Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1275260 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#954331 Jul 26, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Waco
Janet Reno
Just for the sake of arguement

Death Toll
Waco: 76 branch Davidians; 4 ATF agents
Oklahoma City Bombing: 168 KIA; 680 WIA

Do the math, not even close.

ATF went there to serve legal warrants, if Dave had just complied and made his case in our legal system, nobody would have gotten hurt.

Dave opened fire, end of story

Dave bears sole responsibility for what happened at Waco
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#954332 Jul 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
parts can be an issue for '57 Chevy.
Don't park it on the street.
Not really, southeastchevyparts.com has just about every part available.

It doesn't make any difference to Galt, the noisemaker without a clue.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#954333 Jul 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
The BLS lists PT as a separate category than full time.
Evidently the cheap ass grocer pays no health insurance to anyone & dumps his employees to utilize services that sometimes we end up paying for. Your kind of person, moocher Eed.
Hey Dumb Dave the psychopath(s). When are you going to bring out Emoron & Not Surprized to play?
LCN Llin

United States

#954334 Jul 26, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> A war on states that violate the Voting Rights Act is justified and an important function of our Constitutional Federal Government.
...ask Jefferson Davis ?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#954335 Jul 26, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
The jury decides the facts based on the law and the District Attorney says, under the law, the driver is culpable in the death of the two women. It is up to the jury to say whether they agree. Recently, an eighteen year old fell asleep at the wheel, killing another driver. He was charged with vehicular manslaughter and his trial ended with a hung jury. This is no different.
Completely different, because the women voluntarily tried to rescue the driver and were not directly involved in the accident.

They would have suffered absolutely no harm except for their own actions.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#954336 Jul 26, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> National policy and the Public Interest should rule over Corporate private profit interests .
No profits, no products, no jobs.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#954337 Jul 26, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"dumos"
Not surprized you do not know the difference. In effect there is no difference;
Not guilty = Innocent
Innocent = Not guilty
If Zimmerman were black and trayvon white you would have cheered the juries verdict, Not guilty - innocent.
Peace
KMA
Do you know the difference between dumb and stupid?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#954338 Jul 26, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Completely different, because the women voluntarily tried to rescue the driver and were not directly involved in the accident.
They would have suffered absolutely no harm except for their own actions.
Correct

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#954339 Jul 26, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just one conspiracy theory after another with these people. But, like you said, that's OK. Galt make it clear that facts don't matter when expressing their opinions.
It's just one lie and abuse of power after another by this administration.

Why aren't the Benghazi survivors speaking out?
Who has been held accountable for the IRS targeting?
Who is holding Eric Holder accountable for Fast and Furious, confiscating private information and falsely accusing a journalist of being a "co-conspirator" for just reporting the news?

Answer those questions and then tell us again about a conspiracy.

But off to the beach.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#954340 Jul 26, 2013
headlines wrote:
.
ISRAEL to give POPE "Custody" of Temple Mount --
http://youtu.be/Qt9kEQB4ti8
.
As if Israel has earned any right to do anything about the Temple Mount.

That beautiful gold Dome of the Rock seen in the video has been maintained with work financed by Jordan and other Islamic countries...not one dime from Israel. On top of the $9 million spent by Jordan to restore the dome in 1969 after it was set on fire by a Jew, between 1992-1994,the late King Hussein of Jordan spent $8 million of his personal wealth to refurbished the structure with "5000 glittering new gold plates, as well as rebuilding the roof supports, repairing the basic structure of the building and fireproofing the compound."

That is testament to who really holds the Temple Mount and it's tombs of Muslim saints, holy and dear. It's not Israel.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#954341 Jul 26, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
SCOTUS will bitch-slap Holder for ignoring their decision and targeting certain states.
so then you are in favor of Judicial activism. After all SCOTUS struck down Congressional legislation that renewed in 2006 for 25 years and signed into law by George W Bush by an overwhelming majority.the vote was
House: 390-33
Senate 98-0

so you believe SCOTUS has the right to nullify legislation enacted into law by our representatives
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#954342 Jul 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are for subsidizing investments. Just like I thought.
Galt favors a flat tax where all income is taxed at the same rate, with no exemptions, credits, or deductions.

Better yet, abolish the income tax in favor of a consumption tax.

Since: May 11

Hustontown, PA

#954343 Jul 26, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
SCOTUS will bitch-slap Holder for ignoring their decision and targeting certain states.
You really don't have a clue as to what the SC said. Typical.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#954344 Jul 26, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just one conspiracy theory after another with these people. But, like you said, that's OK. Galt make it clear that facts don't matter when expressing their opinions.
lol! They sure love to imitate the Beck-ster!

They're just missing the chalk board!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#954345 Jul 26, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>It's the culture..
lol! Unfortunately, I think it's your stupidity by choice!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#954346 Jul 26, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
All in support of the Democrats War on Women, of course.
... say the cons who want to regulate the bedroom!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#954347 Jul 26, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> A war on states that violate the Voting Rights Act is justified and an important function of our Constitutional Federal Government.
...and declared Unconstitutional by SCOYUS
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#954348 Jul 26, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
Just for the sake of arguement
Death Toll
Waco: 76 branch Davidians; 4 ATF agents
Oklahoma City Bombing: 168 KIA; 680 WIA
Do the math, not even close.
ATF went there to serve legal warrants, if Dave had just complied and made his case in our legal system, nobody would have gotten hurt.
Dave opened fire, end of story
Dave bears sole responsibility for what happened at Waco
OKC was a mentally deranged response to the terrorist attack in Waco.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#954349 Jul 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
with grade school education, to grade four, he does not know!
Casablanca was NOT shown in southern theaters without a warning that racial equality was presented in the film
I've heard about that movie you old moron, but I'm not interested in stooping as low as you race industry scumbags and besides, that may have come out when you & nasty lily were alive, but it was long before my time, old moron.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#954350 Jul 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> You really don't have a clue as to what the SC said. Typical.
Hey old dummy! What does the word "abandon" mean?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
abby 8-28-15 14 min Mister Tonka 4
ask amy 8-29-15 29 min Mister Tonka 3
Steve Wilkos : talk show host ? or simple mi... (Feb '08) 1 hr Tvlover 406
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Rogue Scholar 05 196,953
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Doug77 6,407
last post wins! (Dec '10) 3 hr Red_Forman 1,347
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr Agents of Corruption 54,501
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 hr Fahey Flynn 100,633
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages