Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1496957 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#926771 Jun 18, 2013
Patriot wrote:
Euthanasia for children nears approval by Belgian Parliament; doctors to mass-euthanize children and Alzheimer's patients
June 18, 2013
A proposed law on the verge of approval by the Belgium parliament would allow children to decide for themselves whether they should be euthanized ("killed") by medical personnel.
Currently, Belgian law limits euthanasia to persons 18 and older, but with the rise of autistic children thanks to biopesticides, GMOs and vaccines, nations are increasingly trying to figure out what to do with all these children who have been permanently damaged by the medical and biotech industries...
Hitler did this exact same thing.

Bethlehem, PA

#926772 Jun 18, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> I buy where I can get the best deal for the buck. But no I have shopped at WalMart since moving down here. Maybe a different one depending on time of day and month. I check the flyers and if Food Lion or Kroger has a good deal I go there. Look let me try to explain to you. Same five mile circle. There are 9 Food Lions, 2 Harris Teeters, 5 Farm Fresh, 2 Kroger, 5 WalMarts, 2 Sam's Club, 1 Costco, 1 BJ's, 3 Targets and too many to count convenience stores like WaaWaa and 7-11. Add the WalMart Neighborhood Market being built down the street and there are still way more people than stores. They are all always packed. With more people moving into the area it will not be enough!!! Understand now?
Sounds like hell on earth, you should move out to the country. Maybe get a little fresh air, clear out the cobwebs so to speak.

Belchertown, MA

#926773 Jun 18, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
McCain and Romney have this in common: they are honest enough to not cheat in elections.
The Magic Negro has always fought efforts to clean up elections. His illegal Mexicans came to his aid and the Black Panthers, ACORN and every Federal Agency was corrupted to further his election chances.
The Hood mentality reigns supreme inside of Socialist Circles of the White House.
Long ago, way back there in Chicago and Illinois politics, it was publicly stated that whoever loses against the Magic Negro does so because of their being honest.
It still holds true at this moment.
Yeah, sure. Colin Small, a Republican operative, was arrested in Virginia for dumping voter registration forms that weren't Republican in a dumpster. ...
Also former Republican Party of Florida Chairman Jim Greer admitted that Republicans were actively trying to suppress Democratic voters. ...
And there's also Nathan Sproul another Republican operative investigated in Florida and several other states for voter registration fraud.
In 33 Republican run states there were blatant attempts at voter suppression but it backfired on them because minorities went to the polls in record numbers even if it meant standing in line for hours on end.
So let's see some evidence that any of the groups you mentioned committed voter or registration fraud.
You're an idiot!


Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#926774 Jun 18, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know?
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#926775 Jun 18, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, then, that seems a little odd to me. So is the sky NOT really falling? Because, if it's not, why did Obama scare everyone into thinking it was just a few months ago when he was likely planning this expensive taxpayer-funded vacation?

These kinds of lavish vacations take a long time to plan, you know.

Honolulu, HI

#926776 Jun 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Out of curiosity, how many jihadists did Bush kill?
I take it that you think we should have surrendered to the Arabs on 9/12, right?
And how many civilians and non combatants did he kill?

Seems there's no collateral too high for you idiots, son.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#926777 Jun 18, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Must have missed Galt's post where he said "there are no dinosaurs in the Bible". Maybe I misunderstood the context, but the first dinosaur bones weren't found until 200 or 300 years ago.
A "scientific" documentary on dinosaurs which was based on evolution noted some scientists now believe man and dinosaurs lived together and also that some scientists now believe they miscalculated how long ago dinosaurs roamed the earth.
So if these scientists are correct and the Bible says in Genesis God created all creatures of the earth, that would include dinosaurs...which were just oversized lizards.
Even though this has nothing to do with your post - which I totally agree, by the way - just thought I'd mention it. For what it's worth.
I've often thought about that. I believe in a creator of all things. That means, if evolution is a mechanism for creation, then the creator created that, also. I just don't see the conflict between Genesis and evolution that many other people see. I kind of put it in the same context as Ezekiel. I don't believe Ezekiel was looking at aliens, however bizzarre the description is.
There's a lot we don't know.
Aunt Bettie Lou

Orlando, FL

#926778 Jun 18, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>What if he's a dancer?
Some people make extra money being a clown. Should they wear a clown costume everywhere they go?

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#926779 Jun 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Give it up, moron.
In the section pertaining to malpractice insurance, the exact wording on the document says in very plain English:
"No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status"
Here is the link where you can see the actual document.
When you apply to have your license laced in inactive status, it takes action of the court to do so.

The idea you ASSume this means wrong doing just show how big an idiot you are.
Scarlet Pimpernel

New York, NY

#926780 Jun 18, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> How do you know anything about the black community? You've never been, seen or, slept through a visit. 1 things for sure, 2 things for certain. There's more government cheese & more welfare recipients of your flesh & in your neighborhood than that of mines. You're probably 1 of them!
THE bigots follow the path of the bigotted lololololololo

Honolulu, HI

#926781 Jun 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Another Snopes-type "proof"...
"A court official"... that may or may not exist.
This is exactly why Snopes was completely discredited. They use the same source: "A () official", "a senior advisor", etc., etc., etc.
So, what propaganda site did you get the wording "a court official" from?
We need to know the name of that site in case some other clown uses it as "proof".
It's funny how you can't cite your source son.

No.. really... I mean it's funny... as in you're an idiot.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#926782 Jun 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
66% Believe Obama Administration 'Right' to Analyze and Collect Internet Data
Whistleblower: Obama used NSA for politics
Was there ever any doubt? This is why it was a big deal. It all comes down to trust.

The IRS may have utilized surveillance data collected by the National Security Agency to harass political opponents of the Obama administration, including the tea party, charged NSA whistleblower William Binney in a radio interview.

After working in the intelligence community for more than 30 years, Binney retired from the NSA in 2001. He co-founded a unit on automating NSA signals intelligence and served as technical leader for NSA intelligence in 2001. Binney is credited with helping to modernize the NSA’s worldwide eavesdropping network.

Asked on Aaron Klein’s WABC radio show Sunday whether he believes data collected on millions of Americans was used by the government against political enemies, Binney replied in the affirmative.

“That’s exactly the danger about letting the government have all this kind of information about its citizens,” the ex-NSA official stated.

O'bama and his paid thugs have corrupted the elections in the United States-we are no better than some banana republic now. Thanks commies.

Honolulu, HI

#926783 Jun 18, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Progressives here whine that someone dare disagree with them.
You can have all the opinions you want son...

.... just don't confuse them with facts.

Honolulu, HI

#926784 Jun 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like just another agreement between communist Democrats and RINO Democrats, the two main factions in the Democratic Party.
And the right wing crazies are left out.

America is saved again!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#926785 Jun 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
66% Believe Obama Administration 'Right' to Analyze and Collect Internet Data
It depends. The internet is public domain, until someone uses the internet with the intent of having privacy. It's just like the Supreme Court ruled a few decades ago, if the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, then the right to privacy exists.
When I post the truth about Obama on the internet, I put it in the public domain.
However, there is no way in hell the government has the right to:
1) look into my computer; and
2) investigate my internet activity without evidence of some crime having been committed that their only reason for existence is to investigate.

Let's go over the 4th Amendment again, in case you're confused:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This is non-negotiable.
Do we need to fight yet another war over this principle?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#926786 Jun 18, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>The intelligent person asks the question: "Why are their prices so low?" And when you search and find the answers you walk away from Walmart in disgust. The moron freely walks in, grabs a cart and begins shopping.
any one knows 'volume' keeps prices low. Were you born in a basement and never brought up? come on are you telling me you know nothing about business? Bulls eye!!! LOL.

Bethlehem, PA

#926787 Jun 18, 2013
In the midst of negotiations in Congress over an immigration overhaul, House Republicans are planning a series of meetings with Hispanic-Americans in the nation's capital as part of a partywide effort to woo minority voters.

The House Republican Conference, chaired by Washington Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, is planning four meetup sessions between Hispanic-Americans and Republican lawmakers at the Capitol Building this summer.

“It’s important that we’re having this two-way conversation and hearing the ideas and concerns from a broad base of people from around the country," McMorris Rodgers told Yahoo News in an interview.“More than anything we want them to know that we want to have this relationship with them.... It’s our effort to build relationships with people all around the country to talk to them about issues that impact their daily lives.”

