Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1251545 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#966484 Aug 19, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text>All You do is present baseless claims &, a homework assignment for someone else to do, to get the answer for you! Nothing you you say is factual in the slightest sense of the word. The man was sworn in under oath so if he presented fraudulent documents, he would've committed treason already. You have a problem facing defeat. I know it's nearly killed you on that 2nd round landslide victory. Face it, your republican policies are the laws of " Little House on the Prairie." Another person crying about a man that won fair & square but, was quiet as a church mouse when Bush literally stole an election. Get outta here DB.
If the document is never admitted as evidence, there can not be any testimony about that document, idiot.
How about submitting that document as evidence, dufus. The so-called "birthers" want that document in court. The Democrats will say and do anything to avoid submitting that document as evidence.
Why is that? Do you think it's because they know it's fraudulent?

How about you copy and paste the Democrat party line story about how Ann Dunham met Obama Sr in a Russian language class in September, 1961, from Wikipedia or Snopes or Factcheck, take your pick, and then tell us about Stanley Dunham being photographed meeting Obama Sr at the airport in Honolulu with he arrived in 1959.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#966485 Aug 19, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>ROTLMAO--about every two months an ignorant liberal like you makes the above statement. Clinton did not leave his successor a 'soaring' economy. He left President George W. Bush a recession. The recession began in March of 2001, two months after Clinton left office. Even the most rabid (woof woof) leftist cannot blame Bush for the 2001 recession. It was the Clinton recession.
So Bill Clinton came into office and raised taxes on an accelerating economy, and produced a lethargic economy. Republicans pushed through a tax cut in 1997 and thereby launched the famous Clinton boom. Then Clinton left his successor with a nasty recession. And from this is fashioned a legend of economic performance. Clinton did not have a surplus: The government can have a surplus even if it has trillions in debt, but it cannot have a surplus if that debt increased every year. That debt increased every year Clinton was in office.
The CBO said we were on a path to continued budget surplus & paying down the debt.

George W Bush ran for election based on "giving it back".

When elected, Bush & the Republicans passed multiple unfunded tax cuts slashing revenues & turned that path from surpluses to doubling the debt over his term.

Now you can run from this & make up all your excuses you want, but that is what happened to your precious surplus you right whiners claim to want. We had them then you f*cking bozos voted to eliminate them & bring back debt.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#966486 Aug 19, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Could be she is swimming in the Chicago River, with the rest of the garbage?
I think she is chained to a bed in a hotel. There are burkas all over downtown this morning. I have been at the Daley Center since 8:30. Maybe she can't see out of her burka this morning.
NJ raider 1

Paterson, NJ

#966487 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You obvously weren't here last week.
Just for starters, why don't you copy and paste the story of how Ann Dunham met Obama Sr from either Wikipedia, Factcheck or Snopes, then explain Stanley Dunham meeting Obama Sr at the airport in Honolulu when he arrived in 1959.
Then explain why Obama looks like Frank Marshal Davis, and doesn't look anything like Obama Sr.
Then explain the pornography photos of Ann Dunham.
Then explain Ann Dunham saying her son was "Barry Soetoro" in a letter to Ford Foundation in 1981.
Then explain how Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 while it was on the no-travel list of the US State Department with a US passport.
Then explain why PBS couldn't find one single person who ever met Obama at Columbia for thier documentary on his life.
Then explain how a poor student at Occidental who never attended classes at Columbia was admitted to Harvard.
Then... explain how a computer-generated signature got on a "birth certificate" from 1961.
We'll start there, and see where that takes us.
Obama was "Barry Soetoro" when he was a poor student at Occidental.
Obama never attended classes at Columbia.
Obama met Vernon Jarrett and William Ayers in Chicago after his non-Columbia days, and subsequently they arranged for him to be admitted to Harvard with a record of being a poor student at Occidental and never attending classes at Columbia.
There is NOTHING being promoted about Obama that isn't fraudulent. Frank Marshal Davis is his biological father. His mother was a prostitute.
Obama would never have been born today. His mother would have had an abortion after being knocked up by a black communist who dumped her after he fucked her.
Where did William Ayers get so much power from, that he could pull strings at colleges he never even attended? Even if that were true, which it isn't, Tell me how pornographic pictures makes Mrs. Dunham a prostitute. Then tell me how, if Obama is in total opposition of America, how every branch of our gov't allowed he &, his cronies to pull the wool of their eyes. Obama is laughing at you &, your ilk. You'll do anything to win back the white House &, you'll say anything to win an argument. Republican logic, 1 step from insanity!
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#966488 Aug 19, 2013
LMAO at leftist phags!! The way even the elitist members of this wimp union try and convince themselves of things on their "freeload list" is hilarious.......

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/19/opinion/kru...

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#966489 Aug 19, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>and also it will drive up disability. People are so ignorant, the cost of 'not about health, not about care' is never going to go down when you have more people using it. That is why it is expensive now--most Americans are sick and medicated and using a system designed to keep you that way.
The monthly premium for a healthy young worker will shoot up from $2,047 per month now, in what’s left of the free market, to $5,124 once everyone is FORCED BY LAW to buy insurance next year.
So much for “affordable” care — because at that rate, someone working 25 hours a week would have to earn more than $50 an hour just to pay for their legally required insurance.
I don’t know many part-timers who earn $50 an hour. But even if you did, you still wouldn’t be able to pay for healthcare if you hope to have any money left over for luxuries such as food, clothing, and shelter.
So you can’t afford to pay for your own insurance… but you’ll also earn far too much to qualify for “free” O'bamaCare. So under the new law, you’ll have to pay a fine for not having insurance — a fine that’s expected to average $1,250 a person by 2016.
Remember, you’re not getting a thing for your $1,250 — and when you get sick, you’ll have to pay out-of-pocket for care at the full retail price. Meanwhile, someone who doesn’t work a lick will get FREE O'bamaCare — free care paid for with your $1,250 fine.
If that doesn’t make you mad, I don’t know what will.
$2047 per month? The tales get taller.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#966490 Aug 19, 2013
LCNlin wrote:
<quoted text>
Your daily "the world is ending unless we become republican" act got old years ago?
The world has many problems, always has, and not all were created by President Obama :-)
You can label yourself anything you want. But Obama and the radical left are, in fact, creating more problems than we ever imagined. The federal government has gotten to the point of overriding its powers under the Constitution.

It doesn't matter what letter you have by your name to see this - unless you WANT the power to be in the hands of a few. And, yes, Republicans are as much to blame.

There's a new book entitled "The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic" that's creating quite a stir written by Mark Levin.

Briefly, in 1787, the delegates at the Constitutional Convention and the delegates to each state’s ratification convention foresaw a time when — despite their best efforts to forestall it — the Federal government might breach the Constitution’s limits and begin oppressing the people.

(Well, here we are.)

Therefore, the Framers provided two methods for amending the Constitution - empowering the states to bypass Congress and call a convention for the purpose of amending the Constitution.

The new proposed amendments include:

1. Term limits, including for justices.
2. Repealing Amendment 17 and returning the election of senators to state legislatures
3. A congressional supermajority to override Supreme Court decisions (overruling what could be a stacked court)
4. Spending limit based on GDP
5. Taxation capped at 15%
6. Limiting the commerce clause, and strengthening private property rights
7. Power of states to override a federal statute by a three-fifths vote.

Would you have a problem with any of the above? It's not a partisan endeavor to give the power back to the people where it was always intended to be. It keeps the power out of the hands of the few in both parties.

If a Republican were sitting in the White House right now and we were seeing the abuses of power by powerful government agencies, I'd ditch the "R" and get on board. I've always been prepared to do that when and if Republicans got back in power after mistakes were made by both sides and if they, too, screwed things up.

Aren't you getting tired of both parties screwing things up? Let the states and the people have their power back. It's really a very simple and bipartisan solution. Sounds almost American.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#966491 Aug 19, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know they are not concerned?
Why do you have the need to justify the murder of Trayvon Martin?
Because it wasn't murder, 3Vons had attacked Zimmerman, not the other way around.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#966493 Aug 19, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Lily,
I know Chicago like the back of my hand.
A full 1/2 of the city from south to west even I will not traverse.
The north side also is bad. The area of Howard which separates Evanston and Rodgers Park is now in a gang retaliation war. Lily wants to believe the Canadians that see nothing but the Continental downtown and the lake front know what is going on. Hell Michigan AVE had gotten so bad a few weeks ago that the Guardian Angels were patrolling. There was a gang shooting in Hillary's hometown of Park Ridge last week. And there is a person shooting at people, in Skokie, on Wednesday and Thursday last week. Just randomly shooting.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#966494 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
The so-called "birthers" want the exact document shown on the White House submitted as evidence.
Why are the Obama lawyers saying and doing anything to avoid submitting that document as evidence? Do you think that's because even they know it's fraudulent?
How about submitting that document you so-called "liberals" claim is a "birth certificate" as evidence?
Maybe because even you know it's fraudulent?
so called?

no, i'm pretty sure they fit the description.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#966495 Aug 19, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Suicide rates have become epidemic since O'bama was elected, want to talk about that?
Iraq vets?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#966496 Aug 19, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text>Where did William Ayers get so much power from, that he could pull strings at colleges he never even attended? Even if that were true, which it isn't, Tell me how pornographic pictures makes Mrs. Dunham a prostitute. Then tell me how, if Obama is in total opposition of America, how every branch of our gov't allowed he &, his cronies to pull the wool of their eyes. Obama is laughing at you &, your ilk. You'll do anything to win back the white House &, you'll say anything to win an argument. Republican logic, 1 step from insanity!
wouldn't that be MS. Dunham? no MRS. involved.

Ayers is working for O'bama now and has been to the White House on a number of occasions--remember when the visitors to the White House list were released? O'bama and his commies tried to say it was a 'different' William Ayers. ROTFLMAO.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#966497 Aug 19, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
The CBO said we were on a path to continued budget surplus & paying down the debt.
George W Bush ran for election based on "giving it back".
When elected, Bush & the Republicans passed multiple unfunded tax cuts slashing revenues & turned that path from surpluses to doubling the debt over his term.
Now you can run from this & make up all your excuses you want, but that is what happened to your precious surplus you right whiners claim to want. We had them then you f*cking bozos voted to eliminate them & bring back debt.
Davey, What is an 'unfunded' tax cut? Explain it?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#966498 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Hate to say it - and I've never even noticed it before - but Obama DOES have Frank Marshall Davis' nose, eyes and cheek bone structure.

There's really no resemblance comparing those three features to Barack Obama, Sr.

How odd.

http://www.bing.com/images/search...
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#966499 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
debunked
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#966500 Aug 19, 2013
New Book Outs Democrats as Commies and Obamacare a Commie Plot

I guess this makes all the sense in the world, if you’re a twisted shill like Loudon, Beck, Limbaugh…or Corsi. The only thing I’m left uncertain of in reading this book is whether or not its more frightening that somebody might lie so creatively, or that they might believe their own lies.

http://www.politicususa.com/2013/08/19/book-o...
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#966501 Aug 19, 2013
Emoron wrote:
<quoted text>
Great concept! Can we debunk posters?
Just keep in mind it's not foolproof and your dealing with of course fools.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#966502 Aug 19, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Lily,
I know Chicago like the back of my hand.
A full 1/2 of the city from south to west even I will not traverse.
How many warts do you have on the back of your hand? See? You don't know sh!t.
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#966503 Aug 19, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>The north side also is bad. The area of Howard which separates Evanston and Rodgers Park is now in a gang retaliation war. Lily wants to believe the Canadians that see nothing but the Continental downtown and the lake front know what is going on. Hell Michigan AVE had gotten so bad a few weeks ago that the Guardian Angels were patrolling. There was a gang shooting in Hillary's hometown of Park Ridge last week. And there is a person shooting at people, in Skokie, on Wednesday and Thursday last week. Just randomly shooting.
Take a different approach by leaving free weapons caches at every corner. The higher the thug body count goes, the better off humanity and the gene pool will be.....

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#966504 Aug 19, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Show me the photos.
You saw photo evidence of Obama's life being completely fraudulent last week.
Back your bullshit up.
Want to see the porno pics of Ann Dunham again?
Send me your mother's face & I'll produce lots of photos too.
If you can use proven fake photos, then I can too.

I never said your other posed for pictures. I said she f*cked the entire neighborhood. There were some of the old geezers that looked a lot like you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min Jacques Ottawa 192,257
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 min Go Blue Forever 99,896
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 53,986
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 6,144
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr RACE 5,325
Dear Abby July 3, 2015 1 hr RACE 5
Amy July 3, 2015 3 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages