Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#924193 Jun 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
Will you clowns make up your minds? One side of your mouth says Bush was such a great president that Obama is just doing what Bush did. The other side of your mouth says everything is all Bush's fault.
Let's start with what should be obvious. Bush isn't the president. We are concerned with what is happening today.
There is no comparison between anything that happened when Bush was president and the attempt to install an Orwellian dictatorship today.
Eric Holder is running guns for Mexican drug cartels.
Janet Napolitano is preparing for a major war against the American people.
The government built an 80-million dollar facility for the sole purpose of subjectively spying on the population.
Obama wants to use weaponized drones on the American population.
... and on, and on, and on.
But, let's get to the very core of the discussion. Here is the rule that must be complied with, or we fight a war over this:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
This is non-negotiable. You must comply with this.... or we fight. If you choose to fight a war over this principle, ultimately the winners will most certainly hang the losers. So, don't whine and cry if it's your neck that noose gets put around. Take it like a man. You started it.
"DBWriter"
I am sure you have noted that the left wing loons, i.e. "real dumb", "sonic", "silly", "homo" etal have one thing in common blame Bush. But what else do they have they can not point to any positives from the reign of the boy nobama, there are none. Shit his signature act nobamakare is not popular with a majority of American's and will be even more unpopular when the full effects start hitting them
Peace
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#924194 Jun 13, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>It would also grow the federal and certain state governments in a very significant way.
Rubio is telling one story in Spanish and a completely different one in English, that shyt won't fly very far when there at least ten important Hispanic Dem's who can smack that little puta silly.
Realtime knows all the muckety-mucks in town up close, all the time schmoozing and personal at the local bathhouse civic organizations. Realtime gets a good chuckle out of railroading and hating on Hispanics all the time.

It's the culture...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#924195 Jun 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You know, sooner or later there will be someone who sees what's going on in the White House and tells all. We'll have some very tough decisions to make then. I can see where there are capital treason offenses that are likely to be discovered when they have to turn the power of the White House over to the next administration.
I don't think they have a plan to ever leave.
The information coming out of this administration probably isn't going to get any prettier, and it will probably get very ugly evicting them.
lol! Keep preaching your doom and gloom son.

That's the only way you idiots seem to know!
Scarlet Pimpernel

Bronx, NY

#924196 Jun 13, 2013
Given his calm and reasoned academic demeanor, it is easy to miss just how provocative Erik Brynjolfsson’s contention really is.­Brynjolfsson, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, and his collaborator and coauthor Andrew McAfee have been arguing for the last year and a half that impressive advances in computer technology—from improved industrial robotics to automated translation services—are largely behind the sluggish employment growth of the last 10 to 15 years. Even more ominous for workers, the MIT academics foresee dismal prospects for many types of jobs as these powerful new technologies are increasingly adopted not only in manufacturing, clerical, and retail work but in professions such as law, financial services, education, and medicine.

That robots, automation, and software can replace people might seem obvious to anyone who’s worked in automotive manufacturing or as a travel agent. But Brynjolfsson and McAfee’s claim is more troubling and controversial. They believe that rapid technological change has been destroying jobs faster than it is creating them, contributing to the stagnation of median income and the growth of inequality in the United States. And, they suspect, something similar is happening in other technologically advanced countries.

Perhaps the most damning piece of evidence, according to Brynjolfsson, is a chart that only an economist could love. In economics, productivity—the amount of economic value created for a given unit of input, such as an hour of labor—is a crucial indicator of growth and wealth creation. It is a measure of progress. On the chart Brynjolfsson likes to show, separate lines represent productivity and total employment in the United States. For years after World War II, the two lines closely tracked each other, with increases in jobs corresponding to increases in productivity. The pattern is clear: as businesses generated more value from their workers, the country as a whole became richer, which fueled more economic activity and created even more jobs. Then, beginning in 2000, the lines diverge; productivity continues to rise robustly, but employment suddenly wilts. By 2011, a significant gap appears between the two lines, showing economic growth with no parallel increase in job creation. Brynjolfsson and McAfee call it the “great decoupling.” And Brynjolfsson says he is confident that technology is behind both the healthy growth in productivity and the weak growth in jobs.

NOT TO BE READ BY THE DUNCE BRIGADE LILY NJ1 LEOSANA,REAL DAVE ,SONICFOS
Scarlet Pimpernel

Bronx, NY

#924197 Jun 13, 2013
Race Against the Machine, the 2011 book in which they laid out much of their argument, because they wanted to explain the economic benefits of these new technologies (Brynjolfsson spent much of the 1990s sniffing out evidence that information technology was boosting rates of productivity). But it became clear to them that the same technologies making many jobs safer, easier, and more productive were also reducing the demand for many types of human workers.

Anecdotal evidence that digital technologies threaten jobs is, of course, everywhere. Robots and advanced automation have been common in many types of manufacturing for decades. In the United States and China, the world’s manufacturing powerhouses, fewer people work in manufacturing today than in 1997, thanks at least in part to automation. Modern automotive plants, many of which were transformed by industrial robotics in the 1980s, routinely use machines that autonomously weld and paint body parts—tasks that were once handled by humans. Most recently, industrial robots like Rethink Robotics’ Baxter (see “The Blue-Collar Robot,” May/June 2013), more flexible and far cheaper than their predecessors, have been introduced to perform simple jobs for small manufacturers in a variety of sectors. The website of a Silicon Valley startup called Industrial Perception features a video of the robot it has designed for use in warehouses picking up and throwing boxes like a bored elephant. And such sensations as Google’s driverless car suggest what automation might be able to accomplish someday soon.

A less dramatic change, but one with a potentially far larger impact on employment, is taking place in clerical work and professional services. Technologies like the Web, artificial intelligence, big data, and improved analytics—all made possible by the ever increasing availability of cheap computing power and storage capacity—are automating many routine tasks. Countless traditional white-collar jobs, such as many in the post office and in customer service, have disappeared. W. Brian Arthur, a visiting researcher at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center’s intelligence systems lab and a former economics professor at Stanford University, calls it the “autonomous economy.” It’s far more subtle than the idea of robots and automation doing human jobs, he says: it involves “digital processes talking to other digital processes and creating new processes,” enabling us to do many things with fewer people and making yet other
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#924198 Jun 13, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> How many is negligible?

You know, like the Republicans are trying not to fund the ACA.
Thought you people claimed that Obamacare was "paid for"?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#924200 Jun 13, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>It would also grow the federal and certain state governments in a very significant way.
Rubio is telling one story in Spanish and a completely different one in English, that shyt won't fly very far when there at least ten important Hispanic Dem's who can smack that little puta silly.
Obamabot racist Realtime shows his stripes again.

Rubio is finished as a Presidential candidate if his immigration bill does not give priority to border security.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#924201 Jun 13, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Using the term "spade" in reference to a black mans a racial slur.
You know it. You did it.
At least have the guts to admit it. Pathetic piece of crap that you are.
Keep defending the racists. ItThey are evidently among your ilk.
Wtf? You've taken the racial slur shtick to a whole new level. Congrats assbag.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#924202 Jun 13, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Wether = whether? Another Aunt Batty pupil?
That poster's post was still funny. Lighten' up.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#924203 Jun 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
"Bush did it, too!"
"It's all Bush's fault!"
... anything to avoid talking about the real issue.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Yup. We'll most likely have to fight another war over the principles written in the Constitution.
What do you think? Do you think the Democrats are willing to fight a war to eliminate the Constitution?
Or, do you think they plan to fight a war to stay in the White House so a follow-on administration can't discover all the treason going on there now?
I'm thinking, considering there are Wahhabists in the White House while Wahhabism is at war with the United States, it is likely there are hanging offenses happening.
but, but, but.....Bush did do it, too. first.

so what we're talking about are policies that Bush started that you now want Obama to rein in.

come on man....where are the unicorns?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#924204 Jun 13, 2013
flack wrote:
Most are no longer coming from Mexico but further south and the middle east and Africa.
If they come from "further south", they likely enter through Mexico.

If they come directly from the "middle east and Africa", should be easy to stop them at immigration by tightening visa programs.

Galt is more concerned about Muslims and Africans than about Mexicans.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#924205 Jun 13, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Where was Bush during the Iraq & Afghanistan Wars. I want to know every minute of every day. Did he ever eat, sleep, whack off, get drunk, do a couple lines, fly out to give Mccain a birthday cake??? OMG soldiers that he sent to war were dying!!! Where the f*ck was Bush. OMG OMG OMG
Doesn't suprise me that you want to know if bush wacked off. Don't even ask, you sick pervert.
Scarlet Pimpernel

Bronx, NY

#924206 Jun 13, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
HELL (The Borowitz Report)—Word that the News Corporation chief executive Rupert Murdoch has filed for divorce from his wife, Wendi Deng, came as a “total surprise” to longtime Murdoch confidant Satan, the Lord of the Underworld said today.
“I am totally blindsided by this,” Satan told reporters.“He and I talk every day.”
Citing his long history with the media titan, the Hound of Hell said,“We go way back. I gave him the idea for Fox News. I told him to hire Roger Ailes. That’s why this is such a shock.”
A frequent dining companion of the Murdochs, Satan said he “didn’t have a clue that they were having problems.”
A frequent dining companion of the Murdochs, Satan said he “didn’t have a clue that they were having problems.”
“I’ve had dozens of dinners with them in the Hamptons,” he said.“Did they bicker? No more than other couples. But they seemed to be on the same page about all the important things, like creating corrupt media monopolies and buying politicians. I thought they were for keeps.”
Adding that he “cares deeply about his friends,” Satan said the news about the Murdochs had hit him especially hard:“I was just starting to get over the Putins.”
The Prince of Darkness said he first got word of the Murdoch divorce about an hour before the official announcement:“My banker at Goldman Sachs called and told me to sell my News Corp. stock right away.”
HOW IS aNTHONY WEINER the PERVERT AND beard for hillary clinton doing

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#924207 Jun 13, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"DBWriter"
I am sure you have noted that the left wing loons, i.e. "real dumb", "sonic", "silly", "homo" etal have one thing in common blame Bush. But what else do they have they can not point to any positives from the reign of the boy nobama, there are none. Shit his signature act nobamakare is not popular with a majority of American's and will be even more unpopular when the full effects start hitting them
Peace
"Agree" is an understatement.
It's blatantly obvious the very people who forced it on us don't what any part of it near their lives.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#924208 Jun 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You know, sooner or later there will be someone who sees what's going on in the White House and tells all. We'll have some very tough decisions to make then. I can see where there are capital treason offenses that are likely to be discovered when they have to turn the power of the White House over to the next administration.
I don't think they have a plan to ever leave.
The information coming out of this administration probably isn't going to get any prettier, and it will probably get very ugly evicting them.
Where is "Deep Throat" when you really need him?

Galt suspects that the Obama Regime is busy investigating potential internal leaks...not national security leaks, but political leaks.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#924209 Jun 13, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
but, but, but.....Bush did do it, too. first.
so what we're talking about are policies that Bush started that you now want Obama to rein in.
come on man....where are the unicorns?
... anything to avoid talking about the real issue.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Yup. We'll most likely have to fight another war over the principles written in the Constitution.
What do you think? Do you think the Democrats are willing to fight a war to eliminate the Constitution?
Or, do you think they plan to fight a war to stay in the White House so a follow-on administration can't discover all the treason going on there now?
I'm thinking, considering there are Wahhabists in the White House while Wahhabism is at war with the United States, it is likely there are hanging offenses happening.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#924210 Jun 13, 2013
funny....

CCR v. Obama (formerly CCR v. Bush)

http://ccrjustice.org/CCR-v-Obama

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#924211 Jun 13, 2013
So is the border secure or not? You stupid sheep believe and repeat whatever your told.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#924212 Jun 13, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"ny racist"
Hear this asshole. I had no choice, monies were taken from my pay and put into this system for more than 50 years. Monies are still being taken out.
SS does not support me. Without SS my our life style would change not at all. SS is walking around monies, beer money, fun money.
If you ever get to Spokane, let me know. I will treat you to an ice cold Kokanee Gold at Jack and Dan's. Maybe that would put a little lead in your pencil.
Peace
KMA
EasyEed is right in a sense; however, all Eed's SS payments were taxes that went immediately to fund benefits and do not guarantee Eed any future benefits.

Galt hopes that Jack and Dan's is within walking distance of EasyEed's house. Gotta watch the Gestapo checkpoints!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#924213 Jun 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Keep preaching your doom and gloom son.
That's the only way you idiots seem to know!
... back away from the crack pipe.

You pretend to have military service. Are you one of those frauds who pretended to be Vietnam veterans in the so-called "Vietnam Veterans Against the War" that slandered real veterans with lies?

Why would you join a political party that spit on veterans and invented a system of lies to slander them with?

... well?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 8 min DNF 51,321
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 14 min B as in B S as in S 51,332
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr WelbyMD 184,767
Dear Abby 2-26-15 2 hr PEllen 1
Amy 2-26-15 2 hr PEllen 2
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 7 hr texas pete 5,697
last post wins! (Apr '13) 7 hr Red_Forman 502
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 hr ray 99,152
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:10 pm PST

Bleacher Report 9:10PM
Bears Latest Free Agency News
Bleacher Report12:01 AM
Colts' DL Needs Drastic Growth with Jean Francois Release
NFL 4:47 PM
Indianapolis Colts sign Matt Hasselbeck to extension
Bleacher Report 5:03 PM
Matt Hasselbeck and Colts Agree on New Contract: Latest Details, Reaction
ESPN 5:56 PM
Hasselbeck inks 1-year extension with Colts