hate Talk Radio talking heads is all they know how to do. Facts escape them.
Right wing talking heads have led the republicans to electoral defeat since 2006.
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#968583 Aug 22, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, I understand SNAP is a good program and a necessity in a compassionate society such as ours, Homer.
What YOU don't seem to understand is we have a broken system. There are people who take advantage of those who don't know the difference between compassion and gullibility.
Explain to me why you are so against accountability and oversight and why you support an oversized government who can't do either.
And why you are so against eliminating waste, fraud, abuse and duplication.
I really don't understand.
Of course you don't understand Carol, There's people who will take advantage of any program but as far as SNAP is concerned the abuse about 1%. Do you think that I'd trust some of these Republican dominated state legislatures. In a pig's eye. They've shown repeated patterns of balancing their budgets on the backs of the poor and middle class while heaping tax breaks on the wealthy.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#968584 Aug 22, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That only suggests they've cut "waste, fraud, and abuse" in half instead of four-fold as the percentage would suggest.
So, they effectively cut "waste, fraud, and abuse" in half and we still have serious spending issues and a huge deficit, what's your next magic cure?
In 1996, the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program was transformed from a cash welfare program into a jobs program known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Recipients were required to perform at least 20–30 hours per week of work or job preparation activities in exchange for the cash benefit.

Overnight, welfare agencies became job placement offices, and people who had been trapped in poverty and dependence began seeking employment. Between 1996 and 2009, caseloads dropped from 4.5 million families to 1.7 million. As the reform went into effect, employment for disadvantaged single mothers increased dramatically.

Most of Obama’s spending increases are permanent expansions of the welfare state, not short-term responses to the current recession.

Surely, as a libertarian, you see something wrong with the expansion of a welfare state and it has nothing to do with hating Republicans. Republicans have done everything but beg for reforms.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#968585 Aug 22, 2013
LCNlin wrote:
<quoted text>
Any problems which face the America People seem to cheer you.:-)
Wonder Why
Galt thinks mini computer apps can and should replace whole booklets and books, and libraries should be decimated in favor of 20's and 30's style poker and flapper backrooms era stuff.

He's been hanging around Homer too much.

Galt-that stuffs hard on the eyeballs too, remember? Obammercare should consider implementing one fwee set of dolluh store eyeglasses for everyone once a year as well!
NJ raider 1

Baltimore, MD

#968586 Aug 22, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it racial violence? Or, is it cultural? What do you think will happen when a culture that has no respect for another person's rights, property and life comes into contact with a culture that places the highest regard on individual rights, private property and a person's life?
The problem is, when you define the different cultures, it coincidentally approximates a racial difference.
What do you think of Elbert L. Guillory?
I think like any other person, he has the right to be what he wants to be. I think he is a well spoken, articulate, well educated blackman. I also think he crossed party lines for political gain. What person, after being something for 30yrs has an epiphany &, decides he's been wrong all along? You mean to tell me, it took 30yrs to see you were on the wrong path. That's not a person who can be trusted to run a state, let alone a country. You only make reference of the situation because, he changed from democrat to republican. Had it been the other way around, you would be seeing it my way, reality. At least Herman Cain had the dignity to hold form to his beliefs, however screwed up they were!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#968587 Aug 22, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO. Seems you are the "Dumbass". As usual, your talking heads got it WRONG. It isn't the "Obama phone". You would be far more correct to refer to those cell phones as the "Bush phone".
The Telecommunications Act of 2005 (Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005) expanded the SafeLink program to include free cell phones. Got that???? Remember who was president in 2005???
Here is who voted for it:
5/18/2006 - Passed in the Senate by unanimous consent which means no Republicans opposed the bill.
6/7/2006 – Passed in the House 379-35
6/15/2006 – Signed into law by President Bush
Besides, the SafeLink program is funded by contributions from telecommunications companies through the Universal Service Administrative Company, NOT tax dollars.
An August 2008 press release announced the start of the SafeLink Wireless program in the state of Tennessee:
"Today, TracFone Wireless, Inc., America's leading prepaid cell phone provider announced its launch of SafeLink Wireless(R) in Tennessee. SafeLink Wireless will serve as the company's distribution of Lifeline - a U.S. government supported program for income eligible households that ensures telephone service is available and affordable for eligible low income households.
The SafeLink Wireless service will provide eligible low-income households a free cell phone…
A recent study ("Cell Phones Provide Significant Economic Gains for Low-Income American Households," April 2008) analyzed the impact of mobile phones on low-income households. "In this day and age, the cell phone should be deemed an imperative necessity for the millions of low-income families who are far less likely to own them," said Nicholas P. Sullivan, the study's author and visiting scholar at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Our study showed cell phones can significantly boost the earning potential of these communities, and this connectivity vastly encourages their opportunities and remains central to their everyday survival," Sullivan stressed.
The study also revealed the cell phone is a critical component for personal safety, access to emergency services, and can potentially increase a low-income family's economic productivity and earning power."
http://leadershipforliberty.org/index.php/new...
The Obama Phone?

Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?

A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.

Posted on October 29, 2009

Updated on Nov. 5, 2009


http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-ph...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#968588 Aug 22, 2013
steve richards wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumbass, would you be rather be water boarded or be blown to smithereens by an illegal drone strike? Huh, moron? Could you be any more stupid?
no point in water boarding. it doesn't work.

but those drones.....that the right wing hawks love.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#968589 Aug 22, 2013
TSM wrote:
Another Liberal with an Identity Crisis… Latest: Manning wants to live as woman!!
Looks like he got his wish eh?
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#968590 Aug 22, 2013
LCNlin wrote:
<quoted text>
Right wing talking heads have led the republicans to electoral defeat since 2006.
It's funny to watch them stand on their soapscum podiums of CONdescending and try act like they have an actual clue about anything relevant though!
TSM

El Paso, TX

#968591 Aug 22, 2013
Every day a constant Drip, Drip, Drip of bad news about Obamacare!!University dumps spouses from health care coverage...UPS to drop 15,000 husbands and wives...40% of companies alter insurance coverage to avoid new health care tax...Firms turn to part-time and even after Obamacare is fully implemented 30 million still without Coverage!! WOW
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#968593 Aug 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
no point in water boarding. it doesn't work.
but those drones.....that the right wing hawks love.
Homer on the fence regarding drones/waterboarding. These rightwingers have been droning on for 5 years, waterboarding might actually be refreshing.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#968594 Aug 22, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
I love it when you change the subject when you can't come up with a response Carol but I'll answer you.
1. No. We've tried that before. It was called the Articles of Confederation which proved totally unworkable. During the Civil War the Confederacy tried it again and once again it failed.
2. No. We already have that. It's called elections. If my Congressman and Senators are doing a good job then why would I want to replace them? The Republicans always put term limits in their platforms but once in office forget all about them.
3. While I'd love to see Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia be put out to pasture, again no. That would require amending the Constitution which is time consuming and expensive. It would likely fail and be a total waste of tax dollars.
Anything else Carol?
So, in other words, you're okay with the status quo of career politicians, politically motivated Supreme Court judges and the dissolution of Social Security and Medicaid in a few more decades.

You're basically against any reforms that would limit the size and scope of the federal government and reform programs that are leading us into certain bankruptcy.

You're perfectly happy with a powerful central government who regulates and dictates and takes the power from the people.

Do I have that right?
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#968595 Aug 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Targeting specific individuals is un-American.
What does this have to do with targeting specific individuals moron? Even under Bush those that made over $250,000 a year paid a higher tax rate.
You're an idiot Galt!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#968597 Aug 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
no point in water boarding. it doesn't work.
but those drones.....that the right wing hawks love.
Hey Learn to Read, guess your wife wasn't as excited as you were about the long weekend, huh? She does enjoy "long" things, trust us. LMAO! Guess you're coming up a bit "SHORT", huh? LMAO! Oh well, so much for those plans, Twink!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#968599 Aug 22, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Homer on the fence regarding drones/waterboarding. These rightwingers have been droning on for 5 years, waterboarding might actually be refreshing.
ever the optimist.
LCNlin

United States

#968601 Aug 22, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
So, in other words, you're okay with the status quo of career politicians, politically motivated Supreme Court judges and the dissolution of Social Security and Medicaid in a few more decades.
You're basically against any reforms that would limit the size and scope of the federal government and reform programs that are leading us into certain bankruptcy.
You're perfectly happy with a powerful central government who regulates and dictates and takes the power from the people.
Do I have that right?
Republicans in power, strengthen the Federal Government.
Supreme Court is conservative.
President George Bush expanded medicare to include prescription drugs, something you may champion when it benefits YOU ;-)
YouR head is in the sand or on fox?
PEACE

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#968602 Aug 22, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
So, in other words, you're okay with the status quo of career politicians, politically motivated Supreme Court judges and the dissolution of Social Security and Medicaid in a few more decades.
You're basically against any reforms that would limit the size and scope of the federal government and reform programs that are leading us into certain bankruptcy.
You're perfectly happy with a powerful central government who regulates and dictates and takes the power from the people.
Do I have that right?
Yes you have it right. Power needs to be returned to the states where it belongs.
Tonto

London, UK

#968603 Aug 22, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Yes you have it right. Power needs to be returned to the states where it belongs.
Whatever. You know... in a minute I'm gonna seduce some women... You might wanna... I don't know... go to church or sumthin'?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#968605 Aug 22, 2013
Barack Obama:
~Makes empty threats with invisible red lines.
~Makes empty promises with no intention to keep.
~Desires a welfare state and a powerful central government.
~Desires a one-party system.
~Perpetually leads from behind.
~Creates a part-time employment epidemic to promote his vision of single-payer.
~Surrounds himself with corrupt Chicago advisors.
~Intentionally creates divisiveness among the people.
~Favors the enemies of Israel over Israel.
~Allows abuses of power by powerful agencies by holding no one accountable.
~Stonewalls investigations to cover up incompetency and abuses of power.
~Declares unresolved and disturbing controversies as phony.

This is not the right man to lead our country.

Not one liberal could defend the above truthfully.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#968606 Aug 22, 2013
GOP Candidate Sentenced for Felony Fraud After Changing Party Affiliation of 300 Democratic Voters, Casting Absentee Ballots in Their Name

With these 300 fraudulent votes created by one Republican candidate alone, that's 300 more fraudulent votes than have ever been created by ACORN or anybody who has ever worked for them.

But, of course, you're unlikely to hear that, or even this story itself, from the tenacious Fox "News" "voter fraud special investigative unit" or the GOP clowns who help them disinform American voters.

http://www.bradblog.com/...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 30 min Mothra 52,693
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 45 min Jacques in Orleans 186,845
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr curiousity 99,353
News 3 accused of murder in 2012 shooting 1 hr reality is a crutch 1
Dear Abby 4-18-15 2 hr RACE 2
amy april 17 2 hr PEllen 1
Ak Amy 4-8-15 2 hr PEllen 1
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]