Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#904589 May 16, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Finish the story babe__tell us why Stevens was in Benghazi without his full security detail.
The question has been asked in the hearings but never answered because it's some sort of secret__what's up with that? An open hearing with secrets?
You are dumber than dirt gal!
Did you not hear Obama and Hillary lie about an anti-Muslim video up to two weeks after the attack which they knew was false?

What could possibly have been their motives for lying to the American people about something this important weeks before a close election?

Is lying now acceptable to liberals just as long as they win an election? At any cost? Even about a terrorist attack on 9/11?
femmeIntellect

Irmo, SC

#904590 May 16, 2013
Well if our grand and great grands were here what would they do?
Would the put notes on store windows in disguises complaining secretly?
NO THEY ABSOLUTELY WOULD NOT

This country is the UNITED states of America
I look around today and i DO NOT see us being united.
Brothers stop fighting your brotherrs
Sisters stop fighting your sister
They aren't the ones who've wronged you
Remove the planks and splentors from your eyes and SEE!!!!!

United together..
we are strong
We are capable
We are AMERICANS

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#904591 May 16, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
You still talking about your bush, Susie?
I was answering a question, dumbass. It was about your hero Cheney.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#904593 May 16, 2013
The released emails directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy input from top Obama administration officials and particularly those at the State Department.

Where do liberals draw the line when it comes to betraying the people's trust if our highest elected officials won't tell the truth about something like this?

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#904594 May 16, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Hey DB ,Wall Street made billions on the dot.com bubble and bust like they did on the subprime mortgage boom and bust and you want to slacken the rules again and let Wall Street get away with making chumps out of the American people AGAIN! How stupid can you be??!?
You idiots keep bragging about how well wall street is doing.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#904595 May 16, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
CHIP - or SCHIP - was already in place before Obamacare.
It was created in 1997. It was passed by both parties by a bipartisan vote.
It was to provide health care coverage to low-income children.
The reauthorization bill required in 2007 would have benefited adults as well as non-U.S. citizens and proposed expansion for families with annual incomes up to $82,600.
Bush would not sign this bill for obvious reasons. A family income of $82,600 is not low-income.
The second proposed reauthorization bill prevented adults from joining but, again, covered families with annual incomes up to $62,000.
Even $62,000 is not considering low-income.
However, the extension of SCHIP through March 31, 2009, was signed by President Bush in 2007.
The Democrats moved quickly after Obama's election to expand the coverage to 4 million more including illegal immigrants with no waiting period. Increasing taxes on tobacco products was supposed to fund this massive expansion.
The income requirement under the 2009 bill, I don't know.
But, yes, children should, are and have been covered under CHIP since 1997.
Do you agree with funding millions of illegal immigrants?
Just curious.
I think all children should be covered no matter what as long as it doesn't put a burden on middle income taxpayers. They're burdened enough already. I have serioud doubts increasing taxes on cigarette products alone will cover the expansive costs.
Your thoughts?
"I think all children should be covered no matter what as long as it doesn't put a burden on middle income taxpayers"

Are you retarded?

The middle class is ALREADY burden!!!

Those kids have father, mothers, relatives, church, etc.

Middle class have the burden of their OWN kids they took care and responsability to have.

That is exactly the problem: your liberal compassion!

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#904596 May 16, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
The released emails directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy input from top Obama administration officials and particularly those at the State Department.
Where do liberals draw the line when it comes to betraying the people's trust if our highest elected officials won't tell the truth about something like this?
:Where do liberals draw the line"?

Only if the president is a Republican.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#904597 May 16, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
And that "bump in the road" dot-com bust had a significant impact. Would you care to tell us how much in investment was lost? How about telling us how many companies, oh, hell, in just the state of California went out of business.
And, you continually ignore the fact that when the Arabs started a global war against the United States, it was necessary to increase spending beyond what had become the norm.
How about you close your eyes and concentrate. Then, repeat over and over, "I will speak something truthful. I will speak something truthful. I will speak something truthful...."
If you repeat this often enough, I guarantee you at least one word of your next post will begin to resemble the truth.
My comments bout the Dot Comm bust were absolutely correct.

I never said e didn't need top pe d money in homeland security. I said Bush was an idiot for cutting revenues at the same time we were in need of that spending & heading into war.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#904598 May 16, 2013
As I have 'reported' on TOPIX before!
``````````

BENGHAZI: WHERE ARE GEN. HAM AND ADM. GAOUETTE?
By J.B. Williams

General Carter Ham and Admiral Charles M. Gaouette know the answer to this question. Where are Ham and Gaouette today?

Why hasn’t Issa’s investigative committee called these decorated Military officers to testify before the committee investigating Benghazi?

We have known since 30 October 2012 that these two officers…

1. Were ordered to STAND DOWN in Benghazi
2. Ignored those orders
3. Were relieved of duty for refusing orders to STAND DOWN <<---<<<

We know from the unclassified cables between Benghazi and DC and the subsequent Executive Brief, that cables were firing in all directions in the hours before and during the Benghazi attack that ended in the brutal death of four Americans.

General Ham was head of AFRICOM and Commander of the 2011 US-NATO operation to depose Gadhafi in Libya. Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette was in command of the Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3), then deployed in Middle Eastern waters during the attack on Benghazi.

Both Ham and Gaouette reported receiving the same desperate cables for additional security and backup that Obama administration officials received and ignored from Benghazi.

They did ^not ignore those desperate calls for help ringing out from the Benghazi installation on 11 September 2012.

No, both Ham and Gaouette **attempted to launch ready response teams in the region capable of provided the much needed assistance during the seven hour long assault on Benghazi.

Both were then --relieved of command for their actions, described by the US Military as

“allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.”

General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready to deploy to Benghazi.

Then, General Ham received the order to "stand down."

His response was “screw it,”- he was going to help anyway. <<---<<<[Patrio tism at it's FINEST]

http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/

WE have a TREASONOUS admin!

TOP to BOTTOM and filtering down ...
Like he wants to REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH ...
INSTEAD HE HAS BEEN distributing CORRUPTION!

Are WE just going to sit back and LET THEM REAM US ... again ...???

WHEN IS enough ... going to "BE" enough?

Until everyone in America turns on "each other" with HATRED?

Is THAT what everyone IS waiting on?

WELLLLLL ... let me TELL you ...
It's ALMOST THERE!

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#904600 May 16, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, tell us why! You seem to know although the State Dept cannot come with a coherent answer. Let us hear it!
Bottom line was Stevens was denied security requests which was not related to lack of funding according to the State Dept.
So tell us why they did it
I want to know who denied those people extra security when they literally begged for it knowing the tensions were building.

I want to know who denied them that request and why.

I already know Obama deliberately lied to avoid scrutiny and the possibility of losing an election.

That's nothing new or surprising.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#904601 May 16, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Do the math loser__Ayn Rand was a deadbeat dirtbag not unlike many of the other second rate authors of her time.
Did youv know her too or is that the beer talking?

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#904602 May 16, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Finish the story babe__tell us why Stevens was in Benghazi without his full security detail.
The question has been asked in the hearings but never answered because it's some sort of secret__what's up with that? An open hearing with secrets?
You are dumber than dirt gal!
You can't help but insult carol. She must make you feel very stupid.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#904603 May 16, 2013
Emaam wrote:
Tapping AP phones is an outrageous privacy violation by this administration, even though it was to track a security leak that put American soldier's lives in danger. But torturing to keep American soldiers safe under the Bush administration was a necessary evil, right?
Only an idiot would make that comparison...sorry, forgot for a second who I was talking to.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#904605 May 16, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you not hear Obama and Hillary lie about an anti-Muslim video up to two weeks after the attack which they knew was false?
What could possibly have been their motives for lying to the American people about something this important weeks before a close election?
Is lying now acceptable to liberals just as long as they win an election? At any cost? Even about a terrorist attack on 9/11?
Don't lie to me Carol.

BTW doll the California video actually did create a ruckus just an hours drive East from Benghazi so that angle wasn't completely out of the question during the early hours.

You're not being a contributor here Carol__you're sniping after the fact__no one was killed or injured because Rice had crummy talking points.

The better story is why we still haven't learned the purpose of the CIA base in Benghazi and why Petreaus is not the target the (R) probe.

You haven't a clue. Share your stupidity with someone else eh?
SHADOW

Boerne, TX

#904606 May 16, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If one would have ben my Son I wouldn't want the politicians using his death as political fodder.
This will happen again as long as we have people in dangerous places.
this "wimp" has taken out more Al Qaeda leaders that you tough guy Bush.
Bring it on!" Yep that's tough guy talk.
I don't know if I have actually seen a picture of Obama with his finger on a trigger killing anyone at least since he became president.
Water boarding got osama and O'bigears still says it was wrong being torture and all. Good thing former President Bush had the guts to make these terrorist give info.
Funny how you equate our bumbling president who went to bed the night terrorists were over running our building and killing our patriots with our people being in dangerous places. If we continue to say "we probably couldn't have gotten there in time to save our men" then yes we will lose more people until our people refuse to take these duty stations at all.
The wimp has taken out no one. Our dedicated people have done the fighting. O'bigears is too busy singing and hosting a party for JZ to be bothered with saving anyone.
Political fodder is exactly what O'bigears did when he left our people to die a terrible death at the hands of terrorists.
You and your lying messiah can both go to hell.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#904607 May 16, 2013
Religious Groups Say They Were Scrutinized by IRS

In a letter Tuesday to President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, the Rev. Franklin Graham said charities built by his father may have received extra scrutiny from the IRS because they advocated against gay marriage and the elder Graham appeared in ads urging support for candidates who oppose abortion.

"I do not believe that the IRS audit of our two organizations last year is a coincidence - or justifiable," Franklin Graham wrote. "I am bringing this to your attention because I believe that someone in the administration was targeting and attempting to intimidate us. This is morally wrong and unethical - indeed some would call it ’un-American.’"

http://www.edgechicago.com/index.php...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#904608 May 16, 2013
Emaam wrote:
<quoted text>
You are one angry woman. Can you name anything in your miserable life that Obama hasn't ruined for you?
NOT A DAMN THING ...

EXCEPT ...

my LOVE for my FAMILY ...
AND
theirs for ME!

Capiche?!?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#904611 May 16, 2013
Republicans’ Midwestern Future

Republicans have lost ground in North and gained it in the South partly because their appeal is concentrated among whites. But the South is becoming far less white than it used to be, partly because of immigration and partly because its weather and lower cost of living have made it an attractive destination for domestic relocation. As a result, Republicans are beginning to struggle there, just as they do in the more diverse Northeast and West Coast.

So could the GOP return from Southern exile to its origins in the Midwest? Doing so would refute the geographic argument that it’s the party of the Confederacy. But that’s mainly because the Confederacy ain’t what it used to be.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/republ...
SHADOW

Boerne, TX

#904613 May 16, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If one would have ben my Son I wouldn't want the politicians using his death as political fodder.
This will happen again as long as we have people in dangerous places.
this "wimp" has taken out more Al Qaeda leaders that you tough guy Bush.
Bring it on!" Yep that's tough guy talk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
You know Real Stupid I didn't see any pictures of the wimp in the White House did you?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#904614 May 16, 2013
Fox Outrage Machine Gets Desperate To Resuscitate Benghazi "Scandal"

Fox News is desperate.

The Roger Ailes scandal machine, watching its Benghazi witch hunt crumble all around it, is now trying to stoke outrage that President Obama downplayed the tragedy in Benghazi and insulted the survivors by calling it an "incident" during his May 16 comments to the press.

Here's Fox anchor Gregg Jarrett on the May 16 Happening Now reacting to comments Obama made on the Benghazi tragedy:

He referred to Benghazi as an incident, which I'm sure is an insult to the survivors and the family members of the four murdered Americans.

Got that? Obama, whom Fox figures have accused of letting Americans die for political gain, now stands accused of insulting the survivors by downgrading the tragedy to an "incident."

Except Obama also called Benghazi a tragedy in the very speech that triggered Jarrett's outrage:

We lost four brave Americans, patriots who accepted the risks that come with service because they know that their contributions are vital to our national interests and national security. I am intent on making sure that we do everything we can to prevent another tragedy like this from happening.

But that means we owe it to them and all who serve to do everything in our power to protect our personnel serving overseas. That's why at my direction we've been taking a series of steps that were recommended by the review board after the incident.

It is a fitting coda to Fox's months-long scandal mongering over the tragedy in Benghazi. Jarrett is deceptively attacking the president over comments he made in the Rose Garden, the very spot where Obama first labeled the attack an act of terror, comments that have been decontextualized and parsed endlessly to help promote the entire pseudo-scandal.

Fox's desperate attempt to breathe life back into the "scandal" comes days after the network's scandal machine began a campaign to call for a special prosecutor to investigate the president. This is how the voice of the opposition works. Turning Benghazi into Obama's Watergate is central to the Fox goal of bringing down the administration.

Which is why Fox is desperate to keep it going.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/16/fox-o...

will FOX ever become success at taking down Obama?

stay tuned, only 3 1/2 years left for FOX to try to justify their failures from the last 4 1/2 years.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 8 min Who 47,477
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 20 min Sublime1 98,495
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 21 min jacques Ottawa 179,253
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 22 min Hatti_Hollerand 649
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 24 min Boy G 50,583
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 32 min TRD 68,635
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 55 min Frijoles 69,959
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]