Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939531 Jul 7, 2013
Fans Kill and Quarter Football Referee in Brazil

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939532 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Obama Call for Muslim Brotherhood Role Overtaken in Egypt
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-05/obam...
John McCain calls for suspension of US aid to Egypt following overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood leadership.
Took you long enough, to your first point what's up with this from your article:

"Secretary of State John Kerry said in a separate statement yesterday that “we firmly reject the unfounded and false claims by some in Egypt that the United States supports the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood or any specific Egyptian political party or movement.”

Your second point puts you right back where you started with a false cause argument. US law requires we stop providing aid to the military, they committed a coup. This does not equate to supporting the associates of the ousted President.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939533 Jul 7, 2013
Statewide pain-clinic database may be abolished



Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/06/3488469...
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939534 Jul 7, 2013
Those crazy Amish bomb the holiest site for Buddhists in the world

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Biha...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939535 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the post were you are claiming trying to force into "surgical centers" (hospitals? as other surgical procedures are performed in clinics).
Call it what you want this claim is not supported by the law which is asking the hospitals to board certify but makes no demands the procedure be performed in a hospital related facility.
These are two different aspects of the same piece of legislature. Let's see if we can end the confusion right now:

One provision forces abortions out of clinics and into ambulatory surgery clinics or hospitals.

Another provision requires that doctors performing abortions have hospital admitting privileges.

This is what you claimed I said:

"Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Makes it a little tough for you when you throw your best insults, built all those straw men and in the end-I am not fooled in the least by these idiotic attempts.
You said that the law would move the clinics into hospitals which is not what the law states."

This is the post in which you said I made that claim:

"Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That post wasn't about "standards of care", it was about admitting privileges.
They're not trying to apply standards evenly in TX, they're trying to force abortions into surgical centers while not requiring the same for other surgical procedures routinely performed in clinics. I asked Nobama about this several pages ago, he never answered."

Please tell me you're no longer confused.

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#939536 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the post were you are claiming trying to force into "surgical centers" (hospitals? as other surgical procedures are performed in clinics).
Call it what you want this claim is not supported by the law which is asking the hospitals to board certify but makes no demands the procedure be performed in a hospital related facility.
You continue to prove what an idiot you are. By making these demands on clinics that offer abortion, they will force these facilities to no longer offer them.

The "force" being costs to comply.

Then the only options for abortions are surgical facilities/hospitals.

If you had a home based food business & they pass laws requiring all food must be prepared in a separate dedicated kitchen, they aren't forcing these home businesses to close but they will.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939537 Jul 7, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Can you explain this to me? it seems insane.
The Obama administration has scaled back another of its key healthcare rules, delaying a requirement that verifies the income levels of those seeking taxpayer subsidies until after the 2014 midterm elections.
Instead, the new insurance marketplaces operated by states and the District of Columbia will take the consumer's word that they qualify for the subsidies, The Washington Post reported.
The announcement came on Friday without fanfare with the Department of Health and Human Services publishing the notification in the Federal Register.
Verification plans for the taxpayer subsidies won't go into effect until 2015 for those earning about $45,000 to purchase health insurance, or earning $15,000 to qualify for Medicaid in the District and 23 participating states.
*so are they just going to give out subsidies for the hell of it? or what?
The Christmas tree gets heavier and heavier, proving that ObamaKKKare is unworkable.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939538 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Another reason that trying to get the government or the electorate to graciously grant rights is the wrong approach.
Much broader implication than that.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939539 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Took you long enough, to your first point what's up with this from your article:
"Secretary of State John Kerry said in a separate statement yesterday that “we firmly reject the unfounded and false claims by some in Egypt that the United States supports the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood or any specific Egyptian political party or movement.”
Your second point puts you right back where you started with a false cause argument. US law requires we stop providing aid to the military, they committed a coup. This does not equate to supporting the associates of the ousted President.
Did Obama ask for the Muslim Brotherhood to be included in the New Government? According to the article "Yes"

What McCain is demanding is contrary to what the Obama admin is wanting. How do you balance this?

It depends on how you define a military coup. When an interim government is sit up prior to a general election is that the military ruling the country?

Spin it however you want McCain is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and thinks their ouster as being wrong.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939540 Jul 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You continue to prove what an idiot you are. By making these demands on clinics that offer abortion, they will force these facilities to no longer offer them.
The "force" being costs to comply.
Then the only options for abortions are surgical facilities/hospitals.
If you had a home based food business & they pass laws requiring all food must be prepared in a separate dedicated kitchen, they aren't forcing these home businesses to close but they will.
What cost to comply are you inferring?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939541 Jul 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You continue to prove what an idiot you are. By making these demands on clinics that offer abortion, they will force these facilities to no longer offer them.
The "force" being costs to comply.
Then the only options for abortions are surgical facilities/hospitals.
If you had a home based food business & they pass laws requiring all food must be prepared in a separate dedicated kitchen, they aren't forcing these home businesses to close but they will.
ObamaKKKare makes abortion free for all, rich or poor, so your argument is worthless.

Many local governments are already doing that to home-based businesses, as well as church soup kitchens.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939542 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Did Obama ask for the Muslim Brotherhood to be included in the New Government? According to the article "Yes"
What McCain is demanding is contrary to what the Obama admin is wanting. How do you balance this?
It depends on how you define a military coup. When an interim government is sit up prior to a general election is that the military ruling the country?
Spin it however you want McCain is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and thinks their ouster as being wrong.
Right or wrong, McCain is advocating abiding by US law, while Obama is once again reusing to follow the law.
Stoneman

Boise, ID

#939543 Jul 7, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Which is still a LOT better than Romeny.
America and Americans won. On right wing crazies lost.
Focus, pinhead.

TRY to address ANYTHING I said. How unemployment is still above 7.5% after four and a half years. How Obama flushed almost a TRILLION DOLLARS down the crapper bailing out state gubbermint workers' unions' pensions. I'd love to see you try.

Or you can come up with another completely random non sequitur (which means you say something that has nothing to do with the topic, pinhead) like how you think Romney would be worse (what the hell?).

Either way you illustrate Socialist/Democrat aptitude magnificently.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939544 Jul 7, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
Statewide pain-clinic database may be abolished
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/06/3488469...
Are you opposed to medical privacy?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939545 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Did Obama ask for the Muslim Brotherhood to be included in the New Government? According to the article "Yes"
What McCain is demanding is contrary to what the Obama admin is wanting. How do you balance this?
It depends on how you define a military coup. When an interim government is sit up prior to a general election is that the military ruling the country?
Spin it however you want McCain is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and thinks their ouster as being wrong.
Supposedly Obama said that, don't see how that's supporting them.

I'm not responsible for reconciling what McCain says with what Obama wants. As far as I know McCain has called for an end to financial aid to the Egyptian military, you're welcome to post something that says otherwise.

When a President is removed from office by the military in violation of the Constitution that constitutes a coup.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939546 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
What cost to comply are you inferring?
Perhaps the cost of proper equipment, safety, cleanliness, and adequate professional medical staffing.

Nothing really important.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939547 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
These are two different aspects of the same piece of legislature. Let's see if we can end the confusion right now:
One provision forces abortions out of clinics and into ambulatory surgery clinics or hospitals.
Another provision requires that doctors performing abortions have hospital admitting privileges.
This is what you claimed I said:
"Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Makes it a little tough for you when you throw your best insults, built all those straw men and in the end-I am not fooled in the least by these idiotic attempts.
You said that the law would move the clinics into hospitals which is not what the law states."
This is the post in which you said I made that claim:
"Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That post wasn't about "standards of care", it was about admitting privileges.
They're not trying to apply standards evenly in TX, they're trying to force abortions into surgical centers while not requiring the same for other surgical procedures routinely performed in clinics. I asked Nobama about this several pages ago, he never answered."
Please tell me you're no longer confused.
Neither of your claims are supported by what the article states.

The law wants the hospital to board certify them.

You need to clarify what you think admitting standards are.

As most of the people offering these services also offer Ob/Gyn services that would on occasion use hospital services, I find this complaint lacking much merit.

So you are still objecting to abortion clinics having the same standards as other ambulatory facilities?

They do not have to move their facilities-as you are claiming- but meet the standards as other facilities offering out patient care. Why you think that an invasive procedure should require any less is not putting women's health first.

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#939548 Jul 7, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
It's amazing how you morans copy each other; or perhaps you are also another waxturd
"silly"
Wrong again. Not "wax", just pointing out the lunacy of liberal loons.
Peace
KMA
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939549 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Supposedly Obama said that, don't see how that's supporting them.
I'm not responsible for reconciling what McCain says with what Obama wants. As far as I know McCain has called for an end to financial aid to the Egyptian military, you're welcome to post something that says otherwise.
When a President is removed from office by the military in violation of the Constitution that constitutes a coup.
Yes! Do the rightwingers think we should invade Egypt?

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#939550 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
This comment makes no sense. SCOTUS bases their decisions are established laws and previous decisions. Marriage laws are well established and recognized.
<quoted text>
Really? You are in favor abandoning ALL marriage laws that are regarded as a contract that protects the parties involved?
"Whatever"
"dumos" is a liberaltarianloon. He is a firm believer all laws should be revoked when it comes to sex;
- Laws against incest
- Laws regarding adult sex with minors
- Laws regarding sex with animals
Actually "dumos" is just a loon. And a lair.
Peace

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 38 min Le Jimbo 17
1 dead, 9 injured in daytime Chicago shootings 46 min reality is a crutch 1
xtra xtra read all about it! 1 hr Read and weep 1
The truth regarding Ebola 1 hr C_Evertt Coop 2
Italian boys confession. 1 hr Bubba Klintler 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr Earthling-1 49,187
kalyan single jodi callll-08339890226 7 hr susil bhai 1
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 11 hr Sunshine 181,798
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 13 hr cheluzal 98,851
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:17 am PST

NBC Sports11:17AM
T.Y. Hilton is questionable, but they're not ruling him out
Bleacher Report11:28 AM
Jay Cutler Rumors: Latest Details, Speculation on Bears QB's Future
Bleacher Report11:39 AM
Complete Week 16 Preview for Indianapolis
NBC Sports12:33 PM
1 thing even Rahm can't fix: Da Bears - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 1:01 PM
Cowboys' Murray listed as questionable for Colts - NBC Sports