Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1459870 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#931957 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, I work in the Energy sector.
So, you must know better than anyone that nuclear energy is far too dangerous to use and that solar and wind and "renewables" can supply all our future needs.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931958 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That's his answer to me telling him he has no idea what "conservatism" is.
What mighty balls you have sir!
Never stated that.

Poking fun at Yeah-is he you?- for using a dumb abbreviation.

You need to get it together.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#931959 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Tenzing's meltdown continues.
The post below this one he brings up "Hitler"
If he doesn't step away soon he will devolve to lily's traitor line.
I'm sorry.

What great ovaries you have ma'am!
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931960 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That's his answer to me telling him he has no idea what "conservatism" is.
What mighty balls you have sir!
Metaphorically or literally?
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931961 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't gonna bother with a history of political parties in this country or with the fact that we currently have independents serving at the state and federal level.
TWO parties and ONLY two I tell you!!!
You are melting.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#931962 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
That is your issue not mine-remember.
You get too easily confused.
No son, it's not. It was brought up when you decided to insert your two cents.

Now you're bailing out since you're just too lazy.

You lie as a matter of course that you can't tell the truth anymore.

And the best part is, you do it by your own volition.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931963 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry.
What great ovaries you have ma'am!
Misogynist, my ovaries are not open to your commentary.

*Joking*
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#931964 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Never stated that.
Poking fun at Yeah-is he you?- for using a dumb abbreviation.
You need to get it together.
lol! That's because you can't use facts son.

But that's ok. That's just you being you.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#931966 Jun 25, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you must know better than anyone that nuclear energy is far too dangerous to use and that solar and wind and "renewables" can supply all our future needs.
Who cares?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#931967 Jun 25, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you must know better than anyone that nuclear energy is far too dangerous to use and that solar and wind and "renewables" can supply all our future needs.
???

Trying to make a point with someone?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#931968 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Why does everything have to be spelled out to you?
Two main parties-silly.
Still... you must be from another country son.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931970 Jun 25, 2013
Various climate models haven't predicted past or present. A carbon tax can't be justified based on their predictions
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931971 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>No son, it's not. It was brought up when you decided to insert your two cents.
Now you're bailing out since you're just too lazy.
You lie as a matter of course that you can't tell the truth anymore.
And the best part is, you do it by your own volition.
Yeah, your spots haven't changed.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931972 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! That's because you can't use facts son.
But that's ok. That's just you being you.
YOUR slur -I responded to -had no facts attached.

You get easily confused.
SHADOW

Bulverde, TX

#931973 Jun 25, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>There is nothing in the Constitution about the Air Force either son.
No answer so you deflect.
There is nothing in the Constitution about squatting or eating dogs either is there yeahoo?
You argue for the sake of argueing nothing more.
You are sad and now you can come back with the chihuahua jokes that are as old and tired as you are.

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#931974 Jun 25, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I fully support your opposition to abortion. I urge you to counsel your friends and relatives against the practice. Get your church involved, excommunicate members who've had or has an abortion. I'm all for that just quit trying to get the government to do your dirty work for you.
You have no idea how that comforts me. The government is performing the dirty work, your sarcasm is misplaced.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931975 Jun 25, 2013
Obama climate adviser cheers escalation of War on Coal: http://bit.ly/11XXuI1 But isn't Colo a coal state?

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#931976 Jun 25, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Of course you missed the point-it was about freedom to treat your health with out the government denoting how you do it. I want to live in a country where I have a choice to choose whatever means I, myself, deem necessary to treat something. That isn't the case with O'bamacare. So you with your 'choice mantra' you should be against O'bamacare. But you are not.
So exactly how does Obamacare stop you from treating whatever it is that you have?
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#931977 Jun 25, 2013
What is "climate justice"?
WOW

New York, NY

#931978 Jun 25, 2013
Before God can continue with the final Judgement there are a few things John needs to see about the religion and government that will dominate the world during the full seven year Tribulation. The are known as Babylon the Great. Chapter 17 of Revelation reveals the destruction of the great whore Babylon--the harlot church--while Chapter 18 reveals the destruction of the political and economic system--the ten nation confederacy.

The identity of Babylon the Great is surrounded by much controversy. As discussed earlier, it has been identified as the actual City of Babylon, the City of Rome, the City of New York, and the old Babylonian religion. John provides a clue in Revelation 17:9 and 18,

''This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits.... 18 The woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth."

Rome is often cited as the "city on seven hills." Verse 18 reveals the woman to be the "great city that rules over the kings of the earth."Babylon the Great could only be Rome. Why the secrecy? If John had used the name Rome, the persecution of the Christians would intensify until mass carnage would result. So the early Christians spoke of Rome in code, Babylon!

But there is more. The spiritual concept of adultery and fornication is spiritual infidelity, while that of prostitution and harlotry is a counterfeit religion. Hence, what John is saying here is the kings of the earth (royalty, global leaders, and the like) have abandoned their belief in God and lust after a false religion --pantheism! The seat of this harlot church will be Rome! The fact that the Vatican is located in Rome and is rumored that the occult is well entrenched within its leadership, make it a likely candidate and worthy of careful observation. It is premature, however, to say that the Vatican or the Roman Catholic Church is the harlot of Revelation 17. It may or may not be.

At any rate, the woman is riding the beast with ten horns and seven heads. This is the same beast as John describes in Revelation 13:1 and as Daniel describes in Daniel 7:7,24. The fact that she is controlling the beast suggests that the new world government will ride into power at the direction of the false religion. Indeed, the entire justification for the need for a world government is based on the false belief that only a world government can solve environmental problems such as acid rain, global climate change, ecosystem destruction and ozone depletion. The false belief that these global catastrophes are occurring are in turn based on the occult pantheistic belief that all things of nature are god or the goddess, and humans, merely one portion of the goddess must be destroying goddess earth--Gaia--with all of our unnatural technology and activities!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr District 1 231,181
last post wins! (Apr '13) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 1,975
last post wins! (Dec '10) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 2,762
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr Ize Found 71,238
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr Go Blue Forever 104,548
The Color of Crime in Chicago. 6 hr Earl 20
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 7 hr Into The Night 62,343

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages