Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1276035 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#931798 Jun 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is Flack b;laming the Democrats for the Bush recession.
Signed into Law May25th.
Went into effect July 26th.
That .70 cents an hour raise.
less than two months later Bush tells us we are on the verge of a financial meltdown & the worst recession in 80 years starts in December.
Yep that minimum wage did it.
Nor the unfunded Bush Tax cuts
Not record Earmarks
Not doubling the debt
Not two quagmire unfunded wars
Not the unfunded part D expansion to Medicare.
It was that GD .70 cents an hour raise to the minimum wage.
More ridiculous remarks.

It was a world wide recession. The Democrats were warned about Fannie & Freddie and said, no problem. Democrats also voted for the use of force.

You are just an old retard dissatisfied with your position in life so you blame others.

I suggest a moron like you read this:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/166...

It will provide information in a mature and factual manner, unlike your childish and irresponsible rubbish.

You actually enjoy making a fool of yourself. You do it every day.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#931799 Jun 25, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>So, you would have let the big banks fail , big corporations fail , let the country fall into a Great Depression and then do nothing but hope and pray 'someone' will come to save the day?
Happens every day. The country would have been no worse off than it is now. In fact the banks are now even bigger and fewer and in far more danger of failing.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#931800 Jun 25, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Obama spoke generically about "acts of terror", but did not specifically call Benghazi an act of terror. This was clearly intentional, to give him deniability either way.
Even then, the "acts of terror" was a direct reference to the original 9/11 attack in a different part of his speech.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#931801 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>If you're talking about the cons, could be son.
You must know a lot of cons, being one. Tell us you never spent a day in jail.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#931802 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>It's called capitalism son.
You know, the stuff you cons have been promoting and somehow irrationally tie to the Constitution? Well, my Constitution anyway, not yours.
No it is called the Clinton doctrine. I could see it coming a mile away. Liberalism fails every time. There was nothing free market about it. Give aways to the poor sustain nothing.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#931803 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Horseshit, I heard him on the 12th or 13th describe it as an "act of terror".
By "loop" you must be referring to the O'Reilly "Spin 'til they puke" Zone.


Here's the horseshit for you and the horse it came from.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#931804 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Psst! CRA was passed under Carter son.
If you had any brains, you'd know that.
You really are out of your league son. And all it does it expose your partisan politics and how you like to twist facts around.
You've obviously started drinking already, Joe Six Pack.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#931805 Jun 25, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
["John Galt"]
Three-quarters of the states 'elected representatives in the U.S. Congress' must ratify any proposed Constitutional amendment.
No dingleberry. 2/4 of the states must ratify the amendment. Meaning 3/4 of the state legislatures must approve. It is why the ERA amendment failed. Could not get 3/4 of the states to approve in the time allowed.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#931806 Jun 25, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
You must know a lot of cons, being one. Tell us you never spent a day in jail.
Well son, it's not as extensive as yours.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#931807 Jun 25, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>No it is called the Clinton doctrine. I could see it coming a mile away. Liberalism fails every time. There was nothing free market about it. Give aways to the poor sustain nothing.
Why son? Many people and many companies made much money. They swam in it.

You should be singing the praises, not chastising others for your failures.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#931808 Jun 25, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Homer is old enough to have access to his 401k so he can bury it?
You sure he wasn't burying his jar of pennies?
May have been. Didn't see him put anything in the hole.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#931809 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Well son, it's not as extensive as yours.
I help put people like you in jail, son. I've met many poor souls just like you.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#931810 Jun 25, 2013
What's up gang? What's the latest rightwing fantasy scare? Obama coming for your piggy banks?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#931811 Jun 25, 2013
Is There an Antidote to the Republican Amnesia?

By Barney Frank

Memory eventually fails us all, but apparently the decline strikes one party far more than the other.

In recent weeks, my friends across the aisle have expended a lot of breath proclaiming that the Democrats caused the present financial crisis by failing to pass legislation to regulate financial services companies in the years 1995 through 2006.

There is only small one problem with this story -- throughout this entire period the Republicans were in complete charge of the House and for the most critical years they controlled the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.

In the House of Representatives, the majority party has almost unlimited power over the minority party. The majority party owns the committee chairmanships; it controls what bills come to a vote; and it is under no obligation to consider the ideas of the beleaguered minority. When the Republicans were in the majority they ruled with an iron first; it is no accident that Tom DeLay was known as "The Hammer."

That is why I find it particularly flattering the Republicans now claim that in the years 1995 to 2006 I personally possessed supernatural powers which enabled me to force mighty Republican leaders to do my bidding. Choose your comic book hero -- I was all of them.

I wish I had the power to force the Republican leadership to do my bidding! If I had had that power, I would have used it to block the impeachment of Bill Clinton, to stop the war in Iraq, to prevent large tax cuts for the extremely wealthy, and to stop government intervention into the private life of Terri Schiavo. Yet that power eluded me, and I was unable to stop those things.

According to the Republicans' misty memories of the period before 2007, I allegedly singlehandedly blocked their determined efforts to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and my supposed intransigence literally caused the worldwide financial crisis.

Fortunately, we have tools to aid memory -- pencil and paper, word processing, transcripts, newspapers, and the Congressional record. And as described in the most reputable published sources, in 2005 I in fact worked together with my Republican colleague Michael Oxley, then Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, to write a bill to increase regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We passed the bill out of committee with an overwhelming majority -- every Democrat voted in favor of the legislation. However, on the House floor the Republican leadership added a poison pill amendment, which would have prevented non-profit institutions with religious affiliations from receiving funds. I voted against the legislation in protest, though I continued to work with Mr. Oxley to encourage the Senate to pass a good bill. But these efforts were defeated because President Bush blocked further consideration of the legislation. In the words of Mr. Oxley, no flaming liberal, the Bush administration gave his efforts 'the one-finger salute.'

The Republicans can claim some supposed successes despite my awesome power. In 1999 they passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which overturned a Depression-era law preventing commercial banks from acting like investment banks. In 2000, they passed another bill which loosened regulation of derivative markets. I voted against these bills -- but to no avail.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/200...

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#931812 Jun 25, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>You failed to read the entire link to Park Ridge or you really lied about knowing the town. The town did have a industrial/ retail base with its traditional brick-making business as a core industry to the town's development. And now you're telling me that you oppose U S Constitution civil right equal housing laws . A pewrson ought to have a right to live wherever he damn well pleases and not be forced by the prejudice or racism of others to live someplace else.
DID you read your own post. DID they don't anymore. A "Pew-son" has a right to live where ever they can afford to live. There is no reason why they should have TAX Payer housing forced on that city or any other one. It is now in every city or town in Illinois. O'bama made sure that communities would be disrupted by housing at least 10% dead beats and thugs, illegal aliens and gang bangers-more than likely the same. Moslems and terrorists also go into low housing in these areas and destroy communities. Who is going to foot the bill once all these tax payers leave?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#931813 Jun 25, 2013
Under Republican President George W. Bush, many federal agencies turned a blind eye to activities which would later precipitate the global financial meltdown. The Securities and Exchange Commission decided to allow the nation's largest financial institutions to "self-regulate;" the Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan declined to use its power to regulate subprime mortgages; the Comptroller of the Currency decided to preempt state consumer laws on subprime mortgages.

Meanwhile, President Bush himself demanded that Fannie and Freddie increase the percentage of subprime loans they purchased, supposedly because of his belief in an "ownership society." Incidentally, increased lending to subprime borrowers would also fuel astronomical profits by the financial services industry. I publicly opposed giving mortgages to unqualified borrowers because I believed that some families are better off renting.

Yet somehow none of this was recorded in the Republican collective memory.

Forgotten too is the significant progress that was made after the 2006 elections, when the Republicans in Congress were repudiated by American voters.

Ironically, this is the period in which I and my Democratic colleagues actually did possess the magical power needed to make real change in Washington -- we became the majority party. In March 2007, just two months after I became the Chairman of the Financial Services Committee for the first time, I moved quickly to forge a bill which would regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The bill passed the House in May, with all 223 Democrats voting for it, and 103 Republicans voting against it. President Bush later signed that legislation into law.

Later in 2007, I introduced legislation to restrict subprime mortgages. The bill passed the Financial Services Committee and the House, but it did not pass the Senate, where because of the filibuster rule, the Republican minority actually does have the power to hobble the majority. The bill passed the full House with all 227 Democrats and 64 Republicans voting for it, and 127 Republicans voting against.

Ironically, those Republicans who now attack me most viciously and whose memories are the most impaired were among those who voted against both bills.

Republicans also forget -- or do not understand -- that the present financial crisis has many fathers. The failure to pass any meaningful legislation before 2007 allowed unscrupulous actors to gorge themselves at the public's expense. Unregulated mortgage brokers sold subprime loans including the now infamous NINA (No Income No Assets). Major financial institutions packaged bad mortgages into securities and sold them as low-risk investments. Rating agencies gave stellar grades to toxic assets while being paid by the companies who stood to benefit from their actions. Insurance companies like AIG issued Credit Default Swaps which magically turned toxic assets into gold.

The executives of some of those institutions now seek bonuses for their fine work. Perhaps my Republican colleagues should ask for bonuses too.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/200...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#931814 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>There is nothing in the Constitution about the Air Force either son.
The Air Force was once part of the Army which is in there.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#931815 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Can an unviable fetus?
Is a fetus viable when it has a beating heart and has developed its major organs by the end of the fourth week?

Or when it can suck its thumb by the twelfth week?

Is a 12-week gestation fetus sucking its thumb not human?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#931816 Jun 25, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Obama spoke generically about "acts of terror", but did not specifically call Benghazi an act of terror. This was clearly intentional, to give him deniability either way.
Of course that's how you see it, you're a Republican.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#931817 Jun 25, 2013
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) Sales of new homes rose in May to the highest rate since mid-2008 and purchases in the early spring were also higher than originally estimated, the government said Tuesday.

New home sales rose 3.6% in the West.
Sales increased 2.1% last month to an annual rate of 476,000, the Commerce Department said, providing more evidence of the robust recovery underway in the U.S. housing market.

Economists polled by MarketWatch had forecast sales in May to reach an annual rate of 464,000.

Sales rose in May despite a reversal in mortgage rates that extended into June. The rate on a 30-year mortgage topped 4% for the first time in a year, up from 3.5% just a few months ago, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-us-home-...

Keep up the good work Mr. president. Faith is slowly being restored after the Bush debacle.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 52 min Denny CranesPlace 196,889
Fun Song Combos (Sep '12) 53 min Lexus1985 465
abby 8-28-15 1 hr RACE 6
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr Lexus1985 1,720
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 1 hr RJS 8,133
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 6,420
Ask Amy 8-30-15 1 hr RACE 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages