social engineering is not cheap.Quote:
The "Congressional Budget Office" scored the "Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" and said Thursday "the bill would increase Medicaid costs from $75 million to $400 million over 10 years", "mostly due" "to" "an increase in births". "Estimating that one-quarter of pregnancies" "that would have been" "terminated" after "20 weeks" would instead, under the law, be carried to term, the CBO said "federal spending" for Medicaid "would increase" by $225 million.
WTF? Way to promote "genocide"... you dumb "commie" bastards.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.
#934470 Jun 28, 2013
#934471 Jun 28, 2013
Fox News, Home Of Benghazi Myths, To Air One-Hour Special On Benghazi
Fox News will air a one-hour special titled Benghazi: The Truth Behind The Smokescreen which purports to provide "a comprehensive look at all of the new developments in the story." But Fox is not a credible source on Benghazi, having littered its coverage of the incident with myths, misinformation, and outright falsehoods.
#934472 Jun 28, 2013
Record food stamp numbers in US for Obama administration
#934473 Jun 28, 2013
What are you mumbling about.
MF Global Holdings Ltd. Chief Executive Jon S. Corzine and a top lieutenant oversaw the misuse of almost $1 billion in customer funds.
Your finger pointing is inane and off topic.
#934474 Jun 28, 2013
$100 Million: How Much Pres. Obama's Extended Trip To Sub-Saharan Africa Will Cost
#934475 Jun 28, 2013
That was totally pathetic.
You are really scraping the bottom levels of stupid.
The IRS has blown more than that in the last few years with parties and idiotic training films.
#934476 Jun 28, 2013
Women Fight Back: Ohio Bill Makes Erectile Dysfunction Her Business
You want to regulate our ovaries, uteri and order us to carry state-mandated children? Well, fine. We want to regulate your erectile dysfunction.
That’s the message of state Democratic Senator Nina Turner’s erectile dysfunction bill in Ohio (SB307). The bill is meant to inflict the same sort of humiliation and violation of privacy on men as mostly male legislators are inflicting upon women across the country, but is wisely being sold under the exact same disingenuous “concern” as Republicans sell their attempts to control women’s wombs.
Turner sweetly pointed out,“I certainly want to stand up for men’s health and take this seriously and legislate it the same way mostly men say they want to legislate a woman’s womb.”
SB 307 requires that:
(A) No person other than a physician shall issue to a patient a prescription for a drug intended to treat symptoms of erectile dysfunction.
(B) Prior to issuing a prescription for a drug intended to treat symptoms of erectile dysfunction, a physician shall do all of the following:
(1) Obtain from the patient a notarized affidavit in which at least one of the patient’s sexual partners certifies that the patient has experienced symptoms of erectile dysfunction in the ninety days preceding the date on the affidavit;
(2) Refer the patient to a sexual therapist approved by the state medical board for an assessment of the possible causes of the patient’s symptoms of erectile dysfunction and obtain a written report in which the therapist concludes that the patient’s symptoms are not solely attributable to one or more psychological conditions;
(3) Conduct a cardiac stress test and obtain a result, described in writing, indicating that the patient’s cardiac health is compatible with sexual activity;
(4) Notify the patient in writing of the potential risks and complications associated with taking drugs intended to treat erectile dysfunction and obtain the patient’s signature on a form acknowledging the patient’s receipt of the notification;
(5) Declare in writing, under penalty of perjury, that the drug the physician is prescribing is necessary to treat the patient’s symptoms of erectile dysfunction and attach to the declaration a statement that clearly describes the physician’s medical rationale for issuing the prescription;
(6) Place all documents described in divisions (B)(1) to (5) of this section in the patient’s medical record and retain the documents as part of that record for not less than seven years.
These steps are all sound medical suggestions that are often overlooked out of courtesy to a man’s ego and in deference to his privacy.
The take away is that Senator Turner is going to use legislation to “protect men’s health”, just as Republicans are using legislation to control women under the auspices of protecting health.
There’s nothing like a first hand experience of governmental overreach punishing citizens for things they have no control over and controlling their private organs to help Americans decide that the Republican war on women must stop immediately. Senator Turner is reminding lawmakers that they are setting a precedent that can be applied both ways.
We’re only doing it because “we care”, cried the white men legislating themselves into control over every American woman’s body. Guess what, boys? This ain’t the 1950s and you will pay a price for the relentless war on women. See state Senators Turner and Davis for starters.
We’re mad and we’re not going to take it anymore. And, oh, hey, please proceed because we’re just getting warmed up.
#934477 Jun 28, 2013
Baldwin is just a creepy-ass cracker.
If you're black, using the n-word is OK.
If you're a leftwinger, homophobia is OK.
Ya gotta know the rules.
#934478 Jun 28, 2013
Ah yes Media Matters, Sonic's favorite partisan charity.
#934479 Jun 28, 2013
What does that have to do with Corzine?
And if you don't pay your mortgage, what difference does it make who holds the mortgage?
#934480 Jun 28, 2013
You are a strange person.
#934481 Jun 28, 2013
Just watched a lesbian marriage ceremony from San Francisco on the news.
One absolutely gorgeous woman and her partner who looked like a homosexual in drag.
#934482 Jun 28, 2013
Yeah, screw the Fourth Amendment.
How do you feel about stopping Muslims on the street?
#934483 Jun 28, 2013
When eliminating coal does nothing to affect "climate change", then the environmental whackos will get back on the population control bandwagon.
#934484 Jun 28, 2013
If all that was free, as well as the medication, same as birth control and abortion, many men with that serious medical problem would agree. Provided that women were subject to similar conditions.
So what's your point,you creepy-ass cracker.
Since: Sep 08
#934485 Jun 28, 2013
I don't know where you get your information but it is wayyyy off base and certainly not based on FACTS.
From the IRS, "Summary of Federal Income Tax Data, 2010"
The Top 1% of Tax payers (with ADJUSTED incomes above $369,691) paid 37.4% of total income taxes collected for an average tax rate of 23.39%.
The Top 5% of Tax payers (with ADJUSTED incomes above $161,579 -- hardly "Rich") paid 59
.1% of total income taxes for an average tax rate of 20.64%.
The Top 25% of Tax payers (with ADJUSTED incomes above $69,126) paid 87.1% of total incomes taxes collected for an average tax rate of 15.22%.
The Top 50% of Tax payers (with ADJUSTED incomes above $34,338) paid 97.6% of total income taxes collected for an average tax rate of 13.06%.
For the record the "rich" may not get an income tax credit but they certainly get something far better....loopholes and reduced tax rates not available to "poor people".
“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”
Since: Jan 08
#934486 Jun 28, 2013
#934487 Jun 28, 2013
WTF you mean, Willis?
Poor people don't pay anything.
(By the way, are you talking about AGI or taxable income?)
#934488 Jun 28, 2013
An ad calling for the abolishment of the IRS incorrectly claimed that the federal agency’s budget increased by $2 billion. In fact, it’s down by nearly $1 billion during President Barack Obama’s first term. To its credit, though, Americans for Fair Taxation, the group behind the ad, removed the $2 billion reference after we asked about it.
In the original ad, a narrator accuses an “out of control” IRS of “playing politics” while the words “$2 billion budget increase” appear on screen. The 30-second spot was posted to the group’s YouTube channel on June 12. On the same day, the Washington Post wrote that the anti-tax group would spend “in the mid-six-figures” to air it, beginning June 17.
No explanation or citation is provided for when the $2 billion increase was supposed to have occurred. After FactCheck.org questioned the $2 billion figure, Curtis Ellis, a spokesman for the group, said that it had made a mistake and would fix the ad. And it did.
Since: Apr 09
Elmont, Long Island NY
#934489 Jun 28, 2013
I don't know what's worse, that some site actually puts out this BS or that there are people stupid enough to believe it.
Add your comments below
|BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09)||17 min||Dr Guru||202,046|
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||18 min||facts||55,611|
|Protests after graphic video of Chicago police ...||50 min||All lives matter||6|
|Should prostitution be less illegal-or more?||1 hr||Patriot||264|
|The Latest: 4 arrested during Wednesday evening...||1 hr||facts||22|
|Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09)||5 hr||Irony Department||101,134|
|Abby 11-27||5 hr||Kuuipo||2|
Find what you want!
Search Chicago Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC