Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
855,981 - 856,000 of 1,096,677 Comments Last updated 4 min ago
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931786
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

The Constitutional Accountability Center on Tuesday condemned the Supreme Court's striking of Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which the think tank said prevents Congress from exercising its rightful power to stop the practice of racial discrimination in voting.

"Today is a sad day for all Americans who care about protection of one our most fundamental rights, the right to vote," said David Gans, the center's civil rights director, in a press release. "In striking down a core provision of the Voting Rights Act, the Court flouts the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment, which expressly give to Congress broad powers to prevent and deter all forms of racial discrimination in voting.

"As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg explained in a powerful dissent," he continued. "Congress properly used these broad constitutional powers to prevent current and ongoing racial discrimination in voting concentrated in the covered jurisdictions.

"Justice Ginsburg further explained that Congress was not required to update the coverage formula, because the Voting Rights Act's 15,000-page record in 2006 shows that pre-clearance continues to cover the jurisdictions with the worst record of voting discrimination."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/c...
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931787
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>It's amazing how your source doesn't contain your quote.
That's because you're apparently legally blind.

Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Lead to Risky Lending?

Sumit Agarwal, Efraim Benmelech, Nittai Bergman, Amit Seru

NBER Working Paper No. 18609
Issued in December 2012
NBER Program(s): AP CF

Yes, it did. We use exogenous variation in banks’ incentives to conform to the standards of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) around regulatory exam dates to trace out the effect of the CRA on lending activity. Our empirical strategy compares lending behavior of banks undergoing CRA exams within a given census tract in a given month to the behavior of banks operating in the same census tract-month that do not face these exams. We find that adherence to the act led to riskier lending by banks: in the six quarters surrounding the CRA exams lending is elevated on average by about 5 percent every quarter and loans in these quarters default by about 15 percent more often. These patterns are accentuated in CRA-eligible census tracts and are concentrated among large banks. The effects are strongest during the time period when the market for private securitization was booming.

http://www.nber.org/papers/w18609

The CRA and the revamping of it during the Clinton years is the Democrats' baby.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931788
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
The hypocrisy of the left; the transformation from 'child', protected under the law, to 'intrusive organism', occurs at the whim of a mother.
Yes, its her body therefore her choice.

I know how much you Republicans hate letting individuals make their own choices and take responsibility for the consequences of those choices but that's just how a free society's supposed to work.

Having the government make all your personal decisions is not "less government".
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931789
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush handed money to oil companies trough subsidies aimed at that industry.
GE took advantage of the same tax ;law as all corporations face.
Yes Bush abandoned Afghanistan.
You are a liar and post irresponsible statements only an imbecile would make.

Tell us how Bush "abandoned" Afghanistan, sleazeball. You can't, because you lie, and made one of your typical irresponsible statements.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931790
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
That was a dumb comparison.
Can cancer ever live separate of a host?
Can an unviable fetus?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931791
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Obama spoke generically about "acts of terror", but did not specifically call Benghazi an act of terror. This was clearly intentional, to give him deniability either way.
It's like bushie not tying the attack on the US to his invasion of iraq.

But the only card that could save him was finding the wmd's, and he failed to do that.

So that lie blew up exponentially.

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931792
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
If the West pursues the Kyoto Protocol, it will be economic suicide. That's why Presidents have ignored it while Tree Huggers whine about it.
China has been on a Coal-Fired Power Plant construction binge for years now.
And the Magic Negro wants to tax our Coal Industry into oblivion.
George Soros is snickering.
You live in such a bubble.

With people reduced to wearing mask when they venture outside; schools forced to cancel outdoor activities and field trips; parents with means choosing schools based on air-filtration systems; and some international schools building gigantic, futuristic-looking domes over sports fields to ensure healthy breathing, China has paid a terrible price for their reliance on Coal-fired Power plants.

Just this month Hong Kong adopted measures to improve their air quality including a mandate that coal-fired power plants provide detailed environmental information to the public. They have ordered them to reduce their emissions "for each unit of economic output by 30 percent by the end of 2017."

Public outcries stopped the construction of coal-fired power plants in the southern provinces of Guangdong and Hainan and Beijing (where levels of deadly pollutants are up to 40 times the recommended exposure limit) is "reducing its consumption of heavily polluting coal."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/16/world/asia/...

“I hope in the future we’ll move to a foreign country,” Ms. Zhang, a lawyer, said as her ailing son, Wu Xiaotian, played on a mat in their apartment, near a new air purifier.“Otherwise we’ll choke to death.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/world/asia/...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931793
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you mean like pushing a major piece of legislation that got passed by a strict partisan vote and 60% of Americans were against?
That kind of agenda?
Do you mean the "train wreck that's coming" kind of agenda?
If you're talking about the cons, could be son.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931794
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
What about the rights of the citizens of a town to decide that they don't want low-income subsidized housing?
There is no Constitutional right to equal housing.
There is nothing in the Constitution about the Air Force either son.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931795
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>The right wing nut jobs who run the GOP even think 'rape kits are abortions on demand'.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php...
It's more than amusing how you liberal loons single out a complete unknown "running the GOP".

The rest of us have no problem with rape kits. They not only gather evidence but prevents pregnancy within hours of a possible conception. That's not an abortion. The cells haven't even begun to divide yet.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931796
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
What eludes them is Bush "inherited" a recession after the dot-com bubble burst. The same dot-com bubble Clinton capitalized on and, luckily, was able to exit the stage before it went boom.
So Bush basically got stuck with the dot-com crash and 9/11 right after Clinton said, "Exit stage right!" like Snagglepuss.
Here's a list of 20 years of change in GDP, can you pick out the years represented by the "catastrophic" recession that compelled George to put an end to those pesky surpluses and start a couple of wars?

0.05
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.03
-0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931797
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because you're apparently legally blind.
Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Lead to Risky Lending?
Sumit Agarwal, Efraim Benmelech, Nittai Bergman, Amit Seru
NBER Working Paper No. 18609
Issued in December 2012
NBER Program(s): AP CF
Yes, it did. We use exogenous variation in banks’ incentives to conform to the standards of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) around regulatory exam dates to trace out the effect of the CRA on lending activity. Our empirical strategy compares lending behavior of banks undergoing CRA exams within a given census tract in a given month to the behavior of banks operating in the same census tract-month that do not face these exams. We find that adherence to the act led to riskier lending by banks: in the six quarters surrounding the CRA exams lending is elevated on average by about 5 percent every quarter and loans in these quarters default by about 15 percent more often. These patterns are accentuated in CRA-eligible census tracts and are concentrated among large banks. The effects are strongest during the time period when the market for private securitization was booming.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w18609
The CRA and the revamping of it during the Clinton years is the Democrats' baby.
Psst! CRA was passed under Carter son.

If you had any brains, you'd know that.

You really are out of your league son. And all it does it expose your partisan politics and how you like to twist facts around.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931798
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is Flack b;laming the Democrats for the Bush recession.
Signed into Law May25th.
Went into effect July 26th.
That .70 cents an hour raise.
less than two months later Bush tells us we are on the verge of a financial meltdown & the worst recession in 80 years starts in December.
Yep that minimum wage did it.
Nor the unfunded Bush Tax cuts
Not record Earmarks
Not doubling the debt
Not two quagmire unfunded wars
Not the unfunded part D expansion to Medicare.
It was that GD .70 cents an hour raise to the minimum wage.
More ridiculous remarks.

It was a world wide recession. The Democrats were warned about Fannie & Freddie and said, no problem. Democrats also voted for the use of force.

You are just an old retard dissatisfied with your position in life so you blame others.

I suggest a moron like you read this:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/166...

It will provide information in a mature and factual manner, unlike your childish and irresponsible rubbish.

You actually enjoy making a fool of yourself. You do it every day.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931799
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>So, you would have let the big banks fail , big corporations fail , let the country fall into a Great Depression and then do nothing but hope and pray 'someone' will come to save the day?
Happens every day. The country would have been no worse off than it is now. In fact the banks are now even bigger and fewer and in far more danger of failing.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931800
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Obama spoke generically about "acts of terror", but did not specifically call Benghazi an act of terror. This was clearly intentional, to give him deniability either way.
Even then, the "acts of terror" was a direct reference to the original 9/11 attack in a different part of his speech.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931801
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>If you're talking about the cons, could be son.
You must know a lot of cons, being one. Tell us you never spent a day in jail.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931802
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>It's called capitalism son.
You know, the stuff you cons have been promoting and somehow irrationally tie to the Constitution? Well, my Constitution anyway, not yours.
No it is called the Clinton doctrine. I could see it coming a mile away. Liberalism fails every time. There was nothing free market about it. Give aways to the poor sustain nothing.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931803
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Horseshit, I heard him on the 12th or 13th describe it as an "act of terror".
By "loop" you must be referring to the O'Reilly "Spin 'til they puke" Zone.


Here's the horseshit for you and the horse it came from.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931804
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

2

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Psst! CRA was passed under Carter son.
If you had any brains, you'd know that.
You really are out of your league son. And all it does it expose your partisan politics and how you like to twist facts around.
You've obviously started drinking already, Joe Six Pack.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931805
Jun 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

frontporchreactionary wrote:
["John Galt"]
Three-quarters of the states 'elected representatives in the U.S. Congress' must ratify any proposed Constitutional amendment.
No dingleberry. 2/4 of the states must ratify the amendment. Meaning 3/4 of the state legislatures must approve. It is why the ERA amendment failed. Could not get 3/4 of the states to approve in the time allowed.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Download 2go 3 min naijapaded-com 1
Amy 8-23-14 13 min Mister Tonka 7
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 16 min JOEL 68,862
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 25 min TRD 68,311
Amy 8-22 26 min Pippa 13
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 38 min Learn to Read 176,892
Abby 8-23-14 42 min Pippa 3
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr PEllen 97,848

Search the Chicago Forum:
•••

Flood Warning for Cook County was issued at August 22 at 8:29PM CDT

•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••