Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Whatever

Gering, NE

#905743 May 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Hoping that people remain stupid is Obama's only chance, and it may just work.
The bumbling responses of "I don't know nothing" and one admin official today even using the "I am an idiot" defense has damaged their image as even being vaguely honest and/or competent.

Obama has moved to the lame duck category. The Press knows this. A few like Chuck Todd tries to hold on tenuously.

The Dems in congress knows how the misconduct of IRS hit them like a sack of bricks during the Clinton era. They are in no mood to be super defenders of any Obama official playing dumb or who smacks of dishonesty. With the exception, of course, of the rank partisans who can get away with it.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#905744 May 17, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>A U S Marine also knows how to show the proper respect to a superior officer, the Commander in Chief President Obama unlike you,Galt ,who never served your country a day in your life ,but welcomed the umbrella of security President Obama holds out to you and every American. Obama would prefer that you just say thank you and move on .
Any self-respecting man would hold his own umbrella rather than asking a Marine to be a flunky.
Zeldom ZurpriZed

Lakewood, NJ

#905745 May 17, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
They are volunteers, there to serve the President. Contrary to you disrespectful republicans, to them, it us an honor to do so. The only reason this is an issue is because of racism. I suppose you would have liked to see them defy and disrespect the President.
If they do not want to serve the President of The United States, there are thousands who would love that duty.
You should be ashamed of yourself
You should be ashamed of yourself, you hypocritical vile beast racist moron.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#905746 May 17, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>A U S Marine also knows how to show the proper respect to a superior officer, the Commander in Chief President Obama unlike you,Galt ,who never served your country a day in your life ,but welcomed the umbrella of security President Obama holds out to you and every American. Obama would prefer that you just say thank you and move on .
Actually, I'm pretty sure a Commander-in-Chief who lies about the deaths of those who serve under him to win an election is a sure fire way to lose "proper respect".

Umbrella of security? Tell that to the conservatives whose lives were ruined by the IRS due to the climate set by this president.

He has never been my president because he made it quite clear from the beginning he didn't want to be.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#905747 May 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
UN Ambassador Susan Rice reports directly to Obama, so only Obama could have ordered her to lie about Benghazi.
That is the way I am understanding it. The talking points were greatly diluted but it was Rice who resurrected the video.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#905748 May 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
UN Ambassador Susan Rice reports directly to Obama, so only Obama could have ordered her to lie about Benghazi.
Of course he did. Only after Valerie Jarrett told him to.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#905749 May 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Rangel is a victim of the IRS Gestapo, whether guilty or not.
So you think him being censored was unjustified?

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#905750 May 17, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they did. Why would they target only those who were considered enemies of this administration?
Remember Obama urging a group of Hispanics to "punish our enemies"?
“And if Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, we’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us, if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s gonna be harder - and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2.”
Obama's entire presidency has been about punishing his perceived enemies - capitalism, republicans, the wealthy, the tea party, Fox, etc., etc.
He can be a very strict nanny to those who get out of line.
For one , the Obama Administration does not perceive the Tea Party as "enemy" . President Obama has said on more than one occasion that as President he is responsible for and cares for all Americans regardless of who they voted for(unlike Romney who thought that he didn't have to give a rat's ass for any American who would 'never vote for him anyway.)That's a big reason why Mitt 'no integrity' Romney lost in 2012. Second, the I.R.S. targeted the Tea Party groups who were the most likely suspects to violate U S tax laws since they're on record as believing that the income tax is illegal.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#905752 May 17, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the way I am understanding it. The talking points were greatly diluted but it was Rice who resurrected the video.
Rice does not take orders from the flunkies who prepared the talking points. Only Obama can tell her what to do.

Unless Obama has delegated the power of the Presidency to unnamed White House staffers.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#905753 May 17, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
So you think him being censored was unjustified?
No, Rangel was probably guilty.

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#905754 May 17, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I'm pretty sure a Commander-in-Chief who lies about the deaths of those who serve under him to win an election is a sure fire way to lose "proper respect".
Umbrella of security? Tell that to the conservatives whose lives were ruined by the IRS due to the climate set by this president.
He has never been my president because he made it quite clear from the beginning he didn't want to be.
You can't win the argument so you resort to lies? How NOT mature. What 'lives' were ruined? You don't like this President but you also never refused the Social Security check or TAX Rebate check sighed by this President Obama that arrived in your mail box . Don't be a hypocrite , it only weakens your argument more and makes you look even worse as a jerk.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#905755 May 17, 2013
Obama Breeds Rebellion Among the States
Alan ...
May 13, 2013

How out of touch is the President? He went to Mexico and blamed the violence arising from its drug cartels on America, saying "Most of the guns used here to commit violence came from America." He made no mention of the scandalous "Fast and Furious" scheme in which the ATF actually ran guns into Mexico, claiming they would track them. It took an executive order to throw a blanket of silence over it and a compliant media to ignore that scandal.

It is, however, Obamacare that poses the greatest threat to the nation, intruding on the patient-doctor relationship, robbing billions from Medicare to pay for it, requiring states to fund more Medicaid when many are strapped to meet other needs, and putting 16% of the nation's economy under federal control.

A total of twenty-seven states have filed suit against Obamacare. Two federal judges have upheld its individual mandate to purchase health insurance and two others have ruled that it is unconstitutional

http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/9316

Taxpayers Must Report Personal
Health Info to IRS Starting 2014

http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/9321

If There Was Ever a Golden Opportunity
Frank Salvato
May 16, 2013

If, by the grace of God Almighty, conservatives can dispose of the egos and join in an effort to communicate, if establishment Republicans can lose their penchant for “know-it-all,”“my-way” inside-the-beltway arrogance to provide the national apparatus by which to communicate, and if the TEA Parties can enjoin cohesively with both of the aforementioned to move the message; to educate; to inform the no- and low-information voters, in a non-aggressive and non-inflammatory way – if conservatives of all stripes can craft and move a message that

defines the Progressive Movement for exactly who they are and exactly what their goal is for our country, then we have an opportunity to send their movement into a thousand years of darkness.

Imagine.[heavenly to THINK about]

So, Conservatives of all stripes, establishment Republicans and TEA Partiers, it’s the bottom of the ninth and the score is tied. We’re at bat, their pitcher is tired and they have exhausted their bullpen.

How about it?...

http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/9365

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#905756 May 17, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>For one , the Obama Administration does not perceive the Tea Party as "enemy" . President Obama has said on more than one occasion that as President he is responsible for and cares for all Americans regardless of who they voted for(unlike Romney who thought that he didn't have to give a rat's ass for any American who would 'never vote for him anyway.)That's a big reason why Mitt 'no integrity' Romney lost in 2012. Second, the I.R.S. targeted the Tea Party groups who were the most likely suspects to violate U S tax laws since they're on record as believing that the income tax is illegal.
Of course he does. Anyone who questions his authority is an enemy.

If Obama is about anything, he's about control and a one-party system.

Oh, and bigger government is better government. That's a control mentality. Especially after destroying the enemy...opposition.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#905757 May 17, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>For one , the Obama Administration does not perceive the Tea Party as "enemy" . President Obama has said on more than one occasion that as President he is responsible for and cares for all Americans regardless of who they voted for(unlike Romney who thought that he didn't have to give a rat's ass for any American who would 'never vote for him anyway.)That's a big reason why Mitt 'no integrity' Romney lost in 2012. Second, the I.R.S. targeted the Tea Party groups who were the most likely suspects to violate U S tax laws since they're on record as believing that the income tax is illegal.
Obama perceives anybody who does not vote for him as the enemy and is willing to profile the opposition to beat them into submission.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#905758 May 17, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> You can't win the argument so you resort to lies? How NOT mature. What 'lives' were ruined? You don't like this President but you also never refused the Social Security check or TAX Rebate check sighed by this President Obama that arrived in your mail box . Don't be a hypocrite , it only weakens your argument more and makes you look even worse as a jerk.
What tax rebate?

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#905759 May 17, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
I was amazed to see Charlie Rangler go after Miller, IRS director, today. Despite Sonic's wistful hopes even the Dems smell blood in the water. Sonic, it is all about credibility and the Obama admin has squander their's. The Dems knows mid-terms is already plagued with Obamacare concerns and don't won't anything else clouding things.
Sonic, you also have forgotten that no matter which party they may belong to Congress is jealous of their power and are more than willing to throw an admin of their own party under the bus if they feel their laws and powers are being ignored.
I was surprised too. Then again, a lot of liberals have surprised me lately. Tom Brokaw was one. Jon Stewart another one.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#905760 May 17, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> You can't win the argument so you resort to lies? How NOT mature. What 'lives' were ruined? You don't like this President but you also never refused the Social Security check or TAX Rebate check sighed by this President Obama that arrived in your mail box . Don't be a hypocrite , it only weakens your argument more and makes you look even worse as a jerk.
Please tell me. What was the lie?
Whatever

Gering, NE

#905761 May 17, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>For one , the Obama Administration does not perceive the Tea Party as "enemy" . President Obama has said on more than one occasion that as President he is responsible for and cares for all Americans regardless of who they voted for(unlike Romney who thought that he didn't have to give a rat's ass for any American who would 'never vote for him anyway.)That's a big reason why Mitt 'no integrity' Romney lost in 2012. Second, the I.R.S. targeted the Tea Party groups who were the most likely suspects to violate U S tax laws since they're on record as believing that the income tax is illegal.
If the actions of administration doesn't match the words; the words have no meaning.

Walk down memory lane shows that in an interview for a book that Obama called the Tea Party a gay slur.

Nov 8, 2009 ... Barack Hussein Obama II, used a crude gay-baiting sexual slur to denigrate TeaParty patriots in a talk with House Democrats

May 4, 2010 ... Barack Obama calls tea party movement “tea-baggers” in interview.

Don't forget Obama's comments about making people ride in the back of the car.

Obama has always spat on his alleged enemies and has openly encouraged his blind groupies to do the same.

But, Sonic, once again you are on the wrong side defending the IRS. The IG and POTUS have denounced their behavior
Whatever

Gering, NE

#905762 May 17, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
I was surprised too. Then again, a lot of liberals have surprised me lately. Tom Brokaw was one. Jon Stewart another one.
I think they are perceiving Obama as a lame duck and it is really difficult for them to defend an administration who is now claiming they know nothing about anything. Not very believable.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#905763 May 17, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the way I am understanding it. The talking points were greatly diluted but it was Rice who resurrected the video.
The facts were completely changed only because a terrorist attack on 9/11 right after taking credit for killing bin Laden and weeks before an election would have damaged this president's chance of winning. The talking points were lies first perpetrated by Rice and continued by Hillary and Obama for the purpose of winning at all costs.

No one can deny this is true. Unless they're bubble of denial exploded and killed them.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 29 min Churchlady 183,853
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 29 min litesong 50,408
FOTUS Michelle Obama frowns while refusing to w... 59 min ChicagOpinion 1
Michelle Obama refuses to wear veil in Saudi Ar... 1 hr ChicagOpinion 3
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr KiMerde 51,371
Toni Braxton's abortion 2 hr Rogue Scholar 05 1
A New Place For Talent...Australia 3 hr Shoutline 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr andet1987 98,986
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots