Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 43,944)

Showing posts 878,861 - 878,880 of1,077,634
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956780
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wonder if Obama's father abandoning both him and his mother has anything to do with his lying disorder and resentment - and the fact his father was black and his mother was white drives his deep desire to create racial division.
Very complex man with complicated issues, this president.
Yeah...

Right....

Whatever....
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956781
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>That's the best you have in your quiver, Yeahoo? You keep telling us to leave our birthright country. You're the squatter, and you and your lieberal opinions prove it with every post..
lol! Son, you shouldn't talk since you've proven you're deficient in the US Constitution!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956782
Jul 30, 2013
 
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Look it up. Your knowledge of bankruptcy sucks.
It's amazing how you people demand others looks up points you bring up to support your positions.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956783
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>You mean the same 'train wreck' in our unsustainable healthcare system that all healthcare professionals decried BEFORE the Obamacare reform bill was finally passed by Congress.
We ALL decried a broken health care system long before Obamacare. Physicians stopped "decrying" and are just throwing in the towel.

Did you read my posts explaining why health care costs are so insanely outrageous and that's the pink elephant everyone is pretending not to see?

Or do you just like chasing your tail trying to fix the wrong problem like so many others are doing of which Obama is the prime example?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956784
Jul 30, 2013
 
Just two weeks after Janet Napolitano announced her resignation as Secretary of Homeland Security, the Congressional Black Caucus has suggested Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Houston fill her spot.

A letter dated July 25 and signed by Rep. Marcia Fudge, Ohio Democrat and caucus chairwoman, urges President Obama to consider Miss Jackson Lee for the position, calling the Democrat a “voice of reason” that the agency could stand to gain, the Houston Chronicle reported.

“Representative Jackson Lee would serve as an effective DHS Secretary because she understands the importance of increasing border security and maintaining homeland security,” the letter reads.

Mrs. Jackson Lee currently serves as a ranking member of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security, a position that the caucus said she “stands as a strong and honest ‘voice of reason.’”

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956785
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Carol is not suggesting anything of the kind. It's all in your head.
Lowering health care costs which is still the pink elephant in the room that everyone is squeezing around and pretending not to see would make insurance much more affordable.
Most Americans don't mind paying a little more for those who are truly needy. Safety nets are always going to be in place.
But a heck of a lot more people could afford health insurance IF it was more affordable.
When Dem suggested your daughter might need surgery and not have in insurance you said she would get treated for free if she couldn't pay. By "free" you mean other customers of the health care system will pay for it.

Liar AND socialist.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956786
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Very few people under the age of 40 believe they will ever receive any Social Security benefits and they resent paying the tax.
lol! Is this something you want others to look up to support your claim?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956787
Jul 30, 2013
 
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Christians have always believed that they were better because they would be the only ones going to heaven for believing in Jesus Christ as GOD than any other religion converts. But, we still work with them and cooperate on solving problems in society.
I have my own personal beliefs about who may receive a rewarding afterlife, and like most people I know it differs from the doctrine you think is manifest.

I'd like to know where you "work with them ans cooperate on solving problems in society". Sounds like a very small and inocuous place that is disconnected from the real world... like Utopia.
Do you mutilate your daughters' vaginas?

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956788
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Donal Trump and Warren Buffet each carry billionS worth of term life__what sort of wealthy people are "you" referring to?
He's not the brightest bulb on the tree. He continually makes statements he can't back up. That's what happens when one puts more faith in personal opinions than facts.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956789
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Using a conservative claim to support your claim doesn't help your case.
they provide the link if you look and takes you right to the Social Security Website where it states

Background to the Case:

The fact that workers contribute to the Social Security program's funding through a dedicated payroll tax establishes a unique connection between those tax payments and future benefits. More so than general federal income taxes can be said to establish "rights" to certain government services. This is often expressed in the idea that Social Security benefits are "an earned right." This is true enough in a moral and political sense. But like all federal entitlement programs, Congress can change the rules regarding eligibility--and it has done so many times over the years. The rules can be made more generous, or they can be made more restrictive. Benefits which are granted at one time can be withdrawn, as for example with student benefits, which were substantially scaled-back in the 1983 Amendments.

There has been a temptation throughout the program's history for some people to suppose that their FICA payroll taxes entitle them to a benefit in a legal, contractual sense. That is to say, if a person makes FICA contributions over a number of years, Congress cannot, according to this reasoning, change the rules in such a way that deprives a contributor of a promised future benefit. Under this reasoning, benefits under Social Security could probably only be increased, never decreased, if the Act could be amended at all. Congress clearly had no such limitation in mind when crafting the law. Section 1104 of the 1935 Act, entitled "RESERVATION OF POWER," specifically said: "The right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision of this Act is hereby reserved to the Congress." Even so, some have thought that this reservation was in some way unconstitutional. This is the issue finally settled by Flemming v. Nestor.

In this 1960 Supreme Court decision Nestor's denial of benefits was upheld even though he had contributed to the program for 19 years and was already receiving benefits. Under a 1954 law, Social Security benefits were denied to persons deported for, among other things, having been a member of the Communist party. Accordingly, Mr. Nestor's benefits were terminated. He appealed the termination arguing, among other claims, that promised Social Security benefits were a contract and that Congress could not renege on that contract. In its ruling, the Court rejected this argument and established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not contractual right.

http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956790
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> More baloney. There is no reason to be;eve SS will disappear in 25 years.
Throughout its history, adjustments have been made just like there will be now. Just think in 5 years most baby boomers will likely be dead.
Dumbass Dave hits a new low in studipity considering that baby boomers range in age from 47 to 67.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956791
Jul 30, 2013
 
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
An "outside-the-box" idea for redevelopment of Detroit.
http://birmingham.patch.com/groups/editors-pi...
I saw that and think its a great idea that'll never happen. However, this is happening already:

http://blightbustersdetroit.com/
LCN Llin

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956792
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

President George Bush shows up at the White House with his father, President G H W Bush. Both seem to enjoy President Obama.

Neither attended the Republican convention of 2012.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956793
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>You're sounding a lot like Michelle Bachmann lately doll__are your drugs misfiring?
You really don't know much, do you? If you don't know the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons of this world make a killing on keeping racial division alive and well, you're sounding a lot like Homer Simpson.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956794
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Activist Son of Key Racist Leader Renounces White Nationalism

“I can’t support a movement that tells me I can’t be a friend to whomever I wish or that other people’s races requires me to think about them in a certain way or be suspicious of their advancements,” Black wrote toward the end of his four-page statement.“Minorities must have the ability to rise to positions of power, and many supposed ‘race’ issues are in fact issues of structural oppression, poor educational prospects, and limited opportunity. The differences I thought I observed didn’t go nearly as deeply as I imagined. I believe we can move beyond the sort of mind-boggling emphasis white nationalism puts on maintaining an oppressive, exclusive sense of identity — oppressive for others and stifling for our society.”

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/07/17/acti...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956796
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
When Dem suggested your daughter might need surgery and not have in insurance you said she would get treated for free if she couldn't pay. By "free" you mean other customers of the health care system will pay for it.
Liar AND socialist.
I never said anything of the kind. Go back to sleep. Or drink some more coffee before posting again.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956797
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

John Galt wrote:
Just two weeks after Janet Napolitano announced her resignation as Secretary of Homeland Security, the Congressional Black Caucus has suggested Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Houston fill her spot.
A letter dated July 25 and signed by Rep. Marcia Fudge, Ohio Democrat and caucus chairwoman, urges President Obama to consider Miss Jackson Lee for the position, calling the Democrat a “voice of reason” that the agency could stand to gain, the Houston Chronicle reported.
“Representative Jackson Lee would serve as an effective DHS Secretary because she understands the importance of increasing border security and maintaining homeland security,” the letter reads.
Mrs. Jackson Lee currently serves as a ranking member of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security, a position that the caucus said she “stands as a strong and honest ‘voice of reason.’”
Oh hell no! Not that loon!!!
LCN Llin

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956798
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Recently heard a Muslim Middle Eastern expert explain that most radical Islamists are uneducated and can't read. The only way they can feel relevant in today's world is through violence and terrorism.
Made a lot of sense to me.
"Recently heard ..."
This a funny generalization,as generalization go.
You may be fooled easily if this "Made a lot of sense ".

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956799
Jul 30, 2013
 
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
An "outside-the-box" idea for redevelopment of Detroit.
http://birmingham.patch.com/groups/editors-pi...
I shouldn't say "never", I think its an idea that will happen, I just don't think we're there yet. I think the information economy will cause central government authority to become obsolete and this is the sort of thing that may replace it, at least in some places.

Meanwhile, Manning verdict due this afternoon.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#956800
Jul 30, 2013
 
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
A surgeon's expertise should be compensated just like any medical physician who spent years in school and in residency to become a doctor.
But the attitudes in the medical profession, inflated egos and apathy, sometimes peaks even before a medical student becomes a full-fledged doctor.
And unnecessary tests and procedures are done on a routine "knee-jerk reflex" basis because of the fear of being frivolously sued.
Few people respect the medical profession anymore. There's a good reason for that.
A hospital admission just means everyone can get on board the gravy train - and many do. Specialty doctors are called in for "consults" and get paid just for dictating something in your chart whether they actually treated you or not.
This is not how it's supposed to work.
Just eliminating the outrageous costs of medical supplies and unnecessary tests alone would reduce costs. Making insurance competitive nationwide is another.
But very few surgeons and specialist are worth the god-awful amounts of money the insurances pays them and patients getting stuck with the rest of an outrageous bill.
Doctors used to work for a chicken. It's supposed to be "a calling". Not an insurance Ponzi scheme.
Gimme a number for earnings, not a speech.

Or break it down to one procedure; how much should an orthopedic surgeon be paid to repair a badly fractured ankle requiring plates, pins, screws, etc? Just his fee, not the hospital cost.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 878,861 - 878,880 of1,077,634
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

96 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Rogue Scholar 05 174,382
Thousands march in downtown Chicago in support ... 9 min Garry Ackerman 2
Music Artists A to Z 11 min not a ghost 256
No people will be punchlines in 'Racist Jokes 101' 16 min Huh 5
Fun Song Combos (Sep '12) 17 min not a ghost 358
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 21 min not a ghost 1,102
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 24 min not a ghost 7,696
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••