Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1497036 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#956481 Jul 29, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
That is just the problem, your perception of the "truth" is far from factual. All you do is parrot what you are told by your handlers.
That is just the problem, your perception of the "truth" & the "Facts" I Repeat the "Facts" are factual and over look them. All you do is parrot what you are told by your Pseudo Liberal Democrat handlers and Remember I am a Registered Democrat not a Pseudo Liberal Democrat and you prove that you take and believe in everything that those Pseudo Liberal Democrat Bigots tell you which are a Useful Idoit for them and Obama wants to Cut Social Secuirty Benefits by associating them with the CPI, The Consumer Price Index so when tanks even more Social Security Benefits will Be reduce drastically and for it in his 2014 Budget better wake up the Federal Government can do anything they want when you choose to be a dependent of the Federal Government so suck it up.

Seniors would see smaller Social Security checks under Obama budget

By Tami Luhby
April 10, 2013: 4:50 PM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/10/news/economy/...

The Social Security Tax

NOVEMBER 01, 1955 by CLARENCE MANION

U.S. vs. Butler, 297 U.S. 1; Stewart Machine Company vs. Davis, 301 U.S, 548; Helvering vs. Davis, 301 U.S. 619.
----------

All federal taxes, income taxes, estate taxes, gasoline taxes, and social security taxes, go indiscriminately into the same general fund of the federal treasury. From that general fund, Congress makes periodic appropriations for all the purposes of the federal government, including payments for social security benefits.

Congress could continue to collect the so-called social security pay roll taxes even though Congress discontinued all social security benefit payments. Congress could wipe out the social security pay roll taxes and yet continue to pay all present social security benefits out of the general tax receipts of the federal treasury.

Any apparent connection between the collection of social security pay roll taxes and the payment of social security benefits is purely coincidental. The Supreme Court has held that Congress is without Constitutional power to establish such a connection. For this reason, the so-called Federal Old Age and Survivors’ Insurance Reserve Fund is actually nonexistent. The legal illusion of such a fund was conjured up to dissolve popular resistance to one of the most cruel and unjust systems of taxation ever imposed upon the American people.

The fraud of the great deception is the deliberate and official misrepresentation of social security taxes as payments of insurance premiums for the right to get back specified benefits at a specified time. There is no such right. The government is under no contractual obligation to make any return payment at all. From the very beginning, the Social Security Tax Act has carried this provision:“The right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision of this act is hereby reserved to the Congress.”

http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-soc...
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#956482 Jul 29, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
sigh
so what right wing nutjob site do i need to go to get my head filled with that sort of nonsense.
No need to go online, injun joe!! Just ask all the drugged-out soul brothers hangin round the 7-11 when you pick up your evening 12 pack of Schlitz tall boys.....

“Peace on Earth”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#956483 Jul 29, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>that is the truth and 1960 the Psuedo Liberals on the SCOTUS proved the Conservatives right in their Ruling in 1960 in Flemming v Nestor that individuals have no rights to Social Security.
The Court ruled that no such contract exists, and that there is no contractual right to receive Social Security payments. Payments due under Social Security are not “property” rights and are not protected by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flemming_v._Nest...
Warren Court(Pseudo Liberal Majority, 1953 - 1969)
The Warren Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States between 1953 and 1969, when Earl Warren served as Chief Justice. Warren led a liberal majority that used judicial power in dramatic fashion, to the consternation of conservative opponents. The Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Court
Besides Obama wants to cut Social Benefits again by tying Social Security Benefits to the CPI(Consumer Price Index) so when economy is in bad shape economically Social Security Benefit will be reduced and it is in Obama 2014 Budget Proposal which Obama is supporting.
Seniors would see smaller Social Security checks under Obama budget
By Tami Luhby
April 10, 2013: 4:50 PM ET
http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/10/news/economy/...
LOL. Did you even look at your cut and paste: "The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause." That's right. There interest is protected!! Finally you got it right.

By the way, if you haven't heard of a "non-contractural government benefit", you didn't read the Nestor decision.
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#956484 Jul 29, 2013
killtaker wrote:
I am calling it...
1855 local...
29 July 2013
Liberals forget about Trayvon Martin...
Who?
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#956485 Jul 29, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =UeQsZOQqO6IXX
Well, at least your musical sensibilities are strong.....
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#956486 Jul 29, 2013
killtaker wrote:
music I play and forget lots of things...
if you are musician...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =LEs5sKDXZukXX
Jaco was really a murderer on the bass. Too bad he had so many mental health issues (compounded by drugs)...
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#956487 Jul 29, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
We're looking at 2000 miles of pipeline a year in the near term with the current gas boom why are y'all so concerned with piping Canadian oil to LA for export?
What really drives gasoline prices is NOT supply and demand of oil; its how said S & D is affected by refining capacity. Given transpo costs etc for oil to already over-regulated existing refineries, the Keystone could potentially facilitate new construction in more friendly environments......

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#956490 Jul 29, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
Jaco was really a murderer on the bass. Too bad he had so many mental health issues (compounded by drugs)...
he had some issues...but he could play...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#956491 Jul 29, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
That is just the problem, your perception of the "truth" is far from factual. All you do is parrot what you are told by your handlers.
Another thing, Remember Social Security Act of 1935 was legistlated and is a US Federal Law and not a US Constitutional Amendment or Right to Welfare protected by the US Constitution which the Pseudo Liberal Democrats confuse intentionally which no where in the US Constitution does it says Social Security is a Right and which for that you would need an Amendment to the US Constitution so either way the Pseudo Liberal Democrat can reduce or eliminate or make Changes to Social Security as they want just as Obama is promoting & pushing for in his 2014 budget by linking Social Security to the CPI(consumer price index) which right now Social Security benefits would be cut drastically which means reduced and you are going to say obama cant do it you better wake up.

Seniors would see smaller Social Security checks under Obama budget

By Tami Luhby
April 10, 2013: 4:50 PM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/10/news/economy/...

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#956492 Jul 29, 2013
gotta go...

one more...

another of my favorite bass geetar players...



good night all!

Be safe...
sonicfilter

Greenwood, IN

#956493 Jul 29, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to go online, injun joe!! Just ask all the drugged-out soul brothers hangin round the 7-11 when you pick up your evening 12 pack of Schlitz tall boys.....
beer is for rednecks.

Glenlivet.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#956494 Jul 29, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Did you even look at your cut and paste: "The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause." That's right. There interest is protected!! Finally you got it right.
By the way, if you haven't heard of a "non-contractural government benefit", you didn't read the Nestor decision.
No you didn't read the Nestor decision which its not and you are only cherry picking besides if that was the case the Federal Government couldnt take Nestor's so called earned benefits away him and again you are puting you foot in your mouth which you keep contradicting yourself in your post.
sonicfilter

Greenwood, IN

#956495 Jul 29, 2013
House GOP Defunds ACORN Yet Again, Even Though ACORN Does Not Exist

Conservative political groups targeted ACORN for years, accusing the anti-poverty group, which typically backed liberal policies aiding the poor, of broad voter fraud conspiracies that were ultimately never substantiated. But in the fall of 2009, conservative videographer James O'Keefe released selectively edited videos that appeared to show ACORN employees offering advice on tax avoidance related to prostitution and child smuggling. Independent investigations by the California attorney general, the Massachusetts attorney general and the Brooklyn, N.Y., district attorney would later clear ACORN of criminal wrongdoing, and an investigation by the Government Accountability Office would clear the group of charges that it mishandled federal funds.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/hous...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956497 Jul 29, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That's incorrect.
No, it's not.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956498 Jul 29, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
" ... poll watchers can't stop talking about Weiner."
pole, not poll...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956499 Jul 29, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
See: FDR and "The New Deal" (briefly)
At Roosevelt's nationally broadcast inauguration speech, the new president denounced the "money changers" who had brought on the economic disaster and declared that the government must wage war on the Great Depression as it would against an armed foe.Roosevelt's liberal solution to the problems was to aggressively use government as a tool for creating a "new deal" for the American people, aimed at three R's--relief, recovery, and reform. The New Deal's most immediate goals were short-range relief and immediate recovery. These were the immediate goals of the Hundred Days Congress, which met March 9-June 6, 1933. Long-range goals of permanent recovery and the reform of institutional abuses and practices that had produced the Depression came as part of the Second New Deal, from November 1933 to 1939.
Social Security
Real reform was enacted by passage of the Social Security Act of 1935, which provided a social safety net beneath FDR's New Deal economy. The new law provided for federal-state unemployment insurance, and a retirement pension for old-age workers, ranging from $10 to $85 a month, and paid for by a payroll tax of both employers and employees. Provision was also provided for the blind, the physically handicapped, fatherless children, and other dependents. Opposition to Social Security was bitter. Republicans falsely claimed that every worker would have to wear a metal tag for life in order to be identified by their Social Security number. Liberals were essentially copying the ideas of industrialized Europe. It was a recognition that in the industrialized economy, with its boom-or-bust cycles, the government must bear some responsibility for the welfare of its citizens....
(The New Deal. Authentichistory.com . 6/14/2012)
It was basically implemented FIRSTLY to
1. FREE jobs up in a HORRIBLE job market, by allowing older workers to retire, to make room for the burgeoning younger work force-
AND
2. To suffice WAR widows and the families thereof.
Yeah, and the suckers have swallowed that for almost 80 years.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956500 Jul 29, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
We're looking at 2000 miles of pipeline a year in the near term with the current gas boom why are y'all so concerned with piping Canadian oil to LA for export?
Galt favors private development without government interference.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956501 Jul 29, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
"When too much money and power gets into too few hands, it almost always results in tyranny." This transfer of wealth must be stopped.
Galt agrees that the redistribution of wealth from those who have earned it to the moochers must be stopped.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#956502 Jul 29, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Toyota recently re-captured its position as biggest car manufacturer in the world from GM which is now second.
Galt recently rented a Toyota Corolla for a long trip, really a very nice car that GM cannot compete with.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#956503 Jul 29, 2013
Another Obama "speech tour" is over so he's off on another five-star resort vacation to wind down so he can gear up for the next one.

When was the last time he stayed in Washington and worked? No one else is going anywhere. Most people are working several part-time jobs just to make ends meet because of the crappy economy and all the Obamacare uncertainties.

But he must be plum worn out trying not to think about it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min Larry Smith 237,530
wheres my house keeper? 3 hr john 7
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr CrunchyBacon 104,994
last post wins! (Apr '13) 4 hr honeymylove 2,297
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr Julia 63,296
News Joshua James, Shawn Mullins, Murder Mystery and... 5 hr Trump is the man 1
News Deportation fears, rumors are affecting busines... 5 hr Trump is the man 2

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages