Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939518 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Makes it a little tough for you when you throw your best insults, built all those straw men and in the end-I am not fooled in the least by these idiotic attempts.
You said that the law would move the clinics into hospitals which is not what the law states.
No, I never said that. You're welcome to go look.

You can't be fooled when you're constantly confused.

I think the barometer here is that Galt has been keeping up with the conversation I was having with HIM before you interposed yourself. Now, everyone is welcome to post here, I'm just saying you're the only one who appears confused.
The Elephant in the Room

Waynesboro, MS

#939519 Jul 7, 2013
Egypt overthrows Muslim Brotherhood Government Obama taking time off
Watch:

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939520 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
That would include division of property, alimony, child custody, etc, all decided in advance by contract.
Sure, why not?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939521 Jul 7, 2013
The defeat of Proposition 8 should alarm civil libertarians instead of causing them to celebrate.

Essentially the Court is saying that the executive branch of government can invalidate any law passed by the legislature simply by refusing to defend it.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939522 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
That's fine if a contractual arrangement in the event of divorce, but when the qualified individual dies, the benefits should end.
Unfortunately, there is no Social Security account with any guaranteed value, so a contract arrangement may not be legal. You can't agree to share something that doesn't exist.
This is true. So the government probably shouldn't be in the retirement savings business either.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#939523 Jul 7, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
This sounds like the same scam two of the Golden Girls fell for on one of the sitcom's episodes.
Can you explain this to me? it seems insane.
The Obama administration has scaled back another of its key healthcare rules, delaying a requirement that verifies the income levels of those seeking taxpayer subsidies until after the 2014 midterm elections.

Instead, the new insurance marketplaces operated by states and the District of Columbia will take the consumer's word that they qualify for the subsidies, The Washington Post reported.

The announcement came on Friday without fanfare with the Department of Health and Human Services publishing the notification in the Federal Register.

Verification plans for the taxpayer subsidies won't go into effect until 2015 for those earning about $45,000 to purchase health insurance, or earning $15,000 to qualify for Medicaid in the District and 23 participating states.

*so are they just going to give out subsidies for the hell of it? or what?
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939524 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
The paranoid guy from MO with the youtube post on all things conspiratorial?
You can waste your time with that all you want.
Meanwhile, you've failed your argument.
LOL

Obama Call for Muslim Brotherhood Role Overtaken in Egypt
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-05/obam...

John McCain calls for suspension of US aid to Egypt following overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood leadership.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#939525 Jul 7, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't say much about things Fox because I'm not there but from what I read about O'Reilly, he is extremely popular.
And those snippets of him on YouTube are appealing:]
He's a great debater. Can debate anyone. One of the best.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939526 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
The defeat of Proposition 8 should alarm civil libertarians instead of causing them to celebrate.
Essentially the Court is saying that the executive branch of government can invalidate any law passed by the legislature simply by refusing to defend it.
Another reason that trying to get the government or the electorate to graciously grant rights is the wrong approach.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939527 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That post wasn't about "standards of care", it was about admitting privileges.
They're not trying to apply standards evenly in TX, they're trying to force abortions into surgical centers while not requiring the same for other surgical procedures routinely performed in clinics. I asked Nobama about this several pages ago, he never answered.
This is the post were you are claiming trying to force into "surgical centers" (hospitals? as other surgical procedures are performed in clinics).

Call it what you want this claim is not supported by the law which is asking the hospitals to board certify but makes no demands the procedure be performed in a hospital related facility.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939528 Jul 7, 2013
John Galt wrote:
The defeat of Proposition 8 should alarm civil libertarians instead of causing them to celebrate.
Essentially the Court is saying that the executive branch of government can invalidate any law passed by the legislature simply by refusing to defend it.
Similar to issuing a EO stating you will delay a law due to it being politically inconvenient do it at the time stated.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939529 Jul 7, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I never said that. You're welcome to go look.
You can't be fooled when you're constantly confused.
I think the barometer here is that Galt has been keeping up with the conversation I was having with HIM before you interposed yourself. Now, everyone is welcome to post here, I'm just saying you're the only one who appears confused.
LOL, I just saw this on twitter where someone was trying to get all butt hurt because someone responded to his public tweets/post.

I am not the least confused and that is what is pissing you off.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939530 Jul 7, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a great debater. Can debate anyone. One of the best.
Sure, if shouting down your opposition is considered a great debating skill.

A youtube search of "O'Reilly shouting" yielded 82,000 results.

You're welcome to go watch them:

http://www.youtube.com/results...
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939531 Jul 7, 2013
Fans Kill and Quarter Football Referee in Brazil

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939532 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Obama Call for Muslim Brotherhood Role Overtaken in Egypt
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-05/obam...
John McCain calls for suspension of US aid to Egypt following overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood leadership.
Took you long enough, to your first point what's up with this from your article:

"Secretary of State John Kerry said in a separate statement yesterday that “we firmly reject the unfounded and false claims by some in Egypt that the United States supports the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood or any specific Egyptian political party or movement.”

Your second point puts you right back where you started with a false cause argument. US law requires we stop providing aid to the military, they committed a coup. This does not equate to supporting the associates of the ousted President.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939533 Jul 7, 2013
Statewide pain-clinic database may be abolished



Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/06/3488469...
Whatever

Gering, NE

#939534 Jul 7, 2013
Those crazy Amish bomb the holiest site for Buddhists in the world

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Biha...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#939535 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the post were you are claiming trying to force into "surgical centers" (hospitals? as other surgical procedures are performed in clinics).
Call it what you want this claim is not supported by the law which is asking the hospitals to board certify but makes no demands the procedure be performed in a hospital related facility.
These are two different aspects of the same piece of legislature. Let's see if we can end the confusion right now:

One provision forces abortions out of clinics and into ambulatory surgery clinics or hospitals.

Another provision requires that doctors performing abortions have hospital admitting privileges.

This is what you claimed I said:

"Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Makes it a little tough for you when you throw your best insults, built all those straw men and in the end-I am not fooled in the least by these idiotic attempts.
You said that the law would move the clinics into hospitals which is not what the law states."

This is the post in which you said I made that claim:

"Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That post wasn't about "standards of care", it was about admitting privileges.
They're not trying to apply standards evenly in TX, they're trying to force abortions into surgical centers while not requiring the same for other surgical procedures routinely performed in clinics. I asked Nobama about this several pages ago, he never answered."

Please tell me you're no longer confused.

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#939536 Jul 7, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the post were you are claiming trying to force into "surgical centers" (hospitals? as other surgical procedures are performed in clinics).
Call it what you want this claim is not supported by the law which is asking the hospitals to board certify but makes no demands the procedure be performed in a hospital related facility.
You continue to prove what an idiot you are. By making these demands on clinics that offer abortion, they will force these facilities to no longer offer them.

The "force" being costs to comply.

Then the only options for abortions are surgical facilities/hospitals.

If you had a home based food business & they pass laws requiring all food must be prepared in a separate dedicated kitchen, they aren't forcing these home businesses to close but they will.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#939537 Jul 7, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Can you explain this to me? it seems insane.
The Obama administration has scaled back another of its key healthcare rules, delaying a requirement that verifies the income levels of those seeking taxpayer subsidies until after the 2014 midterm elections.
Instead, the new insurance marketplaces operated by states and the District of Columbia will take the consumer's word that they qualify for the subsidies, The Washington Post reported.
The announcement came on Friday without fanfare with the Department of Health and Human Services publishing the notification in the Federal Register.
Verification plans for the taxpayer subsidies won't go into effect until 2015 for those earning about $45,000 to purchase health insurance, or earning $15,000 to qualify for Medicaid in the District and 23 participating states.
*so are they just going to give out subsidies for the hell of it? or what?
The Christmas tree gets heavier and heavier, proving that ObamaKKKare is unworkable.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 23 min goonsquad 52,268
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 33 min Rogue Scholar 05 185,844
Abby 3-28-15 2 hr RACE 2
Ask Amy 3-28-15 2 hr RACE 2
News Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 3 hr FFS- 54,567
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr Katie Sullivan 99,302
Amy 3-26 4 hr RACE 60
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]