Nuclear power is a non starter. Even Repugnants are against it!! DUH<quoted text>
Name one reliable alternative energy source that has is practical, economical, has widespread applicability, and is available 24/7.
What about nuclear power?
When all is said and done, nuclear power is far more expensive per kw than any other power source, but that's way over your retarded level of comprehension.
Only idiots like you believe it has a future. But then, you live in the 1950's.
Meanwhile, back in realityland:
""Renewable energy is energy that comes from resources which are continually replenished such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, waves and geothermal heat. About 16% of global final energy consumption comes from renewable resources, with 10%[discuss] of all energy from traditional biomass, mainly used for heating, and 3.4% from hydroelectricity. New renewables (small hydro, modern biomass, wind, solar, geothermal, and biofuels) accounted for another 3% and are growing very rapidly. The share of renewables in electricity generation is around 19%, with 16% of electricity coming from hydroelectricity and 3% from new renewables.""
Wind power is growing at the rate of 30% annually, with a worldwide installed capacity of 282,482 megawatts (MW) at the end of 2012, and is widely used in Europe, Asia, and the United States. At the end of 2012 the photovoltaic (PV) capacity worldwide was 100,000 MW, and PV power stations are popular in Germany and Italy. Solar thermal power stations operate in the USA and Spain, and the largest of these is the 354 MW SEGS power plant in the Mojave Desert. The world's largest geothermal power installation is The Geysers in California, with a rated capacity of 750 MW. Brazil has one of the largest renewable energy programs in the world""
So hydro is not 24/7?? Wind power is not 24/7?? Tidal power is not 24/7??
You seem to think saying stupid things somehow enhances your obvious ignorance.