Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1262073 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#939776 Jul 8, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
How about his quote you insufferable twit?
"Over the past month, Muslims have fasted, taking no food or water during daylight hours, in order to refocus their minds on faith and redirect their hearts to charity. Muslims worldwide have stretched out a hand of mercy to those in need. Charity tables at which the poor can break their fast line the streets of cities and towns. And gifts of food and clothing and money are distributed to ensure that all share in God's abundance. Muslims often invite members of other families to their evening iftar meals, demonstrating a spirit of tolerance."
President George W Bush on Eid Al-Fitr The Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. December 5, 2002.
But thank you for showing once again what an ignorant bigot you are.
Thank you for proving my point. All parties of the United States have been duped by Moslems. A hand of mercy???-to their own people-sure they extend a hand to infidels like yourself--hope you grab it and then chop it off.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939777 Jul 8, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Thank you for proving my point. All parties of the United States have been duped by Moslems. A hand of mercy???-to their own people-sure they extend a hand to infidels like yourself--hope you grab it and then chop it off.
For some reason, these same Demcorats that hated Bush now love him and use quotes from him as a standard of reference to justify themselves.
They must be in really bad shape these days to have to use Bush to justify themselves....

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#939779 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I am more interested in knowing more about the unconstitutional actions of the NSA and our government than I am in the on-going drama about Snowden.
How's that investigation into the unconstitutional activities of the NSA going? Or, has everyone's attention been deliberately diverted away from that?
The media is covering the trial of Zimmerman goes free, no one is covering the NSA now. We have a bunch in both parties pushing the "you need surveillance in order to live" mantra. They don't care about your fourth amendment rights. WE THE PEOPLE must DEMAND that the Bluffdale site never open, that the entire PRISM program be shut down and that the PATRIOT Act be rescinded. Beyond that, I think each and every member of Congress who voted for any of these programs needs to be impeached at the very least. Start with Lindsay Graham.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Karma

Bethel, ME

#939780 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's brush up on some history, why don't we....
At the end of World War II the Japanese Army was in Vietnam. An allied army was required to remove the Japanese army from Vietnam after Japan surrendered to the Armed Forces of the United States, ending the war. The British army managed the removal of the Japanese army from the southern region of Vietnam, while the Chinese army managed the removal of the Japanese army from the northern region of Vietnam. After the removal of the Japanese army, the British army left Vietnam. However, the Chinese army did not leave Vietnam.
Kindly list the events in history from this time to the time when the US became involved in Vietnam.
Event number one:_________; and so on....
... well, dumbass?
Yes, let's brush up on history
1. while the chinese did organize the Dong Min Hoi, they had no actual assets on the ground. The Viet Minh did the leg work
2. the Dong Min Hoi were a failure at gathering intel
3. The Allies released Ho Chi Minh and enlisted his aid to fight the Japanese, promising him Vietnam Independence for his cooperation.
4. The Japanese never had more than 6,000 troops stationed in Indochina, although approximately 25,000 troops transited thru most on their way to Burma
5. We defeat Japan
The Allies reneg on their deal with Uncle Ho
6. France defeated
7. DDE sends in U.S. advisors...

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#939781 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats don't enforce existing gun-control laws in their own districts, idiot.
Now, just what kind of a fool do you think would actually believe Democrats intend to enforce any new gun-control law in their own districts?
"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
So, just what do you do when a law contradicts the Constitution?
What do you do when a treaty contradicts the Constitution?
Do you arbitrarily remove "This Constitution" from the text of the Constitution?
No. Hopefully, this issue will be resolved without ANOTHER war to institute a limited government with adherence to the Constitution. Obviously, this administration believes they will have to fight a war with the American people who believe in the Constitution.
There is Illinois-they can't seem to find a copy of the Constitution.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#939782 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
For some reason, these same Demcorats that hated Bush now love him and use quotes from him as a standard of reference to justify themselves.
They must be in really bad shape these days to have to use Bush to justify themselves....
You are correct--I have never seen so much love for GW Bush as I have seen in the last few weeks. Even more love for GW Bush from the liberals than they have for O'bama. It is a real eye opener. No wonder O'bama's approval numbers are in the toilet, they realized how much they loved GW Bush.

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#939783 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, dufus...
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
I will answer your question.

Upon learning who was responsible, I would locate & launch strikes against them

I would not invade a country (Afghanistan) & be stuck nation building. Afghanistan had little military strength. We should have ignored it unless attacked.

I certainly would never call Bin Laden irrelevant, abandon Afghanistan to go into an oil war.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#939784 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, dufus...
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
You'll have to excuse Dave he can't understand what he reads. Watch. Here is the part of the speech you don't want to remember Dave try to understand it this time. "We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against each other, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or place to rest. And we will pursue nations who give safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."

See Dave TERRORISTS! Not Al Qeada. TERRORISTS!!! Here's the other part! Harbor or support TERRORISM will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.

It that in plan enough language for you? I doubt because you are a libtard and can't understand what you read.
Karma

Bethel, ME

#939786 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You are running away from the question... again.
Here it is. Just answer the question.
Ok, dufus...
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
First, I wouldn't have started my administration with a bunch of neo-cons who had no knowledge of the Middle East but were determined to reshape it
2. I wouldn't have staffed my administration with a bunch of yes man, sycophants patting each other on the back, and telling them how smart they are.
3. I would have listened to the numerous Intel briefs from the NSA, CIA & FBI how dangerous Osama bin Laden & al Qaeda are.
4. I would have listened and demanded action when told by the CIA that Osama bin Laden was determined to attack the U.S.
5. I would have put the country on heightened alert when warned of an impending attack on the U.S. by al Qaeda
6. I would have redouble efforts by my intel agencies to gather more intel
7. I would have directed by FBI director and AG to stop focusing on prostitution/drug enforcement and concentrate on anti-terrorism activities
8. If my FBI director ignored warning and requests to investigate odd behavior of Middle Eastern men at flight schools he would have been canned
I WOULDN'T HAVE GONE ON A 30 DAY VACATION AFTER ONLY 7 MONTHS IN OFFICE
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939788 Jul 8, 2013
Karma wrote:
<quoted text>
First, I wouldn't have started my administration with a bunch of neo-cons who had no knowledge of the Middle East but were determined to reshape it
2. I wouldn't have staffed my administration with a bunch of yes man, sycophants patting each other on the back, and telling them how smart they are.
3. I would have listened to the numerous Intel briefs from the NSA, CIA & FBI how dangerous Osama bin Laden & al Qaeda are.
4. I would have listened and demanded action when told by the CIA that Osama bin Laden was determined to attack the U.S.
5. I would have put the country on heightened alert when warned of an impending attack on the U.S. by al Qaeda
6. I would have redouble efforts by my intel agencies to gather more intel
7. I would have directed by FBI director and AG to stop focusing on prostitution/drug enforcement and concentrate on anti-terrorism activities
8. If my FBI director ignored warning and requests to investigate odd behavior of Middle Eastern men at flight schools he would have been canned
I WOULDN'T HAVE GONE ON A 30 DAY VACATION AFTER ONLY 7 MONTHS IN OFFICE
Applause! Bush had a plan to invade Iraq before even becoming President.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939789 Jul 8, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>You are correct--I have never seen so much love for GW Bush as I have seen in the last few weeks. Even more love for GW Bush from the liberals than they have for O'bama. It is a real eye opener. No wonder O'bama's approval numbers are in the toilet, they realized how much they loved GW Bush.
What a load.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939790 Jul 8, 2013
Karma wrote:
<quoted text>
First, I wouldn't have started my administration with a bunch of neo-cons who had no knowledge of the Middle East but were determined to reshape it
2. I wouldn't have staffed my administration with a bunch of yes man, sycophants patting each other on the back, and telling them how smart they are.
3. I would have listened to the numerous Intel briefs from the NSA, CIA & FBI how dangerous Osama bin Laden & al Qaeda are.
4. I would have listened and demanded action when told by the CIA that Osama bin Laden was determined to attack the U.S.
5. I would have put the country on heightened alert when warned of an impending attack on the U.S. by al Qaeda
6. I would have redouble efforts by my intel agencies to gather more intel
7. I would have directed by FBI director and AG to stop focusing on prostitution/drug enforcement and concentrate on anti-terrorism activities
8. If my FBI director ignored warning and requests to investigate odd behavior of Middle Eastern men at flight schools he would have been canned
I WOULDN'T HAVE GONE ON A 30 DAY VACATION AFTER ONLY 7 MONTHS IN OFFICE
First... the Middle East was an Islamist Terrorist Empire that stretched unbroken from the Atlantic shores of Morocco to the Afghan-Tibet border, and every nation within was a source of Wahhabist terrorists. We were attacked by Arab Wahhabists, dumbass. You'd know that if you knew anything about the Middle East.

2.(the question is, what you would do on 9/12, not what you wouldn't have done in January, 2001. And, your note is purely speculative without substance.

3. Or, just watch the news during the Clinton administration when Al Qaeda was bombing us as if they were on a schedule. But, this is before 9/11. The question is what would you have done on 9/12.

4.(same as 3)

5.(same as 3)

6.(same as 3) Perhaps you can describe for us the condition of our foreign intelligence capabilities at that time, you know, when Al Qaeda was bombing us as if they were on a schedule.

You are running away from the question... again.
Here it is. Just answer the question.
Ok, dufus...
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?

You have to tell us what you would have done on 9/12, idiot.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#939791 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You are running away from the question... again.
Here it is. Just answer the question.
Ok, dufus...
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
I think you need to add a number 5...duh ...cause the firwst fowuh are probably to differcult for occupy ayone elses anything ghetto gutter cwowds.

5. Revert to the lame, typical, grade school level, parrot squawk blather, guttersnipe regurgitation known as the peabrained, whineyazz bobbleemptyheadedness Toxic poison of the mentality level sesame street propaganda of lib-uh-rulTics.
GAYS

Holly Springs, NC

#939792 Jul 8, 2013
I DO NOT DISLIKE GAYS HOWEVER I WANT OBAMA TO START KISSING
THEM ON TV LIKE HE KISSES THE FEMALES?HE SAYS HE LOVES THEM
THEN I WANT HIM TO PROVE IT!!!
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#939793 Jul 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I will answer your question.
Upon learning who was responsible, I would locate & launch strikes against them
I would not invade a country (Afghanistan) & be stuck nation building. Afghanistan had little military strength. We should have ignored it unless attacked.
I certainly would never call Bin Laden irrelevant, abandon Afghanistan to go into an oil war.
Is that Before or After you began to figure out who/what and where al qeada... bin_laden (and the Taliban) and Saddams catalyst role in the whole big picture-- are and were...or after.

As in--ultimetely you just basically stated-upon all intel IN and considered--you would've done the SAME exact thing that WAS done-You DUHmmy Moron.
North Texas

Minneapolis, MN

#939795 Jul 8, 2013
zzzzzz Please note that North Texas is nothing like South Texas.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939796 Jul 8, 2013
Newark Mayor Cory Booker proposes government-funded college accounts in run-up to Senate primary
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939798 Jul 8, 2013
GAYS wrote:
I DO NOT DISLIKE GAYS HOWEVER I WANT OBAMA TO START KISSING
THEM ON TV LIKE HE KISSES THE FEMALES?HE SAYS HE LOVES THEM
THEN I WANT HIM TO PROVE IT!!!
http://janekgwizdala.com/home/wp-content/uplo...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939799 Jul 8, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you need to add a number 5...duh ...cause the firwst fowuh are probably to differcult for occupy ayone elses anything ghetto gutter cwowds.
5. Revert to the lame, typical, grade school level, parrot squawk blather, guttersnipe regurgitation known as the peabrained, whineyazz bobbleemptyheadedness Toxic poison of the mentality level sesame street propaganda of lib-uh-rulTics.
Oh my effing word.
North Texas

Minneapolis, MN

#939800 Jul 8, 2013
zzzz more links or copy and paste. zzzz, rinse and repeat.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 33 min Dr Guru 194,355
Abby 7-28-15 1 hr Kuuipo 10
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr Whiny1 6,251
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr PEllen 100,222
Snapchat me 4 hr Cheezybhole 2
5 Truths You Cannot Disagree With. 4 hr gonzo 15
Oak Park: Trying to hold on to its endearing past 5 hr joey 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages