Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1496957 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939896 Jul 8, 2013
Karma wrote:
<quoted text>
GUESS YOU CAN'T READ. The Mission was not support nation building in Afghanistan, or support a puppet regime
here read real slow:
I would not have outsourced the mission to a bunch of warlords. I would have used American troops. I would not have diverted troops & equipment from that mission to invade Iraq., i would have used troops in overwhelming superiority at Tora Bora and gotten Osama bin Laden. Then I would withdraw all troops
I would never have invaded Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, did not pose a threat to us and actually provided a deterrent to Iranian ambitions
I read and understood your response.

So, your answer was:
"Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result?"
Is this correct? You would do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and you're stupid enough to think you'd have a different experience than the Soviets, right?

Bethlehem, PA

#939897 Jul 8, 2013
So what's the latest scoop on Janet's tanks and all that ammo?

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#939898 Jul 8, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
Mark Osterman, Zimmermans friend testifying. He has written a book on Zimmerman.
He can't keep a straight face. Thinks its funny. His fatty wife just cried and said it was "Georgie" screaming help on the 911 tape.
What an effing load.
You are such a vile, hateful beast. No wonder all you post is enquirer caliber stuff.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939899 Jul 8, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
here's a great story about how Rubio could now win a national election because he quit catering to the Tea Party.
Marco Rubio Spurned by Original Tea Party Supporters Over Immigration
The boosters who helped elect the Florida senator are denouncing his immigration heresy—backing ‘amnesty’ when he swore he wouldn’t—and vowing a primary challenge. But his national prospects look brighter.
won't be long before Republicans candidates will be running on....'I don't belong to the Tea party!'....and winning.
Here's the story you ran away from with your ignorant indoctrinated party line rhetoric:

Aist of the ideas the Democrats want everyone to think are archaic....
So, you don't like this idea, right?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
and this:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
and this:
"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
and this:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
and this:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
and this:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
... and most especially, you hate the notion of a constitutional republic with limited government.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
These ideals are what you pretend to believe. The TEA Party actually believes in them,... and will fight you to keep it the standard of our country. You will have to kill them to eliminate the Constitution, which is your ultimate goal.
Do we have to fight ANOTHER war to make these points about limited government and individual rights?

Bethlehem, PA

#939900 Jul 8, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Did you know that she married Wm. Robt. Jarrett in 1983 when Obama was about 22 yoa? Did you know that she then divorced Wm. Robt. Jarrett in 1988 when Obama was about 27 yoa.
To characterize her present status as Vernon Jarrett's daughter in law would be a lie.
Does DBWriter know this? Valerie Bowman Jarrett - parents James E. Bowman and Barbara Taylor Bowman.

Now what?

New York, NY

#939901 Jul 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Any convenient means of stonewalling that's plausible to distract the masses will do.
Sometimes Obama just gets downright lucky - a major hurricane right before the election? Couldn't have asked for a bigger spotlight or photo ops before the people went to the polls.
Romney all but disappeared during that week before the election blinded by the glow of Obama looking so presidential in the aftermath of massive destruction.
Kind of like a sign though too. Massive destruction helps elect the wrong president?
Just being introspective.
No luck HAARP

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#939902 Jul 8, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
Newark Mayor Cory Booker proposes government-funded college accounts in run-up to Senate primary
Government funded? Lmao! He'll get the sheep vote with that for sure. You sheep like free stuff. Government funded = higher taxes.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939903 Jul 8, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> He is Zimmerman's worst witness. His book contradicts Zimmerman's account on several occasions. He just testified that Zimmerman's holster was an internal holster, not an external holster &, that it's hard to see even without a jacket on. Also the prosecutor was trying to get Osterman to admit that, if you shot someone &, didn't know they were dead or the threat was neutralized, it's commonsense or protocol to keep you gun out. Osterman is ducking & dodging his direct questions, trying not to say anything incriminating on George's behalf. His testimony is more damning than good!
So, what you're saying is, if a person has a concealed weapon, it's ok to attack them and bash their brains out against a concrete sidewalk, right?


Americans have the right to be armed.


If you're a drug-using dropout gangbanger wannabe and are thinking about attacking someone because they appear to be weaker than you, remember that Americans have the right to be armed and you may get blown to hell like Hoodieman.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#939904 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I read and understood your response.
So, your answer was:
"Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result?"
Is this correct? You would do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and you're stupid enough to think you'd have a different experience than the Soviets, right?
okay, besides from lacking any reading comprehension skills, and having no historical knoweledge, you are apparently DUMBER THAN A ROCK.

So we will have to start with the basics



Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#939905 Jul 8, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Bah, Homer has no kids but pays for your brats to go to school.
Homer lives in Virginia?

Bethlehem, PA

#939906 Jul 8, 2013
Ok so DBWriter has acknowledged that Valerie Jarrett is in fact the daughter-in-law, and not the daughter.

So he did get one thing right so far this year.

Golden, CO

#939907 Jul 8, 2013
If You See Something Say Something....Unless It's U.S. Government War Crimes

Government's Lack of Evidence Will Be on Display in Week 6 of Bradley Manning Trial

Bethlehem, PA

#939908 Jul 8, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Government funded? Lmao! He'll get the sheep vote with that for sure. You sheep like free stuff. Government funded = higher taxes.
Homer would pay higher taxes for a smarter populace. It is in the best interest of the country. Why are rightwingers so down on education, smart people, and have an overall disdain for intelligence?

El Paso, TX

#939909 Jul 8, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>It's never too old "news"to criticize a war-mongering President George W Bush or a Ronald Reagan.
Front let me hook you up with RealDave both you and Dave could have a great conversation of irrelevance...LATER!!

Bethlehem, PA

#939910 Jul 8, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Homer lives in Virginia?
Do you have to miss the point of everything? Come on Flack, you cannot be this dumb. Okay so I am paying for some bratty Pennsylvania kids. Is there a state in the Union that does not have public schools? Why do I have to explain everything to you?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#939911 Jul 8, 2013
Emoron wrote:
<quoted text>
You're wasting your time by presenting factual information in a logical manner. These right wing morons are programmed to only recognize a fantasy world provided by their handlers. As you can plainly see, DBWriter is mentally ill, no chance of having a rational exchange of ideas.
Perhaps you can fill in the blanks for that idiot. His last non-answer was:

"5. We defeat Japan
The Allies reneg on their deal with Uncle Ho
6. France defeated
7. DDE sends in U.S. advisors..."

"Reneg on their deal"
Your idiot friend forgot to mention the details of that deal. Please help him out.

"France defeated"
Your idiot friend forgot to mention that the French were in Vietnam only because Ho Chi Minh went to Paris and asked them to return. He also forgot to mention that the French brought democracy with them. He also forgot to mention that he started a war with them as a result of the people of Vietnam not electing Ho Chi Minh dictator. He also forgot to mention the Soviet Union joined Ho Chi Minh's fight against the French he asked to return to Vietnam, and defeated the French with Soviet weapons.

Now that the battle of Dien Bien Phu is over, what happened next in the history of Vietnam?
(hint: Vietnam is one country when the French leave Vietnam. How did Vietnam become two countries?)

(... psssssttt... The Soviet Union petitioned the UN to divide Vietnam into two separate countries. The UN agrees. The Soviet Union endorse Ho Chi Minh as supreme ruler of North Vietnam... ok, I'm giving you the answers again. So, after Ho Chi Minh divides Vietnam into two countries, what happens next?)

Bethlehem, PA

#939912 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Can you help us with that one? How many tanks did Janet Napolitano procure while Obama was spending a hundred million dollars on a jaunt in Africa and taking hot meals away from the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Afghanistan?
Now back to the post you keep running away from:
I didn't mean to inadvertently over tax your ability to rationalize. I probably caught you off guard. I'll give you another chance since it was probably a fluke you got your ass handed to you.
Daughter-in-law of communist Vernon Jarrett and has the office immediately adjacent to the Oval Office. You know, the office Obama went to when he was summoned from the golf course when he didn't even have a clue the operation to kill bin Laden was even happening. You ran away from that discussion previously when the truth about Obama being indoctrinated in Marxist communism his entire life got shoved up your ass.
Now, back to the topic you responded to:
It's 9/12.
You're the president.
What do you do? Do you:
1) Surrender to the muslim jihad? or;
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles into their general direction? or;
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expect a different result? or;
4) You do something different.
If you choose 4) You do something different, what do you do?
... well, dumbass?
No, I don't know about the tanks, that is why I was asking you. I thought you said she had 2400 or something like that, I just assumed you knew what type(s).

The 100 million has been debunked coincidentally 100 million times. Do you get all your info from rightwing fringe sites?

The daughter-in-law? LOL

Anyone here been heavily influenced by the politics of their father-in-law?

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#939913 Jul 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>

Do we have to fight ANOTHER war to make these points about limited government and individual rights?
like limiting laws to secular laws and no infusing religious dogma into our legal system
like allowing citizens to marry the individual of their choice
like allowing citizens to decide what medical procedures to have and to respect doctor patient confidentiality
like keeping our laws based on facts
like letting doctors decide medical facts

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#939914 Jul 8, 2013
Here Homer.

Jarrett was a member of the Board of Directors for the Woodlawn Preservation and Investment Corporation along with several Davis and Rezko associates as well as the Fund for Community Redevelopment and Revitalization, an organization that worked with Rezko and Davis.

The Chicago Sun Times reported that one Rezko-managed housing project was "riddled with problems - including squalid living conditions, lack of heat, squatters and drug dealers".

As Chief Executive Officer of the Habitat Company Jarrett also managed a controversial housing project located in Obama's former state senate district called Grove Parc Plaza. According to the Boston Globe the housing complex was considered "uninhabitable by unfixed problems, such as collapsed roofs and fire damage...In 2006, federal inspectors graded the condition of the complex an 11 on a 100-point scale - a score so bad the buildings now face demolition." Ms. Jarrett refused to comment to the Globe on the conditions of the complex.

lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#939915 Jul 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
On behalf of the poster, Whatever...
A number of top SS officials did try to attempt a coup and seize power from Hitler by an assassination and implementing Valkyrie. It obviously failed, so Whatever clearly misspoke.
But he admitted having done so, so now it's your turn to put down the stones and let it go. You'd have lumps all over your body otherwise.
But there is this: Two years after becoming the leader in 1921 after a rapid growth of the Nazi Party by engaging in unrelenting propaganda through the party newspaper, in 1923 Hitler was tried for treason and sentenced to five years in prison for trying to force leaders of the Bavarian government and the local army commander to proclaim a national revolution, only serving nine months.
During Hitler’s absence in prison, the Nazi Party languished and Hitler was forbidden to make speeches after his release in Bavaria and other German states until 1928. But by 1926, Hitler had successfully established his position again.
A coup of sorts.
I learn something new all the time on here.
Did you and Whatever go to the same school? With Galt?

Post #939421 Galt says: Hitler was democratically elected



Scottsbluff, NE

Reply »

Report Abuse
Judge it!
15 hrs ago





John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Right or wrong, McCain is advocating abiding by US law, while Obama is once again reusing to follow the law.

Whatever wrote:(post 939568)
Yes, it is a US law.

However, how do you reconcile an unpopular government who diddle away their time trying to create a theocracy rather than dealing with crushing issues important to the citizens such as jobs, foods and gas?

A government who refused to call for a new election despite public demands.

As you pointed out earlier, Hitler was elected to office to but the US participated in a military coup to remove him.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 16 min WelbyMD 237,302
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 42 min TRD 71,375
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr CrunchyBacon 104,986
last post wins! (Apr '13) 1 hr honeymylove 2,288
last post wins! (Dec '10) 1 hr honeymylove 2,973
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 2 hr honeymylove 2,457
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr RACE 10,337

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages