Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#953348 Jul 25, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just the parallel universe phenomenon again.
Either you're in it or I am.
Zimmerman was clearly going to meet the police at what I understood to be the clubhouse but it was actually the mailboxes.
911 dispatcher:
OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then?[3:42]
Zimmerman:
Yeah, that’s fine.[3:43]
Did you not read that?
Is that where Fox stopped reading to you or something? Read this to the end of the transcript:

911 dispatcher:
OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then?[3:42]
Zimmerman:
Yeah, that’s fine.[3:43]
911 dispatcher:
Alright, George, I’ll let them know you’ll meet them at …
Zimmerman:
Could you have them call me and I’ll tell them where I’m at?[3:49]
911 dispatcher:
OK, that’s no problem.

This is the last thing Zimmerman said to the dispatcher:

Zimmerman:
Could you have them call me and I’ll tell them where I’m at?[3:49]

You could use a look at this map, clearly Zimmerman wasn't heading for the mailboxes:

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/04/14/2748048...

I'm not trying to re-try this case, just trying to figure y'all out.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#953350 Jul 25, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Here is a Black Conservative telling the Truth about the Pseudo Liberal Democrats Great Society.
EW Jackson says Great Society worse for black families than slavery - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =lMyV9632PZAXX
Black conservatism is a very lucrative business. It takes few resources to begin one's hustle. There are boosters who will back your play. The risks are minimal. Their public is eager to be grifted--is there no easier scam than taking money from the willing? And the skills that one needs to be successful in the black conservative con game are minimal. It is a real quota, and an internalized projection of what conservatives say "affirmative action" policies produce in the workplace: skin color, a hostility towards African-Americans, and a heartbeat are all that one needs to be a successful black conservative media darling. Ability is welcome but secondary and coincidental to one's skin color.

The black conservatives only have to sit around until needed, secure in their break in case of emergency bubble that the White Right has them encased within. While sitting there, the checks continue because they are on retainer. Quite a good deal.

All that is required to be a successful black conservative in the Fox News Tea Party GOP mold is to be a professional contrarian who stands against any position taken by the "civil rights establishment", a willingness to degrade black Americans for the pleasure of white racists, and to have little or no self-respect. The more self-hating and contemptible a black conservative's position on a given political issue, the higher the bounty and pay.

http://www.chaunceydevega.com/2013/07/a-trife...

sorry, still not buying.

you might as well quit wasting your time on the subject. plenty of black folks out there who know that black conservatives/FOX race minstrels are no more 'black' than you are.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#953351 Jul 25, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
(Reuters)- President Barack Obama on Monday called the targeting of conservative groups by U.S. tax officials "outrageous" and said that any Internal Revenue Service employees involved would be held accountable.
"We'll wait and see what exactly all the details and the facts are. But I've got no patience with it," Obama said. "I will not tolerate it. And we will make sure that we find out exactly what happened."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/13/us-...
So? Has he found out anything? That was over two months ago.
No one has been fired. In fact, key players have been promoted.
He called the Benghazi scandal a "sideshow" but CNN is even asking about the survivors and why they aren't speaking up.
Is this really too hard for you?
That's deflection.

Can't answer the question?

As to this post, just because the right is still chewing on a bone doesn't mean there's any meat on it.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#953352 Jul 25, 2013
PTBW Forever wrote:
<quoted text>
Kind of like how real white people feel about traitorous and self loathing white liberals who support racists like Al Sharpton.
real white people?

KKK much? or maybe just Hannity and Limbaugh.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#953353 Jul 25, 2013
Martin Bashir Guest Savages Hannity And Limbaugh For ‘Hustling Residue Of Racism’

On Tuesday, Lehigh Valley University professor of Africana Studies, James Peterson, tore into conservative media personalities Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity over statements they made about Trayvon Martin. Peterson bristled over those hosts calling people like himself “race hustlers,” and identified conservatives attacking what they characterized as a culture in the black community that celebrates violence as the people truly “hustling the residue of racism.”

“This started off with an unarmed teenager who was gunned down while he was minding his own business,” Martin Bashir observed.“How can you explain to our viewers how this suddenly became an excuse to attack black families, so-called gangster culture, drug use? how did that happen?”

Peterson dismissed these comments as “racialized thinking” which has a small audience:

The hysteria madness that sometimes comes from the right — some of this has to do with, you know, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh earn a lot of money by speaking to a small minority within the Republican base and a small minority of Americans that still engage in this kind of racialized thinking.

“It’s funny they call people like myself race hustlers but they’re the ones hustling the residue of racism with these kinds of comments,” Peterson declared.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bashir-guest-savag...

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#953354 Jul 25, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Martin Bashir Guest Savages Hannity And Limbaugh For ‘Hustling Residue Of Racism’
On Tuesday, Lehigh Valley University professor of Africana Studies, James Peterson, tore into conservative media personalities Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity over statements they made about Trayvon Martin. Peterson bristled over those hosts calling people like himself “race hustlers,” and identified conservatives attacking what they characterized as a culture in the black community that celebrates violence as the people truly “hustling the residue of racism.”
“This started off with an unarmed teenager who was gunned down while he was minding his own business,” Martin Bashir observed.“How can you explain to our viewers how this suddenly became an excuse to attack black families, so-called gangster culture, drug use? how did that happen?”
Peterson dismissed these comments as “racialized thinking” which has a small audience:
The hysteria madness that sometimes comes from the right — some of this has to do with, you know, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh earn a lot of money by speaking to a small minority within the Republican base and a small minority of Americans that still engage in this kind of racialized thinking.
“It’s funny they call people like myself race hustlers but they’re the ones hustling the residue of racism with these kinds of comments,” Peterson declared.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bashir-guest-savag...
Look you old derelict propaganda queen. Your side has the race hustlers and it's not just the media like MSNBC that doctored an audio tape, for which they are getting sued. It's Obama & Biden, your top Socialists. "They're gonna put y'all back in chains"!

You are a liar and an old frikkin useless idiot!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953355 Jul 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Prior to the Reagan era I made that same argument. Democrats were considered doves and Republicans hawks but that was strictly party politics within the context of Vietnam because if you looked at every war back from and including Vietnam, you have to go back to the Civil War to find a Republican starting a war.
Neither party is the same party it was before the end of Vietnam so its no longer useful to make that comparison.
Bullshit.
If you look at the history of the Demcoratic Party, you'll find that immediately after World War II they became a functioning element of the communists trying to take over the world. The most prominent Democrat in the country aside from the sitting president, Alger Hiss, the administrative architect of the UN and the post-war reconstruction of the US State Department, was convicted while spying for the Soviet Union. This was devastating to the Democratic Party, and it took the communists in the Democratic Party almost 20 years to recover. That brings us to 1968 when the Democratic Party openly joined the communists.
Vietnam was nothing more than one of several proxy wars that were part of the Cold War. Had Ho Chi Minh not brought the Soviet Union into the civil war he started in Vietnam, it would have never been part of the Cold War and nobody would even know where it is.
Throughout the Cold War the Democratic Party sabotaged the United States and indoctrinated the population with lies. The only interruption to this was the period of time it took the communists in the Democratic Party to recover from the Alger Hiss conviction.
The Democrats have never been anti-war. They have always been pro-war, supporting every anti-American militant around the world.

Should we go over the history of Vietnam, how it became part of the Cold War, how the Democratic Party sabotaged the United States and South Vietnam, and the system of lies the Democrats invented that took more than 30 years to debunk?
Just for old time's sake, lets repeat some of those lies:

Lie number one: The war is unwinnable.
Lie number two: You can't win a war with a bunch of drug addicts. That lie came apart quickly after the American population began working with returning Vietnam veterans and saw first-hand this was a lie.

Lie number three: You can't fight an enemy you can't see.(How about you tell us how the NVA was devastated and running away from any fight and the Viet Cong didn't even exist as a military unit by 1970.)

Lie number four: The South Vietnamese wouldn't fight for themselves.(How about you tell us what happened in Vietnam in 1972 when the South Vietnamese defeated the single largest communist invasion of the entire war without assistance from US ground combat units.)

The Democrats and treasonous media indoctrinated the population so thuroughly with these lies, it took 30 years to get the truth to even be spoken.

Today, we see the same old Democrats that have existed through most of our lives. Any enemy of the United States is a friend to the Democrats.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#953356 Jul 25, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Look you old derelict propaganda queen. Your side has the race hustlers and it's not just the media like MSNBC that doctored an audio tape, for which they are getting sued. It's Obama & Biden, your top Socialists. "They're gonna put y'all back in chains"!
You are a liar and an old frikkin useless idiot!
you folks have you own brand of race hustler.

Herman Cain Plays the Banjo for White Conservatives (Again)

For a political ideology that ostensibly embraces individualism and rejects the politics of group identity, grievance, and victimology, it is ironic then that Cain has to signal that he is a different type of black man from President Barack Obama. That Cain needed to explain to a Republican audience that black folks are individuals, and not a nameless, faceless, horde of negritude that all walk lockstep like zombies is frightening to say the least--and a damning indictment of those that Cain would call political allies.

....As opposed to expressing rage at racial injustice, Cain and others of his clan choose to express anger and consternation toward black and brown folk who are not Republicans--the ancestors and heirs to a struggle that won contemporary Black Conservatives their freedom--who they describe as still being on "the Democratic Plantation" or as "slave catchers" that run down "free thinking" black people. Once more, this is a tragic play on the stage of American life where in an oddly racialized version of Stockholm Syndrome, Cain and other Black Conservatives play the quislings to their White Conservative masters.

http://open.salon.com/blog/chauncey_devega/20...

it's pretty funny watching you nutjobs following the FOX racism playbook. you all say the same things, you all think the same way, and you all defend those who have turned you into white zombies despite the fact that they are losing their hold on the narrative.

American is not going to suffer right wing BS forever. i wouldn't be surprised to see some of our politicians start talking about doing this:

Lying is Illegal in Canada('s news broadcasts)

http://www.onthemedia.org/2011/mar/04/lying-i...

and how cool would that be? FOX would have to fire all of it's video editors!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953357 Jul 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said, I have a different perspective of both parties. For you to be indignant about any of the above you first have to excuse the exact same behaviors exhibited by your party. Two of your claims are regarding programs the Bush administration started (F&F and the NSA). Your second accusation reeks of the sort of propaganda nonsense you're so fond of, gonna have to prove it before I'll even consider it (Wahabist and Muslim Brotherhood). When y'all rant about Benghazi all I can think about is the first time the date "9/11" became significant and Bushco's attempts to tie 9/11 to Saddam.
The day you're party isn't every bit as fcked up as the Democrats is the day I'll stop calling you lying morons and waving your lies in your faces.
"your party"
I am an independent. Soemtimes I see a lesser of two evils. Too often I see outright treason.
You seem to exhibit the usual characteristic of a Democrat, assuming that if someone isn't a Democrat they can only be a Republican.
This is just one of the many traits you exhibit that expose you as being just another indoctrinated Democrat.

I lean more toward Libertarian than anything else. However, there are things the Libertarian Party promotes that I ardently disagree with. Besides, Libertarianism is best suited for state governments which comprise the federal republic. To have a Libertarian federal government is a contradiction in terms.
Howevere, I think a Libertarian government would not be treasonous, like the Democratic Party government obviously is.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953358 Jul 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
When did I say anything other than that I agreed with the verdict? I must then agree with the US justice system right?
I guess y'all can't help but lie, I'm still trying to figure that out.
Do you know that you're lying or are you just programmed to do it?
Psychiatrists call what you're doing "projection".

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953359 Jul 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> I am not responsible for your ignorance. If you don't know how government is funded, I have no obligation to provide you with a free education. If you were too stupid to learn it in civic class, it is not my fault.
Stop avoiding the question. If this question isn't answered, the government collapses. To answer the question, you have to identify a source of money.

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

Give us the source of money. If you can't identify a source of money, the government collapses.
So far, no Democrat on the planet has been able to identify a source of money. How about you be the first.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#953360 Jul 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Psychiatrists call what you're doing "projection".
Finally you are commenting on something you are familiar with!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953362 Jul 25, 2013
Emoron wrote:
<quoted text>
Finally you are commenting on something you are familiar with!
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

If you can't answer this question, the government collapses.
You have to identify a source of money to answer the question.
So...

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

Since: May 11

Hustontown, PA

#953363 Jul 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop avoiding the question. If this question isn't answered, the government collapses. To answer the question, you have to identify a source of money.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Give us the source of money. If you can't identify a source of money, the government collapses.
So far, no Democrat on the planet has been able to identify a source of money. How about you be the first.
Why are you asking? Look it up. My God, with all your endless blabbing, I would think you at lead knew how the government was funded.

Why do you think it is different under Obama than it was under George W Bush?

Since: May 11

Hustontown, PA

#953364 Jul 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
"your party"
I am an independent. Soemtimes I see a lesser of two evils. Too often I see outright treason.
You seem to exhibit the usual characteristic of a Democrat, assuming that if someone isn't a Democrat they can only be a Republican.
This is just one of the many traits you exhibit that expose you as being just another indoctrinated Democrat.
I lean more toward Libertarian than anything else. However, there are things the Libertarian Party promotes that I ardently disagree with. Besides, Libertarianism is best suited for state governments which comprise the federal republic. To have a Libertarian federal government is a contradiction in terms.
Howevere, I think a Libertarian government would not be treasonous, like the Democratic Party government obviously is.
"Right Whiner Independent" - a Republican at heart who wants to avoid any responsibility for electing George W Bush & the Republicans in Congress that voted to create this recession & the economic destruction that followed.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953365 Jul 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you asking? Look it up. My God, with all your endless blabbing, I would think you at lead knew how the government was funded.
Why do you think it is different under Obama than it was under George W Bush?
You're running away from the question. If this question isn't answered, the government collapses.

To answer the question, you have to identify a source of money.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Give us the source of money. If you can't identify a source of money, the government collapses.

So far, no Democrat on the planet has been able to identify a source of money. How about you be the first.

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953366 Jul 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
"Right Whiner Independent" - a Republican at heart who wants to avoid any responsibility for electing George W Bush & the Republicans in Congress that voted to create this recession & the economic destruction that followed.
You're talking about the recession created by the Democrats' Marxist subprime CRA program collapsing the economy after two years (one year, eight months, rounded to two years, dumbass) of oversight by Democrats Dodd and Frank, right?
Yup, the worst thing Bush did was to negotiate with Democrats and give them no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program that collapsed our economy after two years (fuck you) of oversight by Democrats in exchange for Democrats supporting the war in Iraq.

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#953367 Jul 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you asking? Look it up. My God, with all your endless blabbing, I would think you at lead knew how the government was funded.
Why do you think it is different under Obama than it was under George W Bush?
You continually and ignorantly ignore Congress' role, dumbass.

You have to identify a source of money to answer the question. If the question isn't answered, the government collapses.

(Let's just assume you don't really want the government to collapse, regardless of your treason.)

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

Since: May 11

Hustontown, PA

#953368 Jul 25, 2013
endeavor wrote:
<quoted text>
The demorat authored mortgage mess, remember?
Money for nothing, money to bad credit risks, SOP for your side.
Wow,still trying to peddle the CRA excuse after Republicans basically ran Congress from Jan 1995 until 2007.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#953369 Jul 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
If you can't answer this question, the government collapses.
You have to identify a source of money to answer the question.
So...
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
That's easy! It will come from increased revenue from taxes generated by an economy that is growing despite an obstructionist Republican House.
Glad to help bring some light into your dark depressing life.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 11 min loose cannon 185,852
Ask Amy 3-29-15 15 min PEllen 1
Abby 3-29-15 16 min PEllen 1
Ask Amy 3-28-15 46 min Pippa 3
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr OzRitz 52,287
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr TRD 69,300
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Brian_G 51,864
Amy 3-26 22 hr RACE 60
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]