Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
poaaddle

Pittsburgh, PA

#961325 Aug 8, 2013
youtube.com/watch... …… Amazing it is a Toad
shrimp_on_treadm ills

Oklahoma City, OK

#961326 Aug 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
i'm sorry, but after a perfunctory Google search, it seems no one is upset about it beyond the right wing nutjob sites.
so where on the internet have you been spending your time?
though how you can think that the tea party isn't full of the same people who opposed civil rights for black people would lead one to think that you probably don't spend much time visiting right wing nutjob sites.
Do you look like an indian, you know Phenotype....or is it one of those gramny told you that you have cherokee cheekbone deals so you ran with it?
Anthony W

New York, NY

#961327 Aug 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
From the Annals of White Crime: Pennsylvania Mass Shooter Rockne Newell is a White Male Domestic Terrorist. When Will White Folks Clean Up Their Own House?
A white man runs amok again. When will the white community have a serious conversation about the violence of its members? Where are the white Don Lemons and white media elites on Fox News and conservative talk radio showing leadership on the frightening trend that is white men committing acts of mass murder and violence in the United States?
White men are approximately 30 percent of the American public, but they account for 70 percent of mass shootings. The pathological mix that is gun culture and imperiled/aggrieved white masculinity is killing people--most of whom are white--yet, the white community looks the other way.
As my Right-wing friends are fond of saying, "what of personal responsibility?"
Of course, when white people commit politically motivated crimes there is no handwringing, introspection, or generalizations made about white folks in mass. As we saw in the aftermath of the Adam Lanza shooting spree, once more the freedom to be white is the freedom to be an individual and to have none of your negative actions reflect anything about the group to which you belong.
....Just as Bill O'Reilly and other white elites did in the aftermath of the Trayvon Martin murder case, where they decided to publicly scold black folks and their "bad culture", we need some black and brown leaders to lecture and truth-tell about the plague of white crime and white domestic terrorism that is imperiling the United States.
Of course, black folks do not have the media platform or authority to lecture white people about the pathological aspects of their culture, or to discuss the reality that is "white crime", as to do so would be "reverse racism" and unkind to the feelings of White America.
White privilege is killing white people. Yet, they choose to stand mute and silent.
http://www.chaunceydevega.com/2013/08/from-an...
Oh my or as we liberal elites say in New York, ouy vey.

All I can say is when in Chi Town, Obama's Hood, I only want Huma and the baby to shop here where most are white and voted for Romney:
http://www.oakbrookcenter.com/
Note the high proportion of children born IN wedlock.

Compared to the Obama voting consitituents, here:
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/433...
Note that 76% of this crowd does not know the name of their father.

As a card carrying Democrat, when in public I have to deny that the only muteness and silence is from the media who under reports such things, unless they come across a rare white on black crime they use promote to fan the flames, no pun towards Obama intended.

By the way, were you in the second video, and maybe took a day off from posting?
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#961328 Aug 8, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>... and the t-p is only making things worse.
They really are political terrorists.
The tea party dirt bags have traded whatever manners they learned as children and the patience they practiced later in life for pure verbal and electronic hatred.

The TP pukes are taking over city and county commission meetings and ruining the experience found in serving through civic organizations.

It's like the fks all have a permanent case of the black azz__everything's in the shttr for them since the nih-nih-nih came to town.

I've begun calling all the TP folks that I encounter Carol.
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#961329 Aug 8, 2013
WOW wrote:
US Growth and Jobs Figures Point to Continuing Economic Breakdown
As usual WOW your FOX has lied to you once again. Here is how the economy is actually shaping up.
The Congressional Budget Office said the 2013 fiscal deficit would fall to about $642 billion, or 4 percent of G.D.P., about $200 billion less than it estimated just three months ago.
WASHINGTON — Since the recession ended four years ago, the federal budget deficit has topped $1 trillion every year. But now the government’s annual deficit is shrinking far faster than anyone in Washington expected, and perhaps even faster than many economists think is advisable for the health of the economy.
The agency forecast that the deficit, which topped 10 percent of gross domestic product in 2009, could shrink to as little as 2.1 percent of gross domestic product by 2015 — a level that most analysts say would be easily sustainable over the long run — before beginning to climb gradually through the rest of the decade.
"Revenues have been strong as the economy has outperformed a bit," said Joel Prakken, a founder of Macroeconomic Advisers, a forecasting firm based in St. Louis.
Over all, the figures demonstrate how the economic recovery has begun to refill the government’s coffers. At the same time, Washington, despite its republican political paralysis.
Republicans say perhaps too successful. Given that the economy continues to perform well below its potential and that unemployment has so far failed to fall below 7.5 percent, many economists are cautioning that the deficit is coming down too fast, too soon.
“It’s good news for the budget deficit and bad news for the jobs deficit,” said Jared Bernstein of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.{R}
“I’m more worried about the latter.” OOOHHH scary..
Now Obama is showing his democratic colors of success in financials. With the government running a hefty $113 billion surplus in the tax payment month of April, according to the Treasury, analysts now do not expect the country to run out of room under its debt ceiling.
The $200 billion reduction to the estimated deficit comes not from the $85 billion in mandatory cuts known as sequestration, nor from the package of tax increases that Congress passed this winter to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff. The office had already incorporated those policy changes in its February forecast.
Republicans want Congress to agree for this year to serving as a partial brake on the recovery, cutting government jobs and preventing growth from accelerating to a more robust pace, many economists have warned. The International Monetary Fund has called the country’s pace of deficit reduction “overly strong,” arguing that Washington should delay some of its budget cuts while adopting a longer-term strategy to hold down future deficits.{R} Typical, small minds for small growth..
CBO is revising its estimates for the current year, the budget office also cut its projections of the 10-year cumulative deficit by $618 billion. Those longer-term adjustments are mostly a result of smaller projected outlays for the entitlement programs of Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare, as well as smaller interest payments on the debt. The C.B.O. has quietly erased hundreds of billions of dollars in projected government health spending over the last few years.
It did so again on Tuesday. In February, the budget office projected that the United States would spend about $8.1 trillion on Medicare and $4.4 trillion on Medicaid over the next 10 fiscal years. It now projects it will spend $7.9 trillion on Medicare and $4.3 trillion on Medicaid.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#961330 Aug 8, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah but it sounds a lot more nefarious if you say unions are exempt as a political favor/payback.
They are....
WOW

