Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1549438 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

NJ raider 1

Newark, NJ

#925926 Jun 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Boy, you're still dodging the subject. If I have to take my belt off and tan your hide to get an answer out of you, it won't be pretty.
Now, here's the post again. Break out your Big Chief tablet and tell us why you support Obama and the Democrats leading the government in a revolt against the constitutional republic:
... anything to avoid talking about the real issue.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Yup. We'll most likely have to fight another war over the principles written in the Constitution.
What do you think? Do you think the Democrats are willing to fight a war to eliminate the Constitution?
Or, do you think they plan to fight a war to stay in the White House so a follow-on administration can't discover all the treason going on there now?
I'm thinking, considering there are Wahhabists in the White House while Wahhabism is at war with the United States, it is likely there are hanging offenses happening.
I guess you don't read what you write! "Unreasonable search & seizures." Those are the key words. Now ask yourself, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks is PRISM reasonable? Is the govt looking through your phone records in attempts to prevent another 9/11? Did president Bush go through the necessary steps to enact the Patriot Act , therefore PRISM? Answer those questions &, you will quickly render your thought process as dumb!

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#925927 Jun 17, 2013
American Lady wrote:
MUST WATCH: REP. LOUIE GOHMERT BLASTS OBAMA FBI DIRECTOR:‘SIR, IF YOU’RE GOING TO CALL ME A LIAR…’– FBI CALLS BOSTON TERRORISTS’ MOSQUE INVESTIGATION ‘OUTREACH’
...
The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15th attacks.
If the Russians tell you that someone has been radicalized and you go check and see the mosques that they went to, then you get the articles of incorporation, as I have for the group that created the Boston mosques where these Tsarnaevs attended, and you’ll find out the name Alamoudi.
You’ll remember because while you were FBI Director, this man who was so helpful to the Clinton administration with so many big things, he gets arrested at Dulles Airport by the FBI and he’s now doing over 20 years for supporting terrorism.
This is the guy that started the mosques where your Tsarnaevs were attending and you didn’t even bother to go check about the mosques?
And then when you have the pictures, why did no one go to the mosque and say, who are these guys? They attend — may attend here? Why was that not done since such a thorough job was done?
http://www.tpnn.com/must-watch-rep-louie-gohm...
Jack 3 days ago
Omitting Mosques from surveillance and making it classified keeps prying eyes from connecting Obama's joined at the hip, slobbering love affair with the Muslim Brotherhood.
plain45 3 days ago
Gohmert was much too kind to this scumbag. I would have been blunt. This entire administration including the FBI are incompetent and should resign. The terrorists were identified to them by the Russians and for some strange reason they refused to do anything about it
joebideyourtime plain45 3 days ago
Looks like another stand down order from O.
Seems that way.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#925928 Jun 17, 2013
G-8 Summit...

The world sees all the buffoonery and lies characteristic of our seat of government. To them, we are a country of ignorant buffoons, with a lying fraud as president. It's no secret to them that Obama is nothing more than a prop to make it appear as if someone's actually president.
Meanwhile, Obama prances around like some crown prince in a lavish life-style while his subject peasants repeat ignorant propaganda and wait for the government dole to come and give them everything they need and want.
Everyone knows our government is certain to collapse going in the direction it's currently headed. We'll see a strong movement to replace the US dollar as the standard currency in the world's trading economy. Given our inevitable collapse, that might not be such a bad idea for the other countries. However, it will have a horrendous effect on our living standard here.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#925929 Jun 17, 2013
Speaking of Democrat bigots & homophobes:
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> I guess you don't read what you write! "Unreasonable search & seizures." Those are the key words. Now ask yourself, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks is PRISM reasonable? Is the govt looking through your phone records in attempts to prevent another 9/11? Did president Bush go through the necessary steps to enact the Patriot Act , therefore PRISM? Answer those questions &, you will quickly render your thought process as dumb!

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#925930 Jun 17, 2013
LCN Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicans still do not understand how they lost the election
You just don't understand the concept of fraud, do you?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#925931 Jun 17, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> I guess you don't read what you write! "Unreasonable search & seizures." Those are the key words. Now ask yourself, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks is PRISM reasonable? Is the govt looking through your phone records in attempts to prevent another 9/11? Did president Bush go through the necessary steps to enact the Patriot Act , therefore PRISM? Answer those questions &, you will quickly render your thought process as dumb!
You ignore the stated conditions.
"...no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Anything that violates these conditions is unreasonable. The government just taking all private communications for a subjective course of action, as is the case with PRISM, is unreasonable.
A case in point, we actually had the 9/11 detailed plans in our possession before 9/11. But, some liberal judge decided that some alien here violating the terms of his visa and in custody had the right to keep the 9/11 plans private. However, on 9/12, there were no constitutional objections.
The clause "upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" was obviously satisfied in that case.
So, there is nothing needed other than for judges to actually use the Constitution instead of obstructing an investigation just because a Republican is president. Had a Demcorat been president and requested to see Moussaoui's hard drive, that judge would have conceeded and had no objection to the search.
That's the problem.
The 4th Amendment is as close to perfection as humans can hope to achieve. A subjective general vilation of privacy is about as far away from perfect as you can get.
TheIndependentMa joruty

London, KY

#925932 Jun 17, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
We were talking about Iraq.
..As in still stuck in "it's awrl Bushes fault" years.

Bush FOLLOWED the regs as outlined in the WAR POWERS ACT.

Found HERE-

http://www.loc.gov/law/help/war-powers.php

As in-NO need for any (WASTE of Time) rewritten -added opinion to- bullchit stuff.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#925933 Jun 17, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
The War Powers Act had nothing to do with Iraq. It did apply to Libya but that's not what we're talking about. If you're going to cite something you should probably at least read a little something about it so's not to look foolish.
There you go again. Why are you claiming it has nothing to do with Iraq when a resolution was passed based on that bill?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#925934 Jun 17, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> I guess you don't read what you write! "Unreasonable search & seizures." Those are the key words. Now ask yourself, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks is PRISM reasonable? Is the govt looking through your phone records in attempts to prevent another 9/11? Did president Bush go through the necessary steps to enact the Patriot Act , therefore PRISM? Answer those questions &, you will quickly render your thought process as dumb!
I take it from your response that you think Bush was a great president, so great that a very common propaganda line from the Democrats is "Bush did it, too."

What you should do is actually read the Patriot Act to learn that what is happening now could not possibly have legally happened under the Patriot Act. That is why a new law had to be written. The Patriot Act would not have permitted what is happening now.
TheIndependentMa joruty

London, KY

#925935 Jun 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You ignore the stated conditions.
"...no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Anything that violates these conditions is unreasonable. The government just taking all private communications for a subjective course of action, as is the case with PRISM, is unreasonable.
A case in point, we actually had the 9/11 detailed plans in our possession before 9/11. But, some liberal judge decided that some alien here violating the terms of his visa and in custody had the right to keep the 9/11 plans private. However, on 9/12, there were no constitutional objections.
The clause "upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" was obviously satisfied in that case.
So, there is nothing needed other than for judges to actually use the Constitution instead of obstructing an investigation just because a Republican is president. Had a Demcorat been president and requested to see Moussaoui's hard drive, that judge would have conceeded and had no objection to the search.
That's the problem.
The 4th Amendment is as close to perfection as humans can hope to achieve. A subjective general vilation of privacy is about as far away from perfect as you can get.
To rational, law abiding, Constitution following US citizens anyway.

To freakishly warped, commieticish dictatorship style jackboots on ego-power trips--well, we see how such can be abused and used to torment and harass INNOCENT people, while lawless mujihadeens roam free.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#925936 Jun 17, 2013
Americans think Bush was a president than Obama.
TheIndependentMa joruty

London, KY

#925937 Jun 17, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I've lived in four countries on four continents, I think I know the difference. We've been talking about the 21st Century war in Iraq.
Left field is still available if you want to go back.
Never played outfield...I just lobbed 'em over home plate-- for the GAME ON fun of it.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#925938 Jun 17, 2013
Brutal Poll Shows That Even Republicans Are Fed Up With Republicans In Congress

The poll found that overall, only 24 percent of voters approve of the job congressional Republicans are doing, compared with 67 percent who disapprove. That's down from a 25-68 approval split in May.

And what's really dragging down their approval rating is an unfavorable view from voters in their own party. Only 40 percent of Republican voters approve of their representatives in Congress, compared with 51 percent who disapprove.

Independents also disapprove of Republicans in Congress by a 61-24 split, which helps President Barack Obama maintain a significant, 8-point edge over Republicans on the question of who voters "trust" more

http://www.businessinsider.com/poll-republica...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#925939 Jun 17, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> I guess you don't read what you write! "Unreasonable search & seizures." Those are the key words. Now ask yourself, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks is PRISM reasonable? Is the govt looking through your phone records in attempts to prevent another 9/11? Did president Bush go through the necessary steps to enact the Patriot Act , therefore PRISM? Answer those questions &, you will quickly render your thought process as dumb!
And another point...
Our government today is preparing to fight a large-scale war against the American people. It is a simple deduction that, since it is an undisputable fact the government is preparing for war with the American people, the PRISM spying program is intended to assist the government's unconstitutional action against the American people in its coup attempt to take over the country and eliminate the constitutional republic.
So, obviously, no, PRISM isn't reasonable. It is a tool to increase the number of Americans killed by the government in their rebellion against the constitutional republic.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#925940 Jun 17, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>But isn't the cover up and shipping around of suspect clergy a fact?
As well as the payoffs?
As much a fact as the many known political coverups and pay offs.

Which is why I stated, there are MANY UNaccounted, that suffered at the hands of perverts.

I know of two or three.

NONE of them were by clergy---FAR FAR from clergy....just their own sick in the head, low life dirt bag relatives.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#925941 Jun 17, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again. Why are you claiming it has nothing to do with Iraq when a resolution was passed based on that bill?
Because Congress authorized the war in Iraq.
Next question?
LCN Lincoln

United States

#925942 Jun 17, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Birthers and serial posters go hand in hand.
Birthers elected President Obama in 2012

Thanks also go the teabaggers with their rape candidates

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#925943 Jun 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
An agreement between Democrats and RINOs is not bipartisan. They're both Democrats.
But, in case you're confused, here is the rule written in English so simply any average person can easily read and understand it:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
This rule is non-negotiable. It is part of the Constitution.
Do we have to fight yet another war over this principle?
Are you willing to die in support of the Democrats' rebellion?
Your kind are a gift to the Democratic party. Calling Republican moderates RINOs and spouting fanatic psychobabble will drive rational thinking people into the arms of the Democratic party. Spout on crazy person!

“Seriously Misguided Democrat”

Since: Oct 12

Chicago Thugtown

#925944 Jun 17, 2013
Hi youngons! Where's my judgeits?

Us old Democrats sure are having fun. One of my fellow Democrats with a large belly was doing a sales job presentation and at the beginning, he said he would move along quickly as none of us were slow southerners, as if southerners were all dumb rednecks.

He then proceeded to make us sit there at the beginning of his demonstration as he forgot what to enter and didn't write down anything to prepare. We sat there for about 10 minutes waiting for this smart northern liberal.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#925945 Jun 17, 2013
TheIndependentMajoruty wrote:
<quoted text>
To rational, law abiding, Constitution following US citizens anyway.
To freakishly warped, commieticish dictatorship style jackboots on ego-power trips--well, we see how such can be abused and used to torment and harass INNOCENT people, while lawless mujihadeens roam free.
New presidential directive gives Bush dictatorial power
National Security & Homeland Security Presidential Directive establishes "National Continuity Policy"

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007 declares that in the event of a “catastrophic event”, George W. Bush can become what is best described as “a dictator”:

“The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.”

This directive, completely unnoticed by the media, and given no scrutiny by Congress, literally gives the White House unprecedented dictatorial power over the government and the country, bypassing the US Congress and obliterating the separation of powers. The directive also placed the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic “security”.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-presidential...

with all of this hate directed towards Bush programs, i'm surprised you right leaners didn't vote for Obama.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Spanx-they're for me. 20 min Spanx ME 2
Black Humor. NO not that black. 24 min GenePoolDead 5
America should let all immigrants in, why not? 43 min Rooster panties 2
last post wins! (Apr '13) 5 hr honeymylove 2,549
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 hr Joe Balls 241,668
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 7 hr They cannot kill ... 10,854
Why are White men obsessed with Latina women? (Feb '10) 7 hr LuvHardCock 209

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages