Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1277522 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#956804 Jul 30, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see...
Providing food and buying their oil. Oh, yeah. I can see where that would piss them off.
Installing the Shah. Let's count the bodies from the Shah's era and compare that to the mountain of corpses the mullahs stacked up. Yeah. I can see where not letting a murderous horde take over a country would piss them off. Let's count the middle class Iranians in universities here and in Europe when the Shah ran Iran, and compare that to the number of middle class Iranians being educated in western universities today. Yeah. I can see where educating the population would piss them off.
"targetted by Islam"
Let's take a look at where Islam borders the rest of the world and compare that with your idiocy. How about we start with Morocco.
Morocco sends terrorists into Spain.
Algeria is separated from the rest of the world by the Mediterranean Sea.
Lybia is a source for international terrorists.
Egypt is routinely at war with Israel.
The entire border of Israel is a war zone.
Lebanon is a war zone.
They had to build a wall across Cyprus to separate the Islamists from everyone else.
The Balkans.
No war across the Black Sea.
Georgia and Daghestan.
No war across the Caspian Sea.
Iran...
Afghanistan...
Pakistan is at war with India routinely.
No war across the Indian Ocean.
You fucking idiots don't see that Islam finds some reason to be at war with every goddam thing it is in contact with.
The only reason they are at war with us is we exist. If we didn't exist, they would be at war with whatever other country occupied our place in the world, which is superior to their place, which is the real reason Islam is at war with everything it is in contact with.
I know y'all have a problem with perspective. Perspective is fundamental to International Relations. You look at everything from a US-centric perspective and the rest of the world has their own. You're not the only one, Carol's one of the worst. Everything is viewed from a late-20th Century, middle-class, white, american, female perspective.

That's pretty narrow.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#956805 Jul 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Recently heard a Muslim Middle Eastern expert explain that most radical Islamists are uneducated and can't read. The only way they can feel relevant in today's world is through violence and terrorism.
Made a lot of sense to me.
And somehow they managed to gain control of the Arab world.
Yes, my observations from living there are similar. They are sufficiently numerous to propel the powers that be there into power.
The Wahhabists have regained control of everything they lost after 9/11(2001), and added to that.
I was not too surprised when the army in Egypt threw the Muslim Brotherhood out on its ass. It was the Muslim Brotherhood inside the Egyptian army that assassinated Sadat. After that the Egyptian army was thoroughly purged of them.
It's ironic, but the best hope for a republican form of government in Egypt is the army there. The Muslim Brotherhood had only one thing in mind, to eliminate any other faction. That's why the Egyptian army stepped in.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#956806 Jul 30, 2013
Reza Aslan, Fox News, and Bulverism

You’ve probably seen a clip of it already: Fox News aired a cringe-worthy interview of the author of the latest Jesus tell-all book on Friday, much to the delight of many on the internet. In the now-viral interview, Fox News anchor and religion correspondent Lauren Green shows zero interest in the arguments or content of scholar Reza Aslan’s new book Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth.

Instead, she leads off the interview with “You’re a Muslim, so why did you write a book about the founder of Christianity?” Aslan’s eyebrows threaten to rise right off of his face, but he comports himself honorably in a painful ten-minute conversation that never moves past this misguided line of questioning:“It still begs the question though, why would you be interested in the founder of Christianity?”

But even if Green’s line of questioning weren’t laced with xenophobia, ignorant about the purpose of scholarship, or breathtakingly incurious, it would still be problematic. There is a deeper philosophical problem behind focusing on the fact that Aslan is a Muslim.

Let’s suppose for the sake of argument the following: Reza Aslan brings personal biases and prejudices from his Muslim faith to his study of the historical Jesus; the liberal media is breathlessly excited by Aslan’s book, even though it merely rehashes debates that have been going on in historical Jesus studies for decades, because that media tends to be hostile to traditional Christian faith.

In fact, there may very well be reason to believe those things. But to think that they have anything to do with the merits of Aslan’s arguments about Jesus is to engage in a logical fallacy that C.S. Lewis called Bulverism. He explains:

You must show that a man is wrong before you start explaining why he is wrong. The modern method is to assume without discussion that he is wrong and then distract his attention from this (the only real issue) by busily explaining how he became so silly… Assume that your opponent is wrong, and explain his error, and the world will be at your feet. Attempt to prove that he is wrong or (worse still) try to find out whether he is wrong or right, and the national dynamism of our age will thrust you to the wall.

Bulverism a great way to score points while getting no closer to the truth, and it comprises perhaps 95% of writing about religion on the internet.

If you’re actually interested in Zealot, you shouldn’t care about Aslan, or Fox, but about the man from Galilee: what was he like? what did he teach? was he the Christ? If you’re looking for answers to that question, Aslan’s Muslim faith, Fox’s hostility, and any number of dreary facts about America’s cultural grievances are strictly irrelevant.

Textual criticism and and historical methodology can be boring and hard. Questioning motives and feigning outrage is always fun and easy, and serves as a particularly shallow way for people to engage in intellectual triage. That’s why interesting subjects only suffer when they get dragged into the culture wars.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/bulver...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956807 Jul 30, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Yet they do don't they? Sex is the poor mans opera.
Can't help those who cannot help themselves.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#956808 Jul 30, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
His philosophy on life is easy enough to understand. He's somewhere between a leech and a sponge.
So, this is why Ronald Reagan was a 'leech and a sponge' He never said anything original and took advantage of other peoples misfortune to advance his own political career. You can see the proof in his 1980 Presidential campaign that started off in Philadelphia, Mississippi(the place where three civil rights workers in the Mississippi Summer Project of 1964-two Jews and a Black, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and James Chaney-had been murdered). Reagan wasn't there to support civil rights ,but side with the states rights to remain racially segregated. Reagan's visit to Bitburg Cemetery ( the place where many Nazis SS members were buried) further revealed his moral callousness.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#956809 Jul 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> You just forgot your hero Dumbwaiter said Islam, not radical Islam.
It was understood. But you go ahead and chase another squirrel up the wrong tree.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956810 Jul 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
I recently had to have an emergent appendectomy. The surgeon's fee alone was over $5000. The hospital bill for a two-night stay was almost the same. Fortunately, we have good insurance through my husband's employer and the surgeon and most of the hospital bill was paid in full.
But what if we didn't have good insurance or didn't have $10,000 just laying around just to take out my appendix?
When does one's expertise cross the line into exploiting and abusing a broken system?
It would seem $5000 would be more than compensatory for both the surgeon's expertise and the two-night hospital stay.
Hospitals are raking in the dough hand-over-fist. Insurance companies have to pay the crux of this medical scam and why medical insurance is so friggin' unaffordable for a lot of people.
How much were the surgeon and the hospital actually paid?

How much is your life worth?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#956811 Jul 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
SPEs have been utilized for years.
But hey, you are progressing. No longer blaming the CRA. Now you are blaming the institutions who bundled bad loans & bought AAA credit ratings for them. Now, if you only could understand that all sub prime mortgages were not CRA.
Really? Care to back your bullshit up? Tell us the history of SPEs being used to get fraudulent ratings applied to real estate traunches.

You haven't told us what a Special Purpose Vehicle is yet, dumbass.
Tell us what it is.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#956812 Jul 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think $16,000 is a reasonable cost to deliver a baby - even by C-section?
How could women afford to have children before HMOs?
Many women couldn't afford it. Pregnant women and infant mortality rates were high.
LCN Llin

United States

#956813 Jul 30, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I know y'all have a problem with perspective. Perspective is fundamental to International Relations. You look at everything from a US-centric perspective and the rest of the world has their own. You're not the only one, Carol's one of the worst. Everything is viewed from a late-20th Century, middle-class, white, american, female perspective.
That's pretty narrow.
DB need to open a book or take a post high school class in history?
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#956814 Jul 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
You really don't know much, do you? If you don't know the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons of this world make a killing on keeping racial division alive and well, you're sounding a lot like Homer Simpson.
Those two are no different than Glenda Beck and others in right wing media who's only real talent is stirring up sht among clowns like you who possess a flea market view of politics.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#956815 Jul 30, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
The arrogant tribal chieftain taking care of his own hood is Boehner.
Obama can't legislate...that's the job of Congress.
Executive Order and Executive Privilege are the hallmarks of the Jerk-In-Chief. And buying votes from the electorate and from business.

Get real.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956816 Jul 30, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
a lot of white bigots.
so who really cares what they care about?
and for you to act like the opinion of black folks on the matter are of no consequence speaks loudly to your acknowledgment that FOX is a racist hotbed.
Nobody cares if you people sit around wallowing in self-pity instead of getting off your butts.

When racists like Al Sharpton speak, the world knows the opposite is true.

By the way, how can you fools let that hustler become your leader?
LCN Llin

United States

#956817 Jul 30, 2013
endeavor wrote:
<quoted text>
$100 million wasted in Africa, next up Martha's Vineyard for the AA couple.
Ignorance run in your family or is it only YOU?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#956818 Jul 30, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>So, this is why Ronald Reagan was a 'leech and a sponge' He never said anything original and took advantage of other peoples misfortune to advance his own political career. You can see the proof in his 1980 Presidential campaign that started off in Philadelphia, Mississippi(the place where three civil rights workers in the Mississippi Summer Project of 1964-two Jews and a Black, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and James Chaney-had been murdered). Reagan wasn't there to support civil rights ,but side with the states rights to remain racially segregated. Reagan's visit to Bitburg Cemetery ( the place where many Nazis SS members were buried) further revealed his moral callousness.
And that explains why Ronal Reagan is so often quoted.
The rest of your rant is probably about as accurate as your first two sentences.
You're so nuts, I'm expecting a monkey to pick you out of a tree to eat you any minute.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#956819 Jul 30, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
a lot of white bigots.
so who really cares what they care about?
and for you to act like the opinion of black folks on the matter are of no consequence speaks loudly to your acknowledgment that FOX is a racist hotbed.
You are so obviously confused it's difficult to respond sometimes.

"Uncle Tom" is a derogatory term used only by black liberals to describe black conservatives or any black person they deem a traitor to keep the race issue alive and well by blaming whites.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#956820 Jul 30, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
This reaction is why the black community remains in poverty, failures regardless of government assistance.
The question is why the wealthiest Americans keep getting richer despite their cries that higher taxes are making them poorer. Why are the rich lying?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956821 Jul 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, did you admit tax cuts cost money? I think you just did. The stimulus bill was 38% tax relief. Yet you just considered them costs.
Your so-called "tax relief" was nothing more than subsidies to non-viable industries.
LCN Llin

United States

#956822 Jul 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said anything of the kind. Go back to sleep. Or drink some more coffee before posting again.
Coffee should be ground
and
then on to Mr Coffee
WOW

Bronx, NY

#956823 Jul 30, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Fair and Balanced and White? Why Fox News Needs Black Conservatives
Fox News Channel, the hugely successful conservative cable TV network whose motto is “Fair and Balanced”, is anything but when it comes to on-air personalities.
Libertarian Greg Gutfeld, host of Fox News Channel’s Red Eye and The Five, believes the network has a race problem. During Wednesday’s opening segment on The Five, Gutfeld noted the incongruous scenario of constantly discussing race without a black person participating in the discussion.
Gutfeld said,“We are here talking about this and there are five white people. I think Fox should be hiring more black conservatives. Because, dammit they need to be here and they need to be everywhere. That’s fair and balanced.”
Gutfeld’s keen observation should not be taken lightly. Fox News’ lack of African-American representation at the highest level of its TV shows, anchors and hosts, has a negative ripple effect throughout the conservative movement.
Cable TV news is less about news and more about presenting opinions and analysis that generate ratings and voter action. Given that statement, it is safe to assume that the opinions of black on-air personalities do not resonate with Fox News’ audience. And if it is safe to assume black on-air personalities do not resonate with Fox News audiences, then they definitely don’t resonate with Republican voters.
The paucity of on-air black anchors and hosts at Fox is completely consistent with the lack of black elected officials in the Republican Party. It is no secret that Fox News is largely seen as the most influential and important communication vehicle of the GOP. It is not a coincidence that there are relatively few black on-air show hosts on Fox and only one black Republican in Congress. If Fox News is not promoting black conservatives for elected office — and they are not— then it is highly improbable that they will be elected. Why Fox is not pumping up the profiles of conservatives like Mia Love, Erika Harold, or Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is anybody’s guess. You would think electing the first African-American Republican woman to Congress and providing a platform for the only black Republican in Congress would be high priorities of the conservative network. Unfortunately, Fox doesn’t have any opinion-making conservatives with black faces to make that point.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/56525/fair-...
If Fox News is not featuring black conservatives on-air, then rest assured that conservative America is not going to support them at the ballot box. The Republican National Committee has an outreach program, largely based on using the media to spread the conservative message to African-Americans. Maybe they should ask Fox News to help out.
WITH ALL THE SUCCESSFUL MINSTRELS in the BLACK COMMUNITy why are AMERICAN IDOLS contestants speaking about racism get your own why dont you if a AUDIENCE doesnt want to see you BRAND OF JIG A BOO MINSTREL SHOW MAKE YOUR OWn YOU HAVE QUEEN JAY Z AND KING BEYONCE THEY SHOULD BE TAKING CARE OF YOU ALSO START YOUR OWN FOX NEWS AND YOUR OWN CNN SO YOU CAN CONTROL CONTENT and your image SO YOU CAN BLACKWASH your STORIES no DON LEMON NEEDED,THEY TALK OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF THEIR MOUTH FOX DONT OWE BLACKS NOTHING BOYCOTT DISNEY HOW IS THAT WORKING OUT LOLOLOLOLHAHAHAHAHAHAh you are not INDIEPENDENT you are DEPENDENT ON YOU KNOW WHO lolololhahahaha OBAMA B.E.T COULD HIRE BLACK CONS. lolololhahahaha

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Rogue Scholar 05 196,995
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 11 min PEllen 100,660
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 55 min ritedownthemiddle 54,568
Ask amy 9-2-15 1 hr Kuuipo 13
How to get into the USA. 3 hr New Beach Boys Song 4
News Three Men Arrested for Oak Park Carjacking, Arm... 3 hr They Shot da Cop 2
abby9-2-15 4 hr Mister Tonka 5
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages