Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#956683 Jul 30, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
What are everyone's thoughts on Andrew Napolitano as the next president?
What are everyone's thoughts on Andrew Napolitano as a candidate?
Great idea! There goes another one of your votes down a rat hole!

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

When's dawn?

#956684 Jul 30, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
bin laden was a PSYCHOPATH.
Only a libuhrulTic,clueless, anti-american scum-idiot would even go where you just did in that stoopid post.
Idiot.
(Don't make me ignorantly label you with the other word attached!)
"Don't make me ignorantly label you..."??? No one has to make you ignorantly label anything, Methmouth, you're obviously quite capable of endlessly doing that prodigiously on your own.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#956685 Jul 30, 2013
THIS GENTLEMAN BLACK HISTORY WOULD NOT MAKE HIM A GOOD DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT HIS HISTORY IS TOO BLACK AMERICAN for liberals
WOW

Bronx, NY

#956686 Jul 30, 2013
"At a Juneteenth event in Newport News, E.W. Jackson, the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor, said slavery did not destroy black families, but government welfare programs launched in the 1960s caused them to deteriorate. Speaking before a small crowd Wednesday at King-Lincoln Park, not too far from where the first African slaves entered the Colonies, Jackson referred to his great-grandparents, who were slaves and sharecroppers in Orange County.'I am a direct descendent of slaves. My grandfather was born there to a father and a mother who had been slaves. And by the way, their family was more intact than the black family is today,' Jackson said.'I’m telling you that slavery did not destroy the black family, even though it certainly was an attack on the black family. It made it difficult,' he said."

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#956687 Jul 30, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
There's still at least a whole generation of workers that have YEARS of paying INTO it, actually deserving of it. Too bad on the greedy, freeriding, entitleMENTALed givverment abusing, dependent type slackerTics-it AINT theirs.
I was forced too to pay into it for years too that is the problem individuals were scammed and taxed along with their employers which were forced into contributing into the TAX SCAM by the Federal Government with no rights to the Social Security SCAM and why there was resistance years ago which I was told years ago by people that were around when FDR implemented the Social Security Act of 1935 and Democrats and they were right to plan without Social Security and now Obama wants to reduce the Social Security benefits even more which he can do and Pseudo Liberals on the SCOTUS reaffirmed what the Conservatives were saying all long when the SCOTUS handed down their verdict in 1960 in Flemming v. Nestor that Social Security was a SCAM with no property rights because Social Security is based on a tax is property of the Federal Government under the US Constitution under Article 1 Section 8 Clause 1, The power to Tax to raise revenue for the Federal Government.

Seniors would see smaller Social Security checks under Obama budget

By Tami Luhby

http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/10/news/economy/...
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#956688 Jul 30, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>"ignorance of proportional levels"??? Just how many folks in the holler are SSI lifers, Methmouth?
Flock off you imbecile...my neighborhood is WORKING class..not fat azz bonbon eating, propoganda and lie spewing sucks like you no doubt.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#956689 Jul 30, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>The bulk of my RESENTMENT is dedicated to liars and racists.
add low life, soapscumbox, entitleMENTALcase race baiters, and we could agree even!

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#956690 Jul 30, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>The bulk of my RESENTMENT is dedicated to liars and racists.
Liars abuse and manipulate a broken system. Racism is a grievance industry for personal and political gain.

Liars and racists come in all shapes and sizes.

In 2008, an NBC/WSJ poll showed 70% of whites and 64% of blacks felt race relations were "very good".

Nothing changed except a new administration who encouraged the grievance industry to rear its ugly head.

But you don't get it, do you?
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#956691 Jul 30, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>"Don't make me ignorantly label you..."??? No one has to make you ignorantly label anything, Methmouth, you're obviously quite capable of endlessly doing that prodigiously on your own.
as in NOT one-you clueless, lying hagbag LOSER libuhrulTIC.

They've ALL worked and helped-NOT just "took".
WOW

Bronx, NY

#956692 Jul 30, 2013
failed under obamas presidency The left would have us believe that having Democrats in charge of the city for so long had nothing to do with where it is today. But they reality is, they’ve got to own their piece of blame. Detroit certainly hasn’t been a bastion of conservative policy, that’s for sure.

On the other hand, Republicans should be aware that Detroit’s decline has been ongoing for quite a while, and there were definitely some mayors with R’s by their name who were in on the game. And economic forces shaped Detroit far more than they’d like to admit.

But ultimately what we see today is the left furiously spinning about Detroit (for example, see the book “Detroit: A Biography”) and the right trying to use it as a poster child for everything they hate. Yet on the right I can’t help but observe a particularly mean streak in the commentary, one that’s positively gleeful about Detroit’s demise. It’s as if, not content with letting the results speak for themselves about what happened under Democratic rule, the right seems determined to humiliate Detroit, reveling in its pain. It’s schadenfreude on steroids.

Let me highlight this. First Kurt Schlichter says that “Conservatives Should Point and Laugh As Detroit Dies.”

The agonizing death of Detroit is cause for celebration. It’s the first of the liberal-run big cities and states to fall, and we should welcome its collapse with glee.

Yeah, liberals, eventually you do run out of other people’s money.

The blue state model is a terminal disease, and Detroit is its poster child. Only this is one telethon where we should pledge that we won’t pay a single dime to keep the progressive party going a single minute longer.

Detroit represents the epitome of the blue state, Democrat machine liberalism that Barack Obama represents. Well, not one damn cent for Barry’s Kids.

Don’t hold back, tell us how you really feel. John Fund at the National Review is nowhere near vicious, but he does paint a target on Detroit’s art, basically arguing that the city should be forced to sell off its assets to satisfy creditors:

What no one wants to do, apparently, is sell the city’s assets. The city has largely unused parks and waterfront property that could be opened to economic development. The Detroit Historical Museum has a collection of 62 vehicles, including an 1870 Phaeton carriage and John Dodge’s 1919 coupe, that is worth millions. But the biggest sacred cow is the Detroit Institute of Art (DIA), one of the nation’s oldest and most valuable art museums. It has pieces by Vincent van Gogh, Henri Matisse, Andy Warhol, and Rembrandt. The Institute also owns William Randolph Hearst’s armor collection and the original puppet from the children’s TV show Howdy Doody.

The Detroit Free Press asked New York and Michigan art dealers to evaluate just a few of the 60,000 items in the Institute’s collection. The experts said the 38 pieces they looked over would fetch a minimum of $2.5 billion on the market, with each of several pieces worth $100 million or more. That would go a long way toward relieving the city’s long-term debt burden of $17 billion.

Let me get this straight. Instead of Detroit being $17 billion in debt, let’s sell off everything left that makes Detroit viable and end up still $14.5 billion in debt and still bankrupt.(Though only a few items were evaluated, they were clearly the handful of most valuable ones. Howdy Doody ain’t Van Gogh). Oh, yeah, that will help – if your definition of help is bailing out banks who loaned money to a city everyone has known is a basket case for many, many years. If those banks expected the art to be sold, they should have made the city pledge it as collateral.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#956693 Jul 30, 2013
obama could have dealt with racial profiling WHEN HE FIRST CAME INTO OFFICE HE DIDNT BECAUSE THAT WAS NOT HIS AGENDA HIS AGENDA WAS TO USE SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO THE BLACK COMMUNITY WAS TO HAVE A BEER PARTY HE DEALT WITH THINGS FROM A SUBURBAN LIBERALS POINT OF VIEW OBAMA NEVER DEALT WITH WHAT TRAYVON MARTIN HAD TO DEAL WITH SO IT WAS NOT IMPORTANT TO BE PROACTIVE HE LAUGHED IT OFF AND HAD A BEER OPEN SEASON STARTED, THE DEMOCRATS NEW LINE WILL BE WE STILL HAVE A LOT MORE WORK TO DO IN HER CON ARTIST SPIRITUAL TRAINED VOICE AMERICA IS MORE BIGOTTED THAN BEFORE OR IS IT STILL THE SAME NO CHANGE

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#956694 Jul 30, 2013
WOW wrote:
<quoted text>SO YOU HATE OBAMA HUH he LIES and he sure doesnt care for MEN THAT LOOKS LIKE HIS BIOLOGICAL FATHER WHO DIDNT BOTHER he responds better to MEN THAT LOOK LIKE HIS BIOLOGICAL GRANDPARENTS WHO RAISED HIM AND THEY WERE RACISTS GRANNY DIDNT LIKE BLACK MEN SHE WOULD CROSS THE STREET WITH OBAMA WHEN SHE SAW THEM YOU THINK OBAMA WAS RAISED LIKE YOU OR HE LIKES YOU HE USES YOU
Wonder if Obama's father abandoning both him and his mother has anything to do with his lying disorder and resentment - and the fact his father was black and his mother was white drives his deep desire to create racial division.

Very complex man with complicated issues, this president.
youtubeNews

AOL

#956695 Jul 30, 2013
.

ISRAEL to give POPE "Custody" of Temple Mount --

http://youtu.be/Qt9kEQB4ti8

.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#956696 Jul 30, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Liars abuse and manipulate a broken system. Racism is a grievance industry for personal and political gain.
Liars and racists come in all shapes and sizes.
In 2008, an NBC/WSJ poll showed 70% of whites and 64% of blacks felt race relations were "very good".
Nothing changed except a new administration who encouraged the grievance industry to rear its ugly head.
But you don't get it, do you?
You're sounding a lot like Michelle Bachmann lately doll__are your drugs misfiring?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#956697 Jul 30, 2013
WOW wrote:
Obama Approval Rating Drops Among Blacks
A recent NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll shows Black approval of President Obama dipped to 78 percent following George Zimmerman’s murder acquittal.“It’s a perceptual shift, a big-time shift in how Black people are perceiving Obama when it comes to being responsive to the needs of our community,” said Dr. Johnny Williams, professor of sociology at Trinity College, in Hartford, Connecticut. The president’s high praise for New York City police commissioner Ray Kelly, who runs the nation’s biggest stop-and-frisk operation, as a potential new chief of Homeland Security “speaks to where Obama is, morally,” said Williams.“How are you going to put somebody who, basically, does the same thing that George Zimmerman did to Trayvon Martin, in charge of Homeland Security?”
OBAMAS LACK OF ATTENTION TO A BLACK AGENDA MIGHT NOT BOTHER THE SUBURBAN LIBERALS BUT WHO FEELS IT KNOWS IT BLACKS WERE USED!
CNN's, Don Lemon, who is black, agreed with Bill O'Reilly on air that blacks are not addressing the root problems in the black community.

Other blacks, including Juan Williams, also adamantly agrees. Williams wrote a book about it years ago beating O'Reilly to the punch but only now getting the recognition for writing it and now having a bigger microphone to talk about it.

If anything good comes of this administration's desperate attempt to keep us divided and the Al Sharptons' grievance industry doing everything possible to help them, it's in their being exposed and even black liberals saying they've had enough.
Patriot

Longmont, CO

#956698 Jul 30, 2013
The people within Our federal government have a controversial plan to kill thousands of owls on the west coast to manipulate the food chain

http://intellihub.com/2013/07/29/feds-plan-to...

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#956699 Jul 30, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I keep telling you son, don't worry what happens in America.
It's none of your busniess!
That's the best you have in your quiver, Yeahoo? You keep telling us to leave our birthright country. You're the squatter, and you and your lieberal opinions prove it with every post..
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956700 Jul 30, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
READ THE CASE!!! The Nestor's decision was based solely on the fact that he had been deported.
From the Decision (which you obviously haven't bothered to read):
"THE INTEREST OF A COVERED EMPLOYEE UNDER THE ACT IS OF SUFFICIENT SUBSTANCE TO FALL WITHIN THE PROTECTION FROM ARBITRARY GOVERNMENTAL ACTION AFFORDED BY THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE."
SUCH IS NOT THE CASE HERE. THE FACT OF A BENEFICIARY'S RESIDENCE
ABROAD - IN THE CASE OF A DEPORTEE, A PRESUMABLY PERMANENT RESIDENCE - CAN BE OF OBVIOUS RELEVANCE TO THE QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY."
"APPELLEE, AN ALIEN, IMMIGRATED TO THIS COUNTRY FROM BULGARIA IN 1913, AND BECAME ELIGIBLE FOR OLD-AGE BENEFITS IN NOVEMBER 1955. IN JULY 1956 HE WAS DEPORTED PURSUANT TO SEC. 241(A)(6)(C)(I) OF THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT FOR HAVING BEEN A MEMBER OF THE
COMMUNIST PARTY FROM 1933 TO 1939. THIS BEING ONE OF THE BENEFIT
TERMINATION DEPORTATION GROUNDS SPECIFIED IN SEC. 202(N)."
Decision means that there are no individual property rights in Social Security, regardless of contribution history.

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

When's dawn?

#956701 Jul 30, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Flock off you imbecile...my neighborhood is WORKING class..not fat azz bonbon eating, propoganda and lie spewing sucks like you no doubt.
Your neighborhood is the meth capital of the nation (are you ever going to learn how to spell propaganda?): It's 97+% white, below the state average; the per capita yearly income is $19, 808, below state average; residents having a Bachelor's degree, 13%, again below; living below the poverty line, 20.6%--now you've finally gone above in something. Don't tell no more lies and keep your hate to yourself...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956702 Jul 30, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
The wealthy has mooched off the federal government for far too long. It's time to reel them in.
On what basis and for what purpose?

What if they tell you to go f*** yourself?

"Reel them in." Sounds like Fascist concentration camps are coming.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 44 min Jacques in Orleans 187,009
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr Mothra 52,728
obama our next president 5 hr bale wayne 3
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 6 hr scirocco 69,617
News Animal brothels prevalent in Chicago? 7 hr News Junkie 1
News Ultra Foods in Crestwood offers array of prepar... (Jun '12) 11 hr J T L U K 19
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 11 hr Red_Forman 856
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]