Bronx, NY

#961331 Aug 8, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
As usual WOW your FOX has lied to you once again. Here is how the economy is actually shaping up.
The Congressional Budget Office said the 2013 fiscal deficit would fall to about $642 billion, or 4 percent of G.D.P., about $200 billion less than it estimated just three months ago.
WASHINGTON — Since the recession ended four years ago, the federal budget deficit has topped $1 trillion every year. But now the government’s annual deficit is shrinking far faster than anyone in Washington expected, and perhaps even faster than many economists think is advisable for the health of the economy.
The agency forecast that the deficit, which topped 10 percent of gross domestic product in 2009, could shrink to as little as 2.1 percent of gross domestic product by 2015 — a level that most analysts say would be easily sustainable over the long run — before beginning to climb gradually through the rest of the decade.
"Revenues have been strong as the economy has outperformed a bit," said Joel Prakken, a founder of Macroeconomic Advisers, a forecasting firm based in St. Louis.
Over all, the figures demonstrate how the economic recovery has begun to refill the government’s coffers. At the same time, Washington, despite its republican political paralysis.
Republicans say perhaps too successful. Given that the economy continues to perform well below its potential and that unemployment has so far failed to fall below 7.5 percent, many economists are cautioning that the deficit is coming down too fast, too soon.
“It’s good news for the budget deficit and bad news for the jobs deficit,” said Jared Bernstein of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.{R}
“I’m more worried about the latter.” OOOHHH scary..
Now Obama is showing his democratic colors of success in financials. With the government running a hefty $113 billion surplus in the tax payment month of April, according to the Treasury, analysts now do not expect the country to run out of room under its debt ceiling.
The $200 billion reduction to the estimated deficit comes not from the $85 billion in mandatory cuts known as sequestration, nor from the package of tax increases that Congress passed this winter to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff. The office had already incorporated those policy changes in its February forecast.
Republicans want Congress to agree for this year to serving as a partial brake on the recovery, cutting government jobs and preventing growth from accelerating to a more robust pace, many economists have warned. The International Monetary Fund has called the country’s pace of deficit reduction “overly strong,” arguing that Washington should delay some of its budget cuts while adopting a longer-term strategy to hold down future deficits.{R} Typical, small minds for small growth..
CBO is revising its estimates for the current year, the budget office also cut its projections of the 10-year cumulative deficit by $618 billion. Those longer-term adjustments are mostly a result of smaller projected outlays for the entitlement programs of Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare, as well as smaller interest payments on the debt. The C.B.O. has quietly erased hundreds of billions of dollars in projected government health spending over the last few years.
It did so again on Tuesday. In February, the budget office projected that the United States would spend about $8.1 trillion on Medicare and $4.4 trillion on Medicaid over the next 10 fiscal years. It now projects it will spend $7.9 trillion on Medicare and $4.3 trillion on Medicaid.
I really dont use fox I use academic indiependent education sites so your brand of information doesnt help anyone because it sell POLITICAL GARBAGE
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#961332 Aug 8, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I know, it is lame to twist quotes to suit your agenda and I'm reluctant to point out such trivialities but I'm just tryin' to help.
Here, from a transcript posted at the Politico, is what Obama actually said about the need to deepen certain coastal ports:

quote:
Q. You mentioned infrastructure. Why is that a partisan issue? I live in a town, the bridge is falling apart, it’s not safe. How does that become Republican or Democrat? How do you not just fix the bridge?(Laughter and applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: I don't know. As you know, for the last three years, I’ve said, let’s work together. Let’s find a financing mechanism and let’s go ahead and fix our bridges, fix our roads, sewer systems, our ports. The Panama is being widened so that these big supertankers can come in. Now, that will be finished in 2015. If we don't deepen our ports all along the Gulf — places like Charleston, South Carolina, or Savannah, Georgia, or Jacksonville, Florida — if we don't do that, those ships are going to go someplace else. And we’ll lose jobs. Businesses won’t locate here.

The only conceivable way to interpret what Obama actually said is that the ports of Charleston, Savannah, and Jacksonville are "along the Gulf" of Mexico. Of course, these ports are really on the Atlantic Ocean.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#961333 Aug 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
i'm sorry, but after a perfunctory Google search, it seems no one is upset about it beyond the right wing nutjob sites.
so where on the internet have you been spending your time?
though how you can think that the tea party isn't full of the same people who opposed civil rights for black people would lead one to think that you probably don't spend much time visiting right wing nutjob sites.
NO BIGOT IT's A SHAME THAT THE ELDER STATES MAN CHARLES RANGEL THE WAR HERO AND CHAMPION WHO WAS THROWN UNDER THE BUS BY OBAMA BECAUSE OF HIS ON SET DEMTIA IS ALLOWED TO EMBARRASS HIS COMMUNITY WITH THAT VERY BIGGOTTED STATEMENT STOP USING BLACK PEOPLES VOICES AS IF ITS YOUR OWN WE DONT SPEAK WITH ONE VOICE I NEVER SUPPORTED THE TWANA BRAWLY NONSENSE SO STOP IT YOU BIGOTS
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#961334 Aug 8, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
... but that wasn't your point was it? Your point was to deny any such cuts took place.
If you return to Galt's original post, Galt was very careful to refer to "tax rate cuts" for the middle class, of which there were none. The payroll tax rate was not reduced, but a portion just temporarily suspended.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#961335 Aug 8, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>it's so perplexing that right wing crazies have a 'kill all muslims' mentality, then balk at it being an American overseas, but have no problems with it with an American in the US.
They want to 'protect' an American's rights overseas, but are will to put it aside for a Muslim in America.
Such a confused bunch!
Not long ago a ship owned by a Danish Co.(Maersk) yet staffed with an American crew was commandeered by pirates off Somalia. The 70 year old motor mach from Lake Helen Florida foiled the takeover by locking the engine room doors and having the below deck crew disperse and hide.

Navy Seals were dropped in and everyone lived happily ever after__except for the pirates who received 50 cal sniper wounds to their foreheads.

Somalian pirates don't fk with Russian, Chinese, Korean and especially Malaysian ships preferring to attack ships registered in nations known to obey maritime laws.

Russian ships run in close to Somalia in hopes that pirates will come near enough to use for target practice.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#961336 Aug 8, 2013
OBAMAS MANDATE FROM HIS MASTERS WAIT TILL HIS LAWS ARE USED ON THE URBAN DEMOCRATS WHEN HE LEAVES OFFICE BIGOTS YOU WILL CRY I WONT USE THE LAWS I SIGNED U.S. Government May – On a Whim – Label ANY American a Terrorist
Government Blurs the Lines Between Bad Guys and Average Americans
Former NSA boss Michael Hayden compared privacy advocates to terrorists:

“If and when our government grabs Edward Snowden, and brings him back here to the United States for trial, what does this group do?” said retired air force general Michael Hayden, who from 1999 to 2009 ran the NSA and then the CIA, referring to “nihilists, anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who haven’t talked to the opposite sex in five or six years”.

“They may want to come after the US government, but frankly, you know, the dot-mil stuff is about the hardest target in the United States,” Hayden said, using a shorthand for US military networks.“So if they can’t create great harm to dot-mil, who are they going after? Who for them are the World Trade Centers? The World Trade Centers, as they were for al-Qaida.”

Hayden provided his speculation during a speech on cybersecurity to a Washington group, the Bipartisan Policy Center, in which he confessed to being deliberately provocative.

Similarly, Slate reported last year:

If you’ve ever cared about privacy while using the Internet in public, you might be a terrorist. At least that’s the message from the FBI and Justice Department’s Communities Against Terrorism initiative. The project created flyers to help employees at several types of businesses—including military surplus stores, financial institutions, and even tattoo shops—recognize “warning signs” of terrorism or extremism. An admirable goal, perhaps, but the execution is flawed—particularly for the flyers intended to help suss out terrorists using Internet cafes.

The flyers haven’t been publicly available online, but Public Intelligence, a project promoting the right to access information, collected 25 documents that it found elsewhere on the Web. As Public Intelligence puts it,“Do you like online privacy? You may be a terrorist.”

ALL UNDER THE 44 PRESIDENT OF AMERICA BARACK HUSSAIN OBAMA
WOW

Bronx, NY

#961337 Aug 8, 2013
FOX AND CNN OWNED BY MEMBERS OF THE SAME CLUB THE BILLIONAIRES club ARE ANY OF YOU A MEMBER IF NOT YOU ARE BEING USED YOUR THOUGHTS are packaged for you nothing is better but you argue who is worst you vote for who is less worst and not look for who is best you vote the less evil so you support evil
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#961338 Aug 8, 2013
WOW wrote:
<quoted text>I really dont use fox I use academic indiependent education sites so your brand of information doesnt help anyone because it sell POLITICAL GARBAGE
As usual WOW is naïve if we don’t see all his A La Propaganda comes from the same source regardless how many right wing tabloids he hides under his comments. Here this is what facts look like .
Want to make money on stock markets?
How to go long on Markets. Simply observe the party in power.{R right wing} Play Bear ,{D left wing} Play Bull simple as that.
A mathematical investigation was produced by the statisticians Pedro Santa Clara and Rossen Valkanov that exposes the superior performance of the stock markets under democrats. That this is but one example of the democrat’s superiority, as there are more.
Their study encompasses 80 years. Study demonstrates systematically and positively surprised by democratic policies. Comparing the stewardship of the two parties. They calculated each economic indicator as an “annual average” during the democrats and republicans of their economic stewardship of their 40 years each. Turns out to be a landslide for democrats providing beneficial returns to the nation. One example; Democrat’s presided over a very respectable average annual compound return of 9.60% during their 40 years where in as republicans averaged a dismal 0.58%.
Consider this; a 401K plan invested in stocks and had a value of $100,000 at the beginning of the 40 years. Democrats would accumulate in compound interest $ 3,912,210 where in as republicans would only produce $126,027 . Another example; “IF” an employee were to invest $5,000 per year into their 401K for 40 years in a democratic stewardship the employee would have $1,985,526 in the bank. Where as the republican would produce a dismal $224,375.
That republicans advocate that they are good for businesses is false as compared to the democrats
Another interesting fact emerges within the statistical study. The income gap between the 99% and the top 1% has widened considerably under republicans. Averaging .49% as compared to the democrat’s .41% That is to say under republicans the income gap in 40 years, widened by 19.6% and narrowed 16.4%. Resulting in a 36% difference.
LOL on debt republicans increased debt by 2.5 times greater than that of the democrats. Republicans $7.1 Trillion vs. the democrats $2.8 Trillion.
GOP’s Self-Proclamation for economic dominance; in fact it is a misnomer to call the GOP a fiscal responsible party and or a smaller government, when in fact the contrary is true.
Obama’s administration indicates he sought the great leaders on these issue. Eccles and FDR, Clinton and O’Neill to do what is most productive for our nation.
Now pass on this one small example of the fallacies of the republican’s erroneous policies and deceptions..
.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#961339 Aug 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Reagan raised taxes 11 times.
Reagan recovery.
The DemoKKKrat Congress raised taxes while Reagan was President.

Unlike Obama, Reagan had the ability to work with others to move the economy ahead.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#961340 Aug 8, 2013
ALL DURING OBAMAS PRESIDENCY DHS ‘Constitution Free’ Zones Inside US Ignored By Media
In what should be front page news blasted out nationwide as a breaking news alert, the DHS has openly established extensive ‘Constitution free zones’ in which your Fourth Amendment does not exist.

It’s not ‘conspiracy’ and it’s not fraud, the DHS has literally created an imaginary ‘border’ within the United States that engulfs 100 miles from every single end of the nation. Within this fabricated ‘border’, the DHS can search your electronic belongings for no reason. We’re talking about no suspicion, no reasonable cause, nothing. No reason whatsoever is required under their own regulations. The DHS is now above the Constitution under their own rules, and even Wired magazine authors were amazed at the level of pure tyranny going on here.

OBAMA WAS SELECTED BECAUSE OF HIS LACK OF EMPATHY REMEMBER HE TOLD BUSH BEFORE YOU LEAVE OFFICE YOU BETTER SIGN THAT BAILOUT THATS WHY HE WAS SELECTED FOR THE 44 PRESIDENT BUSH WAS TOO SOFT THATS WHY CHENY HATED HIM lolololOBAMAS THE BEST CHEANY COULD HOPE DREAMS OF OBAMA DICK CHENY LOVES HIM GO IN THE BACK ROOM AND SEE A DIFFERENT OBAMA

Since: Aug 13

Kansas City, MO

#961341 Aug 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Only fools think that they can get something for nothing, like ObamaKKKare.
Good sources. Please wipe and wash your hands after you get more facts.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#961342 Aug 8, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>And yet, the BoA article clearly indicates what's happening in the real world!
Have you heard? JPM is now being investigated by the SEC for the same mortgage fraud!
Seems to me capitalism is at work again!
Pseudo Liberals within the Federal Government are still deseperate & nervous right now and are trying to hang anybody the can in their sideshow to divert the attention away from what they and the Clinton Adminstration were involved in & did plus you can't prosecute people that were operating under Federal Law that was changed by the Clinton Administration and Congress besides it was the Clinton Adminstration & the other Pseudo Liberals within Congress at the time that had different Ideas how Socialism should work & function which is what caused the Financial Crisis to begin with and were in charge of the Federal Government and involved economically and if these people get prosecuted then people within the Clinton Adminstration will have to be prosecuted too since they were involved and ordered the SEC which is another product of Socialism to look the other way of Wall Street activities which was ordered by the Clinton Adminstration and why nothing was done to Bernie Maddoff too because beginning in 2000 which the SEC was still under the control of the Clinton Administration Harry Markopolos alerted the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Bernie Madoff's Ponzi Scheme formally more than once about Bernie Madoff Ponzi Scheme and the SEC did nothing because were order not to inforce SEC Regulations of Wall Street Activities because the economy looked good and the hell with ethics is the way Clinton Adminstration looked at it.
shrimp_on_treadm ills

Oklahoma City, OK

#961343 Aug 8, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>... and the t-p is only making things worse.
They really are political terrorists.
you bumbling idiot.

Did towns have to set up 'RAPE' tents when the Tea Party held rallies?
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#961344 Aug 8, 2013
Like WOW never addresses facts that are laid on him. Just evades, distracts with no substance or facts. Learned that in the Foxy den of his masters.
I was against invading Iraq from the start. This solidified my speculation the republicans have imperialist dreams. Reminded me of Vietnam when Nixon crossed the line and started to invade Laos and Cambodia. Ironically both republican administrations had blank checks for their wars with no exit strategy. Now I speculate the other two infamous republican fiascos. 1st being the 1929 Great Depression and the 2nd , 2008 Great Recession. Little bit of research and the same principles for these destructive economic results were due to rise in inequality and deregulation.
Putting all of this together I get imperialism ambitious ideologies manifesting with the republican party. Then discovering present republicans ambitions for inequality to our economics solidified that I’m correct as to their goals. The Tea was the glazing that made it obvious to the naked truth of what they represent.
UN’s Gini observation for a nation’s inequality in economics distributions supports my contentions. USA presently is at .47 up from our 1980 .4 status to inequality to the populace. Sweden is .3 Netherlands .31 for a couple of examples. Africa and Latino America .5 and above. Scale is defined as 1 being complete inequality and 0 being totally equal..47 and increasing puts us in the neighborhood of Turkey and Iran. Higher the inequality the higher the probability for the formation of oligarchies with their tyrants and dictators, emperors, etc. etc…
2014 coming up ladies and gentlemen your choice.. No vote will only allow this inequality to further increase. Vote for inequality will accelerate it. Vote for more equality and it may slow it down for the wealth of propaganda is with the oligarchies, at the present. Push for inequality has been going on for over a century. It will take some time to bring it to a standard of .3 .

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min wojar 182,280
Holiday Greetings 23 min Daddy Warbucks 4
Chicago police stop black motorists more, ACLU ... 28 min ProfilingNecessary 10
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 41 min Mister Tonka 98,886
Chicagoa s 2014 murder total on track for anoth... 52 min Did enuf die 6
Amy 12-28-14 55 min Mister Tonka 10
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr JOEL 71,301
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:01 pm PST

ESPN 3:01PM
Bears' Forte sets record for receptions by RB
Bleacher Report 3:21 PM
Mike Zimmer, Vikings Defense Get Last Laugh in Season's Final Game
ESPN 3:30 PM
Bears' Trestman expects to return in 2015
Bleacher Report 4:34 PM
Did Suh Intentionally Step on Rodgers?
Bleacher Report 5:12 PM
Indianapolis Colts Cap Season with Fitting AFC South Sweep