Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939289 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Roe v. Wade did not grant an unlimited right to abortion.
That isn't the point and you know it. The so called less government teabaggers have shown repeatedly that one of their first orders of business is to expand the scope and authority of the government in passing or proposing abortion restrictions or bans. Forcing a woman to get an ultrasound before having an abortion is either putting that cost on the taxpayer or taxing the woman seeking the abortion depending on how its funded. Either way it isn't remotely in keeping with the tenet of Taxed Enough Already.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939290 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Roe v. Wade did not grant an unlimited right to abortion.
Very true.

Also, it cannot be interpreted as meaning health standards should be abandoned.

Should any Texas woman think that are empowered because they can currently get a D&E for an unplanned pregnancy at a place with lower standards than where they go to get a endoscopy for an acid reflux diagnosis?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Nostrilis Waxman

United States

#939291 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a nut case-who cares about your delusions.
That makes two of us!! Do you have any lard to spread on these donuts? If so hand it over and stop hoarding it all. They're a little dry today. And shift yourself, your chair is sagging a bit on the left side. That leg looks like it's buckling some!!

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#939292 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Things in the news?
Read some of DBWriter's posts. What news services carry his bizarre conspirisies? Or American Ladies? Or Waxman's? Or Eman'? Just more hypocrisy from the right.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939293 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd like to see proof of anything you say in this post, its not the least bit unreasonable to assume that right-wingers on here think they're teabaggers.
.......
What an odd comment.

Prove to us how you can make this claim that you "know" what another is thinking?

Special powers?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939294 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That isn't the point and you know it. The so called less government teabaggers have shown repeatedly that one of their first orders of business is to expand the scope and authority of the government in passing or proposing abortion restrictions or bans. Forcing a woman to get an ultrasound before having an abortion is either putting that cost on the taxpayer or taxing the woman seeking the abortion depending on how its funded. Either way it isn't remotely in keeping with the tenet of Taxed Enough Already.
Galt believes that abortion clinics should meet the same standards as other outpatient surgical clinics, including the presence of a licensed physician, and that laws requiring same are reasonable under Roe v. Wade. That requirement was one of the elements of the law that you opposed.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939295 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you mean by "domestic partnerships between heterosexual couples"?
Living together.

The NC teabaggers are so concerned with personal liberty they tried to outlaw the living arrangements of consenting adults, even the heterosexual ones ('cause you know how much gayness violates individual rights and increases taxes).

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939296 Jul 7, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Liar.
How's Lightening?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939297 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That isn't the point and you know it. The so called less government teabaggers have shown repeatedly that one of their first orders of business is to expand the scope and authority of the government in passing or proposing abortion restrictions or bans. Forcing a woman to get an ultrasound before having an abortion is either putting that cost on the taxpayer or taxing the woman seeking the abortion depending on how its funded. Either way it isn't remotely in keeping with the tenet of Taxed Enough Already.
Galt believes that abortions should be performed only by licensed and qualified physicians.

Galt believes that the requirement for an ultrasound should be entirely in the judgment of the physician performing the procedure.

The patient is always free to find another physician if she disagrees.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939299 Jul 7, 2013
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Bright enough to know who's sock you are eh, CA CA? Gothcha!!!
You are an idiot.

However, you and Leo are exhibiting the same grade school mentality today-hmmmm. Are you projecting?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939300 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad to hear that you check all facts independently rather than using one of the so-called "fact-check" sites.
Are you trying to hint that Soros owns Politifact.org or FactCheck.org ?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#939301 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Roe v. Wade did not grant an unlimited right to abortion.
Public Eye, Abortion in 1965___a one hour CBS News documentary hosted by Walter Cronkite provides a glimpse of how and where abortions were performed during the early days of "free love."

Many American females were traveling to Canada, Mexico and elsewhere for safe, or somewhat safe "secret" abortions, some were able to get the job done by family physicians in their local hospitals but the lions share were being aborted by back alley hacks or were self inducing miscarriage via chemical cocktails purchased from back alley hacks or whipped up at home using word of mouth ingredients.

Secret was a big deal then, secret abortions, secret postmortems.

Whatever happened to Becky from homeroom???

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Nostrilis Waxman

United States

#939302 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
What an odd comment.
Prove to us how you can make this claim that you "know" what another is thinking?
Special powers?
Prove to us your not gavoning a calzone, extra cheese, Ca Ca!!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939303 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha! You're so funny.
Let's let the jury decide that Martin attacked Zimmerman proving once and for all that black folks are always the guilty party.
"Unfortunately, whether Zimmerman should have waited for the police outside of his car or not or left his house with a gun or not, that young man ultimately lost his life by deciding to act as the aggressor attacking Zimmerman."
No good can result from this case, regardless of the verdict.

Unfortunately, race pimps like Sharpton and Obama made this a racial issue when that was not clearly the case.

Once again, Obama seeks to pit black against white.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Nostrilis Waxman

United States

#939304 Jul 7, 2013
I'm in judgit mode!!!!!!!!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939305 Jul 7, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
I haven't watched O'Reilly in maybe 10 years or longer. I haven't listened to Rush over the same time period. I watch none of the Fox News Shows at all.
The Liberal Tenzing motormouths and the OBAMA the GENIUS pre-teens are in a constant head-long and mindless rage to push square pegs into round holes. Why? Who knows the finer internal workings of defective minds? Go figure.
I am so often called teabagger, dittohead, foxbot or any of a long list of Liberal Spittle for expressing my views although I neither belong to, listen to or subscribe to any of those groups.
Liberals make lots of noise and stink using big rattles and full diapers respectively.
Translation: they don't have a tv in your institution. Fkoff you lying polack beast from hell.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939306 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
A consumption tax would be preferable.
Well, you know my position on that.

The other poster would put the entire tax burden on individual income earners 'cause "taxing corporations forces corporations to pass that cost along in their pricing" [paraphrased].

I guess he doesn't see how individual earners also pass that cost along in their pricing.

It was just retarded.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939307 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you trying to hint that Soros owns Politifact.org or FactCheck.org ?
Just assuming that someone of your intelligence would research the facts on his own instead of accepting the opinion of a website.
Nostrilis Waxman

United States

#939308 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
You are an idiot.
However, you and Leo are exhibiting the same grade school mentality today-hmmmm. Are you projecting?
Pass the cream puffs pleeeeeease, Carol. I'm getting you a reinforced steel chair for Christmas this year so we all can go on enjoying your pontifications and hate-filled posts. I love them so!!! We all do! Bwaaaaahaaaa!!!!!
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939309 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Living together.
The NC teabaggers are so concerned with personal liberty they tried to outlaw the living arrangements of consenting adults, even the heterosexual ones ('cause you know how much gayness violates individual rights and increases taxes).
You have abandoned logic here.

Here is your original quote
"North Carolina voters took to the polls last year and voted overwhelmingly in favor of a Constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. What voters didnít realize was that defining the only legal partnership as marriage between one man and one woman could in turn nullify domestic partnerships between heterosexual couples. Which is exactly what happened."

Where does it make it cohabitation illegal?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 min Fair Game 46,765
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 12 min loose cannon 178,144
Word (Dec '08) 39 min andet1987 4,728
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 46 min MaryanMattie 49,888
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr _Zoey_ 4,717
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr Faith 68,521
is there any girl frm ghaziabad .... 2 hr ayush11gupta 1
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••