The conference plans to host the first meeting on Wednesday with Hispanic faith leaders; two meetings on July 18, one with women and the other young people; and a final gathering on Aug. 1 to discuss jobs and the economy.

The GOP conference held a series of similar meetings with young voters in March.

Step 1: Reach hand out in a non-threatening manner

Step 2: Grasp firmly hand coming in opposite direction

Step 3: Move hand in rapid up and down motion

Step 4: Fake smile

Step 5: Feign interest

“Peace on Earth”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#926788 Jun 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Boy, you're still dodging the subject. If I have to take my belt off and tan your hide to get an answer out of you, it won't be pretty.
Now, here's the post again. Break out your Big Chief tablet and tell us why you support Obama and the Democrats leading the government in a revolt against the constitutional republic:
... anything to avoid talking about the real issue.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Yup. We'll most likely have to fight another war over the principles written in the Constitution.
What do you think? Do you think the Democrats are willing to fight a war to eliminate the Constitution?
Or, do you think they plan to fight a war to stay in the White House so a follow-on administration can't discover all the treason going on there now?
I'm thinking, considering there are Wahhabists in the White House while Wahhabism is at war with the United States, it is likely there are hanging offenses happening.
You really aren't too bright are you? According to testimony before the Senate committee, U.S. citizens are not being subjected to "unresonable search and seizures". Papers and effects are not accessed without a warrant and the information being collected under the Fisa Amendments Act does not disclose the identity of a person or their location without a valid search warrant being first obtained.

If you would actually listen to the testimony on Capitol Hill instead of parroting rightwing propaganda, you might actually learn a thing or two.

The general counsel for the intelligence community said the NSA cannot target phone conversations between callers inside the U.S.— even if one of those callers was someone they were targeted for surveillance when outside the country.

"The director of national intelligence’s legal chief, Robert S. Litt, said that if the NSA finds it has accidentally gathered a phone call by a target who had traveled into the U.S. without their knowledge, they have to "purge" that from their system. The same goes for an accidental collection of any conversation because of an error.

Litt said those incidents are then reported to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which "pushes back" and asks how it happened, and what the NSA is doing to fix the problem so it doesn’t happen again."

Obama: "...their phone calls aren’t being listened into; their text messages aren’t being monitored, their emails are not being read by some big brother somewhere."

The only people who should be concerned are those with terrorists ties and radicals with allegiance to a foreign country and expressed anti-American sentiments.
No Surprize

Saint Petersburg, FL

#926789 Jun 18, 2013
OBAMA the GENIUS wrote:
<quoted text>
Itsssaaaa so easy!
When the republican robot calls start:
and hang up.
That's what I do!
Maybe a few of them will burst a hemorrhoid!
Never vote for a republican. They are the greediest most selfish low down scumbbbaaagggs on earth.
White Liberals are NOT really on the side of Black people they are pretending to be on the side of blacks so they can control the minorities...

The KKK is liberal they are mad Because they LOST their Slaves when Abraham Lincoln Freed the SLAVES, Now they have Come up with a plan to CONTROL you getting you to dependent on the Government..

Thank you this is the kind of shit that needs to be said & heard. Who the fuck do you people think they are taking chunks of my check to sit around all day & not do shit besides be ghetto as shit. It's not a black thing, a white thing, mexican, whatever. It's a lazy piece of shit thing that needs to stop damnit.

The Government Cheese and Welfare Crowd...The Blind Lead...

It's the culture Ruthie...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#926790 Jun 18, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Because Social Security is a tax to fund benefits for current retirees and those on disability, not a retirement program for future retirees.
That deserves to be said again.

"John Galt"
Because Social Security is a tax to fund benefits for current retirees and those on disability, not a retirement program for future retirees.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 16 min WelbyMD 237,302
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 43 min TRD 71,375
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr CrunchyBacon 104,986
last post wins! (Apr '13) 1 hr honeymylove 2,288
last post wins! (Dec '10) 1 hr honeymylove 2,973
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 2 hr honeymylove 2,457
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr RACE 10,337

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages