Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1262011 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#926500 Jun 17, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>NO not the same at all. O'bama replaced them with affirmative actions hires--you know the ones...they don't have a clue.
Mostly affirmative action hires from Day One, many with a racist attitude to boot.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#926501 Jun 17, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you should mind your own fckn business, I'm talking to Galt.
Coulda fooled me.

Sounds like you're talking to your dog after a few bottles.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#926502 Jun 17, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Irrelevant, you said the Bible doesn't mention dinosaurs, these morons would beg to differ.
But the Bible DOES warn the reader against spirits that deal in vexation of which you are one.

See how popular you are?

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#926503 Jun 17, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>No son. I'm not talking in circles.
I've maintained you made yourself look like an idiot.
And you haven't argued otherwise. All you do is try and divert attention away from your stupidity.
You've maintained?

Hee, Hee.

You can't maintain yourself and yet you're going to maintain an argument?

Idiot.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#926504 Jun 17, 2013
Election process in the US is in trouble...

"Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law Voided by Supreme Court"

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-17/vote...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#926505 Jun 17, 2013
killtaker wrote:
Election process in the US is in trouble...
"Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law Voided by Supreme Court"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-17/vote...
Even worse is the high level of absentee voting, an invitation to fraud.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#926506 Jun 17, 2013
killtaker wrote:
Election process in the US is in trouble...
"Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law Voided by Supreme Court"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-17/vote...
This article is confusing as it's written.

"The state said the federal form doesn’t do enough to keep non-citizens from voting.

The 1993 law lets states use their own voter-registration forms as long as they also accept the federal form. The Supreme Court ruling doesn’t prevent Arizona from continuing to demand proof of citizenship from would-be voters when they use the state registration application."

They need to hammer away at the Elections Assistance Commission who sets the standards. IF the Commission is just another Magic Negro Rubber Stamp Agency for his corruption like so many other Federal Departments then Arizona will have to sue.

Unchecked Election Fraud is Gold to Liberals. That's why they fight so hard against any attempts at strengthening laws against it.

The Magic Negro's middle name is "Fraude Electoral", Senor.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#926510 Jun 17, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
The result of Liberalism!
School is boring if it is not interesting to the student.
Teaching is easy. Teachers love to do nothing.
Public schools are becoming satanic.
Abusive and serve no purpose.
Liberalism instead of atheism?
These are college educated instructors.
What are the universities teaching them?
Give our children better.
Use Gods brain and help them instead of
hurting them.
We make our world what it is.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#926511 Jun 17, 2013
Ad Deum, qui laetificat juventutem meam.

To God who giveth joy to my youth.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#926512 Jun 17, 2013
File in the "at least Halliburton made a profit" folder...

"WH knew electric car maker Fisker was faltering: AP"

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57581104/...

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#926513 Jun 17, 2013
killtaker wrote:
File in the "at least Halliburton made a profit" folder...
"WH knew electric car maker Fisker was faltering: AP"
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57581104/...
It is called Original Politics. When the Fed prints money they have to attach it to something in order to make it worth anything. That is why O'bama has invested so much in worthless companies. The money has to get some value attached to it-even though the companies go bankrupt, the money has been put in circulation. It is a no win situation for Americans--unless you are one of O'bama created millionaires like Solydra, Fisker, and numerous other attachments of money he has made to his supporters.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#926514 Jun 17, 2013
Secret Service Buys Fleet Of Tractors To Protect Obama

ROTFLMAO-Is O'bama really this incompetent or just totally stupid? I say both.

SECRET Service spooks are disguising themselves as FARMERS to protect Barack Obama from terrorist threats at the G8 summit.

They have even bought a fleet of TRACTORS ahead of the US President’s arrival in Northern Ireland for the two-day meeting.

The agents’ plan is to pose as local farmers in the sprawling fields around the five-star lakeside hotel complex hosting the huge event.

But locals near the Lough Erne resort reckon it will not take any potential terrorists long to spot the spooks — as their sparkling tractors are all brand new.

One said:“They reckon the vehicles will let them patrol the fields around the hotel unnoticed — but they’ll stick out like sore thumbs.

“It’s comedy gold really, like something out of Father Ted.”

Patriot

Brighton, CO

#926515 Jun 17, 2013
Tech expert urges Americans to fight back by‘quitting Google, Facebook’ over UNLAWFUL NSA surveillance Revelations

http://www.naturalnews.com/040821_Facebook_NS...

http://biblehub.com/esv/revelation/13.htm note vs 16, 17
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#926516 Jun 17, 2013
killtaker wrote:
File in the "at least Halliburton made a profit" folder...
"WH knew electric car maker Fisker was faltering: AP"
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57581104/...
If Fisker (or Solyndra) was contracted to feed and house our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, then they would all freeze and starve to death.
Patriot

Brighton, CO

#926517 Jun 17, 2013
killtaker wrote:
Election process in the US is in trouble...
"Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law Voided by Supreme Court"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-17/vote...
-----

http://biblehub.com/ecclesiastes/3-16.htm

The Truth of the Matter

It must first be admitted that the U.S. Constitution never gave to the U.S. Supreme Court the power to substitute their will for the intentions of the Founders of the Constitution. This is easy to prove. Alexander Hamilton admits this in Federalist Paper 78:

"It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the Constitutional intentions of the legislature ... The courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body."

Here, Hamilton points out the fact that, in Our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court MUST apply the Constitution to all federal laws as intended by Our Founders for any law to be legal. They are NOT to place their will above the will of those who framed and acceded to the U.S. Constitution. To suggest that the US S CT has the power to alter, change or amend the Constitution at will is to place the US S CT above the Constitution/Law: they can no more do this than the legislative branch can pass an un-Constitutional law and the executive branch can carry out an un-Constitutional law. Or as Hamilton puts it, putting their will above the Constitution will "equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body." Neither is acceptable and neither is Constitutional/Lawful.

The time has come in our Republic to acknowledge and understand that the power to govern ourselves justly and Constitutionally is in the hands of the People of the several states of America--NOT in the hands of the branches of federal government. What most people in America have been duped to believe is that the U.S. Supreme Court is the final arbiter in all matters concerning government actions related to the U.S. Constitution.

When it comes to US S CT rulings that contradict the U.S. Constitution and that reject the historical facts and principles of Our Republic, the People feel hopeless and think that regaining freedom somehow means replacing the "liberal" judges with "conservative" judges. Such an approach to preserving freedom is not only un-American; it is fruitless and ineffectual. History now proves this. Additionally, this approach proves that the vast majority of Americans have been indoctrinated into the centralist-ideology imposed on US by not-so-innocent advocates of such a political belief system.

Let me state this clearly: the U.S. Constitution/Our Law does not grant to the US S CT the power to interpret the Constitution in contradiction to the terms of the Constitution, and it does not strip the powers of the States to actively arrest and resist tyrannical federal actions. The US S CT can no more violate the Constitution/Law than the Legislative and Executive branches can. What sense does it make that the US S CT is bound by Oath to support and defend Our Constitution and then has the power to interpret it however the heck they want to? Do you think Our Founders were so near-sighted and unlearned that they would have given to the US S CT this unchecked and unlimited power in the very document that states its purpose is "to secure the blessings of liberty"?

http://newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin528.h...

"An un-Constitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs Shelby County
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#926518 Jun 17, 2013
Patriot wrote:
<quoted text>
-----
http://biblehub.com/ecclesiastes/3-16.htm
The Truth of the Matter
It must first be admitted that the U.S. Constitution never gave to the U.S. Supreme Court the power to substitute their will for the intentions of the Founders of the Constitution. This is easy to prove. Alexander Hamilton admits this in Federalist Paper 78:
"It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the Constitutional intentions of the legislature ... The courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body."
Here, Hamilton points out the fact that, in Our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court MUST apply the Constitution to all federal laws as intended by Our Founders for any law to be legal. They are NOT to place their will above the will of those who framed and acceded to the U.S. Constitution. To suggest that the US S CT has the power to alter, change or amend the Constitution at will is to place the US S CT above the Constitution/Law: they can no more do this than the legislative branch can pass an un-Constitutional law and the executive branch can carry out an un-Constitutional law. Or as Hamilton puts it, putting their will above the Constitution will "equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body." Neither is acceptable and neither is Constitutional/Lawful.
The time has come in our Republic to acknowledge and understand that the power to govern ourselves justly and Constitutionally is in the hands of the People of the several states of America--NOT in the hands of the branches of federal government. What most people in America have been duped to believe is that the U.S. Supreme Court is the final arbiter in all matters concerning government actions related to the U.S. Constitution.
When it comes to US S CT rulings that contradict the U.S. Constitution and that reject the historical facts and principles of Our Republic, the People feel hopeless and think that regaining freedom somehow means replacing the "liberal" judges with "conservative" judges. Such an approach to preserving freedom is not only un-American; it is fruitless and ineffectual. History now proves this. Additionally, this approach proves that the vast majority of Americans have been indoctrinated into the centralist-ideology imposed on US by not-so-innocent advocates of such a political belief system.
Let me state this clearly: the U.S. Constitution/Our Law does not grant to the US S CT the power to interpret the Constitution in contradiction to the terms of the Constitution, and it does not strip the powers of the States to actively arrest and resist tyrannical federal actions. The US S CT can no more violate the Constitution/Law than the Legislative and Executive branches can. What sense does it make that the US S CT is bound by Oath to support and defend Our Constitution and then has the power to interpret it however the heck they want to? Do you think Our Founders were so near-sighted and unlearned that they would have given to the US S CT this unchecked and unlimited power in the very document that states its purpose is "to secure the blessings of liberty"?
http://newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin528.h...
"An un-Constitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs Shelby County
This decision is not as bad as it might appear on the surface.

The solution is simply to gain control of the federal government and change the federal law to require substantial proof of citizenship in order to vote.

Then even the leftwing states will be forced to require proof of citizenship.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#926519 Jun 17, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
Secret Service Buys Fleet Of Tractors To Protect Obama
ROTFLMAO-Is O'bama really this incompetent or just totally stupid? I say both.
SECRET Service spooks are disguising themselves as FARMERS to protect Barack Obama from terrorist threats at the G8 summit.
They have even bought a fleet of TRACTORS ahead of the US President’s arrival in Northern Ireland for the two-day meeting.
The agents’ plan is to pose as local farmers in the sprawling fields around the five-star lakeside hotel complex hosting the huge event.
But locals near the Lough Erne resort reckon it will not take any potential terrorists long to spot the spooks — as their sparkling tractors are all brand new.
One said:“They reckon the vehicles will let them patrol the fields around the hotel unnoticed — but they’ll stick out like sore thumbs.
“It’s comedy gold really, like something out of Father Ted.”
Maybe we'll get lucky...

http://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2...

...and Mother Nature will take out the unnatural.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#926520 Jun 17, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
Secret Service Buys Fleet Of Tractors To Protect Obama
ROTFLMAO-Is O'bama really this incompetent or just totally stupid? I say both.
SECRET Service spooks are disguising themselves as FARMERS to protect Barack Obama from terrorist threats at the G8 summit.
They have even bought a fleet of TRACTORS ahead of the US President’s arrival in Northern Ireland for the two-day meeting.
The agents’ plan is to pose as local farmers in the sprawling fields around the five-star lakeside hotel complex hosting the huge event.
But locals near the Lough Erne resort reckon it will not take any potential terrorists long to spot the spooks — as their sparkling tractors are all brand new.
One said:“They reckon the vehicles will let them patrol the fields around the hotel unnoticed — but they’ll stick out like sore thumbs.
“It’s comedy gold really, like something out of Father Ted.”
The Imperial Presidency.

What a joke!
LCN Linc

United States

#926521 Jun 17, 2013
Patriot wrote:
Tech expert urges Americans to fight back by‘quitting Google, Facebook’ over UNLAWFUL NSA surveillance Revelations
http://www.naturalnews.com/040821_Facebook_NS...
http://biblehub.com/esv/revelation/13.htm note vs 16, 17
NSA is most likely collecting everything
American Lady

Danville, KY

#926522 Jun 17, 2013
killtaker wrote:
Election process in the US is in trouble...
"Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law Voided by Supreme Court"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-17/vote...
SURPRISE! TABLES TURNED IN VOTE-FRAUD CASE
Video sleuth confronts prosecutor who tried to indict him

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/surprise-tables-tu...

The Duck an hour ago
Just more of Obama and how he won this last election. He got almost all the electoral votes. So many in fact it had to be a lot of fraud going on this time. Congress should indeed investigate this one and kick this fraud out and put him and his whole administration in prison where they belong. Could happen except for Harry Reid and company.

igor1136 The Duck 31 minutes ago
Obama didnt win he stole it. WE ARE DEMANDING HE PROVE HE WAS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY. That junk on the white house web site is as fake as your life story. who are you today? mr bonell barry soetoro or barok Obama? why is it nobody remembers you at Columbia? why are you not in any year books? why did you and wify lose your law license? why is it none of your documents pass anyone looking at them? who are you? your damn sure not an American! we will get to the bottom of this and we will see you rot in prison for this. this crime needs to be exposed and you need to go. we are not about to let you get away with any of this.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 11 min Mister Tonka 100,203
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 18 min jh4freedom 194,336
Abby 7-28-15 2 hr mrs gladys kravitz 9
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Mark 52,052
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 4 hr Lexus1985 1,698
Fun Song Combos (Sep '12) 4 hr Lexus1985 453
No reports of flash mobs recently? Because the... 4 hr Warning to tourists 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages