HEY STUPID! Iraq didn't have a goddamned thing to do with 9/11! Neither did Afghanistan for that matter. George W Bush did exactly what Bin Laden wanted him to do. Both of those unnecessary wars were the best recruiting tools the terrorists could have hoped for. It was also a boon for Iran whose agent Ahmed Chalabi provided the WMD fabricators that Bush used to make his phony case for war in Iraq.<quoted text>
Of those 5,000, a little over 4,000 were killed in Iraq.
I'll just skip over the party line propaganda bullshit "so he could award his friends and cronies billions in no bid government contracts" and get right to the point:
It's 9/12. You are the president. What do you do? Do you:
A) Surrender to the Arab terrorists? or
B) Do the usual Bill Clinton response and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
C) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and some-fucking-how you expect to achieve a different result? or
D) You do it differently to achieve a different result than the Soviets experienced?
If you can think of another option, please begin your response with a description of that option, and include some justification.
A more intelligent approach would have been to target the actual perpetrators, Al Qaeda with surgical strikes and targeted use of special forces to take out their leaders.
You're an idiot DB!