That's funny. Because every source about the Sandy Berger mysterious theft caper said certain documents were still missing in the 9/11 commissioner's report. Berger tried to justify stealing them by using that excuse.<quoted text>
Oh my Gawd the old Sandy Berger story again! Sandy Berger took copies not original documents which are still in the National Archives and still available to the 9/11 Commission.
As to the testimony before the 9/11 Commission Bush and Cheney insisted that they be interviewed together and that no recording be made. Clinton and Gore were also interviewed but separately and their testimony was recorded.
If there is an active criminal investigation going on then the best thing to say is nothing. Lerner was invoking her rights under the Constitution. Your beloved Rick Scott when deposed as to his role as CEO of Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp as part of a Medicaid fraud investigation invoked his Fifth Amendment rights 75 times.
But the question remains: If copies of those documents were readily available, why did Berger take such a risk stuffing them in his socks and pants from the National Archives?