Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#909255 May 22, 2013
Lois Lerner Shows Why Obama Needs to Get Rid of All Remaining Bush Appointees

Pleading the fifth is evidence of guilt if you have the bad fortune to work under the Obama administration, but the same folks will defend your right to plead the fifth if you happen to be working under a Republican president.

....if she has any political persuasion, it would seem to be Republican, based on her appointment by the Bush administration (infamous for politicizing government).

Hysteria is the way of the Right. The Daily Caller made a fool of itself the other day, with Patrick Howley claiming that Lerner’s husband’s law firm had strong Obama connections (read: Marxist, Kenyan Hitler, Nixon, Chicago “connections”):“Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Obama connections.”

Um, no. But nice try. Walter Olson at Overlawywered broke it down, and it looks like her husband’s law firm gave more to Republicans, with Republican Ted Cruz raking in $16,250 from his lawyers. Olson concluded,“‘Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Ted Cruz connections’ would have made for too confusing a headline on a Daily Caller lead story.” Yes, we mustn’t let the facts get in the way of the Narrative.

What I’ve taken from all of these scandals so far is that by Republicans refusing to allow Obama his own nominees, they’ve saddled him with their appointees, who may or may not have an agenda and may or may not be utterly incompetent. That’s a nifty game. So now Bush appointee Lois Lerner, who claims to be “nonpolitical” but yet donated the maximum amount to Romney if this Open Secrets note is the right Lois Lerner, is the Obama administration’s undoing according to Republicans.

I am only sorry Lois Lerner is pleading the fifth, because I’d really like someone to ask her why she “let this slip” at a Bar Association meeting, and upon what evidence she based this “slip”.

The Daily Beast said that Lerner “acknowledged that the influx in tax-exempt applications starting in 2010 is what sparked the heightened scrutiny. The admission raises the question of whether Lerner had the opportunity to help clean up what has become a messy campaign-contribution system and, if so, why she instead is cleaning up the mess of a field office that supposedly went rogue.” You see why we should be asking some questions.

I’d like to ask her if she or anyone in her office was the “source” for several media outlets reporting that conservatives were “targeted” as fact. Then again, no one in the House was going to ask Lerner these questions, because they don’t serve the Republican narrative.

http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-plead...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#909256 May 22, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Son, I don't believe you're even talking the same time period.
You should address your elders with "yes, sir" and "yes, ma'am" and "no, sir" and "no, ma'am", son.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#909257 May 22, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>They fire me and the entire company collapses. Besides I know where all the bodies are buried, so to speak. What else you got?
So...you work in a Funeral Home? A working stiff?

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#909258 May 22, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If we are near the bottom of a cooling trend & have registered 338 consecutive months of above average global temperature, I'd say we'll be in big trouble as this cooling effect due to orientations starts heading in the warming trend direction.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akam aihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/98359 6_508429612317_1437891992_n.jp g Toles drew Mr. Climate Change as a kind of cross between Jabba the Hut, Mr. Potato-Head and some weird internal organ.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#909259 May 22, 2013
So, nobody can explain with the radical conservatives today call themselves "liberals", and why the self-described "progressives" cause everything they touch to regress.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#909260 May 22, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
How can an altered seed be 95% anything but genetically altered?
You are such a f*cking idiot.

The subject was food.

If a food is labeled "organic", then it must contain at least 95% organic ingredients.

Try to keep up.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#909261 May 22, 2013
nobody can explay why.... sorry for the typo.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#909263 May 22, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If we are near the bottom of a cooling trend & have registered 338 consecutive months of above average global temperature, I'd say we'll be in big trouble as this cooling effect due to orientations starts heading in the warming trend direction.
My God you really can't understand what you read! Read the last sentence again!!!

Oh by the way! Earth is cooler than 5,000 years ago

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#909264 May 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Lois Lerner Shows Why Obama Needs to Get Rid of All Remaining Bush Appointees
Pleading the fifth is evidence of guilt if you have the bad fortune to work under the Obama administration, but the same folks will defend your right to plead the fifth if you happen to be working under a Republican president.
....if she has any political persuasion, it would seem to be Republican, based on her appointment by the Bush administration (infamous for politicizing government).
Hysteria is the way of the Right. The Daily Caller made a fool of itself the other day, with Patrick Howley claiming that Lerner’s husband’s law firm had strong Obama connections (read: Marxist, Kenyan Hitler, Nixon, Chicago “connections”):“Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Obama connections.”
Um, no. But nice try. Walter Olson at Overlawywered broke it down, and it looks like her husband’s law firm gave more to Republicans, with Republican Ted Cruz raking in $16,250 from his lawyers. Olson concluded,“‘Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Ted Cruz connections’ would have made for too confusing a headline on a Daily Caller lead story.” Yes, we mustn’t let the facts get in the way of the Narrative.
What I’ve taken from all of these scandals so far is that by Republicans refusing to allow Obama his own nominees, they’ve saddled him with their appointees, who may or may not have an agenda and may or may not be utterly incompetent. That’s a nifty game. So now Bush appointee Lois Lerner, who claims to be “nonpolitical” but yet donated the maximum amount to Romney if this Open Secrets note is the right Lois Lerner, is the Obama administration’s undoing according to Republicans.
I am only sorry Lois Lerner is pleading the fifth, because I’d really like someone to ask her why she “let this slip” at a Bar Association meeting, and upon what evidence she based this “slip”.
The Daily Beast said that Lerner “acknowledged that the influx in tax-exempt applications starting in 2010 is what sparked the heightened scrutiny. The admission raises the question of whether Lerner had the opportunity to help clean up what has become a messy campaign-contribution system and, if so, why she instead is cleaning up the mess of a field office that supposedly went rogue.” You see why we should be asking some questions.
I’d like to ask her if she or anyone in her office was the “source” for several media outlets reporting that conservatives were “targeted” as fact. Then again, no one in the House was going to ask Lerner these questions, because they don’t serve the Republican narrative.
http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-plead...
got anything more reputable than some communist party line spewing rag to reference?
Whatever

Gering, NE

#909265 May 22, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> You understand what you just wrote? You wrote," she have a statement." Do you understand now? She gave a statement, she didn't testify. The 5th amendment is implied so one isn't forced to testify against ones best interest. Key word, "TESTIFY." NOT MAKING A STATEMENT!
I am serious here raider, it is time for you to cut and run from this topic or take the shovel I am offering you.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#909266 May 22, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>No, "Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall." (I've taught Bible as Literature, and I may wind up totally destroyed, but I never fall.)
lily will confess her ignorance, leosnana will provide it...

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

When's dawn?

#909267 May 22, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a 'pun' just like "red hairing".
Check the meaning of pun a little more carefully, but at least you're trying...(Hint: Telling someone he has his finger in a dyke is a pun; calling someone a dike isn't--now figure out why.)
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#909268 May 22, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> You understand what you just wrote? You wrote," she have a statement." Do you understand now? She gave a statement, she didn't testify. The 5th amendment is implied so one isn't forced to testify against ones best interest. Key word, "TESTIFY." NOT MAKING A STATEMENT!
If Lerner was already sworn in, then ANYTHING that she said was testimony.

Why did she open her mouth at all?

By the way, she gave additional testimony relative to the authenticity of a previous written statement.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#909269 May 22, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a 'pun' just like "red hairing".
leosanas talking abut putting a finger in a dyke is very fitting for her.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#909270 May 22, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>No, "Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall." (I've taught Bible as Literature, and I may wind up totally destroyed, but I never fall.)
GFY
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#909271 May 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Lois Lerner Shows Why Obama Needs to Get Rid of All Remaining Bush Appointees
Pleading the fifth is evidence of guilt if you have the bad fortune to work under the Obama administration, but the same folks will defend your right to plead the fifth if you happen to be working under a Republican president.
....if she has any political persuasion, it would seem to be Republican, based on her appointment by the Bush administration (infamous for politicizing government).
Hysteria is the way of the Right. The Daily Caller made a fool of itself the other day, with Patrick Howley claiming that Lerner’s husband’s law firm had strong Obama connections (read: Marxist, Kenyan Hitler, Nixon, Chicago “connections”):“Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Obama connections.”
Um, no. But nice try. Walter Olson at Overlawywered broke it down, and it looks like her husband’s law firm gave more to Republicans, with Republican Ted Cruz raking in $16,250 from his lawyers. Olson concluded,“‘Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Ted Cruz connections’ would have made for too confusing a headline on a Daily Caller lead story.” Yes, we mustn’t let the facts get in the way of the Narrative.
What I’ve taken from all of these scandals so far is that by Republicans refusing to allow Obama his own nominees, they’ve saddled him with their appointees, who may or may not have an agenda and may or may not be utterly incompetent. That’s a nifty game. So now Bush appointee Lois Lerner, who claims to be “nonpolitical” but yet donated the maximum amount to Romney if this Open Secrets note is the right Lois Lerner, is the Obama administration’s undoing according to Republicans.
I am only sorry Lois Lerner is pleading the fifth, because I’d really like someone to ask her why she “let this slip” at a Bar Association meeting, and upon what evidence she based this “slip”.
The Daily Beast said that Lerner “acknowledged that the influx in tax-exempt applications starting in 2010 is what sparked the heightened scrutiny. The admission raises the question of whether Lerner had the opportunity to help clean up what has become a messy campaign-contribution system and, if so, why she instead is cleaning up the mess of a field office that supposedly went rogue.” You see why we should be asking some questions.
I’d like to ask her if she or anyone in her office was the “source” for several media outlets reporting that conservatives were “targeted” as fact. Then again, no one in the House was going to ask Lerner these questions, because they don’t serve the Republican narrative.
http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-plead...
Sonic warms up the Obama bus.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#909273 May 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
Lois Lerner statement, made prior to invoking the Fifth:
“I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations. And I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”
This is testimony.
So, what is she afraid of?
And is she potentially guilty of perjury regardless of her later invocation of the Fifth Amendment?
If Lerner broke any laws, or violated any IRS rules or regulations, or provided any false information, then she is guilty of perjury.
Learning challenged Nobama?

Take it up with the attorney who sitting right next to her.

Hah, remember when witnesses would laugh at the stupid fks on those committees???

It's not federal court__it's more like a kangaroo court.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#909274 May 22, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real slime"
Cut the BS. Nearly 4 PM on the East Coast, Dow down 81.
Peace
KMA
"The June E-mini Dow Jones Industrial Average is trading slightly better this morning as investors await the testimony of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. Today, Bernanke is set to testify before the Economic Committee of Congress at 10 a.m. EDT. The head central banker is expected to field questions about the economy and the central bank’s plan to exit its aggressive stimulus program" Check this out: http://www.fxempire.com/technical/technical-a...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#909275 May 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Lois Lerner Shows Why Obama Needs to Get Rid of All Remaining Bush Appointees
Pleading the fifth is evidence of guilt if you have the bad fortune to work under the Obama administration, but the same folks will defend your right to plead the fifth if you happen to be working under a Republican president.
....if she has any political persuasion, it would seem to be Republican, based on her appointment by the Bush administration (infamous for politicizing government).
Hysteria is the way of the Right. The Daily Caller made a fool of itself the other day, with Patrick Howley claiming that Lerner’s husband’s law firm had strong Obama connections (read: Marxist, Kenyan Hitler, Nixon, Chicago “connections”):“Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Obama connections.”
Um, no. But nice try. Walter Olson at Overlawywered broke it down, and it looks like her husband’s law firm gave more to Republicans, with Republican Ted Cruz raking in $16,250 from his lawyers. Olson concluded,“‘Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner’s husband’s law firm has strong Ted Cruz connections’ would have made for too confusing a headline on a Daily Caller lead story.” Yes, we mustn’t let the facts get in the way of the Narrative.
What I’ve taken from all of these scandals so far is that by Republicans refusing to allow Obama his own nominees, they’ve saddled him with their appointees, who may or may not have an agenda and may or may not be utterly incompetent. That’s a nifty game. So now Bush appointee Lois Lerner, who claims to be “nonpolitical” but yet donated the maximum amount to Romney if this Open Secrets note is the right Lois Lerner, is the Obama administration’s undoing according to Republicans.
I am only sorry Lois Lerner is pleading the fifth, because I’d really like someone to ask her why she “let this slip” at a Bar Association meeting, and upon what evidence she based this “slip”.
The Daily Beast said that Lerner “acknowledged that the influx in tax-exempt applications starting in 2010 is what sparked the heightened scrutiny. The admission raises the question of whether Lerner had the opportunity to help clean up what has become a messy campaign-contribution system and, if so, why she instead is cleaning up the mess of a field office that supposedly went rogue.” You see why we should be asking some questions.
I’d like to ask her if she or anyone in her office was the “source” for several media outlets reporting that conservatives were “targeted” as fact. Then again, no one in the House was going to ask Lerner these questions, because they don’t serve the Republican narrative.
http://www.politicususa.com/lois-lerner-plead...
In the age of information...Your ignorance and running on empty sonicfiller is still a morons best choice.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#909276 May 22, 2013
MSNBC Speculates: Bush Appointee In IRS Targeted Tea Party Because They Reflected Badly On GOP

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-speculates-b...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 29 min Mandela 70,098
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr KiMare 50,621
Steve Wilkos : talk show host ? or simple mi... (Feb '08) 2 hr shell 365
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 hr Sgt Prepper 179,386
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 6 hr Just Saying 54,525
Perfect for Halloween 6 hr Harem 1
Obama Gives Trillions for Wall Street, Not a Di... 7 hr Godly 18
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]