Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#962728 Aug 12, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no such thing as a "liberal" media you delusional twit, it's all corporate. The consulting group Global News Intelligence studied the last presidential campaign and came up with the following conclusion;
Those results, after processing 717 articles and 15,357 quotes, are summarized as follows: ""newsmakers appearing in the media as partisan Republicans are quoted at a 44% higher rate than partisan Democrats. Additionally, the ratio of positive to negative coverage was 17.1% more critical of Obama than Romney." Bottom line? "Our data does not support the thesis of a liberal media bias as it relates to Election 2012 coverage." This insider study actually revealed a very real conservative media bias.
Hillary Clinton was just out campaigned by Barack Obama.
But hey, just keep living in your alternate universe Carol.
The liberal media is so far to the left, they'd fall off a map if they were on the edge of one.

Studies have been done that prove the mainstream media gives very little air time to crucial stories - especially about wrongdoing in this administration - compared to other neutral sources.

Studies have been done to prove the mainstream media spends a disproportionate amount of air time reporting negative stories about conservative candidates than liberal ones.

UCLA is one of them - not exactly right leaning.

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bi...
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#962729 Aug 12, 2013
LCNlin wrote:
<quoted text>
Will Carol declare for congress this year. Could strengthen the tea party wing of the ship, doth this ship sink at the moment.
In true tea party fashion she'd be disqualified due to shoddy paperwork.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#962730 Aug 12, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think blacks don't want real jobs, a real education and don't want to be treated like all Americans but stereotypes and voting blocs instead? Is that why they didn't vote for Reagan?
They would rather have high unemployment because of a lack of a real education in some of the worst schools without school choice and don't want to be treated like all Americans but stereotypes and voting blocs instead? Is that why they voted for Obama?
Free housing, free food, free phones, free money and a dependency on others through entitlements is tempting, especially in light of being kept in poverty and uneducated, stereotyped as victims and used as voting blocs. But is that what blacks choose given a choice?
Apparently, it sadly is.
So why is Reagan to blame? And why are conservatives still blamed for offering them equal status, a choice, a better education and a better alternative to poverty and not Democrats who don't?
The White race in America have been taking advantage of free land, free housing, free public education, free money, free phones , free food for over 150 years before African-Americans who were here in America just as long as Whites ,but without being given their U S Constitutional birthright -- they were shared participants with Whites in fighting the British for independence, in the Civil War, settling the West, developing the country into a great political and economic superpower in the 20th century--so isn't it time African-Americans walk side-by-side with Whites as equal citizens?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#962732 Aug 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Learning the truth & becoming educated is not brainwashing, its called being informed.
You should try it.
The sad and dangerous part is there are thousands of "Cheese Thieves" like you RealDave pimping, selling out America at the moment for Money, Power and Votes...

It's the culture...
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#962733 Aug 12, 2013
Homer wrote:
Good morning folks. What has the rightwing retard's dander up on this fine morning?
Wouldn't EVER speak for everyone Homer-but HERE in my little approx rectangular 5'6''x 38"x noneyabiz or so, part of the world-the Humidity is terrible-again-today.

Lawd have mercy.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#962734 Aug 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> The White race in America have been taking advantage of free land, free housing, free public education, free money, free phones , free food for over 150 years before African-Americans who were here in America just as long as Whites ,but without being given their U S Constitutional birthright -- they were shared participants with Whites in fighting the British for independence, in the Civil War, settling the West, developing the country into a great political and economic superpower in the 20th century--so isn't it time African-Americans walk side-by-side with Whites as equal citizens?
You a race pimp peddler and grievance predator...

You an ignorant frontporchreactionary idiot profiteering in racism and hate...

It's the culture...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#962735 Aug 12, 2013
Homer wrote:
Good morning folks. What has the rightwing retard's dander up on this fine morning?
Good Morning Homer,

I like this new approach:

WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department will avoid charging certain low-level and nonviolent drug offenders with crimes that carry mandatory minimums, Attorney General Eric Holder will announce Monday. The policy shift will allow certain defendants -- those without ties to large-scale organizations, gangs or cartels -- to avoid what Holder called "draconian mandatory minimum sentences."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/12/eric...
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#962736 Aug 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Pasthetic
http://www.amazon.co.uk/T-Shirt-transport-Vik...

Row...row...row....(the SHORT and the fake blonde ones are the WORST lol)

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#962737 Aug 12, 2013
Even if Bush's NSA crossed the line, Bush never set the tone to basically give permission to punish his enemies.

And then the strong arm of the IRS under his own IRS appointee doing just that.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#962738 Aug 12, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
The liberal media is so far to the left, they'd fall off a map if they were on the edge of one.
Studies have been done that prove the mainstream media gives very little air time to crucial stories - especially about wrongdoing in this administration - compared to other neutral sources.
Studies have been done to prove the mainstream media spends a disproportionate amount of air time reporting negative stories about conservative candidates than liberal ones.
UCLA is one of them - not exactly right leaning.
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bi...
UCLA Newsroom 2005? Oh please. Your problem is that you want sensationalist witch hunting of the President on all channels as you see on Fox. Not going to happen. Most people are rational.
I just returned from Canada; what a breath of fresh air their news is.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#962739 Aug 12, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think blacks don't want real jobs, a real education and don't want to be treated like all Americans but stereotypes and voting blocs instead? Is that why they didn't vote for Reagan?
They would rather have high unemployment because of a lack of a real education in some of the worst schools without school choice and don't want to be treated like all Americans but stereotypes and voting blocs instead? Is that why they voted for Obama?
Free housing, free food, free phones, free money and a dependency on others through entitlements is tempting, especially in light of being kept in poverty and uneducated, stereotyped as victims and used as voting blocs. But is that what blacks choose given a choice?
Apparently, it sadly is.
So why is Reagan to blame? And why are conservatives still blamed for offering them equal status, a choice, a better education and a better alternative to poverty and not Democrats who don't?
It may have been because of Reagans white supremacy leanings.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#962740 Aug 12, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Even if Bush's NSA crossed the line, Bush never set the tone to basically give permission to punish his enemies.
And then the strong arm of the IRS under his own IRS appointee doing just that.
LOL
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#962741 Aug 12, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>You a race pimp peddler and grievance predator...
You an ignorant frontporchreactionary idiot profiteering in racism and hate...
It's the culture...
Blind and clueless as to the REAL, NON-entitlementaled, actually WORKING class world too.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#962742 Aug 12, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Even if Bush's NSA crossed the line, Bush never set the tone to basically give permission to punish his enemies.
And then the strong arm of the IRS under his own IRS appointee doing just that.
Good point(s)!

(thugs!!!)

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#962743 Aug 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> The White race in America have been taking advantage of free land, free housing, free public education, free money, free phones , free food for over 150 years before African-Americans who were here in America just as long as Whites ,but without being given their U S Constitutional birthright -- they were shared participants with Whites in fighting the British for independence, in the Civil War, settling the West, developing the country into a great political and economic superpower in the 20th century--so isn't it time African-Americans walk side-by-side with Whites as equal citizens?
In the 2000 Consensus:

"White" - A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa and include people who indicate their race as "white" such as Irish, German, Scottish, Italian, Near Easterner, Arab or Polish.

Jews are considered "white" too.

It most definitely is time African-Americans walked side-by-side with whites as equals.

But Democrats don't want that. An educated and prosperous black community might start thinking for themselves and won't need the free stuff anymore. That's how they keep their votes.
PDUPONT

Easthampton, MA

#962744 Aug 12, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a broader terrorist threat now entrenched throughout an “arc of instability”— from South Asia to West Africa - where our diplomatic posts have been closed because of the reported threats.
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-colu...
Guess when Obama closes down 17 embassies throughout the world because of rising threats, it's probably safe to assume terrorism is getting stronger - far from being "decimated" which you believed just to get him reelected.
Hey dumbass! The core of Al Qaeda has been decimated and the organization has been fractured and scattered. Does that mean that they don't pose a threat? No stupid! The embassies weren't actually closed, only non essential personnel were evacuated.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#962745 Aug 12, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
It may have been because of Reagans white supremacy leanings.
Go back and read the posts from last night.

You couldn't be more wrong.

Better yet, read the article written by a liberal columnist, Mark Shields, after his interview with William Franklin "Burgie" Burghardt, one of the two black teammates on Reagan's college football team who he had invited to his parents' home when they were turned away from a hotel.

Burghardt eloquently testified: The Gipper was free of racial prejudice in his personal life."

http://www.noozhawk.com/article/112710_mark_s...

If you do read this, you either like being wrong or don't care if you are.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#962746 Aug 12, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey dumbass! The core of Al Qaeda has been decimated and the organization has been fractured and scattered. Does that mean that they don't pose a threat? No stupid! The embassies weren't actually closed, only non essential personnel were evacuated.
Demeaning others is a sign of insecurity in order to feel better about yourself.

If you can't win an argument without resorting to name calling, you have no argument and use bully tactics to pretend you do.

Just a helpful hint.
Tick Pickering

Reykjavík, Iceland

#962747 Aug 12, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your arguments would go a lot further if you didn't start out every post demeaning everyone who disagree with you.
Bush's NSA was limited to overseas communications between national security enemies and flagged if they were sent to someone here.
This administration thinks his enemies are mostly here. When he says "reward our friends, punish our enemies" and "if they bring a knife, we'll bring a gun", he's not talking about national security enemies. He's talking about us.
Probably because you're a nutty fat whore? You never know what a whore will do when you back her into a corner - where you are now.
Now, as far as what he meant it's pretty clear he was talking about national security but here's a thought: why don't you ask him? I assure you you'll get a prompt reply and then you can disbelieve that and hurry on with your life of paranoid, christian delusion. You clowns got all the guns so you're probably ok anyways, except for your idiot daughter who never quite mastered not looking down the barrel to see if one was loaded.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#962748 Aug 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
How does a university govern dating and marriage, you moron.
In 2000, following a media uproar prompted by the visit of presidential candidate George W. Bush to the university, Bob Jones III abruptly dropped the interracial dating rule, announcing the change on CNN's "Larry King Live". Five years later when asked for his view of the rule change, the current president, Stephen Jones, replied, "I've never been more proud of my dad than the night he...lifted that policy."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Jones_Univer...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Mister Tonka 98,990
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Mothra 50,449
How to stop ants. 2 hr joey 4
I Hate my life and mom (Aug '07) 3 hr Silk 1,754
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 hr Jacques Ottawa 183,888
abby 1-26 4 hr j_m_w 71
Amy 1-29 4 hr Julie 10
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots