Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1277191 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Buroc Millhouse Obama

East Hartford, CT

#939852 Jul 8, 2013
Emoron wrote:
<quoted text>
You're wasting your time by presenting factual information in a logical manner. These right wing morons are programmed to only recognize a fantasy world provided by their handlers. As you can plainly see, DBWriter is mentally ill, no chance of having a rational exchange of ideas.
Translation:

The non-libtards here don't buy into the propaganda you provided. Only us moron DemoK-Rats swallow the whole load.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#939853 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The beliefs the Democrats want you to think are obsolete so they can install their medieval dictatorship over a population of serf peasants:
http://constitutionus.com/
So, let's go over some of thos "obsolete" beliefs:
"Section 1 All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."
I take it you don't like this idea. So, just what would a government you Democrats want consist of?
(You have to answer this question to answer the post.)
"Section 7
1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
2: Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law.
I take it you don't like this idea. So, just what would a government you Democrats want consist of?
(You have to answer this question to answer the post.)
"6: In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office,9 the Same shall devolve on the VicePresident, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected."
I take it you don't like this idea. So, just what would a government you Democrats want consist of?
(You have to answer this question to answer the post.)
i have to answer the question to answer the post?

so who do you think you are? a Topix god or something?

just because you write the best Topix fiction i, or anyone else for that matter, has ever seen, doesn't mean you're the king. maybe over at Townhall/Breitbart/Daily Caller, but not here buddy.
LCN Llin

United States

#939855 Jul 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Bush: Obama Acted 'To Protect The Country'
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...
Republican idea of RINO seems their destruction.
RINO may assist in holding on the the house but seems destined to knock off their own candidates in the Senate.

Republicans should not have lost Senator Lugar's seat in 2012
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939856 Jul 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
REPORT: Obama Says Tea Party Members Fit Profile of Domestic Terrorists (Really?)
“Typically domestic terrorists in the U.S. are people who cling to obsolete beliefs from the time of the American Revolution. They are conservative Christians, reactionary Republicans and conspiracy theorists many of whom belong to racist hate groups.[...] Tea Partiers commonly own guns and stock up ammunition and food in anticipation of starting another civil war to overthrow the will of the governing body who represent all of the American people.”
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/...
ok, so how many of you TP nutjobs actually think he said that?
LOL, these are hilarious:

Here are samples of their current articles in addition to the one about the terrorist Tea Party:
•Was Paula Deen Framed for Racism by Tasteless Food Trend Purists?
•Lawmaker Corks Gay Talk Hole with God’s Law, Crowned D&D Champ.
•Selfish Wendy Davis Rejects Rick Perry Compliment, Could Have Kidney Infection.
•Poll: Can Zimmerman get a Mistrial if the Lady Jury is on Their Periods?
•New CDC Study Indicates Pets Of Gay Couples Worse At Sports, Better At Fashion Than Pets Of Straight Couples.
NJ raider 1

Newark, NJ

#939857 Jul 8, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
Mark Osterman, Zimmermans friend testifying. He has written a book on Zimmerman.
He can't keep a straight face. Thinks its funny. His fatty wife just cried and said it was "Georgie" screaming help on the 911 tape.
What an effing load.
He is Zimmerman's worst witness. His book contradicts Zimmerman's account on several occasions. He just testified that Zimmerman's holster was an internal holster, not an external holster &, that it's hard to see even without a jacket on. Also the prosecutor was trying to get Osterman to admit that, if you shot someone &, didn't know they were dead or the threat was neutralized, it's commonsense or protocol to keep you gun out. Osterman is ducking & dodging his direct questions, trying not to say anything incriminating on George's behalf. His testimony is more damning than good!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939858 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't mean to inadvertently over tax your ability to rationalize. I probably caught you off guard. I'll give you another chance since it was probably a fluke you got your ass handed to you.
Daughter-in-law of communist Vernon Jarrett and has the office immediately adjacent to the Oval Office. You know, the office Obama went to when he was summoned from the golf course when he didn't even have a clue the operation to kill bin Laden was even happening. You ran away from that discussion previously when the truth about Obama being indoctrinated in Marxist communism his entire life got shoved up your ass.
Now, back to the topic you responded to:
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
Can Zimmerman get a Mistrial if the Lady Jury is on Their Periods?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939859 Jul 8, 2013
Karma wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, let's brush up on history
1. while the chinese did organize the Dong Min Hoi, they had no actual assets on the ground. The Viet Minh did the leg work
2. the Dong Min Hoi were a failure at gathering intel
3. The Allies released Ho Chi Minh and enlisted his aid to fight the Japanese, promising him Vietnam Independence for his cooperation.
4. The Japanese never had more than 6,000 troops stationed in Indochina, although approximately 25,000 troops transited thru most on their way to Burma
5. We defeat Japan
The Allies reneg on their deal with Uncle Ho
6. France defeated
7. DDE sends in U.S. advisors...
Idiot, here's the post again. Start with the British leaving Veitnam and the Chinese refusing to leave.
I'll give you the next event in the recent history of Vietnam:

HO CHI MINH GOES TO PARIS AND ASKS THE FRENCH TO RETURN TO VIETNAM TO REMOVE THE CHINESE ARMY THAT DIDN'T LEAVE VIETNAM AFTER THE JAPANESE ARMY HAD BEEN REMOVED.

Now, what happened next in Vietnam after Ho Chi Minh went to Paris and asked the French to return to Vietnam?

(... psssssttt.... The French bring elections to Vietnam and don't endorse Ho Chi Minh as supreme ruler of Vietnam.)

Ok, I gave that one away. How about you tell us what happened next.

(... psssstttt.... Ho Chi Minh starts a war against the French he asked to return to Vietnam, and the democratically elected government resulting from the elections.)

Well, I gave that away, too. Let's just get to Vietnam becoming part of the Cold War:

Ho Chi Minh asks the Soviet Union to help him with the war he started against the French he asked to come back to Vietnam and who made Vietnam a democracy, and the Viet Minh defeat the French at Dien Bien Phu with weapons supplied by the Soviet Union.

I seem to be giving you all the answers to the test.

Now that you know how Vietnam became part of the Cold War, how about you take it from here and tell us how the US became involved in Vietnam.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939860 Jul 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
i have to answer the question to answer the post?
so who do you think you are? a Topix god or something?
just because you write the best Topix fiction i, or anyone else for that matter, has ever seen, doesn't mean you're the king. maybe over at Townhall/Breitbart/Daily Caller, but not here buddy.
When Svetlana gets on her knees, he looks a little taller to her

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939861 Jul 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
i have to answer the question to answer the post?
so who do you think you are? a Topix god or something?
just because you write the best Topix fiction i, or anyone else for that matter, has ever seen, doesn't mean you're the king. maybe over at Townhall/Breitbart/Daily Caller, but not here buddy.
No. I'm just not a willfully ignorant Democrat party line indoctrination spewer.

Here's the post again, for your easy reference:

The beliefs the Democrats want you to think are obsolete so they can install their medieval dictatorship over a population of serf peasants:
http://constitutionus.com/
So, let's go over some of thos "obsolete" beliefs:
"Section 1 All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."
I take it you don't like this idea. So, just what would a government you Democrats want consist of?
(You have to answer this question to answer the post.)
"Section 7
1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
2: Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law.
I take it you don't like this idea. So, just what would a government you Democrats want consist of?
(You have to answer this question to answer the post.)
"6: In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office,9 the Same shall devolve on the VicePresident, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected."
I take it you don't like this idea. So, just what would a government you Democrats want consist of?
(You have to answer this question to answer the post.)
i have to answer the question to answer the post?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#939862 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Aist of the ideas the Democrats want everyone to think are archaic....
So, you don't like this idea, right?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
and this:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
and this:
"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
and this:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
and this:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
and this:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
... and most especially, you hate the notion of a constitutional republic with limited government.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
These ideals are what you pretend to believe. The TEA Party actually believes in them,... and will fight you to keep it the standard of our country. You will have to kill them to eliminate the Constitution, which is your ultimate goal.
Do we have to fight ANOTHER war to make these points about limited government and individual rights?
hint.....

here's a great story about how Rubio could now win a national election because he quit catering to the Tea Party.

Marco Rubio Spurned by Original Tea Party Supporters Over Immigration

The boosters who helped elect the Florida senator are denouncing his immigration heresy—backing ‘amnesty’ when he swore he wouldn’t—and vowing a primary challenge. But his national prospects look brighter.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07...

won't be long before Republicans candidates will be running on....'I don't belong to the Tea party!'....and winning.

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

United States

#939863 Jul 8, 2013
patbmak wrote:
<quoted text>I'm afraid my God has deserted me. I don't need to pray to Him anymore.
God does not desert anyone.
He never has and never will.
People desert people.
Karma

Bethel, ME

#939864 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
First... the Middle East was an Islamist Terrorist Empire that stretched unbroken from the Atlantic shores of Morocco to the Afghan-Tibet border, and every nation within was a source of Wahhabist terrorists. We were attacked by Arab Wahhabists, dumbass. You'd know that if you knew anything about the Middle East.
2.(the question is, what you would do on 9/12, not what you wouldn't have done in January, 2001. And, your note is purely speculative without substance.
3. Or, just watch the news during the Clinton administration when Al Qaeda was bombing us as if they were on a schedule. But, this is before 9/11. The question is what would you have done on 9/12.
4.(same as 3)
5.(same as 3)
6.(same as 3) Perhaps you can describe for us the condition of our foreign intelligence capabilities at that time, you know, when Al Qaeda was bombing us as if they were on a schedule.
You are running away from the question... again.
Here it is. Just answer the question.
Ok, dufus...
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
You have to tell us what you would have done on 9/12, idiot.
First, I said I would never have staffed my White House with a bunch of Neo-Cons who didn't know anything about the Middle East. Bush not only didn't know what a Wahhabist was, where they originated from (Saudi Arabia-you would at least think "Bandar" Bush would have told him), he didn't even know there are different sects of Islam.

on 9/12, I would have fired Rumnuts & Wolfowitz for preparing to invade Iraq from day 1
I would have directed my Joint Chief of Staff to get Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden and most importantly
I WOULD NEVER LET A BUNCH OF CIVILIANS WITH NO MILITARY EXPERIENCE RUN A MILITARY OP. I would had done what Bush senior did, let the military run military operations
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#939865 Jul 8, 2013
GAYS wrote:
<quoted text>WOW THIS JUST CAME IN OBAMA KISSING MEN?There you have it. Barack Obama, the alleged leader of the free world, is kissing with tongues of David Camera. Barack Obama and David Cameron are kissing.
I am in a state of reporter’s shock right now. When I opened my daily email assignments and it said to cover the latest Obama scandal and get everyone upset over a new dark scandal, I could not believe the first bad thing I found he did today.
I guess we all saw this moment coming. Over 83% of British males experiment with homosexuality before they are 18, so it is no shock their highly liberal educated Prime Minister is queer. He likely sips tea with his pink extended and has a naturally gay British accent.
What is shocking is Obama. I know when Obama was running against McCain, I accused Obama of homosexuality and corraborated my story with National Enquierer after they called and asked us if the story was true. Which it was at the time so I could smear Obama. NBC and Fox News also reported on that same story and later redacted it. I redacted my story as well, because the Hawaii pictures and the secret email text from a Hawaii beach bottom boy that said he had a tryst with Obamo may not have been authentic, even though he went into secret details about Obama’s body and a tell-tale skin tag on his right upper thigh. A detail only Obama’s passed mother (rest her soul) and Michelle Obama should know.
Also, Muslims frown down upon open displays of homosexuality and you would think Obama’s African kinfolk will be shamed and chuck spears at him if he visists the dark continent.
Whatever the case, Obama is now clearly the first homosexual president. Look at the passion and when they take gay turns with each other’s backsides in the White House, there is a good ten minutes of time when Britain once again gets to plant a flag deep into American brown soil and claim itself Master of the World. Obama is shaming our country and our family. Poor Michelle. Poor Sasha and Malia. What a shame.
I will report on this issue with more fire and fury when my heart is still not so drenched with sorrow and grief now that we see the president of America is a gay. What a sick day for normalcy, and what a giant victory for the Gay Agenda.http://christwire.org/2 011/05/barack-obama-and-david- cameron-kissing-with-tongues/
get a grip.

Brokeback Bush

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#939866 Jul 8, 2013
the question is when Martin's mother and brother are proven to have perjured themselves on the stand will they be prosecuted? Pretty damning evidence that they did.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#939867 Jul 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
REPORT: Obama Says Tea Party Members Fit Profile of Domestic Terrorists (Really?)
“Typically domestic terrorists in the U.S. are people who cling to obsolete beliefs from the time of the American Revolution. They are conservative Christians, reactionary Republicans and conspiracy theorists many of whom belong to racist hate groups.[...] Tea Partiers commonly own guns and stock up ammunition and food in anticipation of starting another civil war to overthrow the will of the governing body who represent all of the American people.”
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/...
ok, so how many of you TP nutjobs actually think he said that?
Ever hear of harris ranch? They got hit by a terrorist attack.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#939868 Jul 8, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
When Svetlana gets on her knees, he looks a little taller to her
taller where?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939869 Jul 8, 2013
Karma wrote:
<quoted text>
First, I said I would never have staffed my White House with a bunch of Neo-Cons who didn't know anything about the Middle East. Bush not only didn't know what a Wahhabist was, where they originated from (Saudi Arabia-you would at least think "Bandar" Bush would have told him), he didn't even know there are different sects of Islam.
on 9/12, I would have fired Rumnuts & Wolfowitz for preparing to invade Iraq from day 1
I would have directed my Joint Chief of Staff to get Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden and most importantly
I WOULD NEVER LET A BUNCH OF CIVILIANS WITH NO MILITARY EXPERIENCE RUN A MILITARY OP. I would had done what Bush senior did, let the military run military operations
So, your answer was:

"Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result?"

Is this correct? You would do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and you're stupid enough to think you'd have a different experience than the Soviets, right?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#939870 Jul 8, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe that a healthy educated population benefits our country
Me too! Pay for it yourself!

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#939871 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't mean to inadvertently over tax your ability to rationalize. I probably caught you off guard. I'll give you another chance since it was probably a fluke you got your ass handed to you.
Daughter-in-law of communist Vernon Jarrett and has the office immediately adjacent to the Oval Office. You know, the office Obama went to when he was summoned from the golf course when he didn't even have a clue the operation to kill bin Laden was even happening. You ran away from that discussion previously when the truth about Obama being indoctrinated in Marxist communism his entire life got shoved up your ass.
Now, back to the topic you responded to:
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
Do you have a breakdown of the tanks Janet Napolitano has at her disposal?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#939872 Jul 8, 2013
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>God does not desert anyone.
He never has and never will.
People desert people.
Which god?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Doctor disciplined for allegedly chastising Chi... (Jul '09) 2 hr thenose 160
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr Joe Balls 196,955
News Arrests made after Two-Month burglary Spree in ... 3 hr fedupcracker 1
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 5 hr Cheftell 70,160
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr Ferrerman 100,649
Clare rios 5 hr Lol dumbaz 2
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 6 hr RACE 1,723
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages