Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#909080 May 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
One cannot choose to use the Fifth Amendment selectively.
Lerner's attorney should be disbarred for allowing her to make a statement proclaiming her innocence.
Lerner is an object for pity, set up by the Obama Regime to take the blame for IRS abuses. Hope she made a good deal.
Last week you claimed that Lerner was a criminal who was being promoted by Obama to head the government department implementing Obamacare. Galt is confused or doesn't know what he's talking about.

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

When's dawn?

#909081 May 22, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad the Progressives here don't have the balls to confront some of their own posters.
You folks, cheer on absolute Progressive crazies here.
Not that I really mind. It shows how far afield Progressive thought is.
Far afield of what? Your flocks of silly geese and fleeced sheep? I don't totally agree with Homer regarding climate change; greenhouse gases are obviously acerbating the phenomenon, but that certainly doesn't make him a vile hateful beast that needs to be confronted like smut-spewing Fenny and the rest of the spam-spreading socks "out standing in the Grumpy Old Pricks' field."
Whatever

Gering, NE

#909082 May 22, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> She made a public statement ,but did not answer any question asked by the Committee.Do you know the difference? Lerner did not 'waive her 5th Amendment right'.
One more time....

When she gave an opening statement she technically waved her right [to claim the fifth].I didn't think I needed to state the obvious as her claiming the fifth was the topic.

When you claim the fifth; you cannot make statements.

When she gave an opening statement she waived her right.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#909083 May 22, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Lerner did not lie about anything. Prove it.
frontporchreactionary will never investigate.. You are a chickenshit... You idiot will never hunt... You're "Gun Shy".....
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#909084 May 22, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Far afield of what? Your flocks of silly geese and fleeced sheep? I don't totally agree with Homer regarding climate change; greenhouse gases are obviously acerbating the phenomenon, but that certainly doesn't make him a vile hateful beast that needs to be confronted like smut-spewing Fenny and the rest of the spam-spreading socks "out standing in the Grumpy Old Pricks' field."
lily will confess her ignorance, leosnana will provide it... One in the same...
Whatever

Gering, NE

#909085 May 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
One option is to give Lerner immunity from prosecution for her actions at IRS, although not immunity from prosecution for perjury during her testimony.
I would never give Lerner immunity. She engaged in the same behavior at FEC asking Christian groups about who prayed for them.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#909087 May 22, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Mr. VanderSloot? Why would such a lengthy piece omit the billionaires first name?
Frank VanderSloot was a mega donor for Mitt Romney and others and takes a very active role in matters of gayness.
Frank VanderSloot.
I thought he was the kid that killed that girl in Aruba

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#909088 May 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosnell committed infanticide, no different than other late-term abortionists liked the sainted Dr. Tiller. Too bad some idiot killed Tiller instead of throwing his ass in prison.
Infanticide is illegal and more prosecutions like that of Gosnell should be conducted.
Galt thinks women who have abortions are totally immoral and lacking in ethics, but those are not crimes. One cannot legislate ethics.
You're an insensitive , immoral asshat if you can compare Gosnell with Dr. Tiller . No wonder you don't get any dates with real women( Do you cut overtime wages for your blow-up koopie-doll too?)

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#909089 May 22, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Organically grown does not equate to non-GMO.
To label 100% organic, you can not have/use anything GMO

To label organic means it is 95% organic. see above
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#909091 May 22, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>This isn't a dating site.
Good one
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#909092 May 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
One cannot choose to use the Fifth Amendment selectively.
Lerner's attorney should be disbarred for allowing her to make a statement proclaiming her innocence.
Lerner is an object for pity, set up by the Obama Regime to take the blame for IRS abuses. Hope she made a good deal.
They let her son.

So it would appear they gave her a pass.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#909093 May 22, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>So you haven't completely ruled out the possibility of man made global warming? If you have then I did not lie or make a false accusation.
Of course not. However, my specific discipline requires an intense study of the Earth. If a grain of sand is added to the beach, then the beach has been changed. How significant the impact of human activity is, nobody knows.
But, there are clues here and there, like the so-called "scientists" who are attempting to prove human significance in global warming being so convinced they were wrong that they invented fraudulent evidence to support their caser.
That's just a clue to a scientist that they don't really believe what they, themselves, are saying.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#909094 May 22, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
I would never give Lerner immunity. She engaged in the same behavior at FEC asking Christian groups about who prayed for them.
oh stfu you moran, you have no clue what you're talking about.
NJ raider 1

Paterson, NJ

#909095 May 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
One cannot choose to use the Fifth Amendment selectively.
Lerner's attorney should be disbarred for allowing her to make a statement proclaiming her innocence.
Lerner is an object for pity, set up by the Obama Regime to take the blame for IRS abuses. Hope she made a good deal.
Making a statement is not the same as taking the stand. In court proceedings both, the defendant or lawyer, & the prosecutor make opening statements. Neither are taking the stand therefore, not subject to the 5th amendment laws at that time. Had she taken the stand & pled her innocence, then when asked questions pertaining the case tried to invoke her 5th amendment right, she couldn't because she already had given them up when she took the stand & testified to her innocence. Therefore she would be forced by law to answer the questions or suffer a jail cell until she does answer them!
Whatever

Gering, NE

#909097 May 22, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Far afield of what? Your flocks of silly geese and fleeced sheep? I don't totally agree with Homer regarding climate change; greenhouse gases are obviously acerbating the phenomenon, but that certainly doesn't make him a vile hateful beast that needs to be confronted like smut-spewing Fenny and the rest of the spam-spreading socks "out standing in the Grumpy Old Pricks' field."
Do you really think Homer is the poster boy for Progressive crazies here? Really? He needs to pop you along the side of the head.

Homer is guilty of following the Progressive line often time without much thought and with no attention given to ethics.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#909098 May 22, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
To label 100% organic, you can not have/use anything GMO
To label organic means it is 95% organic. see above
How can an altered seed be 95% anything but genetically altered?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#909099 May 22, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Lerner did not lie about anything. Prove it.
Obviously, she didn't testify so could not lie.

But she may be forced to testify yet.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#909100 May 22, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>It's Boehner's doing fool__he's the one who stood in front of TV camera's and asked who was going to jail, right?
You should just stick to counting vapor trails.
Did you hear about Harry Sargeant?

A former partner of Florida Republican money man and oil billionaire Harry Sargeant III should get interest on a nearly $29 million court judgment, as well as the principal already awarded against Sargeant, a Florida appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The background of the case reads like a novel. Sargeant, a former state Republican Party finance chairman tapped for the post by then-Gov. Charlie Crist, had a partnership with Mohammed Al-Saleh, a brother-in-law of the king of Jordan, to truck oil through Jordan to U.S. troops in Iraq in an exclusive deal with the military. Al-Saleh was reportedly supposed to assure the Jordanian government would keep the deal exclusive. But Al-Saleh alleged that Sargeant and another partner tried to cut him out of the profits and sued. A Palm Beach County jury agreed in 2011 and ordered Sargeant to pay Al-Saleh $28.8 million, a judgment upheld Wednesdayby the 4th District Court of Appeal in West Palm Beach.

http://www.saintpetersblog.com/appeals-court-...

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#909101 May 22, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
One more time....
When she gave an opening statement she technically waved her right [to claim the fifth].I didn't think I needed to state the obvious as her claiming the fifth was the topic.
When you claim the fifth; you cannot make statements.
When she gave an opening statement she waived her right.
You're confused. If she made an opening statement then it only means that she did not have to invoke her fifth amendment right because the Committee was not accusing her of any criminal act;they were only information-gathering. So, Lerner could not have waived anything that she never used.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#909102 May 22, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Last week you claimed that Lerner was a criminal who was being promoted by Obama to head the government department implementing Obamacare. Galt is confused or doesn't know what he's talking about.
That was Sarah Hall Ingram, another IRS Gestapo agent who will have her day on the hot seat.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 7 min No Warming 50,422
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min wojar 183,858
you wont believe what this guy is doing on ebay 1 hr Tatlover 1
Mom & Daughter arrested 4 stabbing school offic... 2 hr The reason 3
FOTUS Michelle Obama frowns while refusing to w... 4 hr ChicagOpinion 1
Michelle Obama refuses to wear veil in Saudi Ar... 4 hr ChicagOpinion 3
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 hr KiMerde 51,371
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 hr andet1987 98,986
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots