Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#932481 Jun 26, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
It's astonishing and unbelievable at the same time.
Don't know which is the more bizarre - how astonishing and unbelievable it is or liberals panting and wagging their tails in anticipated excitement of getting a treat for their undying loyalty.
You seem pretty awed by a fact based world.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#932482 Jun 26, 2013
So how long will fat people be able to collect disability? what if they actually lose weight--- will it be like the disease called Alcoholism--once fat always fat? just saying.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#932483 Jun 26, 2013
The Defense of Marriage Act, the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages legalized by the states, is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday by a 5-4 vote.

"The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion.“By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/26/supr...
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#932484 Jun 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
President Bush introduced Prescription Drug coverage under Medicare and a Guest Worker Program for Mexican workers. Of course President Bush did not attend his parties convention in 2012
Bush was not a racist.
That's like saying Bush kicked you in shin after Carter and Clinton put you in the hospital on life support.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#932485 Jun 26, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing in the decision changes anything with respect to restricting the voting rights of minorities.
It changes the process in that before, subject jurisdictions had to prove legality before changing laws, now they'll have to go through injunctions just like all the other states.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#932486 Jun 26, 2013
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem pretty awed by a fact based world.
Awed by what you cannot accept in a fact-based world.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#932487 Jun 26, 2013
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is outraged—outraged—that the majority of the Court overturned the Defense of Marriage Act, writing in his dissent that "We have no power under the Constitution to invalidate this democratically adopted legislation" and that the decision represents an "exalted notion of the role of this court in American democratic society." Because, don't you know, DOMA was passed by Congress democratically and therefore the Court should not touch it.

One question: Where was this Scalia when the Supreme Court was deciding to gut the Voting Rights Act, which was renewed by Congress in 2006?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/26/1219...
NJ raider 1

Newark, NJ

#932488 Jun 26, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
It's astonishing and unbelievable at the same time.
Don't know which is the more bizarre - how astonishing and unbelievable it is or liberals panting and wagging their tails in anticipated excitement of getting a treat for their undying loyalty.
GlObal warning/Climate change go hand & hand. I don't need scientist nor a govt big wig to tell me that something is effecting the weather severely. I live in New Jersey. Just by demographic, New Jersey is not known for extreme weather. In a years time, we had an earthquake, hurricane, tornado, & an unspecified storm that was widespread like a hurricane but, left a path like a tornado. I see climate change with my own 2 eyes. Global warming is the cause, climate change if the effect. Republicans will do anything for consumption of money &, lying/ignoring Global warming is no exception! Just as sure as cutting down too many trees has an effect on this planet, so does taking too much oil from the earths core & burning into the heavens with no exhaust.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#932489 Jun 26, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Dick Durbin (D Walgreens) announces that the Great Lakes are evaporating at an alarming rate. However they are exactly the same as last year. And now as of today the Chicago area has flooded again. The last flood was less than two months ago. I don't know how Dick is keeping all that rain out of Lake Michigan.
Power hungry people lie...cheat...steal...fudge scientific evidence...whatever.

The present power hungry people have a loyal media who are more than willing to ignore it.

Thus, half a population of useful idiots.

"Squirrel!"

(There they go...)

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#932490 Jun 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Galt caught lying again.
The law says 50 employees not 50 American Citizen employees.
So the rest of his post os all garbage.
He is right.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#932491 Jun 26, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Every person is going to be nailed with pre-existing conditions. You know that don't you? and you will be rated as such. I suppose they will be asking how many sodas you drank too...if you eat bacon once a month, that will be a disease--and G-d forbid if you ever fell down in your life. If your wife says you are a nut then that will also be included-which I am sure she does.
The pre-existing conditions part would have been an acceptable democratic contribution to the republicans no-nonsense, common sense and rational solutions in lowering the costs of health care.

But democrats aren't interested in no-nonsense, common sense and rational solutions that lower the cost of anything.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#932492 Jun 26, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Earned Income Tax Credit?
"Earned Income" is kinda the giveaway there. So they and their employer has paid payroll taxes in order to qualify for any credit.
Jane Says

New York, NY

#932493 Jun 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
The point of course, is that President Obama will not be reelected in 2016?
Democrats voter registration efforts received a major boost yesterday. Guess how?
Missing your daily Benghazi post?
by giving left leaning ACORNesque groups funding via ObamaCare?

'...What is known so far suggests that California politicians are exploiting health reform to enroll millions of the uninsured in the Democratic Party and fill the coffers of left-wing interest groups with taxpayer money. Here are the facts:

California lawmakers passed a law requiring that voter registration be part of the health-insurance exchange. Last month, Covered California announced $37 million in grants to 48 organizations to build public awareness about the opening of the health exchange. Of the 48 groups that got grants, only a handful are health-care-related.

The California NAACP got $600,000 to do door-to-door canvassing and presentations at community organizations. Service Employees International Union, which says its mission is “economic justice,”received two grants totaling $2 million to make phone calls, robo-calls and go door-to-door.

The Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO got $1 million for door-to-door, one-on-one education and social networking. It describes its role as “engaging in both organizing and political campaigns, electing pro-union and pro-worker candidates.”

Community Health Councils, a California organization with a long history of political activism against fracking, for-profit hospitals, state budget cuts and oil exploration, got $1 million to conduct presentations at community and neighborhood meetings and one-to-one sessions.

These groups, closely allied with Democrats, are being funded by your tax dollars to conduct “outreach”— the kind of phone-banking and door-to-door canvassing that activists do to turn out the vote. They will turn out the uninsured to enroll in the exchanges and in the Democratic Party.

California’s actual enrollment process is also outsourced to community groups, unions and health clinics. An additional $49 million is budgeted to pay them the first year, but in future years, these assisters will be paid out of the premiums collected by the exchange. The template is repeated in every state. ObamaCare creates a permanent, nationwide stream of funding for unions and community activists.

Assisters will also guide the uninsured to sign up for whatever non-health social services they may be eligible for — including welfare, food stamps and housing assistance, according to the manual prepared for California’s implementation.

Anyone who remembers the days of James Curley, Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall should get the picture. If you were poor or a newcomer, you went to the local ward boss and got whatever you needed, in exchange for your vote. The difference is that back then, politics was local. Now the Obama health law is institutionalizing this corrupt style of politics across the country to create a permanent, Democratic voting majority.'

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolu...
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#932494 Jun 26, 2013
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem pretty awed by a fact based world.
Let's just do a "fact-based" test, shall we?

1. Under which presidents was the CRA created and expanded?
2. Are there more democrats including blacks and Hispanics in California or more republicans?
3. Do all democrats condone abortion?
4. Which party's leadership started more wars since the 1900s?

If you answered:
1. Carter and Clinton.
2. More democrats in California.
3. No.
4. The Democratic Party.

Then you passed.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#932496 Jun 26, 2013
Community Reinvestment Act had nothing to do with subprime crisis

Fresh off the false and politicized attack on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, today we’re hearing the know-nothings blame the subprime crisis on the Community Reinvestment Act — a 30-year-old law that was actually weakened by the Bush administration just as the worst lending wave began. This is even more ridiculous than blaming Freddie and Fannie.

http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insight...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#932497 Jun 26, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine if instead of a "dim bulb electron" like the Failed Solyndra...a "Right direction" had been chosen instead---and aid had been directed towards continuing(!!!) upgrades in improving known effeciant and affordable energy production.
Would've looked great in the History books-electronic ones too!!!
That's what solar is... a newer technology.

Aid is already given to oil drillers.

But it's not a topic cons like to discuss.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#932498 Jun 26, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>No one is dying. We are all alive and well. O'bama hasn't killed us yet. He wants to--but that isn't working out too well.
Funny how bushie boy actually did succeed in killing Americans...

... just by doing nothing.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#932499 Jun 26, 2013
It has lately become fashionable for conservative pundits (Larry Kudlow, George Will) and disgruntled ex-bankers (Vernon Hill, for example, in his March 7 American Banker editorial) to blame the current credit crisis on the Community Reinvestment Act. This is patent nonsense. The sub-prime debacle has many causes, including greed, lack of and ineffective regulation, failures of risk assessment and management, and misplaced optimism. But CRA is not to blame.

First, the timing is all wrong. CRA was enacted in 1977, its companion disclosure statute, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) in 1975. While many of us warned against bad subprime lending before the turn of the millennium, the massive breakdown of underwriting and extension of risky products far down the income scale-without bothering to even check on income-was primarily a post-2003 phenomenon. To blame a statute enacted in 1977 for something that happened 25 years later takes a fair amount of chutzpah.

http://www.newamerica.net/blog/asset-building...
NJ raider 1

Newark, NJ

#932500 Jun 26, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
That's like saying Bush kicked you in shin after Carter and Clinton put you in the hospital on life support.
No, blaming Clinton because the bad loans happen while he was president is like saying," I used my car for 5yrs &, you used it 1 day for 3hrs,& it broke down while in your possession. That's like me saying that's your fault!

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#932501 Jun 26, 2013
For every 1 job the Obama administration has created, 75 people went on food stamps.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Playboy offered Sarah Palin $4 Million to pose ... 58 min Larry Flint 4
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 2 hr _Zoey_ 7,786
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Jacques from Ottawa 178,266
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 2 hr _Zoey_ 326
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr ritedownthemiddle 46,876
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr PEllen 98,269
Abby 9-21-14 4 hr cheluzal 11
Amy 9-23-14 6 hr edogxxx 21
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••