a non-expert can't testify in court as to the validity of a document. birther lawyers have tried and have been told as much.<quoted text>
Let's take a look at your statement.
You begin by blatantly lying. That obviously fraudulent "birth certificate" has never been submitted in any case. Therefore, it has never been ruled on.
For what you say to be true, that obviously fraudulent birth certificate has to actually be submitted as evidence in a court case. The so-called "birthers" want that document to be submitted as evidence.
So, since you Democrats contend the document is legitimate, how about YOU TELL US WHY OBAMA REFUSES TO SUBMIT THAT "BIRTH CERTIFICATE" AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COURT.
Why is that, dufus? Do you think Obama's lawyers will say and do anything to avoid having to submit that document as evidence because they know it's fraudulent?
As long as that document is on the White House website, it's just propaganda. If it is ever submitted as evidence in any case, a felony will have been committed.
Just submit that document as evidence, dupe. Then, let's see how it's judged.
But, just for today's entertainment, how about you tell us again how a computer-generated signature got on a birth certificate generated in 1961.
so how about you tell us why the birther lawyers can't get a real document expert to testify in court about the 'fake' birth certificate.