Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1396513 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#932558 Jun 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
"Disappointing U.S. economic growth figures>.." make carol happy,
LOL
That was dumb.

Just pointing out that four years after the recession ended the economy still is dragging along.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#932559 Jun 26, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
LONDON (AP)-- Disappointing U.S. economic growth figures failed to alter the mood in financial markets Wednesday which has seen most stocks eke out solid gains for the second day running.
Despite signs that the recent correction in stock markets may have stabilized, investors remain cautious.
"It still feels as if markets are simply looking to catch their breath after all the excitement of the past week, and so it is perhaps unwise to suggest that two days of positive trading make a trend," said Chris Beauchamp, market analyst at IG.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/W/WORLD_...
I'd take his advise if I were you, Homer. Let's wait to bring out the cake in another month or so before we celebrate - or after the Feds completely stop the printing presses this time next year.
This is too funny. Markets up over 100% since Obama took office, yet Carol says we need more tiime to determine what's going on!!

Ain't no cure for that sort of ignorance.

Now we have Carol, the poverty case, talking like a market maven.

News for Carol. They don't sell stocks in thrift shoppes.

HAHAHAHAHA

Funny how the wingnuts who all claimed they bought gold when Glenn Beck was hawking Goldline have gone completely silent.

Just as Carol hasn't said a word about O'Reilly supporting the immigration bill in the Senate.

Why is that??
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#932560 Jun 26, 2013
Jane Says wrote:
<quoted text>that explains the huge crowd of Obama worshippers in Germany last week and how well the economy is doing and how the world is much more stable since Obama won the peace prize. Oh and last but not least, the fact that Obama got caught whispering/promising sweetly to the Russians in 2012 how he'd have "more flexibility after the election," is working out real well for the U.S., right?
As opposed to Romney?

Absolutely.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#932561 Jun 26, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>Communist China already has 'listened'.
Horse squeeze!!!
Jane Says

Jamaica, NY

#932562 Jun 26, 2013
From Canada with love:

Obama in Berlin: Self-indulgent mush masquerades as leadership

Remember how Obama and other Democrats decried that George W. Bush was “alienating” our allies with his supposed go-it-alone cowboy-ness?

What Bush was doing was pursuing a serious agenda in the service of American interests. Some of our allies liked it more than others did.

Our adversaries didn’t like it much at all.

When Bush went abroad to deal with foreign leaders the reception was not always great because there were difficult issues being dealt with. That is how it goes with serious leaders.

WHAT EXACTLY IS OBAMA DEALING WITH?

* Trying to revive the notion of “arms control” negotiations with the Russians as if it were 1979 again?

* Continuing to push the fairy tale that global warming is the “greatest global threat of our time”?

*Vladimir Putin must be astounded at his luck that the American electorate put this EMPTY SUIT in the White House, not once but twice.

Obama still appears sold on the notion that he can lead the nation - maybe even lead the world - with brilliant speeches. NO MATTER HOW NONSENSICAL HIS WORDS, all he has to do is say them skillfully enough, and he can not only keep Americans buying it but somehow do the same to the likes of Putin, Merkel and Cameron.

That, I guess, gives him the heft he needs to SLASH AMERICA’S ARSENAL AND FUNNEL THE MONEY INTO MORE SCHEMES TO CREATE A PERMANENT CLASS OF GOVERNMENT-DEPENDENT HOPEANDCHANGE VOTERS.

Raise your hand if you’ve noticed that Obama’s speeches are terrible and what HE SAYS MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER. In his mind, Putin is raising his hand, but he doesn’t want to help you figure it out. It’s in his interests to have you to keep buying it.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/...

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#932563 Jun 26, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Lieberman was a Dem primaried out of party by idiot Progressives who won seat again as Ind. and caucus with Dems.
As usual you just post whatever fits your tale.
No, Joe Lieberman was a registered Republican before he switched party affiliation status to 'Independent'.The GOP's own turning away from and hostility towards moderate ,'RINO' conservatives forced many honest, progressive conservatives to flee the GOP.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#932564 Jun 26, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Your article omits to mention that a stricter version of the 1977 CRA was enacted by Bill Clinton in 1995. This renewed and toughened CRA gave federal regulators the authority to severely curtail the activities of a bank if the bank fails to follow this act. The next tightening step occurred in 1999, when Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which further expanded the reach of the CRA. From 1995 to 2004 it is a mere 9 years. A large majority of the subprime loans was granted under APR mortgage terms. That is, a very low interest rate is offered for the first five years of the loan. After these five years, the interest rate is no longer fixed and rises sharply. The inital low interest rate was necessary for the banks to sell enough subprime loans and not get criminalized under the CRA. The house owners usually get in trouble when the interest rate rises and they can no longer afford the loan. Therefore, there was a five-year lag after the introduction of the tightened CRA before the first problems started to appear. Furthermore, new loans were granted over many years, and the remaining four years after subtracting the lag do not appear that long anymore. When the tightened 1995 CRA by Bill Clinton is considered, the notion that the CRA is the root cause of the subprime mortgage crisis no longer appears silly.
Next, the article claims
... that 50% of subprime loans were made by mortgage service companies not subject comprehensive federal supervision and another 30% were made by affiliates of banks or thrifts which are not subject to routine supervision or examinations.
Please consider the exact wording. No comprehensive federal supervision. Does this mean that the CRA law still applies and is just not supervised and enforced? What about the banks and thrifts which are not subject to routine supervision or examinations? Do they act unlawfully just because of a lack of supervision? Is this the path recommended by the author? First, the text of the CRA applies to all regulated financial institutions - these are banks, insurance companies and their subsidiaries.
Second, please note that no real statistics are provided.
but....you can take your last statement and apply it to the right wing myth that CRA's caused the housing bubble to burst.

i'm not taking your 'explanation' as solid reasoning without something to back it up.

so i guess we're done.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#932565 Jun 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
Carol can answer for herself
Just another of Waxturd's trolls.

Best to ignore the idiots. And he's got lots of idiots in the closet!! This happens to be one of the newer ones, burt equally ignorant. That's how you can always tell it's Waxturd.

It's the Obamaphobia..........
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#932566 Jun 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Lookie!! Another flat earth idiot!! Thanks in advance for saying truly ignorant stuff!! LOL
January 2013 was the lowest levels recorded-ever. So much for your stupidity about it being the same as last year.
----------
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/11/us/great-la...
"Water Levels Fall in Great Lakes, Taking a Toll on Shipping"
"Drought and other factors have created historically low water marks for the Great Lakes, putting the $34 billion Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway shipping industry in peril, a situation that could send ominous ripples throughout the economy.
Water levels in the Great Lakes have been below their long-term averages during the past 14 years, and this winter the water in Lakes Michigan and Huron, the hardest-hit lakes, dropped to record lows, according to the Army Corps of Engineers. Keith Kompoltowicz, the chief of watershed hydrology with the corps’s Detroit district, said that in January “the monthly mean was the lowest ever recorded, going back to 1918.”
While spring rains have helped so far this year, levels in all five Great Lakes are still low by historical standards, so getting through the shallow points in harbors and channels is a tense affair."
----------
It's so easy to prove your ignorance. Like shooting fish in a barrel.
You must be related to Carol, only she says such idiotic stuff that can be so easily disproven.
What are you mumbling about?

Drought causes drop in Lake level

Rain is improving situation

Why are you claiming this is important in any way?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#932567 Jun 26, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe if you could keep up you'd know everything I've said about the CRA is Clinton and the Democrats expanding it to force banks into providing more subprime mortgages than at any other time - even since Carter's screw up in creating the dang thing in the first place.
I know what you keep SAYING son.

That's the brainwashing you received but you just don't notice.

The banks and capitalists created subprimes. The government didn't create them and force the banks to fund them.

You're the one whose really screwed.

BTW, have you determined when they repealed CRA so you can make your case?
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#932568 Jun 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> You do realize the wording was 'legal marriage', right? Meaning only in the states where same-sex marriage is legal. Not that I care. My opinion is the government has no business in the marriage game. Government should have nothing to do with who marries whom!!!
I agree with the SCOTUS, it should be a state decision.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#932569 Jun 26, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
It looks like the liberals on the Supreme Court subverted Democracy again. First the rule California voters do not have the right to deny same sex marriage, but now they say it's up to the states.
Typical lawless Democrats in action. This SC is a circus act. Totally dysfunctional and not functioning as intended. They do not rule on law, they are nothing more than a political group now.
that was today.

yesterday the Court conservative had their go at subverting democracy. so quit complaining.

but it's nice to see yesterday's wingnut celebration cut short.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#932570 Jun 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
It was the House Republicans that made taxpayers pay for their defense of DOMA, dingbat!!
They lost. You lost. The Repugnant Party lost huge.
Freedom and equality for all Americans, as guarenteed by the Constitution WON!!
Scalia uses his Catholic upbringing to decide, and ignores the 14th Amendment.
He's much like you, dingbat!!
""AMENDMENT XIV
SECTION 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
----------
That is clear as a bell, except for hateful religious freaks like you.
Why do you hate the US Constitution??
bingo!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#932571 Jun 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
"Disappointing U.S. economic growth figures>.." make carol happy,
LOL
She lost all her money in the stock market!!
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#932572 Jun 26, 2013
LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
Hope this post in now in place of the daily
Benghazi, IRS and AP reposts
Why is Patrick so grumpy this morning?

Benghazi and IRS are current issues no matter how much you want them to disappear.

“equality for ALL means ALL”

Since: Jan 07

Fort Lauderdale FL

#932573 Jun 26, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
It looks like the liberals on the Supreme Court subverted Democracy again. First the rule California voters do not have the right to deny same sex marriage, but now they say it's up to the states.
Typical lawless Democrats in action. This SC is a circus act. Totally dysfunctional and not functioning as intended. They do not rule on law, they are nothing more than a political group now.
You don't matter!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#932574 Jun 26, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with the SCOTUS, it should be a state decision.
No it shouldn't, dummy. It's called United States for a reason you treasonous traitor, go to Russia, you anti American miserable wench from hell.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#932575 Jun 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Lookie!! Another flat earth idiot!! Thanks in advance for saying truly ignorant stuff!! LOL
January 2013 was the lowest levels recorded-ever. So much for your stupidity about it being the same as last year.
----------
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/11/us/great-la...
"Water Levels Fall in Great Lakes, Taking a Toll on Shipping"
"Drought and other factors have created historically low water marks for the Great Lakes, putting the $34 billion Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway shipping industry in peril, a situation that could send ominous ripples throughout the economy.
Water levels in the Great Lakes have been below their long-term averages during the past 14 years, and this winter the water in Lakes Michigan and Huron, the hardest-hit lakes, dropped to record lows, according to the Army Corps of Engineers. Keith Kompoltowicz, the chief of watershed hydrology with the corps’s Detroit district, said that in January “the monthly mean was the lowest ever recorded, going back to 1918.”
While spring rains have helped so far this year, levels in all five Great Lakes are still low by historical standards, so getting through the shallow points in harbors and channels is a tense affair."
----------
It's so easy to prove your ignorance. Like shooting fish in a barrel.
You must be related to Carol, only she says such idiotic stuff that can be so easily disproven.
Think it might have something to do with all those water bottling plants along the shores? Do people not realize that when you bottle millions of gallons of water from it's source and ship it outside the water shed that it won't cause a problem?

Blue Gold: World Water Wars Watch it and learn something.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#932576 Jun 26, 2013
In Germany, they still love Obama

Today, according to new Pew Research Center data not yet released in a report, 88% of Germans say they have confidence in Obama to do the right thing in world affairs. In stark contrast, just 14% had confidence in Bush during his last year in office.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/06/...
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#932577 Jun 26, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>No, Joe Lieberman was a registered Republican before he switched party affiliation status to 'Independent'.The GOP's own turning away from and hostility towards moderate ,'RINO' conservatives forced many honest, progressive conservatives to flee the GOP.
Link to anything that supports your claim. Anything

You are wrong; look it up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 min Rogue Scholar 05 217,117
Who's this Fauxcahontas? 46 min Welcome2theWigWam 32
Fat Ankles and hairy toes. 49 min Bills Babes 26
True BRILLIANCE and so correct. 53 min Im On 2nd 7
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr tina anne 60,180
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 1,691
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 2,721
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr CrunchyBacon 102,569

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages