Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
PDUPONT

Holyoke, MA

#907121 May 20, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I'm pretty sure a Commander-in-Chief who lies about the deaths of those who serve under him to win an election is a sure fire way to lose "proper respect".
Umbrella of security? Tell that to the conservatives whose lives were ruined by the IRS due to the climate set by this president.
He has never been my president because he made it quite clear from the beginning he didn't want to be.
Obama didn't lie about anything you clueless twit! Why don't you come up with a single quote with citation that proves he lied about anything?
What conservatives have had their lives ruined by the IRS?
You're living in some kind of bizarre alternate universe.

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#907122 May 20, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Son, I already know you won't stop talking about whatever you want to talk about.
All I'm pointing out is how you change the topics when you don't want to answer if things aren't working your way.
And I have no problems with that (* snicker *)
Whatever is really Eman and he's having an identity crisis and can't think straight lately. Actually he's never been able to think straight.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#907125 May 20, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real dumb"
Personally I do not care if a marine holds an umbrella for president nobama, he needs all the help he can get. There is little nobama can do without help, no reason to expect him to be able to use an umbrella. Thing is the marine should not have. The marines are not nobama's personal servants. Pictures have been shown of Army personnel holding an umbrella for a president, but not a marine. Several posters have posted that male marines are not permitted ho hold an umbrella when on duty.
You should check it out I did not post about military personnel but marines in particular.
Why are you such a phoney, always changing the subject. grow up. Get a job.
Peace
KMA
See. Moocher Eed claims he doesn't care but then goes into a diatribe of baloney bitching about it.

Yet he fails to answer the question.

Why is this a big deal with Obama but not the other Presidents?

Eed won;t answer.

Judged:

20

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#907126 May 20, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude put you big mouth where your cash is...
Here is a link to the Marine Corps regs on Uniforms
now use your pea sized brain and find out where it prohibits Marines from holding an umbrella
heck please show me where it prohibits Marines from using one.
rather than read what someone else thinks...try reading the actual reg
BBBBBBBBut no that would mean using actual facts, something you and your teabaggers are loathe to do
You forgot the link, genius.

You are a typical dishonest weasel DemocRAT scumbag.

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#907127 May 20, 2013
SO, how are you lowlife DemocRATS those morning who support a president who has an enemies list and also uses the IRS to target people, just like Nixon did. You strive for third world status, eh?

yes, of course, I heard you say Obama knows nothing. Sure thing. Holder also knows nothing about anything too. yes, we know, LIARS.

DemocRATS are scum.

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#907128 May 20, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Oh, right. And bushie did. And McCain. And Romney.
Talk about three blind mice!
You prefer an infected, mangy RAT like Obama.

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#907129 May 20, 2013
Waxman wrote:
SO, how are you lowlife DemocRATS those morning who support a president who has an enemies list and also uses the IRS to target people, just like Nixon did. You strive for third world status, eh?
yes, of course, I heard you say Obama knows nothing. Sure thing. Holder also knows nothing about anything too. yes, we know, LIARS.
DemocRATS are scum.
News from planet earth:
"According to two different polls, one by CNN/ORC International survey and the other Gallup, Obama’s approval rating has largely remained unchanged or gone up since Republicans went all-in with the run of “scandals” this past week."
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#907130 May 20, 2013
Car bombings kill 40 in Shiite neighborhoods as far South as Basra. Last week Sunnis were dying__this week it's the Shia

Those Iraqi's are sure loving their freedom.

In other news, 30 Hezbollah fighters and 20 Syrian troops were killed yesterday by rebels in the Syrian town of Qusair.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#907132 May 20, 2013
Waxman wrote:
SO, how are you lowlife DemocRATS those morning who support a president who has an enemies list and also uses the IRS to target people, just like Nixon did. You strive for third world status, eh?
yes, of course, I heard you say Obama knows nothing. Sure thing. Holder also knows nothing about anything too. yes, we know, LIARS.
DemocRATS are scum.
"enimiesgate" is still alive & well among the feeble minded right.

Unbrellagate
enemiesgate
birthergate
Benghazigate
Afirmativeactiongate
IRSgate
APgate
Obamacaregate

Too bad the f*cking Republicans can't spend time working on jobs, the economy, education, climate, immigration, guns, & actually helping America.

Instead we have dipsh*ts like Waxman running screaming thru the streets, waving his arms about, screaming "OMG OMG OMG the umbrella! OMH OMG OMG The enemies list. OMG OMG"

Just how GD dumb are you people?

Judged:

13

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#907133 May 20, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
You prefer an infected, mangy RAT like Obama.
If America wanted that they would have elected an idiot like you----Or Romney, or another Bush..Nutcase.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#907134 May 20, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
"enimiesgate" is still alive & well among the feeble minded right.
Unbrellagate
enemiesgate
birthergate
Benghazigate
Afirmativeactiongate
IRSgate
APgate
Obamacaregate
Too bad the f*cking Republicans can't spend time working on jobs, the economy, education, climate, immigration, guns, & actually helping America.
Instead we have dipsh*ts like Waxman running screaming thru the streets, waving his arms about, screaming "OMG OMG OMG the umbrella! OMH OMG OMG The enemies list. OMG OMG"
Just how GD dumb are you people?
Obama is the President you dumbass... Chris Matthews: Obama Likes Giving Speeches More Than He Likes Leading.

RealDave using his "I am an idiot" defense... Just how GD dumb are you people??
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#907135 May 20, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
If America wanted that they would have elected an idiot like you----Or Romney, or another Bush..Nutcase.
Still in Bumpass you deranged idiot??
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#907137 May 20, 2013
RealDave enjoys blaming other because he's the idiot...

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#907138 May 20, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
"enimiesgate" is still alive & well among the feeble minded right.
Unbrellagate
enemiesgate
birthergate
Benghazigate
Afirmativeactiongate
IRSgate
APgate
Obamacaregate
Too bad the f*cking Republicans can't spend time working on jobs, the economy, education, climate, immigration, guns, & actually helping America.
Instead we have dipsh*ts like Waxman running screaming thru the streets, waving his arms about, screaming "OMG OMG OMG the umbrella! OMH OMG OMG The enemies list. OMG OMG"
Just how GD dumb are you people?
The Republican strategy is to drag the other side down rather than climb out of the hole they have dug themselves in with the teabagger shovel.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#907139 May 20, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
As you apparently did not read my response post to your wild claims, I am re-posting.
"" The differences between the two versions of the email have been overstated. At issue is the involvement of Ben Rhodes, a senior White House aide, in directing the various members of the inter-agency discussion to resolve their dispute.
Here’s the relevant part of the email as quoted by Karl:
We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don’t want to undermine the FBI investigation.
Here’s the relevant sentence from the real email:
We need to resolve this in a way that respects all of the relevant equities, particularly the investigation.
The email is important because in the preceding email back-and-forth, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland had urged that references to terrorism be removed because they could be a political liability to State. Whether Rhodes said Nuland’s objections should be accommodated explicitly or by implication is a difference, but it’s a pretty small one."
So they were talking about State and the FBI in a previous email and then the next email states
" We need to resolve this in a way that respects all of the relevant equities, particularly the investigation."
Who in the world does the Dems think she was referring too? A question I have asked since they started this non-event.
Move on Sonic you can't hype this tale any longer.
NRO? right wing 'oh it's not that big a deal'? lol

ok. left wing 'it is a big deal'.

"When the GOP was given access to the lengthy email documents weeks ago, it was clear that their theory the White House inserted the ‘protest’ in the talking points to mislead the country had been completely debunked. The erroneous statement that the attacks on our facilities in Benghazi began as a protest was drafted by the intelligence community and remained in the talking points from beginning to end. This was the intelligence community’s belief at the time, and as flawed as that assessment was, the emails made clear the White House had no role in it.

But instead of coming clean with the country, someone in the GOP decided to change portions of the emails to discredit the White House, and leak them. This is deplorable conduct, and all the more so if it comes from those entrusted to fairly and objectively investigate claims of misconduct in government. Congressman Issa owes the public an answer as to who doctored these emails, who leaked them to the press, and who is being held accountable."

“A GOP leak of doctored e-mails [became] the basis of GOP talking points,” Schiff told the Washington Post.“That’s a pretty disturbing irony considering the investigation was supposed to be about spin on talking points.”

http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/dem_congressm...

not moving on just because it interferes with right wing talking points that never held any water in the first place.
TIME FOR OBAMA TO GO

Davenport, IA

#907140 May 20, 2013
The United States Constitution states in Article II, Section 4: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Thus far in the history of the United States there been three Presidential impeachment proceedings -- in 1868 against President Andrew Johnson for his removal of Secretary of War Edwin Stanton in violation of the Tenure of Office Act - 1974 against President Richard Richard Nixon for the Watergate coverup (106 years after Johnson)- 1998-99 against President Bill Clinton for concealing an extramarital affair (24 years after Nixon).

Modern Impeachment Procedure:

Impeachment resolutions made by members of the House of Representatives are turned over to the House Judiciary Committee which decides whether the resolution and its allegations of wrongdoing by the President merits a referral to the full House for a vote on launching a formal impeachment inquiry.
The entire House of Representatives votes for or against a formal impeachment inquiry, needing only a simple majority (a single vote) for approval.
If approved, the House Judiciary Committee conducts an investigation to determine (similar to a grand jury) if there is enough evidence to warrant articles of impeachment (indictments) against the President. The Committee then drafts articles of impeachment pertaining to specific charges supported by the evidence. The Committee votes on each article of impeachment, deciding whether to refer each article to the full House for a vote.
If the House Judiciary Committee refers one or more articles of impeachment, the entire House of Representatives votes on whether the article(s) merit a trial in the Senate, needing only a simple majority for approval.
If the full House approves at least one article of impeachment, the President is technically impeached and the matter is referred to the U.S. Senate. The House then appoints members of Congress to act as managers (prosecutors).
The trial of the President is held in the Senate with the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court presiding. The President can be represented by anyone he chooses. He may appear personally or leave his defense in the hands of his lawyers.
The entire Senate may conduct the trial or it or it may be delegated to a special committee which would report all the evidence to the full Senate.
The actual trial is conducted in a courtroom-like proceeding including examination and cross-examination of witnesses. During questioning, Senators remain silent, directing all questions in writing to the Chief Justice.
After hearing all of the evidence and closing arguments, the Senate deliberates behind closed doors then votes in open session on whether to convict or acquit the President. The vote to convict must be by a two thirds majority, or 67 Senators. If this occurs, the President is removed from office and is succeeded by the Vice President. The Senate's verdict is final and there is no right of appeal.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#907141 May 20, 2013
Red State Sucker wrote:
<quoted text>
The Republican strategy is to drag the other side down rather than climb out of the hole they have dug themselves in with the teabagger shovel.
Obama bin Lying...

Chris Matthews: Obama Likes Giving Speeches More Than He Likes Leading.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#907142 May 20, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
NRO? right wing 'oh it's not that big a deal'? lol
ok. left wing 'it is a big deal'.
"When the GOP was given access to the lengthy email documents weeks ago, it was clear that their theory the White House inserted the ‘protest’ in the talking points to mislead the country had been completely debunked. The erroneous statement that the attacks on our facilities in Benghazi began as a protest was drafted by the intelligence community and remained in the talking points from beginning to end. This was the intelligence community’s belief at the time, and as flawed as that assessment was, the emails made clear the White House had no role in it.
But instead of coming clean with the country, someone in the GOP decided to change portions of the emails to discredit the White House, and leak them. This is deplorable conduct, and all the more so if it comes from those entrusted to fairly and objectively investigate claims of misconduct in government. Congressman Issa owes the public an answer as to who doctored these emails, who leaked them to the press, and who is being held accountable."
“A GOP leak of doctored e-mails [became] the basis of GOP talking points,” Schiff told the Washington Post.“That’s a pretty disturbing irony considering the investigation was supposed to be about spin on talking points.”
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/dem_congressm...
not moving on just because it interferes with right wing talking points that never held any water in the first place.
You a garbage scow of foolishness sonicfiller..
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#907144 May 20, 2013
The ABC report was based on notes taken by a still-unnamed source, presumably a Republican, in attendance at one of two briefings the administration held for members and senior staffers of the Senate and House intelligence committees and top leadership offices in February and March of this year. The ABC report contained a great deal of the information the White House would ultimately reveal itself this week when it released all of the inter- and intra-agency email communication that ultimately resulted in the talking points Susan Rice used in a now-infamous series of appearances on network news shows on the Sunday after the attack.

But it got one big part about the White House’s role wrong:

In an email dated 9/14/12 at 9:34 p.m.— three days after the attack and two days before Ambassador Rice appeared on the Sunday shows — Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes wrote an email saying the State Department’s concerns needed to be addressed.“We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don’t want to undermine the FBI investigation. We thus will work through the talking points tomorrow morning at the Deputies Committee meeting.”

It turns out that’s not what the email said. To quiet the growing furor over the idea that the White House had thumbed the scale on the State Department’s behalf, a government official subsequently leaked to CNN the full text of Rhodes’ message, which was assiduously neutral about each relevant agency’s concerns.

But discussions with several people in attendance at or with knowledge of the two congressional briefings suggest that members and staffers were left with the opposite impression — that the White House had remained neutral in the dispute between the State Department and the CIA — and that after a thorough run-through, they were given ample time to take notes not just about the briefing itself, but in theory to transcribe key emails verbatim.

“When I say they were allowed to have the documents for as long as they wanted, they were allowed to take notes for as long as they wanted as well,” the intelligence official said.

The discrepancy between the documents ABC was provided and the official records has led White House officials, congressional aides, and outside observers to the conclusion that a GOP member or staffer falsified notes or tendentiously interpreted administration emails — and then leaked them — to create the impression that the White House had sided with the State Department in an intra-agency dispute to protect President Obama from political blowback.

“I got a lot of questions probing in a lot areas,” the intelligence official said.“Truthfully I cannot recall whether I specifically got any questions asking about the White House. All the questions I got were not sort of tendentious questions but they were asking facts, to understand what went on.”

After those briefings, the Benghazi controversy quieted down for several weeks — a tellingly long silence given how damning the emails supposedly were — until ABC’s report, including its characterization of the White House’s involvement, exploded in the press late last week. Karl, who downplayed the discrepancies between the summaries he relied on and the actual emails, was not immediately available for comment for this story.

“I wouldn’t go into what the members said in the meeting,” the intelligence official said.“The relationship between what the documents show and what the report said sort of speak for itself.”

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/05/be...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#907145 May 20, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>You a garbage scow of foolishness sonicfiller..
WATCH: CBS' Major Garrett calls out GOP over doctored Benghazi emails

The former Fox News correspondent takes the rare step of chastising partisan sources on air

http://theweek.com/article/index/244363/watch...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Deat Abby 12-16 12 min Sublime1 47
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 27 min Rogue Scholar 05 181,688
sexting on whatsapp 28 min cute_bwoy 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 58 min Yumpin Yimminy 68,874
14-Year-Old Boy Shot In Head On Far South Side 1 hr Taint Shield 4
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr kal 49,174
best joke (Oct '09) 2 hr Always Smile 526
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:31 am PST

NBC Sports11:31AM
Chris Conte: NFL career worth shortened life
NFL11:41 AM
Trestman: There's accountability in Bears' building
NBC Sports12:41 PM
Bears' Trestman aware of speculation about future - NBC Sports
Yahoo! Sports 1:20 PM
Chicago sportscaster apologizes for tasteless joke in Cutler pun
NFL 1:47 PM
One Preview: Passing and rushing yardage leaders meet in Big D