Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
864,761 - 864,780 of 1,099,840 Comments Last updated 7 min ago

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#941076 Jul 9, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The fewer laws passed by Congress, the better for all.
More fun to watch ObamaKKKare unravel.
Doing nothing Congress is less "fun" seeing the American economy and the social safety net unraveling unless you're a self-conceited , Koch Brothers wannabe robber baron only out for his own greedy self-interests.(Like a Caligula wallowing lasciviously in his own perverted sex orgies)
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#941077 Jul 9, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>I don't see the wealthiest Americans 'complaining' about the freedom to purchase medical insurance , even wealthy elected Republican Congressmen . I do see many wealthy Americans raising a storm of protest if they were ever prohibited from their right to buy healthcare insurance. Republican Red states attempts to ban the poor from participating in the medical insurance market is immoral and wrong
The "poor" have always been free to participate in the medical insurance market.

It's called working.

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#941078 Jul 9, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>wow. I hope you can get that high son.
I think that would be a remarkable achievement for you!
"yuck"
Son? You have a fixation with that word? Could it be that you do not know the man who was your seed and neither does your mother?
Big salute to you, the one finger kind. You and president nobama have earned that salute.
Peace
KMA

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#941079 Jul 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Hoodieman called his girlfriend and told her he was going to kick some creepy ass cracker's ass, idiot.
Then, there's the location of Zimmerman versus the location of Hoodieman, the busted nose, the grass on the back of the shirt, and the evidence of Zimmerman's head being bashed against the concrete sidewalk.
On the other side, there's a hole blown through Hoodieman's chest cavity... and nothing else.
I think it's funny how the girlfriend thought her testimony made Trayvon look like some sweet young thing instead of Little Red Robbin' Hoodie.

xD
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#941080 Jul 9, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>I don't see the wealthiest Americans 'complaining' about the freedom to purchase medical insurance , even wealthy elected Republican Congressmen . I do see many wealthy Americans raising a storm of protest if they were ever prohibited from their right to buy healthcare insurance. Republican Red states attempts to ban the poor from participating in the medical insurance market is immoral and wrong
The poor wont be participating in the medical insurance market under Obama care, they will be effectively supported in their medical needs by the productive in this country.

The government can't give something for free to someone unless they take it from someone else first.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#941081 Jul 9, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> You're comparing Obamacare to Marxism. Go try and argue that idiocy to the Heritage Foundation and conservative Romneycare proponents in Massachusetts. They'll laugh you right into the street.
How about we just compare ObamaKare to the goddam definition of Marxism, dufus.

Oh, yeah. You never could define the word, could you? I challenged you... how many times?... to define Marxism, and you still can't define the word.

How about this, dufus, try arguing anything not being Marxist when you're so goddam ignorant you can't even define the word.

Or, I could be wrong. Prove me wrong.

Define "Marxism" for us.
I'm betting you don't have a clue what the word means.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#941082 Jul 9, 2013
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
The poor wont be participating in the medical insurance market under Obama care, they will be effectively supported in their medical needs by the productive in this country.
The government can't give something for free to someone unless they take it from someone else first.
That should be an obvious fact to anyone.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#941083 Jul 9, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The "poor" have always been free to participate in the medical insurance market.
It's called working.
That's worth saying again.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#941084 Jul 9, 2013
The Virtue of Minding Our Own Business

....Like other presidents before him, Obama is expected to take positions on unfolding foreign events whether or not he has anything constructive or useful to say about them, and critics conclude that “failing” to take a position is an example of unacceptable passivity. Presidents and their most interventionist critics tend to agree that how other nations resolve their internal political disagreements is somehow the business of the U.S. government, and the critics usually focus on how the president has failed to interfere on the “right” side or how he has not interfered enough to make U.S.“influence” felt. This is the trouble with assuming that the U.S. must exercise “leadership” in response to every crisis and with believing that U.S. interests are at stake in practically every foreign dispute.

The idea that the U.S. shouldn’t try to interfere hardly ever comes up in the debate, because almost everyone in the debate assumes that some degree of interference is necessary and desirable. What the U.S. keeps finding out in Egypt is that it will be blamed for any outcome whether or not it is responsible for it. It would seem wiser to stop trying to be perceived as being on the “right” side of the latest disputes, which is bound to fail again and again, and to try instead to insulate the U.S. from them.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#941085 Jul 9, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
How is your glorious vacation on the East Coast going, pshyco?
"Buroc"
"poop's" vacation is going grate. He flies in Hollywierd models and Circus Circus show girls so they van push his wheel chair when they take him to a local Red Lobster, his choice for fine dining. The turn over is large, the "dates" get tired of having to clean him up and listen to his BS, lies. The stories are the same;
- His best selling bio, "fantasy" that will be released some summer
- His exploits as a war hero in Nam
- His captaincy of the Wake baseball team that won the national title in 56 or 57, he is not sure of the date. Of course the captain of that team said "poop" was not a member of that team
- His tale of woe, taking care of his brother for the 1st 9 years he was in the US Army moving uo thru the ranks
- The BMW's he once drove
- The 2 1/2 or 3 1/2 homes he owns, he has forgotten the actual number, homes that have bathrooms nicer than others homes
- His ongoing meetings with the democrat elite in DC who seek his input
Peace

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#941086 Jul 9, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Puhleeze! Hillary's was a little too convenient, considering that "it" only kept her from giving accurate testimony at a particular point in time. She seems to remember how to lie well enough. Funny how Benghazi is the only subject she appears to have trouble remembering.
She remembered very well those snipers in Sarajevo. She's just another pathological lying Democrat... like we don't have too many of them already.

One of my favorite Dick Cheney moments was when he made the comment about Hillary being confused about whether she was in Sarajevo or on a hunting trip with him.

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#941087 Jul 9, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't look good.
Secular progressive liberalism has taken hold. We now have a president who wants government to meet our every need and he's more than happy to play the role of God with his fellow Democrats as our angels of mercy while stealing our money and destroying the country.
And far too many people want to put government on an altar and bow down before it.
That's the plan apparently.
Hopefully, more Americans will figure it out soon.
Obama and his minions believe that as long as they provide the masses with free cell phones that they won't rise up and protest his giving massive gifts of our tax dollars to foreign countries and corporate welfare.

" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_depriva... ;

The switch-and-bait never ends with crooks like him.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#941088 Jul 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Virtue of Minding Our Own Business
....Like other presidents before him, Obama is expected to take positions on unfolding foreign events whether or not he has anything constructive or useful to say about them, and critics conclude that “failing” to take a position is an example of unacceptable passivity. Presidents and their most interventionist critics tend to agree that how other nations resolve their internal political disagreements is somehow the business of the U.S. government, and the critics usually focus on how the president has failed to interfere on the “right” side or how he has not interfered enough to make U.S.“influence” felt. This is the trouble with assuming that the U.S. must exercise “leadership” in response to every crisis and with believing that U.S. interests are at stake in practically every foreign dispute.
The idea that the U.S. shouldn’t try to interfere hardly ever comes up in the debate, because almost everyone in the debate assumes that some degree of interference is necessary and desirable. What the U.S. keeps finding out in Egypt is that it will be blamed for any outcome whether or not it is responsible for it. It would seem wiser to stop trying to be perceived as being on the “right” side of the latest disputes, which is bound to fail again and again, and to try instead to insulate the U.S. from them.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
agree
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#941089 Jul 9, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Back in Bumpass, stealing more valor.
Poor old Galt, always thinking that he is so smart.Then letting his lying mouth betray him again. I love it..Still smarting from your latest bust...Huh tubba.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#941090 Jul 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Virtue of Minding Our Own Business
....Like other presidents before him, Obama is expected to take positions on unfolding foreign events whether or not he has anything constructive or useful to say about them, and critics conclude that “failing” to take a position is an example of unacceptable passivity. Presidents and their most interventionist critics tend to agree that how other nations resolve their internal political disagreements is somehow the business of the U.S. government, and the critics usually focus on how the president has failed to interfere on the “right” side or how he has not interfered enough to make U.S.“influence” felt. This is the trouble with assuming that the U.S. must exercise “leadership” in response to every crisis and with believing that U.S. interests are at stake in practically every foreign dispute.
The idea that the U.S. shouldn’t try to interfere hardly ever comes up in the debate, because almost everyone in the debate assumes that some degree of interference is necessary and desirable. What the U.S. keeps finding out in Egypt is that it will be blamed for any outcome whether or not it is responsible for it. It would seem wiser to stop trying to be perceived as being on the “right” side of the latest disputes, which is bound to fail again and again, and to try instead to insulate the U.S. from them.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
Critics say Obama is a fraud and doesn't have a clue about anything that happens in government because he isn't in charge of anything and his only function is to make it appear as if someone is actually president and read pre-prepared scripts on command.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#941091 Jul 9, 2013
Just how determined is Fox Nation, the lie-riddled Fox News community web site, in its mission to slander anything and everything connected to liberal politics and media? Apparently they are so determined that they don’t care if they publish devastatingly negative representations of their pals down the hall at Fox News.

In a posting that must have given them goose bumps, the Fox Nationalists linked to an article at the uber-rightist NewsBusters that itself linked to an article at Alternet (Fox would never link directly to a liberal source). The Alternet piece was written by long-time media reformer Jeff Cohen and addressed the failure of the mainstream progressive media, and specifically MSNBC, to criticize President Obama for his actions taken against whistleblowers like Edward Snowden.

Capturing Cohen disparaging the network for which he used to work, was simply to compelling of a story to pass up. So Fox Nation slapped together a couple of paragraphs and topped it off with a headline that extracted the juiciest snippet in the column: Former MSNBC Producer: MSNBC Is ‘Official Network of the Obama White House.’ But in their haste (or more likely their ineptitude), they must have failed to notice that the passage they quoted was far more damaging to Fox News than it was to their intended target, MSNBC. Here is what Fox Nation posted about Fox News:

“…with Obama in power, a number of MSNBC talking heads have reacted to the Snowden disclosures like Fox News hosts did when they were in hysterical damage control mode for Bush – complete with ridiculously fact-free claims and national chauvinism that we’ve long come to expect from the ‘fair & balanced’ channel.”

Sweet! Fox Nation actually published an analysis of Fox News that noted its “hysterical damage control mode for Bush,” its “ridiculously fact-free claims,” and belittled their ever-mockable slogan asserting fairness and balance.

It’s heartening to know that Fox’s audience will read that evaluation and, perhaps, have some of it stick in their Silly Putty brians. The intended swipe at MSNBC is rather mild in comparison. In fact, Cohen’s critique really just demonstrates that progressives are not as cultishly attached to MSNBC as wingnuts are to Fox – a fact recently documented by Gallup.

http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/...
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#941092 Jul 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
That's worth saying again.
Ok, you are a lying psychotic phony. Now go straighten out your patches...Walter.

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#941093 Jul 9, 2013
Emoron wrote:
<quoted text>
Elected and serving for the next 3+ years! Isn't it GREAT!
God Bless America!
Obama better hope that God IS dead.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#941094 Jul 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Hillary-Michelle has to be a joke. Hillary is a pathological liar. Michelle had to surrender her law license to avoid prosecution for scamming insurance companies.
That ticket would be a joke.
Already worried about Hillary? Still waiting for you to suggest who you might support for president in 2016.
It's hard for you to be FOR anything when all you can do is whine and fret about things that scare you.

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#941095 Jul 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
She remembered very well those snipers in Sarajevo. She's just another pathological lying Democrat... like we don't have too many of them already.
One of my favorite Dick Cheney moments was when he made the comment about Hillary being confused about whether she was in Sarajevo or on a hunting trip with him.
lol, you mean the snipers she lied about shooting at her? Too bad she couldn't use a stroke as an excuse when she got caught in that fib.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 46 min LRS 177,347
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 47 min Obama 49,453
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 2 hr _Zoey_ 7,745
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 2 hr _Zoey_ 296
Danger! It is horrible, rotten luck to hug a w... 2 hr Unlucky man 1
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr _Zoey_ 4,648
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr _Zoey_ 4,663
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 hr Phil Indeblanc 97,916
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••