Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 41,844)

Showing posts 836,861 - 836,880 of1,036,987
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909259
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

So, nobody can explain with the radical conservatives today call themselves "liberals", and why the self-described "progressives" cause everything they touch to regress.

Since: May 11

Greencastle, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909260
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
How can an altered seed be 95% anything but genetically altered?
You are such a f*cking idiot.

The subject was food.

If a food is labeled "organic", then it must contain at least 95% organic ingredients.

Try to keep up.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909261
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

nobody can explay why.... sorry for the typo.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909263
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If we are near the bottom of a cooling trend & have registered 338 consecutive months of above average global temperature, I'd say we'll be in big trouble as this cooling effect due to orientations starts heading in the warming trend direction.
My God you really can't understand what you read! Read the last sentence again!!!

Oh by the way! Earth is cooler than 5,000 years ago

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909264
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

sonicfilter wrote:
Lois Lerner Shows Why Obama Needs to Get Rid of All Remaining Bush Appointees
Pleading the fifth is evidence of guilt if you have the bad fortune to work under the Obama administration, but the same folks will defend your right to plead the fifth if you happen to be working under a Republican president.
....if she has any political persuasion, it would seem to be Republican, based on her appointment by the Bush administration (infamous for politicizing government).
Hysteria is the way of the Right. The Daily Caller made a fool of itself the other day, with Patrick Howley claiming that Lerner’s husband’s law firm had strong Obama connections (read: Marxist, Kenyan Hitler, Nixon, Chicago “connections”):“Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Obama connections.”
Um, no. But nice try. Walter Olson at Overlawywered broke it down, and it looks like her husband’s law firm gave more to Republicans, with Republican Ted Cruz raking in $16,250 from his lawyers. Olson concluded,“‘Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Ted Cruz connections’ would have made for too confusing a headline on a Daily Caller lead story.” Yes, we mustn’t let the facts get in the way of the Narrative.
What I’ve taken from all of these scandals so far is that by Republicans refusing to allow Obama his own nominees, they’ve saddled him with their appointees, who may or may not have an agenda and may or may not be utterly incompetent. That’s a nifty game. So now Bush appointee Lois Lerner, who claims to be “nonpolitical” but yet donated the maximum amount to Romney if this Open Secrets note is the right Lois Lerner, is the Obama administration’s undoing according to Republicans.
I am only sorry Lois Lerner is pleading the fifth, because I’d really like someone to ask her why she “let this slip” at a Bar Association meeting, and upon what evidence she based this “slip”.
The Daily Beast said that Lerner “acknowledged that the influx in tax-exempt applications starting in 2010 is what sparked the heightened scrutiny. The admission raises the question of whether Lerner had the opportunity to help clean up what has become a messy campaign-contribution system and, if so, why she instead is cleaning up the mess of a field office that supposedly went rogue.” You see why we should be asking some questions.
I’d like to ask her if she or anyone in her office was the “source” for several media outlets reporting that conservatives were “targeted” as fact. Then again, no one in the House was going to ask Lerner these questions, because they don’t serve the Republican narrative.
http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-plead...
got anything more reputable than some communist party line spewing rag to reference?
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909265
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> You understand what you just wrote? You wrote," she have a statement." Do you understand now? She gave a statement, she didn't testify. The 5th amendment is implied so one isn't forced to testify against ones best interest. Key word, "TESTIFY." NOT MAKING A STATEMENT!
I am serious here raider, it is time for you to cut and run from this topic or take the shovel I am offering you.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909266
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>No, "Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall." (I've taught Bible as Literature, and I may wind up totally destroyed, but I never fall.)
lily will confess her ignorance, leosnana will provide it...

“God bless you, Mr. President”

Since: Jul 08

Peaceful, prosperous second

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909267
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

2

Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a 'pun' just like "red hairing".
Check the meaning of pun a little more carefully, but at least you're trying...(Hint: Telling someone he has his finger in a dyke is a pun; calling someone a dike isn't--now figure out why.)
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909268
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> You understand what you just wrote? You wrote," she have a statement." Do you understand now? She gave a statement, she didn't testify. The 5th amendment is implied so one isn't forced to testify against ones best interest. Key word, "TESTIFY." NOT MAKING A STATEMENT!
If Lerner was already sworn in, then ANYTHING that she said was testimony.

Why did she open her mouth at all?

By the way, she gave additional testimony relative to the authenticity of a previous written statement.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909269
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a 'pun' just like "red hairing".
leosanas talking abut putting a finger in a dyke is very fitting for her.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909270
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>No, "Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall." (I've taught Bible as Literature, and I may wind up totally destroyed, but I never fall.)
GFY
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909271
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

5

3

3

sonicfilter wrote:
Lois Lerner Shows Why Obama Needs to Get Rid of All Remaining Bush Appointees
Pleading the fifth is evidence of guilt if you have the bad fortune to work under the Obama administration, but the same folks will defend your right to plead the fifth if you happen to be working under a Republican president.
....if she has any political persuasion, it would seem to be Republican, based on her appointment by the Bush administration (infamous for politicizing government).
Hysteria is the way of the Right. The Daily Caller made a fool of itself the other day, with Patrick Howley claiming that Lerner’s husband’s law firm had strong Obama connections (read: Marxist, Kenyan Hitler, Nixon, Chicago “connections”):“Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Obama connections.”
Um, no. But nice try. Walter Olson at Overlawywered broke it down, and it looks like her husband’s law firm gave more to Republicans, with Republican Ted Cruz raking in $16,250 from his lawyers. Olson concluded,“‘Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Ted Cruz connections’ would have made for too confusing a headline on a Daily Caller lead story.” Yes, we mustn’t let the facts get in the way of the Narrative.
What I’ve taken from all of these scandals so far is that by Republicans refusing to allow Obama his own nominees, they’ve saddled him with their appointees, who may or may not have an agenda and may or may not be utterly incompetent. That’s a nifty game. So now Bush appointee Lois Lerner, who claims to be “nonpolitical” but yet donated the maximum amount to Romney if this Open Secrets note is the right Lois Lerner, is the Obama administration’s undoing according to Republicans.
I am only sorry Lois Lerner is pleading the fifth, because I’d really like someone to ask her why she “let this slip” at a Bar Association meeting, and upon what evidence she based this “slip”.
The Daily Beast said that Lerner “acknowledged that the influx in tax-exempt applications starting in 2010 is what sparked the heightened scrutiny. The admission raises the question of whether Lerner had the opportunity to help clean up what has become a messy campaign-contribution system and, if so, why she instead is cleaning up the mess of a field office that supposedly went rogue.” You see why we should be asking some questions.
I’d like to ask her if she or anyone in her office was the “source” for several media outlets reporting that conservatives were “targeted” as fact. Then again, no one in the House was going to ask Lerner these questions, because they don’t serve the Republican narrative.
http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-plead...
Sonic warms up the Obama bus.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909273
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

John Galt wrote:
Lois Lerner statement, made prior to invoking the Fifth:
“I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations. And I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”
This is testimony.
So, what is she afraid of?
And is she potentially guilty of perjury regardless of her later invocation of the Fifth Amendment?
If Lerner broke any laws, or violated any IRS rules or regulations, or provided any false information, then she is guilty of perjury.
Learning challenged Nobama?

Take it up with the attorney who sitting right next to her.

Hah, remember when witnesses would laugh at the stupid fks on those committees???

It's not federal court__it's more like a kangaroo court.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909274
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real slime"
Cut the BS. Nearly 4 PM on the East Coast, Dow down 81.
Peace
KMA
"The June E-mini Dow Jones Industrial Average is trading slightly better this morning as investors await the testimony of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. Today, Bernanke is set to testify before the Economic Committee of Congress at 10 a.m. EDT. The head central banker is expected to field questions about the economy and the central bank’s plan to exit its aggressive stimulus program" Check this out: http://www.fxempire.com/technical/technical-a...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909275
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

sonicfilter wrote:
Lois Lerner Shows Why Obama Needs to Get Rid of All Remaining Bush Appointees
Pleading the fifth is evidence of guilt if you have the bad fortune to work under the Obama administration, but the same folks will defend your right to plead the fifth if you happen to be working under a Republican president.
....if she has any political persuasion, it would seem to be Republican, based on her appointment by the Bush administration (infamous for politicizing government).
Hysteria is the way of the Right. The Daily Caller made a fool of itself the other day, with Patrick Howley claiming that Lerner’s husband’s law firm had strong Obama connections (read: Marxist, Kenyan Hitler, Nixon, Chicago “connections”):“Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Obama connections.”
Um, no. But nice try. Walter Olson at Overlawywered broke it down, and it looks like her husband’s law firm gave more to Republicans, with Republican Ted Cruz raking in $16,250 from his lawyers. Olson concluded,“‘Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Ted Cruz connections’ would have made for too confusing a headline on a Daily Caller lead story.” Yes, we mustn’t let the facts get in the way of the Narrative.
What I’ve taken from all of these scandals so far is that by Republicans refusing to allow Obama his own nominees, they’ve saddled him with their appointees, who may or may not have an agenda and may or may not be utterly incompetent. That’s a nifty game. So now Bush appointee Lois Lerner, who claims to be “nonpolitical” but yet donated the maximum amount to Romney if this Open Secrets note is the right Lois Lerner, is the Obama administration’s undoing according to Republicans.
I am only sorry Lois Lerner is pleading the fifth, because I’d really like someone to ask her why she “let this slip” at a Bar Association meeting, and upon what evidence she based this “slip”.
The Daily Beast said that Lerner “acknowledged that the influx in tax-exempt applications starting in 2010 is what sparked the heightened scrutiny. The admission raises the question of whether Lerner had the opportunity to help clean up what has become a messy campaign-contribution system and, if so, why she instead is cleaning up the mess of a field office that supposedly went rogue.” You see why we should be asking some questions.
I’d like to ask her if she or anyone in her office was the “source” for several media outlets reporting that conservatives were “targeted” as fact. Then again, no one in the House was going to ask Lerner these questions, because they don’t serve the Republican narrative.
http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-plead...
In the age of information...Your ignorance and running on empty sonicfiller is still a morons best choice.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909276
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

MSNBC Speculates: Bush Appointee In IRS Targeted Tea Party Because They Reflected Badly On GOP

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-speculates-b...
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909277
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>No, "Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall." (I've taught Bible as Literature, and I may wind up totally destroyed, but I never fall.)
It is an idiom. You know, one of those literary devices you claim to know so much about.

Pride goes before a fall. and Pride goeth before a fall.
Prov. If you are too proud and overconfident, you will make mistakes leading to your defeat.(Biblical.) Sue: I'm the best student in my history class. I'm sure I can pass the exam without studying very hard. Sam: Be careful. Pride goes before a fall, you know.

http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Pride+goe...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909278
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

4

2

2

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You are such a f*cking idiot.
The subject was food.
If a food is labeled "organic", then it must contain at least 95% organic ingredients.
Try to keep up.
Deranged f*cking idiot is not what you do. It's who you are RealDave... My tolerance for you idiot needs work...
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909279
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
GFY
The moron, who claims to be an expert on all things associated with writing, first failed on what a pun is and now does not know what an idiom is.

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#909280
May 22, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like the traditional "back-alley" abortion, which you apparently support.
"John Galt"
"silly" supports abortion/murder anytime, anyplace. Its a woman's right to murder that which she helped create.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 836,861 - 836,880 of1,036,987
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

89 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min loose cannon 167,740
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 4 min JOEL COOL DUDE 65,570
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 min ScarletandOlive 96,293
Amy 4-24 8 min VAdame 14
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 24 min jimtownhounddogsniffing 47,190
Abby 4-24 26 min Toj 9
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 29 min Adam 36 67,245
Amy 4-23 2 hr RACE 41
ask amy 4-22 19 hr Sublime1 69
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••