Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1262834 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

NJ raider 1

Newark, NJ

#939963 Jul 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Parsing the psychology of the president’s bond with Ms. Jarrett has become something of a West Wing pastime: is she some sort of mother or sister figure to an only child whose own parents variously abandoned him?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/us/politics...
The NYT's article goes on to say "After the downgrade in the nation’s debt last year, it was not the Treasury secretary at the president’s side helping map out how to manage the markets reaction. It was Ms. Jarrett."
So what! It was Chaney who was Bush's advisor & basically commander & liar, pushing the initiative to invade a sovereign nation that by all accounts was complying with the UN sanctions. So who was really president?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#939965 Jul 8, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>I don't care. We had Cheney as VP, you cannot get any worse than that, well except for maybe Dan Quayle.
Oh, yes, Homer, you CAN get much worse than that.

Rahm "dead fish" Emmanuel.
Tony "jailbird" Rezko.
Bill "domestic terrorist" Ayres.
Van "avowed communist" Jones.
Anita "Mao Tse-Tung admirer" Dunn.
Valerie "slumlord" Jarrett.
Eric "above the law" Holder.
Rev. "blame whitey" Wright.

Gee, the list goes on and on. Give me a minute. There's a lot more.

But it most definitely can get worse than Cheney and Quayle who were guided by their convictions. You just didn't like their convictions.

Give me convictions even if I disagree over the above list any day.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#939966 Jul 8, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? You're getting cwazyer every day.
It was just a question. So, has he?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#939967 Jul 8, 2013
flack wrote:
Hey you people in Florida Chantal will be knocking on the door around Friday.
Fundraising for Obama?

Thanks for the heads up....
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939968 Jul 8, 2013
flack wrote:
Hey you people in Florida Chantal will be knocking on the door around Friday.
Yup
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#939969 Jul 8, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> So what! It was Chaney who was Bush's advisor & basically commander & liar, pushing the initiative to invade a sovereign nation that by all accounts was complying with the UN sanctions. So who was really president?
Rove.
Jane Says

New York, NY

#939970 Jul 8, 2013
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939971 Jul 8, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Homer would pay higher taxes for a smarter populace. It is in the best interest of the country. Why are rightwingers so down on education, smart people, and have an overall disdain for intelligence?
Education and intelligence are not the same.

Many of the public school systems with the highest per capita expenditures have the worst results.

If you start with substandard raw materials, no amount of money spent on union labor can produce a quality product

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#939972 Jul 8, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Weren't you people complaining about Washington 'insiders' the first time when Palin was running?
Now it's a 'bad' thing?
Boy you people can't make up your minds.
Admit it. You had no idea who Valerie Jarrett was or her significant influence over this president.

Homer apparently didn't.

Now you should ask yourself, "Why is that?"

Shouldn't we know who influences the president's decisions and/or makes them for him?
LCN Llin

United States

#939973 Jul 8, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
So what? Who cares? I suppose you think the republicans should choose the Presidents advisors? Get a grip.
fauxites stick to one particular item, ACORN, President Obama's church, a few people from the 1960s influencing his thought :-) and hammer away into the air with nothing of importance.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#939974 Jul 8, 2013
War by remote control AUSTRALIANS under attack in some future war may be able to call in cyber specialists able to infect an enemy aircraft with a Trojan horse virus and force it to land or to crash, its pilot helpless to intervene.

That's one reason, says national security specialist Des Ball, that Australia needs to develop its own offensive cyber capabilities.

This extraordinary notion, worlds away from the layman's view of dogfights, ack-ack fire and even long-range missile attacks, is contained in a series of papers, to be released today by the Kokoda Foundation think tank, on security challenges facing Australia.

In a joint paper, Ball and former Royal Australian Air Force officer Gary Waters say the government acknowledged in the defence white paper that cyber warfare posed a serious threat to Australia's military capabilities and to the nation's critical infrastructure and commercial operations.
Iran Air Flight 655 in July 3, 1988 killing 290 innocent civilian from six nations including 66 children.



Because of the delay in takeoff, it appeared on the Vincennes’s radar at 10:17, and at 10:19, the Vincennes began to issue warnings on the Military Air Distress frequency. According to U.S. government accounts, Vincennes mistakenly identified the Iranian airplane as an attacking military fighter. The officers identified the flight profile being flown by the A300B2 as being similar to that of an Iranian Air Force F-14A Tomcat during an attack run. According to the same reports Vincennes tried more than once to contact Flight 655, but there was no acknowledgement. The official ICAO report stated that these attempts to contact Iran Air 655 were sent on the wrong frequency and addressed to a non-existent “Iranian F-14&#8243;.

The Iranian F-14s at Bandar Abbas have been set to squawk in “Mode II,” a mode that would identify to the U.S. ships that the aircraft in question were military, and Iranian. Being a commercial flight, Iran Air 655 was instructed to squawk in Mode III, a signal that identifies civilian traffic. A unique transmission code number, 6760 in this case, was assigned to distinguish this particular flight from others.

During the next three minutes, the Vincennes issued a number of warnings on both military and civil distress frequencies, it (mistakenly) identified the Airbus 320 as a possible Iranian F-14, it (mistakenly) reported hearing IFF squawks in Mode II, and it (mistakenly) reported the aircraft as descending toward the ship when it was in fact still climbing according to its usual flight plan.

At 10:24 am, Captain Rogers, the Commanding Officer of Vincennes ordered to fire two SM-2ER antiaircraft missiles at the assumed F-14 fighter jet. A few seconds later, with the Airbus still on its assigned climb out, and slightly to one side of, but well within air corridor Amber 59, it was intercepted by one or both of the missiles at a range of eight nautical miles and an altitude of 13,500 feet. Flight 655, with some 290 people, tumbled in flames into the Persian Gulf. The whole flight had taken less than seven minutes. There were no survivors. By noon that day, Iranian helicopters and boats began to search the area and recover the bodies. It was not until later in the day that the officers and men of the Vincennes would learn that what they had shot down was not an Iranian F-14, but a commercial, civil flight.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939975 Jul 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, yes, Homer, you CAN get much worse than that.
Rahm "dead fish" Emmanuel.
Tony "jailbird" Rezko.
Bill "domestic terrorist" Ayres.
Van "avowed communist" Jones.
Anita "Mao Tse-Tung admirer" Dunn.
Valerie "slumlord" Jarrett.
Eric "above the law" Holder.
Rev. "blame whitey" Wright.
Gee, the list goes on and on. Give me a minute. There's a lot more.
But it most definitely can get worse than Cheney and Quayle who were guided by their convictions. You just didn't like their convictions.
Give me convictions even if I disagree over the above list any day.
A person who is guided by convictions is not a thinker. Bush was like that; that's why he was dangerous and got us into wars.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#939976 Jul 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, yes, Homer, you CAN get much worse than that.
Rahm "dead fish" Emmanuel.
Tony "jailbird" Rezko.
Bill "domestic terrorist" Ayres.
Van "avowed communist" Jones.
Anita "Mao Tse-Tung admirer" Dunn.
Valerie "slumlord" Jarrett.
Eric "above the law" Holder.
Rev. "blame whitey" Wright.
Gee, the list goes on and on. Give me a minute. There's a lot more.
But it most definitely can get worse than Cheney and Quayle who were guided by their convictions. You just didn't like their convictions.
Give me convictions even if I disagree over the above list any day.
the conviction that we should find more oil for Cheney's buddies brought us an unfunded illegal war.

i'll take the right wing fear-mongering over that conviction.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939977 Jul 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fundraising for Obama?
Thanks for the heads up....
Fundraising? Is he running for office? You're outta yer minduh.
Jane Says

New York, NY

#939978 Jul 8, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> So what! It was Chaney who was Bush's advisor & basically commander & liar, pushing the initiative to invade a sovereign nation that by all accounts was complying with the UN sanctions. So who was really president?
with either one, who could have ever imagined THOSE would be the good old days.

as the world burns, the empty suit vacations in Africa
and his lackey Kerry is on his sailboat

the only good news is that this year Obammy didn't "scramble the jets" to transport the family dog on vacation; although the summer isn't over yet.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939979 Jul 8, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> A bunch of gibberish from another school nerd. Too shook to put up your hands & fight like a man. No! That's not what I'm saying dumass. Zimmerman claimed in his recorded confession or statements from that night that, Trayvon saw his gun & reached for it. If the gun is holstered in an internal holster, on ones back right side as Zimmerman stated &, Trayvon is straddling Zimmerman who by his accounts was on his back &, Trayvon was banging his head on the sidewalk as Zimmerman claimed. How could Trayvon have seen something in the dark while straddling Zimmerman if the gun was already hard to see &, the gun would've been behind Trayvon? I could believe your demeanor if you hadn't already confessed to being scared of going to the hood, tough guy! Not!
If Hoodieman had never pursued Zimmerman, and had never attacked Zimmerman, and had never tried to bash his brains out against a concrete sidewalk, then Hoodieman would never have never seen the gun that blew his ass to hell.

NOTE TO DRUG-USING DROPOUT GANGBANGER WANNABES:

Do not pursue and attack someone because they appear to be weaker than you. Americans have the right to be armed. You just might not see the gun that blows you away while you're bashing someone's head against a concrete sidewalk.

So, are you going to do the usual riot and burn your own neighborhood down when Zimmerman is acquitted?... and of course expect us to pick up the tab for fixing your bullshit, right?
How about this. Live in the goddam ashes, asshole.
LCN Llin

United States

#939980 Jul 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, yes, Homer, you CAN get much worse than that.
Rahm "dead fish" Emmanuel.
Tony "jailbird" Rezko.
Bill "domestic terrorist" Ayres.
Van "avowed communist" Jones.
Anita "Mao Tse-Tung admirer" Dunn.
Valerie "slumlord" Jarrett.
Eric "above the law" Holder.
Rev. "blame whitey" Wright.
Gee, the list goes on and on. Give me a minute. There's a lot more.
But it most definitely can get worse than Cheney and Quayle who were guided by their convictions. You just didn't like their convictions.
Give me convictions even if I disagree over the above list any day.
Amusing lack of grasp on history and recent politics.
Your counterproductive posts, if anyone actually read them, over the years, would have elected President Obama :-)
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#939981 Jul 8, 2013
Rand Paul: American Neocons Want To Send Egypt More Of ‘Your’ Money

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/r...

neocons....

Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) said U.S. assistance should be used “as leverage” to press the military to pursue a quick transition to a civilian government.

“At the end of the day, while we have already made some obligations on that $1.4 billion, by no means have we made the overwhelming amount of that obligation,” Menendez said on NBC’s “Meet The Press.”“This is an opportunity to have a pause and say to the Egyptians, you have an opportunity to come together. You have to have the military understand that that’s what we are looking for.”

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), the ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, cautioned against rushing into discussions about aid.

“There will be plenty of time to asses the aid issue,” Corker said on “Fox News Sunday,” later adding,“Trying to jump to what we are going to do relative to support at this moment is not the place that we need to be.”

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) said on the same program:“I think on a practical basis we have to look and ask a very simple question: Will cutting off aid accelerate or enhance the opportunities and the chances to have a truly Democratic government? I don’t think so.”

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) called the military in Egypt the “one stable factor there.” The military “should continue to be rewarded” for its stabilizing presence, Rogers said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-poli...

50/50, or: more stuff you won't hear on FOX.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#939982 Jul 8, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> It was just a question. So, has he?
To you it was just a question, but to normal people it was cwazy. Sorry loon.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939983 Jul 8, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> A bunch of gibberish from another school nerd. Too shook to put up your hands & fight like a man. No! That's not what I'm saying dumass. Zimmerman claimed in his recorded confession or statements from that night that, Trayvon saw his gun & reached for it. If the gun is holstered in an internal holster, on ones back right side as Zimmerman stated &, Trayvon is straddling Zimmerman who by his accounts was on his back &, Trayvon was banging his head on the sidewalk as Zimmerman claimed. How could Trayvon have seen something in the dark while straddling Zimmerman if the gun was already hard to see &, the gun would've been behind Trayvon? I could believe your demeanor if you hadn't already confessed to being scared of going to the hood, tough guy! Not!
None of this matters.

The prosecution has failed to prove the elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

Not even close.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 28 min Earthling-1 54,333
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Guru 194,408
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr CrunchyBacon 100,274
Cincinnati campus police officer charged with m... 3 hr joey 2
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr Whiny1 6,254
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 7 hr Ariel Sharon 70,141
Amy 7-29-15 10 hr mrs gladys kravitz 14
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages