Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Nov 11

United States

#966393 Aug 19, 2013
OBAMACARE: Liberal's greatests achievement.

.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#966394 Aug 19, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Yes I love Rush-he is the reason I am a conservative, after I voted for Clinton-he was the only one that could explain and really the only one that bothered to explain what the hell Bill Cliton was doing. I never voted for a democrat again.:)
Does your husband also do your thinking for you or is it all Rush?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#966395 Aug 19, 2013
Waxman wrote:
"Don't Be Fooled, ObamaCare Will Drive Up Unemployment And Healthcare Costs"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoodman/2013/...
and also it will drive up disability. People are so ignorant, the cost of 'not about health, not about care' is never going to go down when you have more people using it. That is why it is expensive now--most Americans are sick and medicated and using a system designed to keep you that way.

The monthly premium for a healthy young worker will shoot up from $2,047 per month now, in what’s left of the free market, to $5,124 once everyone is FORCED BY LAW to buy insurance next year.

So much for “affordable” care — because at that rate, someone working 25 hours a week would have to earn more than $50 an hour just to pay for their legally required insurance.

I don’t know many part-timers who earn $50 an hour. But even if you did, you still wouldn’t be able to pay for healthcare if you hope to have any money left over for luxuries such as food, clothing, and shelter.

So you can’t afford to pay for your own insurance… but you’ll also earn far too much to qualify for “free” O'bamaCare. So under the new law, you’ll have to pay a fine for not having insurance — a fine that’s expected to average $1,250 a person by 2016.

Remember, you’re not getting a thing for your $1,250 — and when you get sick, you’ll have to pay out-of-pocket for care at the full retail price. Meanwhile, someone who doesn’t work a lick will get FREE O'bamaCare — free care paid for with your $1,250 fine.

If that doesn’t make you mad, I don’t know what will.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966396 Aug 19, 2013
Let's recap last week....

The week began with a discussion about Obama having never attended classes at Columbia. It was pointed out that nobody has ever found anyone who met Obama at Columbia. Even PBS couldn't find anyone who ever met Obama at columbia for their documentary production on Obama's life. But, given the fact that nobody ever met Obama at Columbia, someone here somehow found a list of graduates with the name "Barack Hussein Obama" on it, which had to be fraudulent because his name at Columbia had to have been the same name at Occidental, Barry Soetoro.
In looking into the name, some other evidence of fraud was discovered. The Democrat party line, as given by Snopes, Factcheck and Wikipedia, was Ann Dunham met Obama Sr in September 1960 in a Russia language class at the University of Hawaii. A photo was produced showing Stanley Dunham meeting Obama Sr at the Honolulu airport in 1959.
Additional to that photo, it was proved Ann Dunham was making photos for pornographic magazines, and speculated that she would have had the normal activities of the women who worked in the pornography business at that time, that of being a prostitute.
It was also obvious Obama Jr has absolutely no resemblance to Obama Sr, and has a remarkable likeness to Communist Party USA prominent member Frank Marshal Davis. It appears Frank Marshal Davis knocked up Ann Dunham, then dumped her and arranged for the young communist from Kenya, Obama Sr, to marry Ann Dunham and get her out of the country.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966397 Aug 19, 2013
It should be obvious Obama is a complete fraud.

The next topic of discussion should be, how did the entire country become duped into thinking there is anything about Obama that is not a lie.

So, how about some so-called "liberal" here tell us how the entire country was duped into thinking Obama Sr was Obama Jr's father, and received a degree from Columbia when it's obvious Obama never even attended classes there.

Who was involved in the grand conspiracy to dupe the entire country and put what could be the biggest fraud in the history of civilization into the presidency?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#966398 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's take a look at your statement.
You begin by blatantly lying. That obviously fraudulent "birth certificate" has never been submitted in any case. Therefore, it has never been ruled on.
For what you say to be true, that obviously fraudulent birth certificate has to actually be submitted as evidence in a court case. The so-called "birthers" want that document to be submitted as evidence.
So, since you Democrats contend the document is legitimate, how about YOU TELL US WHY OBAMA REFUSES TO SUBMIT THAT "BIRTH CERTIFICATE" AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COURT.
Why is that, dufus? Do you think Obama's lawyers will say and do anything to avoid having to submit that document as evidence because they know it's fraudulent?
As long as that document is on the White House website, it's just propaganda. If it is ever submitted as evidence in any case, a felony will have been committed.
Just submit that document as evidence, dupe. Then, let's see how it's judged.
But, just for today's entertainment, how about you tell us again how a computer-generated signature got on a birth certificate generated in 1961.
a non-expert can't testify in court as to the validity of a document. birther lawyers have tried and have been told as much.

so how about you tell us why the birther lawyers can't get a real document expert to testify in court about the 'fake' birth certificate.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#966399 Aug 19, 2013
Ted Cruz Releases Birth Certificate

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/t...

doesn't matter. wasn't born in US. not a NBC.

this could be fun. don't you agree DB?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#966400 Aug 19, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Yes I love Rush-he is the reason I am a conservative, after I voted for Clinton-he was the only one that could explain and really the only one that bothered to explain what the hell Bill Cliton was doing. I never voted for a democrat again.:)
How did Limbaugh explain/spin what happened to the budget surplus and soaring economy Clinton left your Republican friend Bush?
OBAMA the GENIUS

Raleigh, NC

#966401 Aug 19, 2013
OBAMACARE!!

IT'S EVERYWHERE!!

EVERY STATE ACROSS THE LAND.

even little red schitttty ones!

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT!

GUARANTEED MEDICAL INSURANCE.

BY FEDERAL LAW!

THIS OCTOBER: EXCHANGES ONLINE.

hey republican trash! There isn't a dammmmmm thing you can do about it!

LOL!

LOL!

LOL!

thanks genius!

Premiums $300 below Per Month!

What a great deal.

Democrats are so smart! America better!

Republicans? Still stupid and greedy!

Since: Nov 11

United States

#966402 Aug 19, 2013
Obama's Moslem Brotherhood killing Egypt's Christian Coptics!!!

Liberals were wrong!

Conservatives were right!!!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966403 Aug 19, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
a non-expert can't testify in court as to the validity of a document. birther lawyers have tried and have been told as much.
so how about you tell us why the birther lawyers can't get a real document expert to testify in court about the 'fake' birth certificate.
You just can't open you rmouth without lying, can you?
Because the document has never been submitted as evidence. The so-called "birthers" want that document submitted.
So, since you Democrats contend the document is legitimate, how about YOU TELL US WHY OBAMA REFUSES TO SUBMIT THAT "BIRTH CERTIFICATE" AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COURT.
Why is that, dupe? Do you think Obama's lawyers will say and do anything to avoid having to submit that document as evidence because they know it's fraudulent?
As long as that document is on the White House website, it's just propaganda. If it is ever submitted as evidence in any case, a felony will have been committed.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#966404 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's take a look at your statement.
You begin by blatantly lying. That obviously fraudulent "birth certificate" has never been submitted in any case. Therefore, it has never been ruled on.
For what you say to be true, that obviously fraudulent birth certificate has to actually be submitted as evidence in a court case. The so-called "birthers" want that document to be submitted as evidence.
So, since you Democrats contend the document is legitimate, how about YOU TELL US WHY OBAMA REFUSES TO SUBMIT THAT "BIRTH CERTIFICATE" AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COURT.
Why is that, dufus? Do you think Obama's lawyers will say and do anything to avoid having to submit that document as evidence because they know it's fraudulent?
As long as that document is on the White House website, it's just propaganda. If it is ever submitted as evidence in any case, a felony will have been committed.
Just submit that document as evidence, dupe. Then, let's see how it's judged.
But, just for today's entertainment, how about you tell us again how a computer-generated signature got on a birth certificate generated in 1961.
Check out some of the OTHER revised and newly created ones lol.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966405 Aug 19, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Ted Cruz Releases Birth Certificate
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/t...
doesn't matter. wasn't born in US. not a NBC.
this could be fun. don't you agree DB?
Sure could. It could be like when Obama said "so what? I'm not running for president" when his oponent accused him of being born in Kenya when he was running for the US Senate in 2004.

I like Ted Cruz. But, the person I want to see run is Andrew Napolitano.
What are your thoughts on that?
How would Andrew Napolitano be as president?
How would Andrew Napolitano be as a candidate?

Since: Nov 11

United States

#966406 Aug 19, 2013
Obama's Moslem Brotherhood killing Christians and raping their kids for Islam.

Liberals are happy and proud of Obama's meddling on other countries's affair.

Liberals are sick!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966407 Aug 19, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
biased conservative.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_...
Oh, gawd....
Isn't Wikipedia the same site that gives the history of Obama Sr and Ann Dunham as having met in a Russian language course in September, 1960, while the fact is Stanley Dunham met Obama Sr at the airport in Honolulu when he arrived in 1959?
Wikipedia has the same credibility as George Soros' Snopes, and so-called "Factcheck", both of which have been proved to lie over and over.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#966408 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
It should be obvious Obama is a complete fraud.
The next topic of discussion should be, how did the entire country become duped into thinking there is anything about Obama that is not a lie.
So, how about some so-called "liberal" here tell us how the entire country was duped into thinking Obama Sr was Obama Jr's father, and received a degree from Columbia when it's obvious Obama never even attended classes there.
Who was involved in the grand conspiracy to dupe the entire country and put what could be the biggest fraud in the history of civilization into the presidency?
He sure does look a lot like that Davis guy.

Mutta been some of those O'Kennedy immigration reform libuhrultic tacTics of the decade in action fo'sho.

Just not sure WHY they'd've wanted to appease anyone who apparently had such communisTic unideals!

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#966409 Aug 19, 2013
Emoron wrote:
<quoted text>
How did Limbaugh explain/spin what happened to the budget surplus and soaring economy Clinton left your Republican friend Bush?
ROTLMAO--about every two months an ignorant liberal like you makes the above statement. Clinton did not leave his successor a 'soaring' economy. He left President George W. Bush a recession. The recession began in March of 2001, two months after Clinton left office. Even the most rabid (woof woof) leftist cannot blame Bush for the 2001 recession. It was the Clinton recession.
So Bill Clinton came into office and raised taxes on an accelerating economy, and produced a lethargic economy. Republicans pushed through a tax cut in 1997 and thereby launched the famous Clinton boom. Then Clinton left his successor with a nasty recession. And from this is fashioned a legend of economic performance. Clinton did not have a surplus: The government can have a surplus even if it has trillions in debt, but it cannot have a surplus if that debt increased every year. That debt increased every year Clinton was in office.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966410 Aug 19, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Check out some of the OTHER revised and newly created ones lol.
It's like the photo the White House released of Obama photoshopped in the command center. In three different versions of that photo, hey move him around the room while everyone else in the room has the exact same position and expression.

Since: Nov 11

United States

#966411 Aug 19, 2013
In 1940's no Liberal leader helped the Jews. Today Obama personally refuses to help Coptic Christians.

Liberals are sick!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966412 Aug 19, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
a non-expert can't testify in court as to the validity of a document. birther lawyers have tried and have been told as much.
so how about you tell us why the birther lawyers can't get a real document expert to testify in court about the 'fake' birth certificate.
Can you open your mouth without lying?

If the document is never admitted as evidence, there can not be any testimony about that document, idiot.

How about submitting that document as evidence, dufus. The so-called "birthers" want that document in court. The Democrats will say and do anything to avoid submitting that document as evidence.

Why is that? Do you think it's because they know it's fraudulent?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 min The Real Missyfit 47,480
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 30 min HulkHoeGun 50,589
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 38 min edogxxx 98,498
Abby 10-21 41 min edogxxx 1
Amy 10-21 44 min edogxxx 1
Do you find smoking attractive? (No posts about... 53 min Girly girl 7
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr JOEL 69,974
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr wojar 179,265
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]