Yes, I am aware that the IRS was targeting tea party groups, however, I am also aware that the man responsible for it is a conservative republican...<quoted text>
BIG PROBLEM with your slant-the pesky little IG report that stated the IRS was targeting conservative groups.
You cannot do an end run around that report with anecdotal claims of some groups being rejected.
You still don't get what happened in Benghazi do you?
State Dept REFUSAL to provide requested security.
INACTION by all depts on the night the four US citizens were killed.
DENIAL that it was a terrorist attack and feet dragging that allowed those responsible to escape from justice.
WASHINGTON (Reuters)- A U.S. Internal Revenue Service manager, who described himself as a conservative Republican, told congressional investigators that he and a local colleague decided to give conservative groups the extra scrutiny that has prompted weeks of political controversy.
In an official interview transcript released on Sunday by Democratic Representative Elijah Cummings, the manager said he and an underling set aside "Tea Party" and "patriot" groups that had applied for tax-exempt status because the organizations appeared to pose a new precedent that could affect future IRS filings.
Cummings, top Democrat on the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee conducting the probe, told CNN's "State of the Union" program that the manager's comments provided evidence that politics was not behind IRS actions that have fueled a month-long furor in Washington.
"He is a conservative Republican working for the IRS. I think this interview and these statements go a long way toward showing that the White House was not involved in this," Cummings told CNN's "State of the Union" program.
I am also aware that facing budget cuts, imposed by the Republican controlled house, officials in the State Department developed a mindset to reduce spending...
Funny how you throw around the IRS report, but completely ignore the IG report on Benghazi that identified the people responsible, and the issues. Those issues are being addressed and the people reassigned.
One burning question no one seems to want to ask, Ambassador Stevens knew of the situation in Benghazi, was warned of the security risk, but chose to go anyway. WHY?