Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1482261 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#912841 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Has nothing to do with background checks, which a large majority of your fellow citizens believe should be enacted and robust.
It's a fact that background checks will stop many straw buyers from selling their guns to criminals for profit.
The Repugnant killers so far have been killing with perfectly legal guns.
A background check on Repugnant skinhead James Holmes would have prevented mass murder.
Even most NRA members approve of backround checks.
You remain a nitwit, far outside the norm of your fellow citizens in your radical anti Government stupidity.
People who sell illegal guns don't bother with background checks. The liberal stupid is thick in here today. You want to argue so bad you don't care how ignorant you sound.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#912843 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
You are clueless.
I understood why he asked the question of the poster and you will always be too slow to figure it out.
Nuc is looking for a pissing match no matter how stupid he sounds.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912845 May 27, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Wtf? You are one stupid fck. Background checks will keep illegal guns out of the hands of criminals?
Even Lapierre believed in background checks plus law enforcement begin using 'gunpowder taggants ' that can trace back to the perpetrator and gun explosives maker.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#912846 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
You are clueless.
I understood why he asked the question of the poster and you will always be too slow to figure it out.
You and Emaam are idiots of a similar nature.

No wonder you comprehend what he's saying, you're both stupid.

Anyone who asks questions as stupid as he did deserves to get his butt kicked around the thread.

All you and Emaam do is come out with stupid things to say.

It's like you're trying to catch up with Nobraina, King of the Nitwits!!

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#912848 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You ask stupid questions, and call us idiots??
if you knew there was no Embassy in Benghazi, why did you ask repeatedly??
Because you're a stinkin' liar, all that you've ever been here.
Must be the mother of all hangovers you have today.
Keep up your ignorance.
I'll continue to mock you for it.
Why do you idiots keep bringing up embassy security when there is no embassy in benghazii?

Go piss in the wind, son.

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#912850 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Only an idiot like you would ask such an ignorant question.
Thanks again for displaying your stupidity.
A better question is what our Ambassador was doing in Benghazi without a complete security detail to provide protection.
Why aren't the Repugnants smart enough to ask what Mr. Hill was up to in Benghazi, where he went to on the sly..........
But that's a National Security secret, not likely to be revealed for another 20 years or so.
You idiots have been on this joke for months now. You already lost an election because nobody cared, and you continue to act stupidly while America ignores you, realizing it's all racist hatred from losers like you.
You must have an awful hangover today to be asking such stupid questions.
Typically your questions aren't quite that brainless. Close, but not quite!!
"nutsucker"
Why was the ambassador in Benghazi with not security? You might want to ask SofS Clinton. After all she was the person in charge. But we all know her reaction to the deaths, who cares, what does it matter.
Pe3ace
KMA
RUSH10ME

Warsaw, VA

#912851 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Every time, you nitwits make a predictable, if ignorant argument.
Bush is an idiot, yet all you can do is speak of his wealth, as if it matters.
Rmoney is an idiot, yet all you can do is speak of his wealth.
How'd his wealth help hinm in the last election??
Why won't he release his tax records?? Because he'd be put in jail for illegal tax shelters, that's why.
Funny how you nitwits admire wealth, even if it's from corrupted aholes like Bush and Rmoney.
Proves what an idiot you are.
You were likely open minded before all your brains fell out.
The HNIC will be exposed for what he is ignorant traitors such as yourself may give him a pass but history will not , his day is comming .

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912852 May 27, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
People who sell illegal guns don't bother with background checks. The liberal stupid is thick in here today. You want to argue so bad you don't care how ignorant you sound.
Enforced background checks make sure illegal gun sellers can't sell to criminals or the mentally deranged--it is the illegal gun sellers that make up the bulk of gun sales to criminals .

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912853 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, I was reading an article yesterday about Berger pleading guilty to removing and destroying classified documents. His lawyer was still going on about the staff accusing Berger of pant stuffing like how he committed the crime he just plead guilty to really was the point.
Another point the Progressives are missing here was Berger removed ALL three copies of the documents he destroyed. Reading comprehension problems prevents them from understanding that ALL -means ALL of the records they had of that document.
You did not. You were on Topix reading Aunt Batty Lou's crappy posts on the subject. Otherwise , you would have never even knew who Sandy Berger was, stupe!:-D
proud2bwhite

Chicago, IL

#912854 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>And Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton approval ratings remain around 63%! Hillary/Michelle in 2016!
no doubt you would support 2 nasty criminal hags that both had their law licenses taken revoked .
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#912855 May 27, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
I realize you have a comprehension problem. The idiot poster claimed lack of embassy safety was a factor in what happened in benghazi. Stupid fcks like you defend that opinion. Obama supplying libyan rebels with weapons was most likely the major factor.
Explain the presence of "at least" 24 CIA agents/operatives/contractors located less than one mile from the State Department mission in Benghazi. Tell us all how long that facility had been operating.

Then tell us why Petreaus's statements haven't been made public in spite of his bj girl stating that the CIA annex had been used to house prisoners.

google__paula broadwell benghazi

And then GFY
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#912856 May 27, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
She's kickng their collective asses.
They know this and are trying to use arrogance unsuccessfully to claim a win they did not earn.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#912857 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>Even Lapierre believed in background checks plus law enforcement begin using 'gunpowder taggants ' that can trace back to the perpetrator and gun explosives maker.
People who sell illgal guns don't do background checks. Criminals don't take background checks.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912859 May 27, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Go have another beer. You're just being stupid now.
And you're flagged . You 're getting too stupid to risk having another beer. Next , you'll be yelling that the black helicopters are after you, paranoid .
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#912860 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You and Emaam are idiots of a similar nature.
No wonder you comprehend what he's saying, you're both stupid.
Anyone who asks questions as stupid as he did deserves to get his butt kicked around the thread.
All you and Emaam do is come out with stupid things to say.
It's like you're trying to catch up with Nobraina, King of the Nitwits!!
Aww, Nuk got caught being incredibly DUMB now tries to blame others for his stupidity.

Your lack of reading comprehension skills is your PERSONAL problem and lashing out at others is a idiotic cover-up.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#912861 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, I was reading an article yesterday about Berger pleading guilty to removing and destroying classified documents. His lawyer was still going on about the staff accusing Berger of pant stuffing like how he committed the crime he just plead guilty to really was the point.
Another point the Progressives are missing here was Berger removed ALL three copies of the documents he destroyed. Reading comprehension problems prevents them from understanding that ALL -means ALL of the records they had of that document.
That's it, Jason, prove you're just as big an idiot as Carol!!

We all knew it all along.

I notice you provided no links to support your lies.

Still can't figure out how to post a link, I see!! HAHAHAHAHA

Just to interrupt your lies, here's the truth;

"In April 2005, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material from the National Archives in Washington. According to the lead prosecutor in the case Berger only took copies of classified information and no original material was destroyed."

Note: That was what the PROSECUTOR said, kind of destroys your and Carol's digging into ancient history.

As far as your lies about him stealing all copies of a document, again you speak thru your rectum;

"Several Archives officials acknowledged that Berger could have stolen any number of items and they "would never know what, if any, original documents were missing."

----------

You said he took all copies. Prove what you said, or admit to your lies.

You're getting your info from that right wing nitwit site again, Jason. Admit it.

Too bad it's all lies and bullshit fed to suckers like you.

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#912862 May 27, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny to see a brain dead old troll who calls others 'acocksucker' and worse accusing others of smearing people.
You really are one demented old fool, Ed.
GFY
"nutsucker"
I call a spade a spade. In your case I call acocksucker, you, acocksucker. You fit the bill.
Peace
KMA

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#912863 May 27, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>Enforced background checks make sure illegal gun sellers can't sell to criminals or the mentally deranged--it is the illegal gun sellers that make up the bulk of gun sales to criminals .
Lmao. Illegal gun sellers don't bother with background checks.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#912864 May 27, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU ARE the moron. What you are asking for will bring on scandal five. This issue of gathering US weapons from the Libyans, why did they have them?, and sending them to Syria is a MAJOR concern and probably being dealt with behind close doors -due to security concerns- with a great deal of stonewalling from the admin.
You are typically idiotic in your ranting and ill thought out responses.
You arm and train Libyans so American veterans won't have to die overseas fighting their battles. Got it now?
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#912865 May 27, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Explain the presence of "at least" 24 CIA agents/operatives/contractors located less than one mile from the State Department mission in Benghazi. Tell us all how long that facility had been operating.
Then tell us why Petreaus's statements haven't been made public in spite of his bj girl stating that the CIA annex had been used to house prisoners.
google__paula broadwell benghazi
And then GFY
They were gathering US weapons from the Libyan protesters. Do you really want to get into WHY they had these?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Phil 234,308
Cong. John Lewis is a worthless black dem. hack... 1 hr Well Well 12
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Lovey794 62,964
Are democrats destroyed? 3 hr Genl Forrest 244
FRIDAY 1/20/17 PRESIDENT TRUMP. Democrap Tota... 3 hr Genl Forrest 11
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 5 hr SweLL GirL 10,092
BENZOS and others available 10 hr Meds 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages