Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#923833 Jun 12, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
26 years ago today...
June 12, 1987
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"
We need another Reagan.
Agreed.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#923834 Jun 12, 2013
Stock market eroding, slowly but surely.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#923835 Jun 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>And Mr. Gorbachev ignored Reagan because he was too busy watching East German teenagers commandeer bulldozers to roll over 'The Wall'. What shall we use to fill the empty spaces
Where waves of hunger roar?
Shall we set out across the sea of faces
In search of more and more applause?
Shall we buy a new guitar?
Shall we drive a more powerful car?
Shall we work straight through the night?
Shall we get into fights?
Leave the lights on?
Drop bombs?
Do tours of the east?
contract diseases?
Bury bones?
Break up homes?
Send flowers by phone?
Take to drink?
Go to shrinks?
Give up meat?
Rarely sleep?
Keep people as pets?
Train dogs?
Race rats?
Fill the attic with cash?
Bury treasure?
Store up leisure?
But never relax at all
With our backs to the wall.
http://youtu.be/f1ZU3qOmAks
Find a cliff to jump from you ows trash.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#923836 Jun 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>And Mr. Gorbachev ignored Reagan because he was too busy watching East German teenagers commandeer bulldozers to roll over 'The Wall'.
Didn't happen that way, except in Bocajew fiction.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#923837 Jun 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>Real Dave didn't need 'links'. He back up his claims with reason ,logic, argument, and some relevant historical perspective. Good show,RealDave! Why can't you do the same 'Whatever'?
Dumbass dave just cringed from this ows trash endoresment.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#923838 Jun 12, 2013
Patriot wrote:
Obama Quietly Raises 'Carbon Price' as Costs to Climate Increase
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-12/toug...
"Even supporters questioned the way the administration slipped the policy out without first opening it for public comment. The change was buried in an afternoon announcement on May 31 about efficiency standards for microwave ovens, a rule not seen as groundbreaking.

“This is a very strange way to make policy about something this important,” Frank Ackerman, an economist at Tufts University who published a book about the economics of global warming, said in an interview. The Obama administration “hasn’t always leveled with us about what is happening behind closed doors.”

This is preposterous ,shoddy reporting by Bloomberg.com news because the EPA has been using this kind of carbon-accounting method for years in their reports and wrote a scathing criticism of the State Department for not using it for their own analysis of the prevailing costs of building the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline. "For years, the Environmental Protection Agency has urged the State Department to do just this kind of calculation as part of its environmental review of the Keystone project. But the State Department has never done so.

In April, in a review sharply critical of the State Department's latest draft environmental impact statement for the project, the EPA again urged this approach.

It cited estimates that the tar sands crude oil the pipeline would carry could add 19 million tons of incremental emissions to the atmosphere each year—the amount of extra pollution due to the fact that tar sands oil is dirtier than conventional oil and uses more energy to produce. Using the new carbon cost estimate, the extra emissions from the oil delivered in the year 2020 alone would impose future costs of more than $800 million in today's dollars. Every following year's emissions would add to the economic harm, and at a steadily escalating price per ton.

"If greenhouse gas intensity of oil sands crude is not reduced, over a 50 year period the additional carbon dioxide from oil sands crude transported by the pipeline could be as much as 935 million metric tons," the EPA told the State Department. "It is this difference in greenhouse gas intensity—between oil sands and other crudes—that is a major focus of the public debate about the climate impacts of oil sands crude."

Some analysts contend that the social damage costs from the Keystone would be far higher."
http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130610/wh...

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#923839 Jun 12, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave is a f*ckin' government union liquor store clerk, working the checkout register while insulting customers as trained.
So ,Galt hates RealDave because he is the epitome of the American Ayn Randian dream ordinary man --a self-made small businessman success story.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#923840 Jun 12, 2013
In today’s episode of “What’s good for me is not good for thee” we find then-Senator Joe Biden in 2006 pontificating on the evils of spying presidents. Funny how Joe’s position has “evolved” in seven years, huh?

On Fox News’ Special Report with Bret Baier, last night, a video from May 12, 2006 was aired in which Biden admonished us not to trust a president who spies on the American people.

“If I know every single phone call you’ve made, I’m able to determine every single person you’ve talked to; I can get a pattern about your life that is very, very intrusive. And the real question here, is what do they do with this information that they collect – that does not have anything to do with al-Qaeda? And we’re gonna trust the president and the vice president that they’re doing the right thing? Don’t count me in on that.”

So, what’s changed, Joe? Other than it’s now Barack Obama who’s doing the “information collecting,” I mean? Anyway, don’t count me – or other freedom-loving Americans – in, either.

Judged:

10

10

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#923841 Jun 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>"Even supporters questioned the way the administration slipped the policy out without first opening it for public comment. The change was buried in an afternoon announcement on May 31 about efficiency standards for microwave ovens, a rule not seen as groundbreaking.
“This is a very strange way to make policy about something this important,” Frank Ackerman, an economist at Tufts University who published a book about the economics of global warming, said in an interview. The Obama administration “hasn’t always leveled with us about what is happening behind closed doors.”
This is preposterous ,shoddy reporting by Bloomberg.com news because the EPA has been using this kind of carbon-accounting method for years in their reports and wrote a scathing criticism of the State Department for not using it for their own analysis of the prevailing costs of building the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline. "For years, the Environmental Protection Agency has urged the State Department to do just this kind of calculation as part of its environmental review of the Keystone project. But the State Department has never done so.
In April, in a review sharply critical of the State Department's latest draft environmental impact statement for the project, the EPA again urged this approach.
It cited estimates that the tar sands crude oil the pipeline would carry could add 19 million tons of incremental emissions to the atmosphere each year—the amount of extra pollution due to the fact that tar sands oil is dirtier than conventional oil and uses more energy to produce. Using the new carbon cost estimate, the extra emissions from the oil delivered in the year 2020 alone would impose future costs of more than $800 million in today's dollars. Every following year's emissions would add to the economic harm, and at a steadily escalating price per ton.
"If greenhouse gas intensity of oil sands crude is not reduced, over a 50 year period the additional carbon dioxide from oil sands crude transported by the pipeline could be as much as 935 million metric tons," the EPA told the State Department. "It is this difference in greenhouse gas intensity—between oil sands and other crudes—that is a major focus of the public debate about the climate impacts of oil sands crude."
Some analysts contend that the social damage costs from the Keystone would be far higher."
http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130610/wh...
Social damage costs?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA .........

How about self-image damage to Tree-Huggers?

Equality and Justice for Earth Worms?

Suicidal tendencies amongst Liberals?

This is serious stuff indeed!

(snicker, snicker...up-chuck...snicker, snicker)
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#923842 Jun 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>"Even supporters questioned the way the administration slipped the policy out without first opening it for public comment. The change was buried in an afternoon announcement on May 31 about efficiency standards for microwave ovens, a rule not seen as groundbreaking.
“This is a very strange way to make policy about something this important,” Frank Ackerman, an economist at Tufts University who published a book about the economics of global warming, said in an interview. The Obama administration “hasn’t always leveled with us about what is happening behind closed doors.”
This is preposterous ,shoddy reporting by Bloomberg.com news because the EPA has been using this kind of carbon-accounting method for years in their reports and wrote a scathing criticism of the State Department for not using it for their own analysis of the prevailing costs of building the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline. "For years, the Environmental Protection Agency has urged the State Department to do just this kind of calculation as part of its environmental review of the Keystone project. But the State Department has never done so.
In April, in a review sharply critical of the State Department's latest draft environmental impact statement for the project, the EPA again urged this approach.
It cited estimates that the tar sands crude oil the pipeline would carry could add 19 million tons of incremental emissions to the atmosphere each year—the amount of extra pollution due to the fact that tar sands oil is dirtier than conventional oil and uses more energy to produce. Using the new carbon cost estimate, the extra emissions from the oil delivered in the year 2020 alone would impose future costs of more than $800 million in today's dollars. Every following year's emissions would add to the economic harm, and at a steadily escalating price per ton.
"If greenhouse gas intensity of oil sands crude is not reduced, over a 50 year period the additional carbon dioxide from oil sands crude transported by the pipeline could be as much as 935 million metric tons," the EPA told the State Department. "It is this difference in greenhouse gas intensity—between oil sands and other crudes—that is a major focus of the public debate about the climate impacts of oil sands crude."
Some analysts contend that the social damage costs from the Keystone would be far higher."
http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130610/wh...
Galt suggests major solar power installation on South Florida beaches as alternative to petroleum.

Demolish Boca condos as necessary to provide power for the people.

Judged:

10

10

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#923843 Jun 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>So ,Galt hates RealDave because he is the epitome of the American Ayn Randian dream ordinary man --a self-made small businessman success story.
Dumbass Dave's liquor store is not a business, but a government monopoly.

Government union checkout clerks earn $60K per year, guaranteeing highest liquor prices in the US. But they offer lousy selection and surly attitude as compensation.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#923844 Jun 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>"Even supporters questioned the way the administration slipped the policy out without first opening it for public comment. The change was buried in an afternoon announcement on May 31 about efficiency standards for microwave ovens, a rule not seen as groundbreaking.
“This is a very strange way to make policy about something this important,” Frank Ackerman, an economist at Tufts University who published a book about the economics of global warming, said in an interview. The Obama administration “hasn’t always leveled with us about what is happening behind closed doors.”
This is preposterous ,shoddy reporting by Bloomberg.com news because the EPA has been using this kind of carbon-accounting method for years in their reports and wrote a scathing criticism of the State Department for not using it for their own analysis of the prevailing costs of building the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline. "For years, the Environmental Protection Agency has urged the State Department to do just this kind of calculation as part of its environmental review of the Keystone project. But the State Department has never done so.
In April, in a review sharply critical of the State Department's latest draft environmental impact statement for the project, the EPA again urged this approach.
It cited estimates that the tar sands crude oil the pipeline would carry could add 19 million tons of incremental emissions to the atmosphere each year—the amount of extra pollution due to the fact that tar sands oil is dirtier than conventional oil and uses more energy to produce. Using the new carbon cost estimate, the extra emissions from the oil delivered in the year 2020 alone would impose future costs of more than $800 million in today's dollars. Every following year's emissions would add to the economic harm, and at a steadily escalating price per ton.
"If greenhouse gas intensity of oil sands crude is not reduced, over a 50 year period the additional carbon dioxide from oil sands crude transported by the pipeline could be as much as 935 million metric tons," the EPA told the State Department. "It is this difference in greenhouse gas intensity—between oil sands and other crudes—that is a major focus of the public debate about the climate impacts of oil sands crude."
Some analysts contend that the social damage costs from the Keystone would be far higher."
http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130610/wh...
Crackpot environmentalists are destroying huge swaths of the fragile Mohave Desert ecosystem to build solar power projects, with nary a peep from Bocajews like you.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#923847 Jun 12, 2013
Leggy Mountbatten wrote:
<quoted text>
Fartsack reveals he's gay, no one is surprised.
Yeah just can't say No.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#923852 Jun 12, 2013
Leggy Mountbatten wrote:
<quoted text>
Boy are you stupid, Zimmerman is out on bail.
frontporchreactionary is a backporchwannabe.

A big mouth is his only claim to fame on Topix, in the hood and in the bath houses.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#923853 Jun 12, 2013
Masama Muhfugger wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like a triple top. Once this baby heads down look out below. They'll be riding Mr. Obama out of town on a rail. Worst pres in history.
Interesting observation...
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#923854 Jun 12, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
26 years ago today...
June 12, 1987
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"
We need another Reagan.
lol! Talk about unearned hero worship!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#923855 Jun 12, 2013
Whatever wrote:
I went to mow my lawn and I came back to discover that if you don't feed Yeah, she/he goes away.
You should mow your lawn more often and longer.

Everyone benefits!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#923856 Jun 12, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
You post this earlier.
I responded that this does NOT change the main finding of the study that Americans disapprove of this being utilize on ordinary Americans.
You propose a cherry picking fallacy. A fallacy as the Title and Main emphasis of the POLL was the Disapproval that I noted.
What is wrong with you that you have forgotten so soon?
lol! It's so funny how you still have to explain your point because your point can't!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#923857 Jun 12, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Polling clueless fools means squat.
You should tell some of your brethren that.

They seem to love polls, even when it screws them up !
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#923858 Jun 12, 2013
Leggy Mountbatten wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm gay, no one is surprised. So what?
Well, ok.....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min Rogue Scholar 05 178,157
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 min Fair Game 46,787
Abby 9-21-14 59 min cheluzal 3
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr cheluzal 98,238
Abby 9-20 1 hr cheluzal 12
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr JOEL 69,413
Imo state university,(IMSU) Merit admission lis... 2 hr omokaro Collins 1
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••